[SLP] Fix isCommutative to check uses of the original instruction instead of the converted instruction. (#143094)

This commit is contained in:
Han-Kuan Chen
2025-06-17 23:03:14 +09:00
committed by GitHub
parent dc72b91ffe
commit 414710c753
2 changed files with 64 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@@ -511,15 +511,25 @@ static bool isSplat(ArrayRef<Value *> VL) {
}
/// \returns True if \p I is commutative, handles CmpInst and BinaryOperator.
static bool isCommutative(Instruction *I) {
/// For BinaryOperator, it also checks if \p InstWithUses is used in specific
/// patterns that make it effectively commutative (like equality comparisons
/// with zero).
/// In most cases, users should not call this function directly (since \p I and
/// \p InstWithUses are the same). However, when analyzing interchangeable
/// instructions, we need to use the converted opcode along with the original
/// uses.
/// \param I The instruction to check for commutativity
/// \param InstWithUses The instruction whose uses are analyzed for special
/// patterns
static bool isCommutative(Instruction *I, Instruction *InstWithUses) {
if (auto *Cmp = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(I))
return Cmp->isCommutative();
if (auto *BO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(I))
return BO->isCommutative() ||
(BO->getOpcode() == Instruction::Sub &&
!BO->hasNUsesOrMore(UsesLimit) &&
!InstWithUses->hasNUsesOrMore(UsesLimit) &&
all_of(
BO->uses(),
InstWithUses->uses(),
[](const Use &U) {
// Commutative, if icmp eq/ne sub, 0
CmpPredicate Pred;
@@ -536,14 +546,24 @@ static bool isCommutative(Instruction *I) {
Flag->isOne());
})) ||
(BO->getOpcode() == Instruction::FSub &&
!BO->hasNUsesOrMore(UsesLimit) &&
all_of(BO->uses(), [](const Use &U) {
!InstWithUses->hasNUsesOrMore(UsesLimit) &&
all_of(InstWithUses->uses(), [](const Use &U) {
return match(U.getUser(),
m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::fabs>(m_Specific(U.get())));
}));
return I->isCommutative();
}
/// This is a helper function to check whether \p I is commutative.
/// This is a convenience wrapper that calls the two-parameter version of
/// isCommutative with the same instruction for both parameters. This is
/// the common case where the instruction being checked for commutativity
/// is the same as the instruction whose uses are analyzed for special
/// patterns (see the two-parameter version above for details).
/// \param I The instruction to check for commutativity
/// \returns true if the instruction is commutative, false otherwise
static bool isCommutative(Instruction *I) { return isCommutative(I, I); }
template <typename T>
static std::optional<unsigned> getInsertExtractIndex(const Value *Inst,
unsigned Offset) {
@@ -2898,7 +2918,11 @@ public:
continue;
}
auto [SelectedOp, Ops] = convertTo(cast<Instruction>(V), S);
bool IsInverseOperation = !isCommutative(SelectedOp);
// We cannot check commutativity by the converted instruction
// (SelectedOp) because isCommutative also examines def-use
// relationships.
bool IsInverseOperation =
!isCommutative(SelectedOp, cast<Instruction>(V));
for (unsigned OpIdx : seq<unsigned>(ArgSize)) {
bool APO = (OpIdx == 0) ? false : IsInverseOperation;
OpsVec[OpIdx][Lane] = {Operands[OpIdx][Lane], APO, false};

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
; RUN: opt -passes=slp-vectorizer -S %s | FileCheck %s
define i16 @check_isCommutative_with_the_original_source() {
; CHECK-LABEL: @check_isCommutative_with_the_original_source(
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND3:%.*]] = select i1 true, i16 1, i16 0
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i16 [[COND3]]
;
entry:
%sub = sub i16 0, -1
%cmp = icmp eq i16 %sub, 1
%sub1 = sub i16 0, -1
%cmp2 = icmp eq i16 %sub1, 1
%cond3 = select i1 %cmp2, i16 1, i16 0
%sub5 = sub nsw i16 0, 0
%cmp6 = icmp eq i16 %sub5, 0
%cmp9 = icmp eq i16 %sub5, 0
%sub12 = sub nsw i16 0, 0
%cmp13 = icmp eq i16 %sub12, 0
%sub16 = sub nsw i16 0, 0
%cmp17 = icmp eq i16 %sub16, 0
%sub20 = sub nsw i16 0, 0
%cmp21 = icmp eq i16 %sub20, 0
%cmp24 = icmp eq i16 %sub20, 0
ret i16 %cond3
}