[NFC] SLVectorizer comparator refactoring that preserves behavior (#84966)

Spinning off from #79321 / 35f4592 - looked like the comparator could be
simplified & made more clear/less risk of leaving hidden bugs.
This commit is contained in:
David Blaikie
2024-03-12 11:25:12 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 42ecccfe34
commit a843f26a77

View File

@@ -16614,36 +16614,11 @@ bool SLPVectorizerPass::vectorizeChainsInBlock(BasicBlock *BB, BoUpSLP &R) {
if (Opcodes1.size() > Opcodes2.size())
return false;
for (int I = 0, E = Opcodes1.size(); I < E; ++I) {
// Undefs are compatible with any other value.
if (isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes1[I]) || isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes2[I])) {
if (isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes1[I]) && isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes2[I]))
continue;
if (isa<Instruction>(Opcodes1[I])) {
assert(isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes2[I]) && "Expected 2nd undef value");
return true;
}
if (isa<Instruction>(Opcodes2[I])) {
assert(isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes1[I]) && "Expected 1st undef value");
return false;
}
if (isa<Constant>(Opcodes1[I]) && !isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes1[I])) {
assert(isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes2[I]) && "Expected 2nd undef value");
return true;
}
if (isa<Constant>(Opcodes2[I]) && !isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes2[I])) {
assert(isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes1[I]) && "Expected 1st undef value");
return false;
}
if (!isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes2[I])) {
assert(isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes1[I]) && "Expected 1st undef value");
return false;
}
assert(!isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes1[I]) && isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes2[I]) &&
"Expected 1st non-undef and 2nd undef value");
return true;
}
if (auto *I1 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Opcodes1[I]))
if (auto *I2 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Opcodes2[I])) {
{
// Instructions come first.
auto *I1 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Opcodes1[I]);
auto *I2 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Opcodes2[I]);
if (I1 && I2) {
DomTreeNodeBase<BasicBlock> *NodeI1 = DT->getNode(I1->getParent());
DomTreeNodeBase<BasicBlock> *NodeI2 = DT->getNode(I2->getParent());
if (!NodeI1)
@@ -16660,20 +16635,44 @@ bool SLPVectorizerPass::vectorizeChainsInBlock(BasicBlock *BB, BoUpSLP &R) {
continue;
return I1->getOpcode() < I2->getOpcode();
}
if (isa<Constant>(Opcodes1[I]) && isa<Constant>(Opcodes2[I]))
continue;
if (isa<Instruction>(Opcodes1[I]) && !isa<Instruction>(Opcodes2[I]))
return true;
if (!isa<Instruction>(Opcodes1[I]) && isa<Instruction>(Opcodes2[I]))
return false;
if (isa<Constant>(Opcodes1[I]) && !isa<Constant>(Opcodes2[I]))
return true;
if (!isa<Constant>(Opcodes1[I]) && isa<Constant>(Opcodes2[I]))
return false;
if (Opcodes1[I]->getValueID() < Opcodes2[I]->getValueID())
return true;
if (Opcodes1[I]->getValueID() > Opcodes2[I]->getValueID())
return false;
if (I1)
return true;
if (I2)
return false;
}
{
// Non-undef constants come next.
bool C1 = isa<Constant>(Opcodes1[I]) && !isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes1[I]);
bool C2 = isa<Constant>(Opcodes2[I]) && !isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes2[I]);
if (C1 && C2)
continue;
if (C1)
return true;
if (C2)
return false;
}
bool U1 = isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes1[I]);
bool U2 = isa<UndefValue>(Opcodes2[I]);
{
// Non-constant non-instructions come next.
if (!U1 && !U2) {
auto ValID1 = Opcodes1[I]->getValueID();
auto ValID2 = Opcodes2[I]->getValueID();
if (ValID1 == ValID2)
continue;
if (ValID1 < ValID2)
return true;
if (ValID1 > ValID2)
return false;
}
if (!U1)
return true;
if (!U2)
return false;
}
// Undefs come last.
assert(U1 && U2);
continue;
}
return false;
};