Now incorrect type argument that looks like T<A><B> doesn't
cause an assert, but just a parsing error.
Bug: 36224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42939
llvm-svn: 324380
Current implementation of CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::Parse() doesn't
get anywhere close to covering full extent of possible function declarations.
It causes incorrect behavior in avoid-stepping and sometimes messes
printing of thread backtrace.
This change implements more methodical parsing logic based on clang
lexer and simple recursive parser.
Examples:
void std::vector<Class, std::allocator<Class>>::_M_emplace_back_aux<Class const&>(Class const&)
void (*&std::_Any_data::_M_access<void (*)()>())()
Previous version of this change (D31451) was rolled back due to an issue
with Objective-C selectors being incorrectly recognized as a C++ identifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31451
llvm-svn: 299721
This caused a failure in the test case:
functionalities/breakpoint/objc/TestObjCBreakpoints.py
When we are parsing up names we stick interesting parts of the names
in various buckets, one of which is the ObjC selector bucket. The new
C++ name parser must be interfering with this process somehow.
<rdar://problem/31439305>
llvm-svn: 299489
Current implementation of CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::Parse() doesn't
get anywhere close to covering full extent of possible function declarations.
It causes incorrect behavior in avoid-stepping and sometimes messes
printing of thread backtrace.
This change implements more methodical parsing logic based on clang
lexer and simple recursive parser.
Examples:
void std::vector<Class, std::allocator<Class>>::_M_emplace_back_aux<Class const&>(Class const&)
void (*&std::_Any_data::_M_access<void (*)()>())()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31451
llvm-svn: 299374
