This patch also changes the implementation of the ArrayInfoMap to a MapVector
which will ensure that iterating over the list of ArrayInfo objects gives
predictable results. The single loop that currently enumerates the ArrayInfo
objects only frees the individual objectes, hence a possibly changing
iteration order does not affect the outcome. The added robustness is for
future users of this interface.
llvm-svn: 236583
In Polly we used both the term 'scattering' and the term 'schedule' to describe
the execution order of a statement without actually distinguishing between them.
We now uniformly use the term 'schedule' for the execution order. This
corresponds to the terminology of isl.
History: CLooG introduced the term scattering as the generated code can be used
as a sequential execution order (schedule) or as a parallel dimension
enumerating different threads of execution (placement). In Polly and/or isl the
term placement was never used, but we uniformly refer to an execution order as a
schedule and only later introduce parallelism. When doing so we do not talk
about about specific placement dimensions.
llvm-svn: 235380
This will allow the ScopInfo to build the polyhedral representation for
non-affine regions that contain loops. Such loops are basically not visible
in the SCoP representation. Accesses that are variant in such loops are
therefor represented as non-affine accesses.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8153
llvm-svn: 234713
This allows us to delinerize code such as:
A[][n]
for (i
for (j
A[i][n-j-1] = ...
which would previously have been delinearize to an access A[i+1][-j-1].
To recover the correct access we apply the piecewise expression:
{ A[i][j] -> A[i-1][i+N]: i < 0; A[i][j] -> A[i][i]: i >= 0}
This approach generalizes to higher dimensions.
llvm-svn: 233566
This will strip the constant factor of a parameter befor we add it to
the SCoP. As a result the access functions are simplified, e.g., for
the attached test case.
llvm-svn: 233501
This allows us to model non-affine regions in the SCoP representation.
SCoP statements can now describe either basic blocks or non-affine
regions. In the latter case all accesses in the region are accumulated
for the statement and write accesses, except in the entry, have to be
marked as may-write.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7846
llvm-svn: 230329
Alias checks might become costly if there are divisions that complicate the
description of the accessed locations. By overaproximating them we get fairly
accurate results without the huge compile time cost.
llvm-svn: 229252
This allows us to skip ast and code generation if we did not optimize
a SCoP and will not generate parallel or alias annotations. The
initial heuristic to exit is simple but allows improvements later on.
All failing test cases have been modified to disable early exit, thus
to keep their coverage.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7254
llvm-svn: 228851
This change has two main purposes:
1) We do not use a static interface to hide an object we create and
destroy for every basic block we copy.
2) We allow the BlockGenerator to store information between calls to
the copyBB method. This will ease scalar/phi code generation
later on.
While a lot of method signatures were changed this should not cause
any real behaviour change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7467
llvm-svn: 228443
This allows us to model PHI nodes in the polyhedral description
without demoting them. The modeling however will result in the
same accesses as the demotion would have introduced.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7415
llvm-svn: 228433
The max loop depth was incorrectly computed for scops that contain a
block from a loop but do not contain the entire loop. We need to
check that the full loop is contained in the region when computing
the max loop depth.
These scops occur when a region containing an inner loop is expanded
to include some blocks from the outer loop, but it cannot be fully
expanded to contain the outer loop because the region containing the
outer loop is invalid.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6913
llvm-svn: 225812
This support is still incomplete and consequently hidden behind a switch that
needs to be enabled. One problem is ATM that we incorrectly interpret very large
unsigned values as negative values even if used in an unsigned comparision.
llvm-svn: 225480
Schedule dimensions that have the same constant value accross all statements do
not carry any information, but due to the increased dimensionality of the
schedule cost compile time. To not pay this cost, we remove constant dimensions
if possible.
llvm-svn: 225067
SCEV based code generation has been the default for two weeks after having
been tested for a long time. We now drop the support the non-scev-based code
generation.
llvm-svn: 222978
In case a GEP instruction references into a fixed size array e.g., an access
A[i][j] into an array A[100x100], LLVM-IR does not guarantee that the subscripts
always compute values that are within array bounds. We now derive the set of
parameter values for which all accesses are within bounds and add the assumption
that the scop is only every executed with this set of parameter values.
Example:
void foo(float A[][20], long n, long m {
for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < m; j++)
A[i][j] = ...
This loop yields out-of-bound accesses if m is at least 20 and at the same time
at least one iteration of the outer loop is executed. Hence, we assume:
n <= 0 or m <= 20.
Doing so simplifies the dependence analysis problem, allows us to perform
more optimizations and generate better code.
TODO: The location where the GEP instruction is executed is not necessarily the
location where the memory is actually accessed. As a result scanning for GEP[s]
is imprecise. Even though this is not a correctness problem, this imprecision
may result in missed optimizations or non-optimal run-time checks.
In polybench where this mismatch between parametric loop bounds and fixed size
arrays is common, we see with this patch significant reductions in compile time
(up to 50%) and execution time (up to 70%). We see two significant compile time
regressions (fdtd-2d, jacobi-2d-imper), and one execution time regression
(trmm). Both regressions arise due to additional optimizations that have been
enabled by this patch. They can be addressed in subsequent commits.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6369
llvm-svn: 222754
We will use ScalarEvolution in the ScopInfo.cpp to get the loop trip
count, not cache it in the TempScop object.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6070
llvm-svn: 221035
Now MaxLoopDepth only lives in Scops not in TempScops anymore.
This is the first part of a series of changes to make TempScops
obsolete.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6069
llvm-svn: 221026
This patch does not change the semantic on it's own. However, the
dependence analysis as well as dce will now use the newest available
access relation for each memory access, thus if at some point the json
importer or any other pass will run before those two and set a new
access relation the behaviour will be different. In general it is
unclear if the dependence analysis and dce should be run on the old or
new access functions anyway. If we need to access the original access
function from the outside later, we can expose the getter again.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5707
llvm-svn: 219612
In case the pieceweise affine function used to create an isl_ast_expr
had empty cases (e.g., with contradicting constraints on the
parameters), it was possible that the condition of the isl_ast_expr
select was not a comparison but a constant (thus of type i64).
This patch does two thing:
1) Handle the case the condition of a select is not a i1 type like C.
2) Try to simplify the pieceweise affine functions for the min/max
access when we generate runtime alias checks. That step can often
remove empty or redundant cases as well as redundant constrains.
This fixes bug: http://llvm.org/PR21167
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5627
llvm-svn: 219208
