This patch changes the way the reproducer is initialized. Rather than
making changes at run time we now do everything at initialization time.
To make this happen we had to introduce initializer options and their SB
variant. This allows us to tell the initializer that we're running in
reproducer capture/replay mode.
Because of this change we also had to alter our testing strategy. We
cannot reinitialize LLDB when using the dotest infrastructure. Instead
we use lit and invoke two instances of the driver.
Another consequence is that we can no longer enable capture or replay
through commands. This was bound to go away form the beginning, but I
had something in mind where you could enable/disable specific providers.
However this seems like it adds very little value right now so the
corresponding commands were removed.
Finally this change also means you now have to control this through the
driver, for which I replaced --reproducer with --capture and --replay to
differentiate between the two modes.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55038
llvm-svn: 348152
The test assumes that HW breakpoints are not implemented by the debug
server. Windows doesn't use these and might actually support HW
breakpoints so these tests are expected fail because they don't raise
the expected error.
llvm-svn: 348010
Summary:
This patch fixes the next situation. On Windows clang-cl makes no stub before
the main function, so the main function is located exactly on module entry
point. May be it is the same on other platforms. So consider the following
sequence:
- set a breakpoint on main and stop there;
- try to evaluate expression, which requires a code execution on the debuggee
side. Such an execution always returns to the module entry, and the plan waits
for it there;
- the plan understands that it is complete now and removes its breakpoint. But
the breakpoint site is still there, because we also have a breakpoint on
entry;
- StopInfo analyzes a situation. It sees that we have stopped on the breakpoint
site, and it sees that the breakpoint site has owners, and no one logical
breakpoint is internal (because the plan is already completed and it have
removed its breakpoint);
- StopInfo thinks that it's a user breakpoint and skips it to avoid recursive
computations;
- the program continues.
So in this situation the program continues without a stop right after
the expression evaluation. To avoid this an additional check that
the plan was completed was added.
Reviewers: jingham, zturner, boris.ulasevich
Reviewed by: jingham
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53761
llvm-svn: 347974
A couple of new tests have been added that use existing class names. This causes failures on Windows if the tests run at the same time and on any platform it results in the logs being overwritten.
llvm-svn: 347717
Those tests were using pexpect and being flaky on some of ours bots.
This patch reimplmeents the tests usinf FileCheck, and it also
extends the test coverage to a few more stop-hook options.
llvm-svn: 347109
Summary:
This commit implements basic DidAttach and DidLaunch for the windows
DynamicLoader plugin which allow us to load shared libraries from the
inferior.
Reviewers: sas, zturner
Reviewed By: zturner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54544
llvm-svn: 346994
When debugging read-only memory we cannot use software breakpoint. We
already have support for hardware breakpoints and users can specify them
with `-H`. However, there's no option to force LLDB to use hardware
breakpoints internally, for example while stepping.
This patch adds a setting target.require-hardware-breakpoint that forces
LLDB to always use hardware breakpoints. Because hardware breakpoints
are a limited resource and can fail to resolve, this patch also extends
error handling in thread plans, where breakpoints are used for stepping.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54221
llvm-svn: 346920
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
qWatchpointSupportInfo packet correctly.
In GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::GetWatchpointSupportInfo,
if the response to qWatchpointSupportInfo does not
include the 'num' field, then we did not get an answer
we understood, mark this target as not supporting that
packet.
In Target.cpp, rename the very confusingly named
CheckIfWatchpointsExhausted to CheckIfWatchpointsSupported,
and check the error status returned by
Process::GetWatchpointSupportInfo. If we cannot determine
what the number of supported watchpoints are, assume that
they will work. We'll handle the failure
later when we try to create/enable the watchpoint if the
Z2 packet isn't supported.
Add a gdb_remote_client test case.
<rdar://problem/42621432>
llvm-svn: 346561
This patch introduces a concept of "frame recognizer" and "recognized frame". This should be an extensible mechanism that retrieves information about special frames based on ABI, arguments or other special properties of that frame, even without source code. A few examples where that could be useful could be 1) objc_exception_throw, where we'd like to get the current exception, 2) terminate_with_reason and extracting the current terminate string, 3) recognizing Objective-C frames and automatically extracting the receiver+selector, or perhaps all arguments (based on selector).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44603
llvm-svn: 345693
This patch introduces a concept of "frame recognizer" and "recognized frame". This should be an extensible mechanism that retrieves information about special frames based on ABI, arguments or other special properties of that frame, even without source code. A few examples where that could be useful could be 1) objc_exception_throw, where we'd like to get the current exception, 2) terminate_with_reason and extracting the current terminate string, 3) recognizing Objective-C frames and automatically extracting the receiver+selector, or perhaps all arguments (based on selector).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44603
llvm-svn: 345686
This patch introduces a concept of "frame recognizer" and "recognized frame". This should be an extensible mechanism that retrieves information about special frames based on ABI, arguments or other special properties of that frame, even without source code. A few examples where that could be useful could be 1) objc_exception_throw, where we'd like to get the current exception, 2) terminate_with_reason and extracting the current terminate string, 3) recognizing Objective-C frames and automatically extracting the receiver+selector, or perhaps all arguments (based on selector).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44603
llvm-svn: 345678
Add support in ProcessGDBRemote::GetGDBServerRegisterInfo
for recognizing a generic "arm" architecture that will be used if
nothing better is available so that we don't ignore the register
definitions if we didn't already have an architecture set.
Also in ProcessGDBRemote::DoConnectRemote don't set the target
arch unless we have a valid architecture to set it to.
Platform::ConnectProcess will try to get the current target's
architecture, or the default architecture, when creating the
target for the connection to be attempted. If lldb was started
with a target binary, we want to create this target with that
architecture in case the remote gdb stub doesn't supply a
qHostInfo arch.
Add logging to Target::MergeArchitecture.
<rdar://problem/34916465>
llvm-svn: 345106
Summary: These tests fail on Windows because of known limitations (a.k.a. bugs) with the current implementation of GetFrameAtIndex
Reviewers: asmith, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53415
llvm-svn: 344788
Summary: They fail similarly to some of the other breakpoint tests on Windows, so I suspect the cause is the same. I've linked to the same bug.
Reviewers: asmith, zturner, jingham
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53331
llvm-svn: 344744
The TestTailCallFrameSBAPI.py test checks that function names in a
backtrace are equal to an expected value.
Use a relaxed substring check because function dislpay names are
platform-dependent. E.g we see "void sink(void)" on Windows, but "sink()" on
Darwin. This seems like a bug -- just work around it for now.
llvm-svn: 344634
Some tests in test/functionalities/tail_call_frames are failing on
non-Darwin platforms. Use assertEqual to improve logging on failure.
llvm-svn: 344581
Summary:
If the names are not unique, the tests overwrite each other's results and logs. This also causes failures on platforms where the files are locked for writing.
The names of the class/test pairs *have to* always be unique. The easiest way to achieve that is to name each class differently (usually the same as the file name).
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, asmith
Subscribers: clayborg, nemanjai, kbarton, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53297
llvm-svn: 344547
This patch teaches lldb to detect when there are missing frames in a
backtrace due to a sequence of tail calls, and to fill in the backtrace
with artificial tail call frames when this happens. This is only done
when the execution history can be determined from the call graph and
from the return PC addresses of calls on the stack. Ambiguous sequences
of tail calls (e.g anything involving tail calls and recursion) are
detected and ignored.
Depends on D49887.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50478
llvm-svn: 343900
Before inspecting the contents of a list, make sure that we've stepped
past the push_back() that inserts the element we're interested in.
llvm-svn: 343899
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D46362.
When evaluating a complex expression in DWARFExpression::Evaluate,
file addresses must be resolved to load addresses before we can
perform operations such as DW_OP_deref on them.
For this the address goes through three steps
1. Read the file address as stored in the DWARF
2. Link/relocate the file address (when reading from a .dSYM, this is a no-op)
3. Convert the file address to a load address.
D46362 implemented step (3) by resolving the file address using the
Module that the original DWARF came from. In the case of a dSYM that
is correct, but when reading from .o files, we need to look up
relocated/linked addresses, so the right place to look them up is the
current frame's module. This patch fixes that by setting the
expression's Module to point to the linked debugmap object.
A word a bout the unorthodox testcase: The motivating testcase for
this fix is in Swift, but I managed to hand-modify LLVM-IR for a
trivial C program to exhibit the same problem, so we can fix this in
llvm.org.
rdar://problem/44689915
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52678
llvm-svn: 343612
max number of stack frames to backtrace, make it a setting,
target.process.thread.max-backtrace-depth.
Add a test case for the setting.
<rdar://problem/28759559>
llvm-svn: 343029
On linux, we do not support automatic loading of dependent modules, so
the module list will always contain just one module (until the target is
launched).
llvm-svn: 343016
When creating a target, lldb loads all dependent files (i.e. libs in
LC_LOAD_DYLIB for Mach-O). This can be confusing, especially when two
versions of the same library end up in the shared cache. It's possible
to change this behavior, by specifying target create -d <target> these
dependents are not loaded.
This patch changes the default behavior to only load dependent files
only when the target is an executable. When creating a target for a
library, it is now no longer necessary to pass -d. The user can still
override this behavior by specifying the -d option to change this
behavior.
rdar://problem/43721382
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51934
llvm-svn: 342634
Add a "filecheck" method to the LLDB test base. This allows test authors
to pattern match command output using FileCheck, making it possible to
write stricter tests than what `self.expect` allows.
For context (motivation, examples of stricter checking, etc), see the
lldb-dev thread: "Using FileCheck in lldb inline tests".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50751
llvm-svn: 342508
I started from a clean slate to do the checkin, but forgot to svn add the new files.
Do that now.
Also add the one new source file to CMakeLists.txt
llvm-svn: 342190
Summary:
This patch adds a framework for adding descriptions to the command completions we provide.
It also adds descriptions for completed top-level commands so that we can test this code.
Completions are in general supposed to be displayed alongside the completion itself. The descriptions
can be used to provide additional information about the completion to the user. Examples for descriptions
are function signatures when completing function calls in the expression command or the binary name
when providing completion for a symbol.
There is still some boilerplate code from the old completion API left in LLDB (mostly because the respective
APIs are reused for non-completion related purposes, so the CompletionRequest doesn't make sense to be
used), so that's why I still had to change some function signatures. Also, as the old API only passes around a
list of matches, and the descriptions are for these functions just another list, I had to add some code that
essentially just ensures that both lists are always the same side (e.g. all the manual calls to
`descriptions->AddString(X)` below a `matches->AddString(Y)` call).
The initial command descriptions that come with this patch are just reusing the existing
short help that is already added in LLDB.
An example completion with descriptions looks like this:
```
(lldb) pl
Available completions:
platform -- Commands to manage and create platforms.
plugin -- Commands for managing LLDB plugins.
```
Reviewers: #lldb, jingham
Reviewed By: #lldb, jingham
Subscribers: jingham, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51175
llvm-svn: 342181
This patch improves the support of DWARF5.
Particularly the reporting of source code locations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51935
llvm-svn: 342153
