Handle dbg.declares in SROA using DPValues.
In order to reduce duplication, the migrate-debug-info loop has been changed
to a generic lambda with some helper function overloads, which is called
for dbg.declares, dbg.assigns, and DPValues alike.
The tests will become "live" once #74090 lands (see for more info).
This is a boring mechanical update to support DPValues that look like
dbg.declares in SelectionDAG.
The tests will become "live" once #74090 lands (see for more info).
This patch updates the last few places in LLVM using findDbgValues that
don't also collect and handle DPValue objects. This largely involves
instcombine and mem2reg changes, and are largely mechanical, calling
existing utilities on collections of DPValues instead of just
DbgValuesInsts.
A variety of tests have had RemoveDIs RUN lines added to them to cover
these behaviours. We have some technical debt of the instcombine sinking
code for DPValues not being implemented yet, so I've left FIXME stubs
indicating that we intend to cover tests with RemoveDIs but haven't yet.
With intrinsics representing debug-info, we just clone all the
intrinsics when inlining a function and don't think about it any
further. With non-instruction debug-info however we need to be a bit
more careful and manually move the debug-info from one place to another.
For the most part, this means keeping a "cursor" during block cloning of
where we last copied debug-info from, and performing debug-info copying
whenever we successfully clone another instruction.
There are several utilities in LLVM for doing this, all of which now
need to manually call cloneDebugInfo. The testing story for this is not
well covered as we could rely on normal instruction-cloning mechanisms
to do all the hard stuff. Thus, I've added a few tests to explicitly
test dbg.value behaviours, ahead of them becoming not-instructions.
This was reverted because it broke the OCaml LLVM bindings.
Relanding the original patch but without changing the C-API.
They'll continue to work just fine as they do today. If in the
future there is a need to pass a new tag to the C-API for creating
static members, then we'll make the change to the OCaml bindings
at that time.
Original commit message:
"""
This patch adds the LLVM-side infrastructure to implement DWARFv5 issue
161118.1: "DW_TAG for C++ static data members".
The clang-side of this patch will simply construct the DIDerivedType
with a different DW_TAG.
"""
This reverts commit 9a9933fae2.
The OCaml bindings were using `LLVMDIBuilderCreateStaticMemberType`,
causing the API change in `9a9933fae23249fbf6cf5b3c090e630f578b7f98`
to break buildbots that built the bindings. Revert until we figure out
whether to fixup the bindings or just not change the C-API
This patch adds the LLVM-side infrastructure to implement DWARFv5 issue
161118.1: "DW_TAG for C++ static data members".
The clang-side of this patch will simply construct the DIDerivedType
with a different DW_TAG.
After performing sink-and-fold over a COPY, the original instruction is
replaced with one that produces its output in the destination of the
copy. Its value is still available (in a hard register), so if there are
debug instructions which refer to the (now deleted) virtual register
they could be updated to refer to the hard register, in principle.
However, it's not clear how to do that, moreover in some cases the debug
instructions may need to be replicated proportionally to the number of
the COPY instructions replaced and in some extreme cases we can end up
with quadratic increase in the number of debug instructions, e.g:
int f(int);
void g(int x) {
int y = x + 1;
int t0 = y;
f(t0);
int t1 = y;
f(t1);
}
The base-type field of a DICompositeType is optional in the IR syntax,
however it makes no sense to have an array of an unspecified type. Such
debug-info would be meaningless, and the added test crashes otherwise
(see #70787). Thus, add a verifier check to reject such ill-formed debug
info metadata. Test produced by Christian Ulmann.
fixes#70787
Reapply now that generation of incorrect debuginfo for FnDef
in rustc has been fixed.
-----
Add a check that the DILocalVariable fragment size in dbg.declare
does not exceed the size of the alloca.
This would have caught the invalid debuginfo regenerated by rustc
in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64149.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158743
This caused asserts:
llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp:2331:
virtual void llvm::DwarfDebug::endFunctionImpl(const llvm::MachineFunction *):
Assertion `LScopes.getAbstractScopesList().size() == NumAbstractSubprograms &&
"getOrCreateAbstractScope() inserted an abstract subprogram scope"' failed.
See comment on the code review for reproducer.
> RFC https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-dwarfdebug-fix-and-improve-handling-imported-entities-types-and-static-local-in-subprogram-and-lexical-block-scopes/68544
>
> Similar to imported declarations, the patch tracks function-local types in
> DISubprogram's 'retainedNodes' field. DwarfDebug is adjusted in accordance with
> the aforementioned metadata change and provided a support of function-local
> types scoped within a lexical block.
>
> The patch assumes that DICompileUnit's 'enums field' no longer tracks local
> types and DwarfDebug would assert if any locally-scoped types get placed there.
>
> Reviewed By: jmmartinez
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144006
This reverts commit f8aab289b5.
Reapply after fixing a clang bug this exposed in D158972 and
adjusting a number of tests that failed for 32-bit targets.
-----
Add a check that the DILocalVariable fragment size in dbg.declare
does not exceed the size of the alloca.
This would have caught the invalid debuginfo regenerated by rustc
in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64149.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158743
This reverts the test case in commit 549773f9e9.
After committing 2ee4d0386c, We don't support subprogram definitions nested within `DICompositeType` when doing LTO builds.
For a detailed discussion, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D152095.
This reverts commit d20e4a1d68.
After committing 2ee4d0386c, We don't support subprogram definitions nested within `DICompositeType` when doing LTO builds.
For a detailed discussion, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D152095.
Entries of the same DJB hash are in the hash lookup table/name table are
ordered by the iteration order of `Entries` (a StringMap). Change
`Entries` to a MapVector to stabilize the order and simplify future
changes like D142862 that change the StringMap hash function.
This is a preparatory patch for extending DWARFDebugLine to properly
parse line number programs with maximum_operations_per_instruction > 1
for VLIW targets.
Add some scaffolding for handling op-index in line number programs, and
add printouts for that in the table. As this affects a lot of tests,
this is done in a separate commit to get a cleaner review for the actual
op-index implementation.
Verbose printouts are not present in many tests, and adding op-index to
those will require a bit more code changes, so that is done in the
actual implementation patch.
Reviewed By: StephenTozer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152535
Explicitly inserting undef is overly defensive. Any values computed
nside the loop that are referenced by dbg.values should naturally
become undef when the loop is deleted, and all other values that
are loop invariant must be preserved.
Reviewed By: scott.linder
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153539
The DWARF 5 specification says that:
> All other debugging information entries without a DW_AT_name attribute are
> excluded.
Clang started generating these variables for string literals, see D123534.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153809
This commit adds functionality to the Apple Accelerator table allowing iteration
over all elements in the table.
Our iterators look like streaming iterators: when we increment the iterator we
check if there is still enough data in the "stream" (in our case, the blob of
data of the accelerator table) and extract the next entry. If any failures
occur, we immediately set the iterator to be the end iterator.
Since the ultimate user of this functionality is LLDB, there are roughly two
iteration methods we want support: one that also loads the name of each entry,
and one which does not. Loading names is measurably slower (one order the
magnitude) than only loading DIEs, so we used some template metaprograming to
implement both iteration methods.
Depends on D153066
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153066
