Android devices frequently don't have enough memory to run this test.
e.g. On the API 33 x86-64 emulator with 2GiB RAM, the test triggers the
OOM Killer, the device reboots, and then `adb shell` exits with status
0 and no output.
Reviewed By: danalbert, #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139502
This allows porting the library to platforms that are able to support
<iostream> but that do not have a notion of a filesystem, and where it
hence doesn't make sense to support std::fstream (and never will).
Also, remove reliance on <fstream> in various tests that didn't
actually need it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138327
We've said that we'll remove `std::function` from C++03 in LLVM 16, so we might as well do it now before we forget.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Mordante
Spies: jloser, Mordante, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135868
Summary:
This patch enables libc++ LIT test case last_write_time.pass.cpp for AIX. Because system call utimensat() of AIX which is used in the libc++ implementation of last_write_time() does not accept the times parameter with a negative tv_sec or tv_nsec field, testing of setting file time to before epoch time is excluded for AIX.
Reviewed by: ldionne, libc++
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133124
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
The `ostream` `nullptr` inserter implemented in 3c125fe is missing a C++ version
guard. Normally, `libc++` takes the stance of backporting LWG issues to older
standards modes as was done in 3c125fe. However, backporting to older standards
modes breaks existing code in popular libraries such as `Boost.Test` and
`Google Test` who define their own overload for `nullptr_t`.
Instead, only apply this `operator<<` overload in C++17 or later.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55861.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127033
The debug mode has been broken pretty much ever since it was shipped
because it was possible to enable the debug mode in user code without
actually enabling it in the dylib, leading to ODR violations that
caused various kinds of failures.
This commit makes the debug mode a knob that is configured when
building the library and which can't be changed afterwards. This is
less flexible for users, however it will actually work as intended
and it will allow us, in the future, to add various kinds of checks
that do not assume the same ABI as the normal library. Furthermore,
this will make the debug mode more robust, which means that vendors
might be more tempted to support it properly, which hasn't been the
case with the current debug mode.
This patch shouldn't break any user code, except folks who are building
against a library that doesn't have the debug mode enabled and who try
to enable the debug mode in their code. Such users will get a compile-time
error explaining that this configuration isn't supported anymore.
In the future, we should further increase the granularity of the debug
mode checks so that we can cherry-pick which checks to enable, like we
do for unspecified behavior randomization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122941
Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name libcpp-has-no-xxx
doesn't make sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126482
from libcxx/test/std/input.output/string.streams/stringbuf/stringbuf.virtuals/
[NFC] As part of using inclusive language within the llvm project, this
patch rewords comments to remove sanity check.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124391
The pointer.volatile.pass.cpp test was already marked as XFAIL for
mingw-dll (for reasons explained in the comment above it).
The same issue also appears in clang-cl-dll when built with newer
CMake versions. (It didn't appear with older versions of CMake, as
CMake built the library with the clang-cl flag `-std:c++latest` when
we've requested C++ 20 - which practically built it in c++2b mode with
current clang versions. With current versions of CMake, it passes
`-std:c++20` instead.)
As it succeeds/fails dependent on factors we don't
directly control, mark it as UNSUPPORTED instead of XFAIL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122718
The test fails on AIX due to it expecting an error as on Linux. However, as on
other non-Linux systems symlinks permissions are supported so expect an empty
error code.
Reviewed By: daltenty, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121140
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
Move `__quoted_output_proxy` into the one file that uses it.
A `const char*` has no associated traits class, so `std::quoted("literal")`
should be printable into any basic_ostream regardless of traits.
Use hidden-friend `operator<<` and `operator>>`, since we're permitted to.
(The exact signature is unspecified because the class itself is unspecified.)
We shouldn't support `std::quoted("literal")` in C++03 or C++11 mode.
(We do need `std::__quoted(s)` and `std::__quoted(cs)` in C++11 mode,
because they're used by `std::__fs::filesystem::path`.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120135
`basic_ios` delays initialization of `__fill_` to `widen(' ')` until `fill()` is called. But, `fill(char_type)` is missing this logic, so the fill character does not get initialized to whitespace if `fill(char_type)` is called first. This patch adds this logic to `fill(char_type)`.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120751
In the en_US locale on Windows, negative currency amounts is formatted
as "($0.01)" instead of "-$0.01".
Adjust the test references accordingly, making these tests pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120798
As part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D119036
(506cf6dc04), `-DNOMINMAX` was
dropped from the Windows CI configurations, replaced with a
block with `_LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS`, `#include <__undef_macros>`
and `_LIBCPP_POP_MACROS` (and
`ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS: -DNOMINMAX` left in two tests).
However, this workaround breaks the running the libc++ tests
against a different C++ standard library than libc++, as those
macros and that header are libc++ internals.
Therefore, reinstate `-DNOMINMAX` for clang-cl configurations
and remove the libc++ specific bits in filesystem_test_helper.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120478
Since Windows 10 version 1803 (10.0.17134.0) (or Windows Server 2019),
the Windows Universal C Runtime (UCRT) actually does support UTF-8
locales - they're available e.g. via the same names as commonly on Unices,
e.g. "en_US.UTF-8".
The UTF-8 locale support unfortunately has a bug which breaks a couple
tests that were passing previously. That bug is fixed in the very
latest version of the UCRT (in UCRT 10.0.20348.0, available in Windows
11 or Windows Server 2022), so it will get resolved at some point
eventually, provided that the CI environment does get upgraded to a
newer version of Windows Server.
While the net number of xfailed/passing tests in this patch is a loss,
this does allow fixing a lot more locale tests properly for Windows
in later patches.
Intentionally not touching the ISO-8859-1/2 locales used for testing;
they're not detected and tested/used right now, and fixing that up
is another project.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119930
We shouldn't be calling `move` via ADL -- and neither should anybody
in the wild be calling it via ADL, so it's not like we need to test
this ADL ability of `move` in particular.
Reviewed as part of D119860.
For some reason `<string>` defines `std::fpos`, which should be defined in `<ios>`.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118914
The renames the output_iterator to cpp17_output_iterator. These
iterators are still used in C++20 so it's not possible to change the
current type to the new C++20 requirements. This is done in a similar
fashion as the cpp17_input_iterator.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117950
The macro that opts out of `std::ranges::` functionality is called
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`, and is unrelated to this macro
which is specifically about _compiler_ support for the _syntax_.
The only non-mechanical diff here is in `<__config>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118507
A number of the filesystem tests create a directory that contains a bad
symlink. On AIX recursively setting permissions on said directory will
return a non-zero value because of the bad symlink, however the
following rm -r still completes successfully. Avoid the assertion on
AIX, and rely on the return value of the remove command to detect
problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112086
This essentially reverts e02ed1c255 and puts in a new fix, which makes `path::iterator`
a true C++20 `bidirectional_iterator`, but downgrades it to an `input_iterator` in C++17.
Fixes#37852.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116489
I believe all four of these failures are directly due to the pattern where
allocations in the dylib are unobserved by the client program. If AIX32 and AIX64
don't support that, we should just disable the ASSERT_WITH_LIBRARY_INTERNAL_ALLOCATIONS
macro on AIX, and then we don't need to XFAIL these tests.
This also means I won't need to XFAIL a dozen other tests in D89057,
which rely heavily on ASSERT_WITH_LIBRARY_INTERNAL_ALLOCATIONS and
also currently fail on AIX.
See https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/builds/7669
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116866
I didn't split the calendar bits more than this because there was little
benefit to doing it, and I know our calendar support is incomplete.
Whoever picks up the missing calendar bits can organize these headers
at their leisure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116965
