This is a retry of r326502 with updates to the reassociate
test file that I missed the first time.
@test15_reassoc in the supposed -reassociate test file
(except that it tests 2 other passes too...) shows that
there's no clear responsiblity for reassociation transforms.
Instcombine now gets that case, but only because the
constant values are identical. Otherwise, it would still
miss that pattern.
Reassociate doesn't get that case because it hasn't been
updated to use less than 'fast' FMF.
llvm-svn: 326513
I forgot that I added tests for 'reassoc' to -reassociate, but
suprisingly that file calls -instcombine too, so it is affected.
I'll update that file and try again.
llvm-svn: 326510
Currently this code's control flow very much assumes that there are no meaningful checks after determining that it's a ConstantFP. So whenever it wants to stop it just does "return V". But V is also the variable name it uses when it wants to return a new value. So 'return V' appears multiple times with different meanings.
This patch just moves all the code into a helper function and returns nullptr when it wants to stop.
I've split this from D43774 while I try to figure out how to best handle the vector case there. But this change by itself at least seemed like a readability improvement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43833
llvm-svn: 326361
Also, rename 'foldOpWithConstantIntoOperand' because that's annoyingly
vague. The constant check is redundant in some cases, but it allows
removing duplication for most of the calls.
llvm-svn: 326329
Note: gcc appears to allow this fold with -freciprocal-math alone,
but clang/llvm require more than that with this patch. The wording
in the definitions seems fuzzy enough that it could go either way,
but we'll err on the conservative side of FMF interpretation.
This patch also changes the newly created fmul to have FMF propagated
by the last fdiv rather than intersecting the FMF of the fdivs. This
matches the behavior of other folds near here. The new fmul is only
used to produce an intermediate op for the final fdiv result, so it
shouldn't be any stricter than that result. The previous behavior
could result in dropping FMF via other folds in instcombine or CSE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43398
llvm-svn: 326098
The existing code was inefficiently looking for 'nsz' variants.
That's unnecessary because we canonicalize those to the expected
form with -0.0.
We may also want to adjust or remove the fold that sinks negation.
We don't do that for fdiv (or integer ops?). That should be uniform?
It may also lead to missed optimization as in PR21914:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21914
...or we just have to fix other passes to avoid that problem.
llvm-svn: 325924
These are fdiv-with-constant-divisor, so they already become
reciprocal multiplies. The last gap for vector ops should be
closed with rL325590.
It's possible that we're missing folds for some edge cases
with denormal intermediate constants after deleting these,
but there are no tests for those patterns, and it would be
better to handle denormals more consistently (and less
conservatively) as noted in TODO comments.
llvm-svn: 325595
It's possible that we could allow this either 'arcp' or 'reassoc' alone, but this
should be conservatively better than what we have right now. GCC allows this with
only -freciprocal-math.
The last test is changed to show a case that is expected to fold, but we need D43398.
llvm-svn: 325533
The last fold that used to be here was not necessary. That's a
combination of 2 folds (and there's a regression test to show that).
The transforms are guarded by isFast(), but that should be loosened.
llvm-svn: 325531
With this patch in place, when a new-format TBAA tag is available
for a memory-transfer intrinsic call, we prefer propagating that
new-format tag. Otherwise, we fallback to the old approach where
we try to construct a proper TBAA access tag from 'tbaa.struct'
metadata.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41543
llvm-svn: 325488
...and delete the equivalent local functiona from InstCombine.
These might be useful to other InstCombine files or other passes
and makes FP queries more similar to integer constant queries.
llvm-svn: 325398
The variable name 'AllowReassociate' is a lie at this point because
it's set to 'isFast()' which is more than the 'reassoc' FMF after
rL317488.
In D41286, we showed that this transform may be valid even with strict
math by brute force checking every 32-bit float result.
There's a potential problem here because we're replacing with a tan()
libcall rather than a hypothetical LLVM tan intrinsic. So we might
set errno when we should be guaranteed not to do that. But that's
independent of this change.
llvm-svn: 325247
The select may have been preventing a division by zero or INT_MIN/-1 so removing it might not be safe.
Fixes PR36362.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43276
llvm-svn: 325148
This keeps with our current usage of 'match' and is easier to see that
the optional NSW only applies in the non-constant operand case.
llvm-svn: 325140
Making a width of GEP Index, which is used for address calculation, to be one of the pointer properties in the Data Layout.
p[address space]:size:memory_size:alignment:pref_alignment:index_size_in_bits.
The index size parameter is optional, if not specified, it is equal to the pointer size.
Till now, the InstCombiner normalized GEPs and extended the Index operand to the pointer width.
It works fine if you can convert pointer to integer for address calculation and all registered targets do this.
But some ISAs have very restricted instruction set for the pointer calculation. During discussions were desided to retrieve information for GEP index from the Data Layout.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120416.html
I added an interface to the Data Layout and I changed the InstCombiner and some other passes to take the Index width into account.
This change does not affect any in-tree target. I added tests to cover data layouts with explicitly specified index size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42123
llvm-svn: 325102
This replaces the bit-tracking based fold that did the same thing,
but it only worked for scalars and not directly.
There is no evidence in existing regression tests that the greater
power of bit-tracking was needed here, but we should be aware of
this potential loss of optimization.
llvm-svn: 325062
This is both a functional improvement for vectors and an
efficiency improvement for scalars. The existing code below
the new folds does the same thing for scalars, but in an
indirect and expensive way.
llvm-svn: 325048
Summary:
This change is part of step five in the series of changes to remove alignment argument from
memcpy/memmove/memset in favour of alignment attributes. In particular, this changes the
InstCombine pass to cease using the deprecated MemoryIntrinsic::getAlignment() method, and
instead we use the separate getSourceAlignment and getDestAlignment APIs to simplify
the source and destination alignment attributes separately.
Steps:
Step 1) Remove alignment parameter and create alignment parameter attributes for
memcpy/memmove/memset. ( rL322965, rC322964, rL322963 )
Step 2) Expand the IRBuilder API to allow creation of memcpy/memmove with differing
source and dest alignments. ( rL323597 )
Step 3) Update Clang to use the new IRBuilder API. ( rC323617 )
Step 4) Update Polly to use the new IRBuilder API. ( rL323618 )
Step 5) Update LLVM passes that create memcpy/memmove calls to use the new IRBuilder API,
and those that use use MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() to use [get|set]DestAlignment()
and [get|set]SourceAlignment() instead. ( rL323886, rL323891, rL324148, rL324273, rL324278,
rL324384, rL324395, rL324402, rL324626, rL324642, rL324653, rL324654, rL324773, rL324774,
rL324781, rL324784, rL324955 )
Step 6) Remove the single-alignment IRBuilder API for memcpy/memmove, and the
MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() methods.
Reference
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-August/089384.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
Reviewers: majnemer, bollu, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42871
llvm-svn: 324960
This is similar to the instsimplify fold added with D42385
( rL323716 )
...but this can't be in instsimplify because we're creating/morphing
a different instruction.
llvm-svn: 324927
The related cases for (X * Y) / X were handled in rL124487.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/6k9
The division in these tests is subsequently eliminated by existing instcombines
for 1/X.
llvm-svn: 324843
