Once we start the definition of an ObjCInterfaceDecl we won't attempt to ImportDeclContext
later on. Unlike RecordDecl case which uses DefinitionCompleter to force completeDefinition
we don't seem to have a similar mechanism for ObjCInterfaceDecl.
This fix was needed due to a bug we see in LLDB expression parsing where an initial expression
cause an ObjCInterfaceDecl to be defined and subsequent expressions during import do not call
ImportDeclContext and we can end up in a situation where ivars are imported out of order and not all ivars are imported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83972
Currently expressions dealing with bit-fields in Objective-C objects is pretty broken. When generating debug-info for Objective-C bit-fields DW_AT_data_bit_offset has a different meaning than it does to C and C++.
When we parse the DWARF we validate bit offsets for C and C++ correctly but not for ObjC. For ObjC in some cases we end up incorrectly flagging an error and we don't generate further bit-fields in the AST.
Later on when we do a name lookup we don't find the ObjCIvarDecl in the ObjCInterfaceDecl in some cases since we never added it and then we don't go to the runtime to obtain the offset.
This will fix how we handle bit-fields for the Objective-C case and add tests to verify this fix but also to documents areas that still don't work and will be addressed in follow-up PRs.
Note: we can never correctly calculate offsets statically because of how Objective-C deals with the fragile base class issue. Which means the runtime may need to shift fields over.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83433
Template specializations are not handled in many of the
TypeSystemClang methods. For example, GetNumChildren does not handle
the TemplateSpecialization type class, so template specializations
always look like empty objects.
This patch just desugars template specializations in the existing
RemoveWrappingTypes desugaring helper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83858
Summary:
Currently expect_expr will not run the expression if no target is selected. This
patch changes this behavior so that expect_expr will instead fall back to the
dummy target similar to what the `expression` command is doing. This way we
don't have to compile an empty executable to be able to use `expect_expr` (which
is a waste of resources for tests that just test generic type system features).
As a test I modernized the TestTypeOfDeclTypeExpr into a Python test +
expect_expr (as it relied on the dummy target fallback of the expression
command).
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83388
Currently the ItaniumRecordLayoutBuilder when laying out base classes has the virtual
and non-virtual bases mixed up when pulling the base class layouts from the external source.
This came up in an LLDB bug where on arm64 because of differences in how it deals with
tail padding would layout the bases differently without the correct layout from the
external source (LLDB). This would result in some fields being off by 4 bytes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83008
and delete a bunch (but not all) redundant code. If you compare the remaining implementations of Platform*Simulator.cpp, there is still an obvious leftover cleanup task.
Specifically, this patch
- removes SDK initialization from dotest (there is equivalent but more
complete code in Makefile.rules)
- make Platform*Simulator inherit the generic implementation of
PlatformAppleSimulator (more can be done here)
- simplify the platform logic in Makefile.rules
- replace the custom SDK finding logic in Platform*Simulator with XcodeSDK
- adds a test for each supported simulator
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81980
On the buildbot long and int have the same size but long and long long don't,
so the bug where we find the first type by size will produce a different error.
Make the test dynamic based on int/long/long long size to fix the bot.
Summary:
When we get an error back from IRForTarget we directly print that error to the
debugger output stream instead of putting it in the result object. The result
object only gets a vague "The expression could not be prepared to run in the
target" error message that doesn't actually tell the user what went wrong.
This patch just puts the IRForTarget errors into the status object that is
returned to the caller instead of directly printing it to the debugger. Also
updates one test that now can actually check for the error message it is
supposed to check for (instead of the default error which is all we had before).
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81654
Before 539b47c9 this test was not actually using the debug_names section
because the -gdwarf added by Makefile.rules on windows overrode the
-gdwarf-5 flag from CFLAGS_EXTRAS. Now that -gdwarf-5 is respected, the
test is failing.
After this patch all remaining tests should pass on macOS when replayed
from a reproducer.
To capture the reproducers:
./bin/llvm-lit ../llvm-project/lldb/test/ --param lldb-run-with-repro=capture
To replay the reproducers:
./bin/llvm-lit ../llvm-project/lldb/test/ --param lldb-run-with-repro=replay
Many tests use (commented out) print statement for debugging the test
itself. This patch adds a new trace method to lldbtest to reuse the
existing tracing infrastructure and replace these print statements.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80448
This reverts commit 5f88f39ab8. It broke these
three tests on the Window bot:
lldb-api :: commands/expression/completion/TestExprCompletion.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/scope/TestCppScope.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/standards/cpp11/TestCPP11Standard.py
Summary:
Currently we never enable C++14 in the expression evaluator. This enables it when the language of the program is C++14.
It seems C++17 and so on isn't yet in any of the language enums (and the DWARF standard it seems), so C++17 support will be a follow up patch.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80308
This recommits f665e80c02 which was reverted in 1cbd1b8f69 for breaking
TestFoundationDisassembly.py. The fix is to use --force in the test to avoid
bailing out on large functions.
I have also doubled the large function limit to 8000 bytes (~~ 2000 insns), as
the foundation library contains a lot of large-ish functions. The intent of this
feature is to prevent accidental disassembling of enormous (multi-megabyte)
"functions", not to get in people's way.
The original commit message follows:
If we have a binary without symbol information (and without
LC_FUNCTION_STARTS, if on a mac), then we have to resort to using
heuristics to determine the function boundaries. However, these don't
always work, and so we can easily end up thinking we have functions
which are several megabytes in size. Attempting to (accidentally)
disassemble these can take a very long time spam the terminal with
thousands of lines of disassembly.
This patch works around that problem by adding a sanity check to the
disassemble command. If we are about to disassemble a function which is
larger than a certain threshold, we will refuse to disassemble such a
function unless the user explicitly specifies the number of instructions
to disassemble, uses start/stop addresses for disassembly, or passes the
(new) --force argument.
The threshold is currently fairly aggressive (4000 bytes ~~ 1000
instructions). If needed, we can increase it, or even make it
configurable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79789
Summary:
When the ClangModulesDeclVendor currently fails it just prints very basic and often incomplete diagnostics without any source locations:
```
(lldb) p @import Foundation
error: while importing modules:
'foo/bar.h' file not found
could not build module 'Darwin'
[...]
```
or even just
```
(lldb) p @import Foundation
error: while importing modules:
could not build module 'Darwin'
[...]
```
These diagnostics help neither the user nor us with figuring out what is the reason for the failure.
This patch wires up a full TextDiagnosticPrinter in the ClangModulesDeclVendor and makes
sure we always return the error stream to the user when we fail to compile our modules.
Fixes rdar://63216849
Reviewers: aprantl, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79947
The overloaded new operator in TestCppOperators.py are working by accident because of how
we currently deal with artificial methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79251
Summary:
Sometimes a result variable of some expression can be presented as an elaborated
type. In this case the methods `IsTypedefType()` and `GetTypedefedType()` of
`SBType` didn't work. This patch fixes that.
I didn't find the test for these API methods, so I added a basic test for this
too.
Reviewers: aprantl, teemperor, labath, leonid.mashinskiy
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78697
Add the skipIfReproducer decorator to the remaining tests that fail to
replay because the GDB remote packets diverge during replay. This is
*not* expected and should be fixed, but figuring out exactly what caused
the divergence has proven pretty difficult to track down.
I've marked these tests as skipped for now so we can get clean results
and detect new regressions. I have no evidence to believe that these
failures have the same root cause, so I've not assigned them a PR.
Some tests are not expected to work with reproducers, for example tests
that completely circumvent the reproducers (i.e. using the side_effects
Python module) or that rely on changes to the file system.
This is a regression since:
[lldb][NFC] Modernize lang/cpp/scope test
acb0b99c8e
rGacb0b99c8e4f
File "/home/jkratoch/redhat/llvm-monorepo/lldb/test/API/lang/cpp/scope/TestCppScope.py", line 19, in test
self.assertEqual(global_var_names, expected_var_names)
AssertionError: Lists differ: ['C::a', 'A::a', 'B::a', '::a'... != ['A::a', 'B::a', 'C::a', '::a'...
First differing element 0:
C::a
A::a
- ['C::a', 'A::a', 'B::a', '::a']
+ ['A::a', 'B::a', 'C::a', '::a']
ManualDWARFIndex using NameToDIE does not sort alphabetically:
// This is only for uniqueness, not lexicographical ordering, so we can
// just compare pointers.
return uintptr_t(lhs.GetCString()) < uintptr_t(rhs.GetCString());
Summary:
D73024 seems to have fixed one set crash, but it introduced another.
Namely, if a class contains a covariant method returning itself, the
logic in MaybeCompleteReturnType could cause us to attempt a recursive
import, which would result in an assertion failure in
clang::DeclContext::removeDecl.
For some reason, this only manifested itself if the class contained at
least two member variables, and the class itself was imported as a
result of a recursive covariant import.
This patch fixes the crash by not attempting to import classes which are
already completed in MaybeCompleteReturnType. However, it's not clear to
me if this is the right fix, or if this should be handled automatically
by functions lower in the stack.
Reviewers: teemperor, shafik
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76840
When parsing DWARF and laying out bit-fields we currently don't take into account whether we have a base class or not.
Currently if the first field is a bit-field but the bit offset is due a field we inherit from a base class we currently
treat it as an unnamed bit-field and therefore add an extra field.
This fix will not check if we have a base class and assume that this offset is due to members we are inheriting from the base.
We are currently seeing asserts during codegen when debugging clang::DiagnosticOptions.
This assumption will fail in the case where the first field in the derived class in an unnamed bit-field. Fixing the first field
being an unnamed bit-field looks like it will require a larger change since we will need a way to track or discover the last field offset of the bases(s).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76808
This test was stripping a binary generated by Makefile.rules which is
potentially codesigned. Stripping invalidates the code signature, so
we might need to re-sign after stripping.
The test was stripping the binaries from the Python
code. Unfortunately, if running on darwin embedded in a context that
requires code signing, the stripping was invalidating the signature,
thus breaking the test.
This patch moves the stripping to the Makefile and resigns the
stripped binaries if required.
It was an inline test before. Clang stopped emitting line information
for the TLS initialization and the inline test didn't have a way to
break before it anymore.
This rewrites the test as a full-fldeged python test and improves the
checking of the error case to verify that the failure we are looking
for is related to the TLS setup not being complete.
Fix to get the AST we generate for function templates closer to what clang generates and expects.
We fix which FuntionDecl we are passing to CreateFunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo and we strip
template parameters from the name when creating the FunctionDecl and FunctionTemplateDecl.
These two fixes together fix asserts and ambiguous lookup issues for several cases which are added to the already existing small function template test.
This fixes issues with overloads, overloads and ADL, variadic function templates and templated operator overloads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75761
This was previously crashing due to a missing nullptr check (see
e2d8aa6bf7 ). This just adds a test that should
make sure this doesn't crash in case a user ends up in this strange setup.
Summary:
Currently the test suite runs with enabled automatically applied Clang fix-its for expressions.
This is causing that sometimes incorrect expressions in tests are still evaluated even though they
are actually incorrect. Let's disable this feature in the test suite so that we know when expressions
are wrong and leave the fix-it testing to the dedicated tests for that feature.
Also updates the `lang/cpp/operators/` test as it seems Clang needs the `struct` keywords
before C and would otherwise fail without fixits.
Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere, shafik
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, shafik
Subscribers: shafik, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74957
Summary:
Around a third of our test sources have LLVM license headers. This patch removes those headers from all test
sources and also fixes any tests that depended on the length of the license header.
The reasons for this are:
* A few tests verify line numbers and will start failing if the number of lines in the LLVM license header changes. Once I landed my patch for valid SourceLocations in debug info we will probably have even more tests that verify line numbers.
* No other LLVM project is putting license headers in its test files to my knowledge.
* They make the test sources much more verbose than they have to be. Several tests have longer license headers than the actual test source.
For the record, the following tests had their line numbers changed to pass with the removal of the license header:
lldb-api :: functionalities/breakpoint/breakpoint_by_line_and_column/TestBreakpointByLineAndColumn.py
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestGDBRemoteRepro.test
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestMultipleTargets.test
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestReuseDirectory.test
lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook-threads.test
lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook.test
lldb-api :: lang/objc/exceptions/TestObjCExceptions.py
Reviewers: #lldb, espindola, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: emaste, aprantl, arphaman, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74839
