From e391301e0e4d9183fe06e69602e87b0bc889aeda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonas Devlieghere Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 10:35:42 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Use `proc` instead of `pro` to avoid command ambiguity Use `proc` instead of `pro` to avoid ambiguity between the `process` and `protocol-server` command. --- .../API/functionalities/unwind/sigtramp/TestSigtrampUnwind.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lldb/test/API/functionalities/unwind/sigtramp/TestSigtrampUnwind.py b/lldb/test/API/functionalities/unwind/sigtramp/TestSigtrampUnwind.py index 3476647a12ec..4736d4815179 100644 --- a/lldb/test/API/functionalities/unwind/sigtramp/TestSigtrampUnwind.py +++ b/lldb/test/API/functionalities/unwind/sigtramp/TestSigtrampUnwind.py @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ class SigtrampUnwind(TestBase): ) self.expect( - "pro handle -n false -p true -s false SIGUSR1", + "proc handle -n false -p true -s false SIGUSR1", "Have lldb pass SIGUSR1 signals", substrs=["SIGUSR1", "true", "false", "false"], )