This will be used by the modernize-use-std-print clang-tidy check and
related checks later.
Reviewed By: PiotrZSL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153716
Fixes the `FIXME:` related to adding `forEachTemplateArgument` to the
core AST Matchers library.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D125383
This reverts commit cc56c66f27.
Fixed a bad assertion, the target of a UsingShadowDecl must not have
*local* qualifiers, but it can be a typedef whose underlying type is qualified.
Currently there's no way to find the UsingDecl that a typeloc found its
underlying type through. Compare to DeclRefExpr::getFoundDecl().
Design decisions:
- a sugar type, as there are many contexts this type of use may appear in
- UsingType is a leaf like TypedefType, the underlying type has no TypeLoc
- not unified with UnresolvedUsingType: a single name is appealing,
but being sometimes-sugar is often fiddly.
- not unified with TypedefType: the UsingShadowDecl is not a TypedefNameDecl or
even a TypeDecl, and users think of these differently.
- does not cover other rarer aliases like objc @compatibility_alias,
in order to be have a concrete API that's easy to understand.
- implicitly desugared by the hasDeclaration ASTMatcher, to avoid
breaking existing patterns and following the precedent of ElaboratedType.
Scope:
- This does not cover types associated with template names introduced by
using declarations. A future patch should introduce a sugar TemplateName
variant for this. (CTAD deduced types fall under this)
- There are enough AST matchers to fix the in-tree clang-tidy tests and
probably any other matchers, though more may be useful later.
Caveats:
- This changes a fairly common pattern in the AST people may depend on matching.
Previously, typeLoc(loc(recordType())) matched whether a struct was
referred to by its original scope or introduced via using-decl.
Now, the using-decl case is not matched, and needs a separate matcher.
This is similar to the case of typedefs but nevertheless both adds
complexity and breaks existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251
This contributes follow-up work from https://reviews.llvm.org/D112491, which
allows for increased control over the matching of lambda captures. This also
updates the documentation for the `lambdaCapture` matcher.
Reviewed By: ymandel, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113575
This provides better support for `LambdaCapture`s by making them first-
class and allowing them to be bindable. In addition, this implements several
`LambdaCapture`-related matchers. This does not update how lambdas are
traversed. As a result, something like trying to match `lambdaCapture()` by
itself will not work - it must be used as an inner matcher.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112491
This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.
There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:
struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator
this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
The new matcher additionally covers blocks and Objective-C methods.
This matcher actually makes sure that the statement truly belongs
to that declaration's body. forFunction() incorrectly reported that
a statement in a nested block belonged to the surrounding function.
forFunction() is now deprecated due to the above footgun, in favor of
forCallable(functionDecl()) when only functions need to be considered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102213
Required for capturing base specifier in matchers:
`cxxRecordDecl(hasDirectBase(cxxBaseSpecifier().bind("base")))`
Reviewed By: steveire, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69218
Summary: Try to enable the support for C++20 coroutine keywords for AST
Matchers.
Reviewers: sammccall, njames93, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96316
Add the `fixedPointLiteral`, `hasAnyBody` and `templateArgumentLoc` to the dynamic matcher registry.
Reviewed By: steveire
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98556
This is a simple utility which allows matching on binaryOperator and
cxxOperatorCallExpr. It can also be extended to support
cxxRewrittenBinaryOperator.
Add generic support for MapAnyOfMatchers to auto-marshalling functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94129
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain GenericSelectionExpr
nodes (this is _Generic from C11). This is needed, for example, for
CTU analysis of C code that makes use of _Generic, like the Linux
kernel.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter. Additionally, this change adds support for structural
equivalence of _Generic in the AST.
Reviewed By: martong, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92600
The analysis for const-ness of local variables required a view generally useful
matchers that are extracted into its own patch.
They are decompositionDecl and forEachArgumentWithParamType, that works
for calls through function pointers as well.
This is a reupload of https://reviews.llvm.org/D72505, that already landed,
but had to be reverted due to a GCC crash on powerpc
(https://reviews.llvm.org/rG4c48ea68e491cb42f1b5d43ffba89f6a7f0dadc4)
Because this took a long time to adress, i decided to redo this patch and
have a clean workflow.
I try to coordinate with someone that has a PPC to apply this patch and
test for the crash. If everything is fine, I intend to just commit.
If the crash is still happening, i hope to at least find the cause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87588
There are already matchers for type template parameters and non-type template
parameters, but somehow no matcher exists for template template parameters
and I need it to write unit tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85536
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
This implements the default(firstprivate) clause as defined in OpenMP
Technical Report 8 (2.22.4).
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75591
Adds a matcher called `hasDirectBase` for matching the `CXXBaseSpecifier` of a class that directly derives from another class.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81552
