caio/clang-p2996
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

remove use of Mutex in favour of std::{,recursive_}mutex

Browse Source 
This is a pretty straightforward first pass over removing a number of uses of
Mutex in favor of std::mutex or std::recursive_mutex. The problem is that there
are interfaces which take Mutex::Locker & to lock internal locks. This patch
cleans up most of the easy cases. The only non-trivial change is in
CommandObjectTarget.cpp where a Mutex::Locker was split into two.

llvm-svn: 269877
This commit is contained in:
Saleem Abdulrasool
2016-05-18 01:59:10 +00:00
parent a36a61d46a
commit 16ff860469
139 changed files with 1675 additions and 1801 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
lldb/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/JIT/ObjectFileJIT.cpp
View File

@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ ObjectFileJIT::GetSymtab()
ModuleSP module_sp(GetModule());
if (module_sp)
{
lldb_private::Mutex::Locker locker(module_sp->GetMutex());
std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> guard(module_sp->GetMutex());
if (m_symtab_ap.get() == NULL)
{
m_symtab_ap.reset(new Symtab(this));
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ ObjectFileJIT::Dump (Stream *s)
ModuleSP module_sp(GetModule());
if (module_sp)
{
lldb_private::Mutex::Locker locker(module_sp->GetMutex());
std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> guard(module_sp->GetMutex());
s->Printf("%p: ", static_cast<void*>(this));
s->Indent();
s->PutCString("ObjectFileJIT");