Try to be more consistent with the SDLoc param in the TargetLowering methods.
This also exposes an issue where we were passing a SDNode as a SDLoc, relying on the implicit SDLoc(SDNode) constructor.
In an upcoming AMDGPU patch, the scalar cases will be legal and vector
ops should be scalarized, rather than producing a long sequence of
vector ops which will also need to be scalarized.
Use a lazy heuristic that seems to work and improves the thumb2 MVE
test.
Summary:
This patch modifies IncrementMemoryAddress to use a vscale
when calculating the new address if the data type is scalable.
Also adds tablegen patterns which match an extract_subvector
of a legal predicate type with zip1/zip2 instructions
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, david-arm
Reviewed By: efriedma, david-arm
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83137
Use a simpler code sequence when the shift amount is known not to be
zero modulo the bit width.
Nothing much uses this until D77152 changes the translation of fshl and
fshr intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82540
Using a negation instead of a subtraction from a constant can save an
instruction on some targets.
Nothing much uses this until D77152 changes the translation of fshl and
fshr intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82539
If a constant is only allsignbits in the demanded/active bits, then sign extend it to an allsignbits bool pattern for OR/XOR ops.
This also requires SimplifyDemandedBits XOR handling to be modified to call ShrinkDemandedConstant on any (non-NOT) XOR pattern to account for non-splat cases.
Next step towards fixing PR45808 - with this patch we now get a <-1,-1,0,0> v4i64 constant instead of <1,1,0,0>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82257
Pre-commit for D82257, this adds a DemandedElts arg to ShrinkDemandedConstant/targetShrinkDemandedConstant which will allow future patches to (optionally) add vector support.
Implement them on top of sdiv/udiv, similar to what we do for integer
types.
Potential future work: implementing i8/i16 srem/urem, optimizations for
constant divisors, optimizing the mul+sub to mls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81511
Summary:
This patch adds base support for code generating fixed length
vector operations targeting a known SVE vector length. To achieve
this we lower fixed length vector operations to equivalent scalable
vector operations, whereby SVE predication is used to limit the
elements processed to those present within the fixed length vector.
Specifically this patch implements load and store operations, which
get lowered to their masked counterparts thusly:
V = load(Addr) =>
V = extract_fixed_vector(masked_load(make_pred(V.NumElts), Addr))
store(V, (Addr)) =>
masked_store(insert_fixed_vector(V), make_pred(V.NumElts), Addr))
Reviewers: rengolin, efriedma
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80385
We have many cases where we call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits and demand specific vector elements, but all the bits from them - this adds a helper wrapper to handle this.
For little endian targets, if we only need the lowest element and none of the extended bits then we can just use the (bitcasted) source vector directly.
We already do this in SimplifyDemandedBits, this adds the SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits equivalent.
For now I have changed SimplifyDemandedBits and it's various callers
to assume we know nothing for scalable vectors and to ignore the
demanded bits completely. I have also done something similar for
SimplifyDemandedVectorElts. These changes fix up lots of warnings
due to calls to EVT::getVectorNumElements() for types with scalable
vectors. These functions are all used for optimisations, rather than
functional requirements. In future we can revisit this code if
there is a need to improve code quality for SVE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80537
Just computing the alignment makes sense without caring about the
general known bits, such as for non-integral pointers. Separate the
two and start calling into the TargetLowering hooks for frame indexes.
Start calling the TargetLowering implementation for FrameIndexes,
which improves the AMDGPU matching for stack addressing modes. Also
introduce a new hook for returning known alignment of target
instructions. For AMDGPU, it would be useful to report the known
alignment implied by certain intrinsic calls.
Also stop using MaybeAlign.
This wasn't getting much value from the DAG or depth arguments, since
it's only called on the frame index root nodes. FrameIndexes can also
only return a scalar value, so it also didn't need DemandedElts.
If we're only demanding the (shifted) sign bits of the shift source value, then we can use the value directly.
This handles SimplifyDemandedBits/SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits for both ISD::SHL and X86ISD::VSHLI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80869
For the supported binops (basic arithmetic, logicals + shifts), if we fail to simplify the demanded vector elts, then call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits and try to peek through ops to remove unnecessary dependencies.
This helps with PR40502.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79003
For the 'inverse shift', we currently always perform a subtraction of the original (masked) shift amount.
But for the case where we are handling power-of-2 type widths, we can replace:
(sub bw-1, (and amt, bw-1) ) -> (and (xor amt, bw-1), bw-1) -> (and ~amt, bw-1)
This allows x86 shifts to fold away the and-mask.
Followup to D77301 + D80466.
http://volta.cs.utah.edu:8080/z/Nod0Gr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80489
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D74651 for the preallocated IR constructs
and LangRef changes.
In X86TargetLowering::LowerCall(), if a call is preallocated, record
each argument's offset from the stack pointer and the total stack
adjustment. Associate the call Value with an integer index. Store the
info in X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index as the key.
This adds two new target independent ISDOpcodes and two new target
dependent Opcodes corresponding to @llvm.call.preallocated.{setup,arg}.
The setup ISelDAG node takes in a chain and outputs a chain and a
SrcValue of the preallocated call Value. It is lowered to a target
dependent node with the SrcValue replaced with the integer index key by
looking in X86MachineFunctionInfo. In
X86TargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter() this is lowered to an
%esp adjustment, the exact amount determined by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index key.
The arg ISelDAG node takes in a chain, a SrcValue of the preallocated
call Value, and the arg index int constant. It produces a chain and the
pointer fo the arg. It is lowered to a target dependent node with the
SrcValue replaced with the integer index key by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo. In
X86TargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter() this is lowered to a
lea of the stack pointer plus an offset determined by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index key.
Force any function containing a preallocated call to use the frame
pointer.
Does not yet handle a setup without a call, or a conditional call.
Does not yet handle musttail. That requires a LangRef change first.
Tried to look at all references to inalloca and see if they apply to
preallocated. I've made preallocated versions of tests testing inalloca
whenever possible and when they make sense (e.g. not alloca related,
inalloca edge cases).
Aside from the tests added here, I checked that this codegen produces
correct code for something like
```
struct A {
A();
A(A&&);
~A();
};
void bar() {
foo(foo(foo(foo(foo(A(), 4), 5), 6), 7), 8);
}
```
by replacing the inalloca version of the .ll file with the appropriate
preallocated code. Running the executable produces the same results as
using the current inalloca implementation.
Reverted due to unexpectedly passing tests, added REQUIRES: asserts for reland.
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77689
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D74651 for the preallocated IR constructs
and LangRef changes.
In X86TargetLowering::LowerCall(), if a call is preallocated, record
each argument's offset from the stack pointer and the total stack
adjustment. Associate the call Value with an integer index. Store the
info in X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index as the key.
This adds two new target independent ISDOpcodes and two new target
dependent Opcodes corresponding to @llvm.call.preallocated.{setup,arg}.
The setup ISelDAG node takes in a chain and outputs a chain and a
SrcValue of the preallocated call Value. It is lowered to a target
dependent node with the SrcValue replaced with the integer index key by
looking in X86MachineFunctionInfo. In
X86TargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter() this is lowered to an
%esp adjustment, the exact amount determined by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index key.
The arg ISelDAG node takes in a chain, a SrcValue of the preallocated
call Value, and the arg index int constant. It produces a chain and the
pointer fo the arg. It is lowered to a target dependent node with the
SrcValue replaced with the integer index key by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo. In
X86TargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter() this is lowered to a
lea of the stack pointer plus an offset determined by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index key.
Force any function containing a preallocated call to use the frame
pointer.
Does not yet handle a setup without a call, or a conditional call.
Does not yet handle musttail. That requires a LangRef change first.
Tried to look at all references to inalloca and see if they apply to
preallocated. I've made preallocated versions of tests testing inalloca
whenever possible and when they make sense (e.g. not alloca related,
inalloca edge cases).
Aside from the tests added here, I checked that this codegen produces
correct code for something like
```
struct A {
A();
A(A&&);
~A();
};
void bar() {
foo(foo(foo(foo(foo(A(), 4), 5), 6), 7), 8);
}
```
by replacing the inalloca version of the .ll file with the appropriate
preallocated code. Running the executable produces the same results as
using the current inalloca implementation.
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77689
We have the getNegatibleCost/getNegatedExpression to evaluate the cost and negate the expression.
However, during negating the expression, the cost might change as we are changing the DAG,
and then, hit the assertion if we negated the wrong expression as the cost is not trustful anymore.
This patch is target to remove the getNegatibleCost to avoid the out of sync with getNegatedExpression,
and check the cost during negating the expression. It also reduce the duplicated code between
getNegatibleCost and getNegatedExpression. And fix the crash for the test in D76638
Reviewed By: RKSimon, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77319
Use an extra shift-by-1 instead of a compare and select to handle the
shift-by-zero case. This sometimes saves one instruction (if the compare
couldn't be combined with a previous instruction). It also works better
on targets that don't have good select instructions.
Note that currently this change doesn't affect most targets because
expandFunnelShift is not used because funnel shift intrinsics are
lowered early in SelectionDAGBuilder. But there is work afoot to change
that; see D77152.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77301
We have the getNegatibleCost/getNegatedExpression to evaluate the cost and negate the expression.
However, during negating the expression, the cost might change as we are changing the DAG,
and then, hit the assertion if we negated the wrong expression as the cost is not trustful anymore.
This patch is target to remove the getNegatibleCost to avoid the out of sync with getNegatedExpression,
and check the cost during negating the expression. It also reduce the duplicated code between
getNegatibleCost and getNegatedExpression. And fix the crash for the test in D76638
Reviewed By: RKSimon, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77319
If the SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits calls BITCASTs that peek through back to the original type then we can remove the BITCASTs entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79572
Calling getShiftAmountTy with LegalTypes set may return a type that's too narrow to hold the shift amount for integer type it's applied to.
Fixes the regression introduced by D79096
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79405
The two code paths have the same goal, legalizing a load of a non-byte-sized vector by loading the "flattened" representation in memory, slicing off each single element and then building a vector out of those pieces.
The technique employed by `ExpandLoad` is slightly more convoluted and produces slightly better codegen on ARM, AMDGPU and x86 but suffers from some bugs (D78480) and is wrong for BE machines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79096
This method has been commented as deprecated for a while. Remove
it and replace all uses with the equivalent getCalledOperand().
I also made a few cleanups in here. For example, to removes use
of getElementType on a pointer when we could just use getFunctionType
from the call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78882
This is a NFC patch for D77319. The idea is to hide the getNegatibleCost inside the getNegatedExpression()
to have it return null if the cost is expensive, and add some helper function for easy to use. And
rename the old getNegatedExpression to negateExpression to avoid the semantic conflict.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78291
This is a minor NFC change to make the code more clear. We have the NegatibleCost that
has cheaper, neutral, and expensive. Typically, the smaller one means the less cost.
It is inverse for current implementation, which makes following code not easy to read.
If (CostX > CostY) negate(X)
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77993
Summary:
There are at least three clients for KnownBits calculations:
ValueTracking, SelectionDAG and GlobalISel. To reduce duplication the
common logic should be moved out of these clients and into KnownBits
itself.
This patch does this for AND, OR and XOR calculations by implementing
and using appropriate operator overloads KnownBits::operator& etc.
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74060
This removes a call to getScalarType from a bunch of call sites.
It also makes the behavior consistent with SIGN_EXTEND_INREG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77631
I think we can save the MRI argument from these since it's in
GISelKnownBits already, but currently not accessible.
Implementation deferred to avoid dependency on other patches.
ISD::ROTL/ROTR rotation values are guaranteed to act as a modulo amount, so for power-of-2 bitwidths we only need the lowest bits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76201
PowerPC hits an assertion due to somewhat the same reason as https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975.
Though there are already some hack, it still failed with some case, when the operand 0 is NOT
a const fp, it is another fma that with const fp. And that const fp is negated which result in multi-uses.
A better fix is to check the uses of the negated const fp. If there are already use of its negated
value, we will have benefit as no extra Node is added.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75501
