If we are only truncating bits from the extend we should be able to just use a smaller extend.
If we are truncating more than the extend we should be able to just use a fptrunc since the presense of the fpextend shouldn't affect rounding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43970
llvm-svn: 326595
Currently when AllowRemainder is disabled, pragma unroll count is not
respected even though there is no remainder. This bug causes a loop
fully unrolled in many cases even though the user specifies a unroll
count. Especially it affects OpenCL/CUDA since in many cases a loop
contains convergent instructions and currently AllowRemainder is
disabled for such loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43826
llvm-svn: 326585
This includes the test cases from D43970 and additional tests for combining (fptrunc (binop (fpext), (fpext))) where the pre-extended types don't match the trunc and therefore can't be completely removed.
llvm-svn: 326528
The loads and stores were getting the data and storing the results. There's no reason we can't just use function arguments and return.
llvm-svn: 326515
This is a retry of r326502 with updates to the reassociate
test file that I missed the first time.
@test15_reassoc in the supposed -reassociate test file
(except that it tests 2 other passes too...) shows that
there's no clear responsiblity for reassociation transforms.
Instcombine now gets that case, but only because the
constant values are identical. Otherwise, it would still
miss that pattern.
Reassociate doesn't get that case because it hasn't been
updated to use less than 'fast' FMF.
llvm-svn: 326513
I forgot that I added tests for 'reassoc' to -reassociate, but
suprisingly that file calls -instcombine too, so it is affected.
I'll update that file and try again.
llvm-svn: 326510
The range of SCEVUnknown Phi which merges values `X1, X2, ..., XN`
can be evaluated as `U(Range(X1), Range(X2), ..., Range(XN))`.
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43810
llvm-svn: 326418
Do not replace results of `musttail` calls with a constant if the
call itself can't be removed.
Do not zap returns of `musttail` callees, if the call site can't be
removed and replaced with a constant.
Do not zap returns of `musttail`-calling blocks, this breaks
invariant too.
Patch by Fedor Indutny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43695
llvm-svn: 326404
When the function has musttail call - its cc is fixed to be equal to the
cc of the musttail callee. In such case (and in the case of the musttail
callee), GlobalOpt should not change the cc to fastcc as it will break
the invariant.
This fixes PR36546
Patch by: Fedor Indutny (indutny)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43859
llvm-svn: 326376
Summary:
Fix a bug in MergeICmp that can lead to a BCECmp block being processed more than once and eventually lead to a broken LLVM module.
The problem is that if the non-constant value is not produced by the last block, the producer will be processed once when the its parent block
is processed and second time when the last block is processed.
We end up having 2 same BCECmpBlock in the merge queue. And eventually lead to a broken LLVM module.
Reviewers: courbet, davide
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43825
llvm-svn: 326318
This is similar to what's done in computeKnownBits and computeSignBits. Don't do anything fancy just collect information valid for any element.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43789
llvm-svn: 326237
This is a slight reduction of one of the benchmarks
that suffered with D43079. Cost model changes should
not cause this test to remain scalarized.
llvm-svn: 326221
This is a slight reduction of one of the benchmarks
that suffered with D43079. Cost model changes should
not cause this test to remain scalarized.
llvm-svn: 326217
In case we update a ValuePHI node created earlier, we could update it
based on a different OpPHI which could be in a different block.
We need to update the TempToBlock mapping reflecting the new block,
otherwise we would end up placing the new phi node in a wrong block.
This problem is exposed by the test case in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36504.
This patch fixes a slightly simpler problem than in the bug report. In
the bug's re-producer, the additional problem is that we are re-using a
ValuePHI node with to few incoming values for the new OpPHI. If this
patch makes sense, I will follow it up with a patch that creates a new
PHI node if the existing PHI node has a different number of incoming
values.
Reviewers: davide, dberlin
Reviewed By: dberlin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43770
llvm-svn: 326181
Agner's tables indicate that for SSE42+ targets (Core2 and later) we can reduce the FADD/FSUB/FMUL costs down to 1, which should fix the Himeno benchmark.
Note: the AVX512 FDIV costs look rather dodgy, but this isn't part of this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43733
llvm-svn: 326133
Note: gcc appears to allow this fold with -freciprocal-math alone,
but clang/llvm require more than that with this patch. The wording
in the definitions seems fuzzy enough that it could go either way,
but we'll err on the conservative side of FMF interpretation.
This patch also changes the newly created fmul to have FMF propagated
by the last fdiv rather than intersecting the FMF of the fdivs. This
matches the behavior of other folds near here. The new fmul is only
used to produce an intermediate op for the final fdiv result, so it
shouldn't be any stricter than that result. The previous behavior
could result in dropping FMF via other folds in instcombine or CSE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43398
llvm-svn: 326098
All SIMD architectures can emulate masked load/store/gather/scatter
through element-wise condition check, scalar load/store, and
insert/extract. Therefore, bailing out of vectorization as legality
failure, when they return false, is incorrect. We should proceed to cost
model and determine profitability.
This patch is to address the vectorizer's architectural limitation
described above. As such, I tried to keep the cost model and
vectorize/don't-vectorize behavior nearly unchanged. Cost model tuning
should be done separately.
Please see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120164.html for
RFC and the discussions.
Closes D43208.
Patch by: Hideki Saito <hideki.saito@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 326079
Summary:
This patch is an enhancement to propagate dbg.value information when Phis are created on behalf of LCSSA.
I noticed a case where a value carried across a loop was reported as <optimized out>.
Specifically this case:
```
int bar(int x, int y) {
return x + y;
}
int foo(int size) {
int val = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
val = bar(val, i); // Both val and i are correct
}
return val; // <optimized out>
}
```
In the above case, after all of the interesting computation completes our value
is reported as "optimized out." This change will add a dbg.value to correct this.
This patch also moves the dbg.value insertion routine from LoopRotation.cpp
into Local.cpp, so that we can share it in both places (LoopRotation and LCSSA).
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, aprantl, vsk, davide
Reviewed By: aprantl, vsk
Subscribers: dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42551
llvm-svn: 325926
Summary:
This fixes cases like the new test @nonuniform. In that test, %cc itself
is a uniform value; however, when reading it after the end of the loop in
basic block %if, its value is effectively non-uniform.
This problem was encountered in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103743; however, this change
in itself is not sufficient to fix that bug, as there is another issue
in the AMDGPU backend.
Change-Id: I32bbffece4a32f686fab54964dae1a5dd72949d4
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, jlebar
Subscribers: wdng, tpr, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40546
llvm-svn: 325881
Summary:
MemDep caches results that signify that a dependence is non-local, and
there is currently no way to invalidate such cache entries.
Unfortunately, when MLSM sinks a store that can result in a non-local
dependence becoming a local one, and then MemDep gives wrong answers.
The easiest way out here is to just say that MLSM does indeed not
preserve MemDep results.
Reviewers: davide, Gerolf
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43177
llvm-svn: 325880
Summary:
This change is part of step five in the series of changes to remove alignment argument from
memcpy/memmove/memset in favour of alignment attributes. In particular, this changes the
AlignmentFromAssumptions pass to cease using the old getAlignment()/setAlignment API of
MemoryIntrinsic in favour of getting/setting source & dest specific alignments through
the new API. This allows us to simplify some of the code in this pass and also be more
aggressive about setting the source and destination alignments separately.
Steps:
Step 1) Remove alignment parameter and create alignment parameter attributes for
memcpy/memmove/memset. ( rL322965, rC322964, rL322963 )
Step 2) Expand the IRBuilder API to allow creation of memcpy/memmove with differing
source and dest alignments. ( rL323597 )
Step 3) Update Clang to use the new IRBuilder API. ( rC323617 )
Step 4) Update Polly to use the new IRBuilder API. ( rL323618 )
Step 5) Update LLVM passes that create memcpy/memmove calls to use the new IRBuilder API,
and those that use use MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() to use [get|set]DestAlignment()
and [get|set]SourceAlignment() instead. ( rL323886, rL323891, rL324148, rL324273, rL324278,
rL324384, rL324395, rL324402, rL324626, rL324642, rL324653, rL324654, rL324773, rL324774,
rL324781, rL324784, rL324955, rL324960 )
Step 6) Remove the single-alignment IRBuilder API for memcpy/memmove, and the
MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() methods.
Reference
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-August/089384.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
Reviewers: hfinkel, bollu, reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43081
llvm-svn: 325816
