This avoids the confusing 'CS.paramHasAttr(ArgNo + 1, Foo)' pattern.
Previously we were testing return value attributes with index 0, so I
introduced hasReturnAttr() for that use case.
llvm-svn: 300367
...when C1 differs from C2 by one bit and C1 <u C2:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/Vuo
And move related folds to a helper function. This reduces code duplication and
will make it easier to remove the scalar-only restriction as a follow-up step.
llvm-svn: 300364
We currently only support folding a subtract into a select but not a PHI. This fixes that.
I had to fix an assumption in FoldOpIntoPhi that assumed the PHI node was always in operand 0. Now we pass it in like we do for FoldOpIntoSelect. But we still require some dancing to find the Constant when we create the BinOp or ConstantExpr. This is based code is similar to what we do for selects.
Since I touched all call sites, this also renames FoldOpIntoPhi to foldOpIntoPhi to match coding standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31686
llvm-svn: 300363
Currently this code always makes 2 or 3 calls to tryFactorization regardless of whether the LHS/RHS are BinaryOperators. We make 3 calls when both operands are BinaryOperators with the same opcode. Or surprisingly, when neither are BinaryOperators. This is because getBinOpsForFactorization returns Instruction::BinaryOpsEnd when the operand is not a BinaryOperator. If both LHS and RHS are not BinaryOperators then they both have an Opcode of Instruction::BinaryOpsEnd. When this happens we rely on tryFactorization to early out due to A/B/C/D being null. Similar behavior occurs for the other calls, we rely on getBinOpsForFactorization having made A/B or C/D null to get tryFactorization to early out.
We also rely on these null checks to check the result of getIdentityValue and early out for it.
This patches refactors this to pull these checks up to SimplifyUsingDistributiveLaws so we don't rely on BinaryOpsEnd as a sentinel or this A/B/C/D null behavior. I think this makes this code easier to reason about. Should also give a tiny performance improvement for cases where the LHS or RHS isn't a BinaryOperator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31913
llvm-svn: 300353
It is cleaner to have a callback based system where the logic of
whether an add recurrence is normalized or not lives on IVUsers.
This is one step in a multi-step cleanup.
llvm-svn: 300330
This patch is part of D28975's breakdown - no change in output intended.
LV's code currently assumes the vectorized loop is a single basic block up
until predicateInstructions() is called. This patch removes two manifestations
of this assumption (loop phi incoming values, dominator tree update) by
replacing the use of vectorLoopBody with the vectorized loop's latch/header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32040
llvm-svn: 300310
Add hasParamAttribute() and use it instead of hasAttribute(ArgNo+1,
Kind) everywhere.
The fact that the AttributeList index for an argument is ArgNo+1 should
be a hidden implementation detail.
NFC
llvm-svn: 300272
For LCSSA purposes, loop BBs not dominating any of the exits aren't
interesting, as none of the values defined in these blocks can be
used outside the loop.
The way the code computed this information was by comparing each
BB of the loop with each of the exit blocks and ask the dominator tree
about their dominance relation. This is slow.
A more efficient way, implemented here, is that of starting from the
exit blocks and walking the dom upwards until we hit an header. By
transitivity, all the blocks we encounter in our path dominate an exit.
For the testcase provided in PR31851, this reduces compile time on
`opt -O2` by ~25%, going from 1m47s to 1m22s.
Thanks to Dan/MichaelZ for discussions/suggesting the approach/review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31843
llvm-svn: 300255
Switch from Euclid's algorithm to Stein's algorithm for computing GCD. This
avoids the (expensive) APInt division operation in favour of bit operations.
Remove all memory allocation from within the GCD loop by tweaking our `lshr`
implementation so it can operate in-place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31968
llvm-svn: 300252
Summary:
Bug noticed by inspection.
Extend the test to handle invokes as well as calls, and rewrite it to
not depend on the inliner and other passes.
Also simplify the call site replacement code with CallSite, similar to
what I did to dead arg elimination and arg promotion (rL300235 and
rL300229).
Reviewers: danielcdh, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32041
llvm-svn: 300251
Summary: For iterative SamplePGO, an indirect call can be speculatively promoted to multiple direct calls and get inlined. All these promoted direct calls will share the same callsite location (offset+discriminator). With the current implementation, we cannot distinguish between different promotion candidates and its inlined instance. This patch adds callee_name to the key of the callsite sample map. And added helper functions to get all inlined callee samples for a given callsite location. This helps the profile annotator promote correct targets and inline it before annotation, and ensures all indirect call targets to be annotated correctly.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31950
llvm-svn: 300240
Summary:
In first order recurrences where phi's are used outside the loop,
we should generate an additional vector.extract of the second last element from
the vectorized phi update.
This is because we require the phi itself (which is the value at the second last
iteration of the vector loop) and not the phi's update within the loop.
Also fix the code gen when we just unroll, but don't vectorize.
Fixes PR32396.
Reviewers: mssimpso, mkuper, anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31979
llvm-svn: 300238
This is effectively a retry of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL299851
but now we have tests and an assert to make sure the bug
that was exposed with that attempt will not happen again.
I'll fix the code duplication and missing sibling fold next,
but I want to make this change as small as possible to reduce
risk since I messed it up last time.
This should fix:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32524
llvm-svn: 300236
Noticed by inspection while doing attribute work. DAE, InstCombineCalls,
and ArgPromotion have a fair amount of duplicated code for hacking on
call sites, and you can find bugs by comparing them.
Add a test case for this.
llvm-svn: 300229
It's less efficient to produce 'ule' than 'ult' since we know we're going to
canonicalize to 'ult', but we shouldn't have duplicated code for these folds.
As a trade-off, this was a pretty terrible way to make a '2'. :)
if (LHSC == SubOne(RHSC))
AddC = ConstantExpr::getSub(AddOne(RHSC), LHSC);
The next steps are to share the code to fix PR32524 and add the missing 'and'
fold that was left out when PR14708 was fixed:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14708
llvm-svn: 300222
Refactoring InnerLoopVectorizer's vectorizeBlockInLoop() to provide
vectorizeInstruction(). Aligning DeadInstructions with its only user.
Facilitates driving the transformation by VPlan - follows
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28975 and its tentative breakdown.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31997
llvm-svn: 300183
This seems like a much more natural API, based on Derek Schuff's
comments on r300015. It further hides the implementation detail of
AttributeList that function attributes come last and appear at index
~0U, which is easy for the user to screw up. git diff says it saves code
as well: 97 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-)
This also makes it easier to change the implementation, which I want to
do next.
llvm-svn: 300153
This replicates the known bits and constant creation code from the single use case for these instructions and adds it here. The computeKnownBits and constant creation code for other instructions is now in the default case of the opcode switch.
llvm-svn: 300094
We already handled a superset check that included the known ones too and folded to a constant that may include ones. But it can also handle the case of no ones.
llvm-svn: 300093
As discussed in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32486
...the canonicalization of vector select to shufflevector does not hold up
when undef elements are present in the condition vector.
Try to make the undef handling clear in the code and the LangRef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31980
llvm-svn: 300092
Currently if we reach an instruction with multiples uses we know we can't do any optimizations to that instruction itself since we only have the demanded bits for one of the users. But if we know all of the bits are zero/one for that one user we can still go ahead and create a constant to give to that user.
This might then reduce the instruction to having a single use and allow additional optimizations on the other path.
This picks up an additional case that r300075 didn't catch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31552
llvm-svn: 300084
If we are adding/subtractings 0s below the highest demanded bit we can just use the other operand and remove the operation.
My primary motivation is observing that we can call ShrinkDemandedConstant for the add/sub and create a 0 constant, rather than removing the add completely. In the case I saw, we modified the constant on an add instruction to a 0, but the add is not put into the worklist. So we didn't revisit it until the next InstCombine iteration. This caused an IR modification to remove add and a subsequent iteration to be ran.
With this change we get bypass the add in the first iteration and prevent the second iteration from changing anything.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31120
llvm-svn: 300075
One potential way to make InstCombine (very slightly?) faster is to recycle instructions
when possible instead of creating new ones. It's not explicitly stated AFAIK, but we don't
consider this an "InstSimplify". We could, however, make a new layer to house transforms
like this if that makes InstCombine more manageable (just throwing out an idea; not sure
how much opportunity is actually here).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31863
llvm-svn: 300067
In getEntryCost(), make the scalar type for a compare instruction that of the
operands, not i1. This is needed in order to call getCmpSelInstrCost() for a
compare in a sensible way, the same way as the LoopVectorizer does.
New test: test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/SystemZ/SLP-cmp-cost-query.ll
Review: Matthew Simpson
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31601
llvm-svn: 300061
The cost for a branch after vectorization is very different depending on if
the vectorizer will if-convert the block (branch is eliminated), or if
scalarized and predicated blocks will be produced (branch duplicated before
each block). There is also the case of remaining scalar branches, such as the
back-edge branch.
This patch handles these cases differently with TTI based cost estimates.
Review: Matthew Simpson
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31175
llvm-svn: 300058
Since SystemZ supports vector element load/store instructions, there is no
need for extracts/inserts if a vector load/store gets scalarized.
This patch lets Target specify that it supports such instructions by means of
a new TTI hook that defaults to false.
The use for this is in the LoopVectorizer getScalarizationOverhead() method,
which will with this patch produce a smaller sum for a vector load/store on
SystemZ.
New test: test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/SystemZ/load-store-scalarization-cost.ll
Review: Adam Nemet
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30680
llvm-svn: 300056
getArithmeticInstrCost(), getShuffleCost(), getCastInstrCost(),
getCmpSelInstrCost(), getVectorInstrCost(), getMemoryOpCost(),
getInterleavedMemoryOpCost() implemented.
Interleaved access vectorization enabled.
BasicTTIImpl::getCastInstrCost() improved to check for legal extending loads,
in which case the cost of the z/sext instruction becomes 0.
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Renato Golin.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29631
llvm-svn: 300052
Summary:
Dead basic blocks may be forming a loop, for which SSA form is
fulfilled, but with a circular def-use chain. LoadCombine could
enter an infinite loop when analysing such dead code. This patch
solves the problem by simply avoiding to analyse all basic blocks
that aren't forward reachable, from function entry, in LoadCombine.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27065
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, chandlerc, grosser, Bigcheese, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: dberlin, zzheng, bjope, grandinj, Ka-Ka, materi, jholewinski, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31032
llvm-svn: 300034
and to expose a handle to represent the actual case rather than having
the iterator return a reference to itself.
All of this allows the iterator to be used with common STL facilities,
standard algorithms, etc.
Doing this exposed some missing facilities in the iterator facade that
I've fixed and required some work to the actual iterator to fully
support the necessary API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31548
llvm-svn: 300032
Summary:
COFF requires that every comdat contain a symbol with the same name as
the comdat. ThinLTOBitcodeWriter renames symbols, which may cause this
requirement to be violated. This change avoids such violations by
renaming comdats if their leaders are renamed. It also keeps comdats
together when splitting modules.
Reviewers: pcc, mehdi_amini, tejohnson
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: rnk, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31963
llvm-svn: 300019
Summary:
For now, it just wraps AttributeSetNode*. Eventually, it will hold
AvailableAttrs as an inline bitset, and adding and removing enum
attributes will be super cheap.
This sinks AttributeSetNode back down to lib/IR/AttributeImpl.h.
Reviewers: pete, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31940
llvm-svn: 300014
