I'll be making changes to the ObjC implementation (bug fix) in a later
change, and I noticed that this test isn't being tested at all. Fix that up
here separately so further changes are easier to differentiate.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis, int3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139396
The test added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D137368 has been failing
on our 32 bit arm bots:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/178/builds/3460
You get this for the strings:
<<dead>> 0x883255000000003 [ 10] literal string: Hello, it's me
Instead of the expected:
<<dead>> 0x0000000F [ 3] literal string: Hello, it's me
This is because unlike symbols whose size is a uint64_t, strings
use a StringRef whose size is size_t. size_t changes size between
32 and 64 bit platforms.
This fixes the test by using %z to print the size of the strings,
this works for 32 and 64 bit.
The main motivation for this change is to avoid ambiguity because
mapping symbol names may not be unique across a binary and do not allow uniquely
identifying target address. So that mapping symbols used as branch target
labels make llvm-objdump output less readable.
Another point is that mapping symbols sometimes appear in
non-allocatable sections, like debug info sections which make objdump
output even more confusing.
For example, a small AArch64 executable may contain plenty of `$d[.*]`
symbols and none of them would be useful as a label for resolving
a branch or a memory operand target address:
```
0000000000000254 l .note.ABI-tag 0000000000000000 $d
00000000000008d4 l .eh_frame 0000000000000000 $d
0000000000000868 l .rodata 0000000000000000 $d
0000000000011028 l .data 0000000000000000 $d
0000000000010db8 l .fini_array 0000000000000000 $d
0000000000010db0 l .init_array 0000000000000000 $d
00000000000008e8 l .eh_frame 0000000000000000 $d
0000000000011034 l .bss 0000000000000000 $d
```
Note that GNU objdump doesn't use mapping symbols as branch target
labels for all targets that support such symbols (ARM, AArch64, CSKY).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139131
CodeView doesn't have the ability to represent variables
in other ways than as in registers or memory values, but
LLVM very often transforms simple values into constants,
consider this program:
int f () { int i = 123; return i; }
LLVM will transform `i` into a constant value and just
leave behind a llvm.dbg.value, this can't be represented
as a S_LOCAL record in CodeView. But we can represent it
as a S_CONSTANT record.
This patch checks if the location of a debug value is null,
then we will insert a S_CONSTANT record instead of a S_LOCAL
value with the flag "OptimizedAway".
In lld we then output the S_CONSTANT in the right scope, before
they where always inserted in the global stream, now we check
the scope before inserting it.
This has shown to improve debugging for our developers
internally.
Fixes to llvm/llvm-project#55958
Reviewed By: aganea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138995
This was causing an uncaught exception issue in one of our programs. The
issue was fairly subtle / rare as it required two identical LSDAs that were
referenced by a pair of non-identical compact unwind encodings.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139269
Fixes#59162. The test has a comment explaining what's going on.
See also Symbol::extract() in lld/ELF/Symbols.cpp.
The included test sadly also passes if I pass just bd448f01a6,
while doing that isn't enough to make my bigger repro case work
(if I port just that, something else asserts later on, but with
this fix here everything's fine in my bigger repro).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139199
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/190 introduced STO_RISCV_VARIANT_CC.
The linker should:
* Copy the STO_RISCV_VARIANT_CC bit to .symtab/.dynsym: already fulfilled after
82ed93ea05
* Produce DT_RISCV_VARIANT_CC if at least one R_RISCV_JUMP_SLOT relocation
references a symbol with the STO_RISCV_VARIANT_CC bit. Done by this patch.
Reviewed By: kito-cheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107951
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
I intend to slowly upgrade all alignments to the Align type in lld as well.
Some places talk about alignment in Bytes while other specify them as Log2(Bytes).
Let's make sure all of this is coherent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139181
If we have two files with the same weak symbol like so:
```
ltmp0:
_weak:
<contents>
```
and
```
ltmp1:
_weak:
<contents>
```
Linking them together should leave only one copy of `<contents>`, not
two. Previously, we would keep around both copies because of the
private-label `ltmp<N>` symbols (i.e. symbols that start with `l`) -- we
would not coalesce those, so we would treat them as retaining the
contents.
This matters for more than just size -- we are depending upon this
behavior internally for emitting a certain file format. This file
format's header is repeated in each object file, but we want it to
appear just once in our output.
Why can't we not emit those aliases to `_weak`, or reference the
`ltmp<N>` symbols instead of `_weak`? Well, MC actually adds `ltmp<N>`
symbols as part of the assembly-to-binary translation step. So any
codegen at the clang level can't access them.
All that said... this solution is actually kind of hacky. Here, we avoid
creating the private-label symbols at parse time. This is acceptable
since we never emit those symbols in our output. However, in ld64, any
aliasing temporary symbols (ignored or otherwise) won't retain coalesced
data. But implementing this is harder -- we would have to create those
symbols first (so we can emit their names later), but we would have to
ensure the linker correctly shuffles them around when their aliasees get
coalesced.
Additionally, ld64 treats these temporary symbols as functionally
equivalent to the weak symbols themselves -- that is, it will emit weak
binds when those non-weak temporary aliases are referenced. We have
imitated this behavior for private-label symbols, but implementing it for
local aliases in general seems substantially more difficult. I'm not
sure if any programs actually depend on this behavior though, so maybe
it's a moot point.
Finally, ld64 does all this regardless of whether
`.subsections_via_symbols` is specified. We don't. But again, given how
rare the lack of that directive is (I've only seen it from hand-written
assembly inputs), I don't think we need to worry about it.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139069
ld64 rejects `-no_pie` when targeting arm64, this mirrors that behavior.
Newer versions of ld64 also reject it based on minimum OS versions, but
that logic isn't in an open source dump yet so it isn't implemented
here.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59115
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138884
Add a version to non-LLVM cmake package so that users needing an exact
version match can use the version parameter to find_package. Also adjust
the find_package(LLVM) to use an exact version match as well.
Reviewed By: arsenm, stellaraccident, mceier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138274
Breaks build of LLVMgold here:
```
/repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1108:19: error: no matching function for call to 'localCache'
Cache = check(localCache("ThinLTO", "Thin", options::cache_dir, AddBuffer));
^~~~~~~~~~
/repositories/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Caching.h:72:21: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from '(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1102:20)' to 'llvm::AddBufferFn' (aka 'function<void (unsigned int, const llvm::Twine &, std::unique_ptr<MemoryBuffer>)>') for 4th argument
Expected<FileCache> localCache(
^
/repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1110:18: error: no viable conversion from '(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20)' to 'llvm::AddStreamFn' (aka 'function<Expected<std::unique_ptr<CachedFileStream>> (unsigned int, const llvm::Twine &)>')
check(Lto->run(AddStream, Cache));
^~~~~~~~~
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12/../../../../include/c++/12/bits/std_function.h:375:7: note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from '(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20)' to 'std::nullptr_t' for 1st argument
function(nullptr_t) noexcept
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12/../../../../include/c++/12/bits/std_function.h:386:7: note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from '(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20)' to 'const std::function<llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<llvm::CachedFileStream>> (unsigned int, const llvm::Twine &)> &' for 1st argument
function(const function& __x)
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12/../../../../include/c++/12/bits/std_function.h:404:7: note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from '(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20)' to 'std::function<llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<llvm::CachedFileStream>> (unsigned int, const llvm::Twine &)> &&' for 1st argument
function(function&& __x) noexcept
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12/../../../../include/c++/12/bits/std_function.h:435:2: note: candidate template ignored: requirement '_Callable<(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20) &, (lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20), std::__invoke_result<(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20) &, unsigned int, const llvm::Twine &>>::value' was not satisfied [with _Functor = (lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20) &]
function(_Functor&& __f)
^
/repositories/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/LTO/LTO.h:278:25: note: passing argument to parameter 'AddStream' here
Error run(AddStreamFn AddStream, FileCache Cache = nullptr);
^
```
This reverts commit 387620aa8c.
_TLS_MODULE_BASE_ is supposed to be defined by the final link. Defining it in a
relocatable link may render the final link value incorrect.
GNU ld i386/x86-64 have the same issue: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29820
