[mlir][docs] Fix mistakes in data flow analysis code example (#97286)
This commit is contained in:
committed by
GitHub
parent
46f42d4db9
commit
becc238f77
@@ -114,10 +114,10 @@ struct MetadataLatticeValue {
|
||||
// only keep information that is the same. This means that we only keep
|
||||
// facts that are true in both.
|
||||
MetadataLatticeValue result;
|
||||
for (const auto &lhsIt : lhs) {
|
||||
for (const auto &lhsIt : lhs.metadata) {
|
||||
// As noted above, we only merge if the values are the same.
|
||||
auto it = rhs.metadata.find(lhsIt.first);
|
||||
if (it == rhs.metadata.end() || it->second != lhsIt.second)
|
||||
if (it == rhs.metadata.end() || it.second != lhsIt.second)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
result.insert(lhsIt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -129,10 +129,13 @@ struct MetadataLatticeValue {
|
||||
bool operator==(const MetadataLatticeValue &rhs) const {
|
||||
if (metadata.size() != rhs.metadata.size())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
// Check that the 'rhs' contains the same metadata.
|
||||
return llvm::all_of(metadata, [&](auto &it) {
|
||||
return rhs.metadata.count(it.second);
|
||||
});
|
||||
// Check that `rhs` contains the same metadata.
|
||||
for (const auto &it : metadata) {
|
||||
auto rhsIt = rhs.metadata.find(it.first);
|
||||
if (rhsIt == rhs.metadata.end() || it.second != rhsIt.second)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Our value represents the combined metadata, which is originally a
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user