Add a function to make it easier to debug a test failure caused by an
unexpected state.
Currently, tests are using assertEqual which results in a cryptic error
message: "AssertionError: 5 != 10". Even when a test provides a message
to make it clear why a particular state is expected, you still have to
figure out which of the two was the expected state, and what the other
value corresponds to.
We have a function in lldbutil that helps you convert the state number
into a user readable string. This patch adds a wrapper around
assertEqual specifically for comparing states and reporting better error
messages.
The aforementioned error message now looks like this: "AssertionError:
stopped (5) != exited (10)". If the user provided a message, that
continues to get printed as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127355
This patch remove XFAIL decorator from tests which as passing on AArch64
Windows. This is tested on surface pro x using tot llvm and clang 14.0.3
as compiler with visual studio 2019 x86_arm64 environment.
Following 8b9caad8eb, this only skips
TestCppIncompleteTypeMembers.py on macOS if we test with `-gmodules` enabled.
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
IIUC, the purpose of CopyUniqueClassMethodTypes is to link together
class definitions in two compile units so that we only have a single
definition of a class. It does this by adding entries to the die_to_type
and die_to_decl_ctx maps.
However, the direction of the linking seems to be reversed. It is taking
entries from the class that has not yet been parsed, and copying them to
the class which has been parsed already -- i.e., it is a very
complicated no-op.
Changing the linking order allows us to revert the changes in D13224
(while keeping the associated test case passing), and is sufficient to
fix PR54761, which was caused by an undesired interaction with that
patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124370
The test was broken (in the sense that it was not testing what it was
supposed to test) in two ways:
- a Makefile refactor caused it to stop being built with
-flimit-debug-info
- clang's constructor homing changed the "home" of the type
This patch fixes the Makefile, and modifies the source code to produce
the same result with both type homing strategies. Due to constructor
homing I had to use a different implicitly-defined function for the test
-- I chose the assignment operator.
I also added some sanity checks to the test to ensure that the test is
indeed operating on limited debug info.
Currently we are not emitting debug-info for all cases of structured bindings a
C++17 feature which allows us to bind names to subobjects in an initializer.
A structured binding is represented by a DecompositionDecl AST node and the
binding are represented by a BindingDecl. It looks the original implementation
only covered the tuple like case which be represented by a DeclRefExpr which
contains a VarDecl.
If the binding is to a subobject of the struct the binding will contain a
MemberExpr and in the case of arrays it will contain an ArraySubscriptExpr.
This PR adds support emitting debug-info for the MemberExpr and ArraySubscriptExpr
cases as well as llvm and lldb tests for these cases as well as the tuple case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119178
The IR interpreter supports const operands to the `GetElementPtr` IR
instruction, so it should be able to evaluate expression without JIT.
Follow up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D113498
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119734
Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).
* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616
Operands to `getelementptr` can be constants or constant expressions. Check
that all operands can be constant-resolved and resolve them during the
evaluation. If some operands can't be resolved as constants -- the expression
evaluation will fallback to JIT.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52449
Reviewed By: #lldb, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113498
This test for anonymous unions seems off. It tests the following:
```
union {
// fields
};
struct {
// fields
} var{...};
```
Both are anonymous types, but the first does not declare a variable and the
second one does. The test then checks that `frame var` can directly access the
fields of the anonymous union, but can't directly access the fields of the
anonymous struct variable.
The second test, to directly access the members of the struct variable, seems
pointless as similar code would not compile. A demonstration:
```
struct {
int a;
int z;
} a_z{23, 45};
printf("%d\n", a_z.a); // fine
printf("%d\n", a); // this does not compile
```
Since we can't directly access the fields in code, I'm not sure there's a
reason to test that lldb also can't directly access them (other than perhaps as
a regression test).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116863
Ensure that errors in `frame variable` are reflected in result object.
The statistics for `frame variable` show invocations as being successful, even
when executing one of the error paths.
This change replaces `result.GetErrorStream()` with `result.AppendError()`,
which also sets the status to `eReturnStatusFailed`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116788
(cherry picked from commit 2c7d10c412)
It was being used only in some very old tests (which pass even without
it) and its implementation is highly questionable.
These days we have different mechanisms for requesting a build with a
particular kind of c++ library (USE_LIB(STD)CPP in the makefile).
Split TestCxxChar8_t into two parts: one that check reading variables
without a process and another part with. This allows us to skip the
former on Apple Silicon, where lack of support for chained fix-ups
causes the test to fail.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114819
LLDB uses mangled name to construct a fully qualified name for global
variables. Sometimes DW_TAG_linkage_name attribute is missing from
debug info, so LLDB has to rely on parent entries to construct the
fully qualified name.
Currently, the fallback is handled when the parent DW_TAG is either
DW_TAG_compiled_unit or DW_TAG_partial_unit, which may not work well
for global constants in namespaces. For example:
namespace ns {
const int x = 10;
}
may produce the following debug info:
<1><2a>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_namespace)
<2b> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x5e): ns
<2><2f>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_variable)
<30> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x61): x
<34> DW_AT_type : <0x3c>
<38> DW_AT_decl_file : 1
<39> DW_AT_decl_line : 2
<3a> DW_AT_const_value : 10
Since the fallback didn't handle the case when parent tag is
DW_TAG_namespace, LLDB wasn't able to match the variable by its fully
qualified name "ns::x". This change fixes this by additional check
if the parent is a DW_TAG_namespace.
Reviewed By: werat, clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112147
The StringPrinter class was using a Process instance to read memory.
This automatically prevented it from working before starting the
program.
This patch changes the class to use the Target object for reading
memory, as targets are always available. This required moving
ReadStringFromMemory from Process to Target.
This is sufficient to make frame/target variable work, but further
changes are necessary for the expression evaluator. Preliminary analysis
indicates the failures are due to the expression result ValueObjects
failing to provide an address, presumably because we're operating on
file addresses before starting. I haven't looked into what would it take
to make that work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113098
The value type can be a typedef of a reference (e.g. `typedef int& myint`).
In this case `GetQualType(type)` will return `clang::Typedef`, which cannot
be casted to `clang::ReferenceType`.
Fix a regression introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D103532.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113673
This reverts commit 3bf96b0329.
It causes crashes as reported in PR52257 and a few other places. A reproducer is bundled with this commit to verify any fix forward. The original test is left in place, but marked XFAIL as it now produces the wrong result.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113449
Currently calling SBType::IsTypeComplete returns true for record types if and
only if the underlying record in our internal Clang AST has a definition.
The function however doesn't actually force the loading of any external
definition from debug info, so it currently can return false even if the type is
actually defined in a program's debug info but LLDB hasn't lazily created the
definition yet.
This patch changes the behaviour to always load the definition first so that
IsTypeComplete now consistently returns true if there is a definition in the
module/target.
The motivation for this patch is twofold:
* The API is now arguably more useful for the user which don't know or care
about the internal lazy loading mechanism of LLDB.
* With D101950 there is no longer a good way to ask a Decl for a definition
without automatically pulling in a definition from the ExternalASTSource. The
current behaviour doesn't seem useful enough to justify the necessary
workarounds to preserve it for a time after D101950.
Note that there was a test that used this API to test lazy loading of debug info
but that has been replaced with TestLazyLoading by now (which just dumps the
internal Clang AST state instead).
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112615
`DWARFASTParserClang::ParseSingleMember` turns DWARF DIEs that describe
struct/class members into their respective Clang representation (e.g.,
clang::FieldDecl). It also updates a record of where the last field
started/ended so that we can speculatively fill any holes between a field and a
bitfield with unnamed bitfield padding.
Right now we are completely ignoring 'artificial' members when parsing the DWARF
of a struct/class. The only artificial member that seems to be emitted in
practice for C/C++ seems to be the vtable pointer.
By completely skipping both the Clang AST node creation and the updating of the
last-field record, we essentially leave a hole in our layout with the size of
our artificial member. If the next member is a bitfield we then speculatively
fill the hole with an unnamed bitfield. During CodeGen Clang inserts an
artificial vtable pointer into the layout again which now occupies the same
offset as the unnamed bitfield. This later brings down Clang's
`CGRecordLowering::insertPadding` when it checks that none of the fields of the
generated record layout overlap.
Note that this is not a Clang bug. We explicitly set the offset of our fields in
LLDB and overwrite whatever Clang makes up.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112697
* clang-format test source.
* Removed the dead setup code.
* Using expect_expr etc. instead of raw expect.
* Slightly expanded with tests for vtable pointers (which mostly just crash atm.)
* Removed some other minor test guideline problems.
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5
Reverted in f9ad1d1c77 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
Just regrouping the checks for the same typedef together and also giving the
different typedefs unique names. We might want to have a second test with
identical names to see how LLDB handle the potential name conflict, but that
should be a separate test and not part of the main typedef test.
Also this test is actually unintentionally passing. LLDB can't lookup typedefs
in a struct/class scope, but in the test the check passes as the local variable
in the expression evaluation scope pulls in the typedef. I added a second check
that makes it clear that this is not working right now.
This feature doesn't seem to have any dedicated test. Instead some random tests
(e.g. the bitfield tests) are declaring function-local classes for some reason.
This adds a dedicated test so we can clean up those other tests.
Also add FIXME's for some basic stuff that doesn't work. The first FIXME is a
good beginner bug which just requires prepending the function name (in case we
decide to fix it instead of documenting this behaviour). The second FIXME is
caused by LLDB searching for definitions by name (which also seems to miss the
function name so there is a conflict with the outer type).
Some more things that should be tested (and might not work):
* Local classes with member functions with local classes.
* Classes in different functions with same name.
* Classes with the same name in different TUs with internal linkage functions of
the same name.
* Empty classes are parsed by the DWARF parser in a fast path, so that requires
dedicated tests.
* Repeat some of the tested logic for C.
Summary:
In the spirit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D70846, we only return functions with
matching mangled name from Apple/DebugNamesDWARFIndex::GetFunction if
eFunctionNameTypeFull is requested.
This speeds up lookup in the presence of large amount of class methods of the
same name (a typical examples would be constructors of templates with many
instantiations or overloaded operators).
Reviewers: labath, teemperor
Reviewed By: labath, teemperor
Subscribers: aprantl, arphaman, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73191
C doesn't allow empty structs but Clang/GCC support them and give them a size of 0.
LLDB implements this by checking the tag kind and if it's `DW_TAG_structure_type` then
we give it a size of 0 via an empty external RecordLayout. This is done because our
internal TypeSystem is always in C++ mode (which means we would give them a size
of 1).
The current check for when we have this special case is currently too lax as types with
`DW_TAG_structure_type` can also occur in C++ with types defined using the `struct`
keyword. This means that in a C++ program with `struct Empty{};`, LLDB would return
`0` for `sizeof(Empty)` even though the correct size is 1.
This patch removes this special case and replaces it with a generic approach that just
assigns empty structs the byte_size as specified in DWARF. The GCC/Clang special
case is handles as they both emit an explicit `DW_AT_byte_size` of 0. And if another
compiler decides to use a different byte size for this case then this should also be
handled by the same code as long as that information is provided via `DW_AT_byte_size`.
Reviewed By: werat, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105471
DWARF doesn't describe templates itself but only actual template instantiations.
Because of that LLDB has to infer the parameters of the class template
declarations from the actual instantiations when creating the internal Clang AST
from debug info
Because there is no dedicated DIE for the class template, LLDB also creates the
`ClassTemplateDecl` implicitly when parsing a template instantiation. To avoid
creating one ClassTemplateDecls for every instantiation,
`TypeSystemClang::CreateClassTemplateDecl` will check if there is already a
`ClassTemplateDecl` in the requested `DeclContext` and will reuse a found
fitting declaration.
The logic that checks if a found class template fits to an instantiation is
currently just comparing the name of the template. So right now we map
`template<typename T> struct S;` to an instantiation with the values `S<1, 2,
3>` even though they clearly don't belong together.
This causes crashes later on when for example the Itanium mangler's
`TemplateArgManglingInfo::needExactType` method tries to find fitting the class
template parameter that fits to an instantiation value. In the example above it
will try to find the parameter for the value `2` but will just trigger a
boundary check when retrieving the parameter with index 1 from the class
template.
There are two ways we can end up with an instantiation that doesn't fit to a
class template with the same name:
1. We have two TUs with two templates that have the same name and internal
linkage.
2. A forward declared template instantiation is emitted by GCC and Clang
without an empty list of parameter values.
This patch makes the check for whether a class template declaration can be
reused more sophisticated by also comparing whether the parameter values can fit
to the found class template. If we can't find a fitting class template we
justcreate a second class template with the fitting parameters.
Fixes rdar://76592821
Reviewed By: kastiglione
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100662
Both tests are passing for GCC>8 on Linux so let's mark them as passing.
TestCPPAuto was originally disabled due to "an problem with debug info generation"
in ea35dbeff2 .
TestClassTemplateParameterPack was disabled without explanation in
0f01fb39e3 .
This reverts commit 00764c36ed and the
follow up d2223c7a49.
The original patch broke that one could use static member variables while
inside a static member functions without having a running target. It seems that
LLDB currently requires that static variables are only found via the global
variable lookup so that they can get materialized and mapped to the argument
struct of the expression.
After 00764c36ed static variables of the current
class could be found via Clang's lookup which LLDB isn't observing. This
resulting in expressions actually containing these variables as normal
globals that can't be rewritten to a member of the argument struct.
More specifically, in the test TestCPPThis, the expression
`expr --j false -- s_a` is now only passing if we have a runnable target.
I'll revert the patch as the possible fixes aren't trivial and it degrades
the debugging experience more than the issue that the revert patch addressed.
The underlying bug can be reproduced before/after this patch by stopping
in `TestCPPThis` main function and running: `e -j false -- my_a; A<int>::s_a`.
The `my_a` will pull in the `A<int>` class and the second expression will
be resolved by Clang on its own (which causes LLDB to not materialize the
static variable).
Note: A workaround is to just do `::s_a` which will force LLDB to take the global
variable lookup.
