This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional. This patch changes the way mlir-tblgen generates .inc
files, and modifies tests and documentation appropriately. It is a "no
compromises" patch, and doesn't leave the user with an unpleasant mix of
llvm::Optional and std::optional.
A non-trivial change has been made to ControlFlowInterfaces to split one
constructor into two, relating to a build failure on Windows.
See also: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <r@artagnon.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138934
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
This patch replaces NoneType() and NoneType::None with None in
preparation for migration from llvm::Optional to std::optional.
In the std::optional world, we are not guranteed to be able to
default-construct std::nullopt_t or peek what's inside it, so neither
NoneType() nor NoneType::None has a corresponding expression in the
std::optional world.
Once we consistently use None, we should even be able to replace the
contents of llvm/include/llvm/ADT/None.h with something like:
using NoneType = std::nullopt_t;
inline constexpr std::nullopt_t None = std::nullopt;
to ease the migration from llvm::Optional to std::optional.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138376
simd aligned construct is represented as pair of variable which needs
to be aligned and corresponding alignment value.
Added parser, printer and verifier of aligned clause. MLIR tests were
updated to test correctness of MLIR definition of aligned clause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135865
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
This allows for incrementally updating the old API usages without
needing to update everything at once. These will be left on Both
for a little bit and then flipped to prefixed when all APIs have been
updated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134386
This supports translation from MLIR to LLVM IR using OMPIRBuilder for
OpenMP safelen clause in SIMD construct.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132245
This patch adds canonicalization conditions for omp.atomic.update thus
eliminating it when it becomes just a write or a no-op due to other
changes during canonicalization.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126531
1. Remove the redundant collapse clause in MLIR OpenMP worksharing-loop
operation.
2. Fix several typos.
3. Refactor the chunk size type conversion since CreateSExtOrTrunc has
both type check and type conversion.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128338
This patch adds omp.taskgroup operation according to OpenMP 5.0 2.17.6.
Also added tests for the same.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, peixin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127250
This patch adds tests for memory_order clause for atomic update and
capture operations. This patch also adds a check for making sure that
the operations inside and omp.atomic.capture region do not specify the
memory_order clause.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, peixin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126195
This patch makes sure that the address dereferences to value in
omp.atomic.write operation.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, peixin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126272
MLIR has a common pattern for "arguments" that uses syntax
like `%x : i32 {attrs} loc("sourceloc")` which is implemented
in adhoc ways throughout the codebase. The approach this uses
is verbose (because it is implemented with parallel arrays) and
inconsistent (e.g. lots of things drop source location info).
Solve this by introducing OpAsmParser::Argument and make addRegion
(which sets up BlockArguments for the region) take it. Convert the
world to propagating this down. This means that we correctly
capture and propagate source location information in a lot more
cases (e.g. see the affine.for testcase example), and it also
simplifies much code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124649
I would ideally like to eliminate 'requiredOperandCount' as a bit of
verification that should be in the client side, but it is much more
widely used than I expected. Just tidy some pieces up around it given
we can't drop it immediately.
NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124629
The asm parser had a notional distinction between parsing an
operand (like "%foo" or "%4#3") and parsing a region argument
(which isn't supposed to allow a result number like #3).
Unfortunately the implementation has two problems:
1) It didn't actually check for the result number and reject
it. parseRegionArgument and parseOperand were identical.
2) It had a lot of machinery built up around it that paralleled
operand parsing. This also was functionally identical, but
also had some subtle differences (e.g. the parseOptional
stuff had a different result type).
I thought about just removing all of this, but decided that the
missing error checking was important, so I reimplemented it with
a `allowResultNumber` flag on parseOperand. This keeps the
codepaths unified and adds the missing error checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124470
This patch handles empty hint value for critical and atomic constructs.
This also adds checks and tests for hint clause on atomic constructs.
Reviewed By: peixin, kiranchandramohan, NimishMishra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123186
This patch adds tasking construct according to Section 2.10.1 of OpenMP 5.0
Reviewed By: peixin, kiranchandramohan, abidmalikwaterloo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123575
This patch adds the ReductionClauseInterface and also adds reduction
support for `omp.parallel` operation.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122402
This patch adds omp.single according to Section 2.8.2 of OpenMP 5.0.
Also added tests for the same.
Reviewed By: peixin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122288
Co-authored-by: Kiran Kumar T P <kirankumar.tp@amd.com>
This patch
- adds assembly format for `omp.wsloop` operation
- removes the `parseClauses` clauses as it is not required anymore
This is expected to be the final patch in a series of patches for replacing
parsers for clauses with `oilist`.
Reviewed By: Mogball
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121367
I am not sure about the meaning of Type in the name (was it meant be interpreted as Kind?), and given the importance and meaning of Type in the context of MLIR, its probably better to rename it. Given the comment in the source code, the suggestion in the GitHub issue and the final discussions in the review, this patch renames the OperandType to UnresolvedOperand.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54446
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122142
This patch adds translation from `omp.atomic.capture` to LLVM IR. Also
added tests for the same.
Depends on D121546
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121554
Patch adds a new operation for the SIMD construct. The op is designed to be very similar to the existing `wsloop` operation, so that the `CanonicalLoopInfo` of `OpenMPIRBuilder` can be used.
Reviewed By: shraiysh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118065
In this CL, update the function name of verifier according to the
behavior. If a verifier needs to access the region then it'll be updated
to `verifyRegions`.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120373
This patch adds lowering from omp.atomic.update to LLVM IR. Whenever a
special LLVM IR instruction is available for the operation, `atomicrmw`
instruction is emitted, otherwise a compare-exchange loop based update
is emitted.
Depends on D119522
Reviewed By: ftynse, peixin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119657
This patch adds assemblyFormat for `omp.critical.declare`, `omp.atomic.read`,
`omp.atomic.write`, `omp.atomic.update` and `omp.atomic.capture`.
Also removing those clauses from `parseClauses` that aren't needed
anymore, thanks to the new assemblyFormats.
Reviewed By: NimishMishra, rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120248
This patch removes the builders for `omp.wsloop` operation that aren't
specifically needed anywhere. We can add them later if the need arises.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120533
This patch adds assemblyFormat for omp.sections operation.
Some existing functions have been altered to fit the custom directive
in assemblyFormat. This has led to their callsites to get modified too,
but those will be removed in later patches, when other operations get
their assemblyFormat. All operations were not changed in one patch for
ease of review.
Reviewed By: Mogball
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120176
This patch adds assemblyFormat for omp.parallel operation.
Some existing functions have been altered to fit the custom directive
in assemblyFormat. This has led to their callsites to get modified too,
but those will be removed in later patches, when other operations get
their assemblyFormat. All operations were not changed in one patch for
ease of review.
Reviewed By: Mogball
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120157
This patch removes the following clauses from OpenMP Dialect:
- private
- firstprivate
- lastprivate
- shared
- default
- copyin
- copyprivate
The privatization clauses are being handled in the flang frontend. The
data copying clauses are not being handled anywhere for now. Once
we have a better picture of how to handle these clauses in OpenMP
Dialect, we can add these. For the time being, removing unneeded
clauses.
For detailed discussion about this refer to [[ https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-privatisation-in-openmp-dialect/3526 | Privatisation in OpenMP dialect ]]
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120029
