Currently when creating tail predicated loops, we need to validate that
all the live-outs of a loop will be equivalent with and without tail
predication, and if they are not we cannot legally create a
tail-predicated loop, leaving expensive vctp and vpst instructions in
the loop. These notably can include register-allocation instructions
like stack loads and stores, and copys lowered from COPYs to MVE_VORRs.
Instead of trying to prove this is valid late in the pipeline, this
patch introduces a MQPRCopy pseudo instruction that COPY is lowered to.
This can then either be converted to a MVE_VORR where possible, or to a
couple of VMOVD instructions if not. This way they do not behave
differently within and outside of tail-predications regions, and we can
know by construction that they are always valid. The idea is that we can
do the same with stack load and stores, converting them to VLDR/VSTR or
VLDM/VSTM where required to prove tail predication is always valid.
This does unfortunately mean inserting multiple VMOVD instructions,
instead of a single MVE_VORR, but my experiments show it to be an
improvement in general.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111048
Changes in architecture revision 00eac1:
* Renamed to PSEL.
* Copies whole source register.
* Element type suffix removed from destination.
* Element index no longer optional and '#' prefix has been removed.
The reference can be found here:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0602/2021-09
Depends on D111212.
Reviewed By: kmclaughlin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111213
Changes in architecture revision 00eac1:
* Tile slice index offset no longer prefixed with '#'.
* The syntax for 128-bit (.Q) ZA tile slice accesses must now include
an explicit zero index.
The reference can be found here:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0602/2021-09
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111212
To better reflect the meaning of the now-disambiguated {GlobalValue,
GlobalAlias}::getBaseObject after breaking off GlobalIFunc::getResolverFunction
(D109792), the function is renamed to getAliaseeObject.
Without popcnt we had a special case for using the parity flag from a single test i8 test instruction if only bits 7:0 could be non-zero. That special case is still useful when we have popcnt.
To reach this special case, we enable custom lowering of parity for i16/i32/i64 even when popcnt is enabled. The check for POPCNT being enabled is now after the special case in LowerPARITY.
Fixes PR52093
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111249
Lowering of byval parameters with sizes that are not represented by a single
store require multiple stores to properly address the correct size of the
parameter.
Sizes that cannot be done with a single store are 3 bytes, 5 bytes, 6 bytes,
7 bytes. It is not correct to simply perform an 8 byte store and for these
elements because then the store would be larger than the element and alias
analysis would assume that this is undefined behaivour and return NoAlias
for them.
This patch adds the correct stores so that the size of the store is not larger
than the size of the element.
Reviewed By: nemanjai, #powerpc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108795
D100244 missed a check on the ResNo of the extract's operand 0 when finding a
pair of extracts to combine into a VMOVRRD (extract(x, n); extract(x, n+1) ->
VMOVRRD(extract x, n/2)). As a result, it can incorrectly pair an extract(x, n)
with another extract(x:3, n+1) for example. This patch fixes the bug by adding
the proper check on ResNo.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111188
As described on D111049, we're trying to remove the <string> dependency from error handling and replace uses of report_fatal_error(const std::string&) with the Twine() variant which can be forward declared.
The X86 backend only needs to know whether structure return is via an
sret pointer. This removes the categorization enumeration and
adjusts, templatizes and renames the related functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109966
As suggested on D111024, we should treat getCmpSelInstrCost calls without a specific predicate as matching the worst case predicate cost.
These regressions will be addressed with a mixture of D111024 and fixing other specific getCmpSelInstrCost calls to have realistic predicates.
Seem to cause test failures in compiler-rt.
Revert "[SystemZ] Implement memcmp of variable length with CLC."
This reverts commit 7a4e9a0c73.
Revert "[SystemZ] Implement memcpy of variable length with MVC."
This reverts commit c6c13c58ee.
The currently implementation of funcrefs is broken since it is putting
the funcref itself on the stack before the call_indirect. Instead what
should be on the stack is the constant 0, which is the index at which
we store the funcref in __funcref_call_table.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111152
This is a non-functional change to remove the duplicate
WasmAddressSpace enum and refactor reftype predicates by moving them
to the Utilities source file.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111144
Without this change _term instructions can be removed during
critical edge splitting.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111126
This removes `WasmTagType`. `WasmTagType` contained an attribute and a
signature index:
```
struct WasmTagType {
uint8_t Attribute;
uint32_t SigIndex;
};
```
Currently the attribute field is not used and reserved for future use,
and always 0. And that this class contains `SigIndex` as its property is
a little weird in the place, because the tag type's signature index is
not an inherent property of a tag but rather a reference to another
section that changes after linking. This makes tag handling in the
linker also weird that tag-related methods are taking both `WasmTagType`
and `WasmSignature` even though `WasmTagType` contains a signature
index. This is because the signature index changes in linking so it
doesn't have any info at this point. This instead moves `SigIndex` to
`struct WasmTag` itself, as we did for `struct WasmFunction` in D111104.
In this CL, in lib/MC and lib/Object, this now treats tag types in the
same way as function types. Also in YAML, this removes `struct Tag`,
because now it only contains the tag index. Also tags set `SigIndex` in
`WasmImport` union, as functions do.
I think this makes things simpler and makes tag handling more in line
with function handling. These two shares similar properties in that both
of them have signatures, but they are kind of nominal so having the same
signature doesn't mean they are the same element.
Also a drive-by fix: the reserved 'attirubute' part's encoding changed
from uleb32 to uint8 a while ago. This was fixed in lib/MC and
lib/Object but not in YAML. This doesn't change object files because the
field's value is always 0 and its encoding is the same for the both
encoding.
This is effectively NFC; I didn't mark it as such just because it
changed YAML test results.
Reviewed By: sbc100, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111086
As described on D111049, we're trying to remove the <string> dependency from error handling and replace uses of report_fatal_error(const std::string&) with the Twine() variant which can be forward declared.
We can use the raw_string_ostream::str() method to perform the implicit flush() and return a reference to the std::string container that we can then wrap inside Twine().
Following the same pattern of memset/memcpy, this patch implements a variable
length memcmp with a CLC loop followed by an EXRL instruction.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107380
Instead of making a memcpy libcall, emit an MVC loop and an EXRL instruction
the same way as is already done for memset 0.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106874
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/1jfGddcre - for intels `Block RThroughput: =36.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =12.0`
So could pick cost of `36`
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/ao9srMT8r - for intels `Block RThroughput: =30.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =12.0`
So we could pick cost of `30`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111094
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/rc8jYxW6M - for intels `Block RThroughput: =18.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =6.0`
So could pick cost of `18`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/9PhPEr65G - for intels `Block RThroughput: =15.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =6.0`
So we could pick cost of `15`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111093
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/onese7rec - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =3.0`
So could pick cost of `6`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/bMd7dddnT - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=6.0`
So we could pick cost of `8`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111092
This one required quite a bit of an assembly surgery, but i think it's in the right ballpark..
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/na97Kb96o - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=64.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=32.0`
So could pick cost of `64`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/GG1WeoKar - for intels `Block RThroughput: =66.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=27.5`
So we could pick cost of `66`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111091
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/jK85GWKaK - for intels `Block RThroughput: =31.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=17.0`
So could pick cost of `31`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/hPWWhEEf9 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =33.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=13.8`
So we could pick cost of `33`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111089
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/szEj1ceee - for intels `Block RThroughput: =15.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.8`
So could pick cost of `15`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/81bq4fTo1 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =12.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=10.0`
So we could pick cost of `12`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111087
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/aec96Thee - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.3`
So could pick cost of `6`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/aec96Thee - for intels `Block RThroughput: =9.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So we could pick cost of `9`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111083
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/3M3hbq7n8 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =20.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =8.0`
So could pick cost of `20`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/zvnPYWTx7 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =20.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =8.0`
So we could pick cost of `20`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111076
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/MTKdzjvnr - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So could pick cost of `8`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/cMYEvqoah - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So we could pick cost of `8`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111075
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/z197317d1 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =2.0`
So could pick cost of `6`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/8dzszjf9q - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So we could pick cost of `6`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111073
This one required quite a bit of assembly surgery, but the trend continues, so i think this is right.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/EKWdj8cKT - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=32.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=24.0`
So could pick cost of `32`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/zj4bb9P75 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =32.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=16.0`
So we could pick cost of `32`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111064
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/a6rxMG6ec - for intels `Block RThroughput: =16.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=12.0`
So could pick cost of `16`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/ced1bdqc9 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =16.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.0`
So we could pick cost of `16`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111063
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/avq1oz98W - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =4.0`
So could pick cost of `8`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/89PGMc1qs - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=6.0`
So we could pick cost of `6`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111061
Finally, we are getting to the heavy-hitter stuff!
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/7crGWoar6 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So could pick cost of `4`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/T8aq3MszM - for intels `Block RThroughput: =5.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So we could pick cost of `5`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111060
The current way to detect hostcalls by looking for "ockl_hostcall_internal()" function in the module seems to be not reliable enough. The LTO may rename the "ockl_hostcall_internal()" function when an application is compiled with "-fgpu-rdc", and MetadataStreamer pass to fail to detect hostcalls, therefore it does not set the "hidden_hostcall_buffer" kernel argument.
This change adds a new module flag: hostcall that can be used to detect whether GPU functions use host calls for printf.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110337
Scalarize before narrowing because the narrowing implementation does not
work on vectors. This matches what we do for regular G_MUL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111129
The delayed stack protector feature which is currently used for SDAG (and thus
allows for more commonly generating tail calls) depends on being able to extract
the tail call into a separate return block. To do this it also has to extract
the vreg->physreg copies that set up the call's arguments, since if it doesn't
then the call inst ends up using undefined physregs in it's new spliced block.
SelectionDAG implementations can do this because they delay emitting register
copies until *after* the stack arguments are set up. GISel however just
processes and emits the arguments in IR order, so stack arguments always end up
last, and thus this breaks the code that looks for any register arg copies that
precede the call instruction.
This patch adds a thunk argument to the assignValueToReg() and custom assignment
hooks. For outgoing arguments, register assignments use this return param to
return a thunk that does the actual generating of the copies. We collect these
until all the outgoing stack assignments have been done and then execute them,
so that the copies (and perhaps some artifacts like G_SEXTs) are placed after
any stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110610
Both ports are required for BitScan ops. Update the port usage and distributed throughput based off the most recent llvm-exegesis captures (PR36895) and what Intel AoM / Agner reports as well.
AArch64StorePairSuppress will prevent the creation of LDP's based on
scheduling info. This shouldn't apply when optimizing for size though,
where the size decrease should be considered more important.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110809
Noticed while investigating the regressions in D110995 - if the RHS element is already zero, then we don't need the corresponding LHS element.
Technically we could also recheck RHS once we have LHS's known zeros, but I haven't seen any missed opportunities from that yet.
This required huge amount of assembly surgery, but i think this is about right.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/z11crMEcj - for intels `Block RThroughput: =20.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=18.0`
So could pick cost of `25`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/eqT4ze3j4 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =24.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=16.0`
So we could pick cost of `24`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111031
This one required quite a bit of assembly surgery.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/oYWv4cTnK - for intels `Block RThroughput: =10.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.0`
So pick cost of `10`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/33GMhrsG9 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =12.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.0`
So pick cost of `12`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111027
This one required quite a bit of assembly surgery.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Tce3osvcz - for intels `Block RThroughput: =5.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So pick cost of `5`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/oc3arEcnE - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So pick cost of `6`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111026
