remove use of Mutex in favour of std::{,recursive_}mutex

This is a pretty straightforward first pass over removing a number of uses of
Mutex in favor of std::mutex or std::recursive_mutex. The problem is that there
are interfaces which take Mutex::Locker & to lock internal locks. This patch
cleans up most of the easy cases. The only non-trivial change is in
CommandObjectTarget.cpp where a Mutex::Locker was split into two.

llvm-svn: 269877
This commit is contained in:
Saleem Abdulrasool
2016-05-18 01:59:10 +00:00
parent a36a61d46a
commit 16ff860469
139 changed files with 1675 additions and 1801 deletions

View File

@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ ObjectFilePECOFF::ParseHeader ()
ModuleSP module_sp(GetModule());
if (module_sp)
{
lldb_private::Mutex::Locker locker(module_sp->GetMutex());
std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> guard(module_sp->GetMutex());
m_sect_headers.clear();
m_data.SetByteOrder (eByteOrderLittle);
lldb::offset_t offset = 0;
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ ObjectFilePECOFF::GetSymtab()
ModuleSP module_sp(GetModule());
if (module_sp)
{
lldb_private::Mutex::Locker locker(module_sp->GetMutex());
std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> guard(module_sp->GetMutex());
if (m_symtab_ap.get() == NULL)
{
SectionList *sect_list = GetSectionList();
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ ObjectFilePECOFF::CreateSections (SectionList &unified_section_list)
ModuleSP module_sp(GetModule());
if (module_sp)
{
lldb_private::Mutex::Locker locker(module_sp->GetMutex());
std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> guard(module_sp->GetMutex());
const uint32_t nsects = m_sect_headers.size();
ModuleSP module_sp (GetModule());
for (uint32_t idx = 0; idx<nsects; ++idx)
@@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ ObjectFilePECOFF::Dump(Stream *s)
ModuleSP module_sp(GetModule());
if (module_sp)
{
lldb_private::Mutex::Locker locker(module_sp->GetMutex());
std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> guard(module_sp->GetMutex());
s->Printf("%p: ", static_cast<void*>(this));
s->Indent();
s->PutCString("ObjectFilePECOFF");