DWARFExpression::Evaluate will convert DW_OP_addr addresses in
a DWARF expression into load addresses on the expression stack
when there is a StackFrame in the ExecutionContext, this from
a change in 2018 in https://reviews.llvm.org/D46362. At the
time this was handling a case that came up in swift programs,
and is no longer necessary. I generalized this conversion to
a load address when a Target is available in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137682 to make a test case possible;
this change broke a use case that Ted reported.
This change removes my test case, and removes this conversion
of a DW_OP_addr into a load address in some instances.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139226
When we cannot allocate memory in the inferior process, the IR
interpreter's IRMemoryMap::FindSpace will create an lldb local
buffer and assign it an address range in the inferior address
space. When the interpreter sees an address in that range, it
will read/write from the local buffer instead of the target. If
this magic address overlaps with actual data in the target, the
target cannot be accessed through expressions.
Instead of using a high memory address that is validly addressable,
this patch uses an address that cannot be accessed on 64-bit systems
that don't actually use all 64 bits of the virtual address.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137682
rdar://96248287
Currently, SymbolFileDWARFDebugMap works on the assumption that there is
only one compile unit per object file. This patch documents this
limitation (when using the general SymbolFile API), and allows users of
the concrete SymbolFileDWARFDebugMap class to find out about these extra
compile units.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136114
Patch sets ARM cpu, before compiling JIT code. This enables FastISel for armv6 and higher CPUs and allows using hardware FPU
~~~
OS Laboratory. Huawei RRI. Saint-Petersburg
Reviewed By: DavidSpickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131783
When targeting macOS Ventura, ld64 will use authenticated fixups for
x86_64 as well as arm64 (where that has always been the case). This
results in test failures when using an Xcode 14 toolchain on an Intel
mac running macOS Ventura:
Failed Tests (3):
lldb-api :: commands/target/basic/TestTargetCommand.py
lldb-api :: lang/c/global_variables/TestGlobalVariables.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/char8_t/TestCxxChar8_t.py
Rather than trying to come up with a sophisticated decorator based off
the deployment target, I marked them all as skipped with a comment
explaining why.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131741
Patch adds support for fadd, fsub, fdiv, fmul and fcmp to IR interpreter.
~~~
OS Laboratory. Huawei RRI. Saint-Petersburg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126359
This test was disabled because clang struggled to emit a Windows calling
convention when targeting an Apple environment. This test is now showing
up as an XPASS so someone must have fixed this.
Add a function to make it easier to debug a test failure caused by an
unexpected stop reason. This is similar to the assertState helper that
was added in ce825e4674.
Before:
self.assertEqual(stop_reason, lldb.eStopReasonInstrumentation)
AssertionError: 5 != 10
After:
self.assertStopReason(stop_reason, lldb.eStopReasonInstrumentation)
AssertionError: signal (5) != instrumentation (10)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131083
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).
* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616
This just does the usual modernizations such as using new test functions where
possible, clang-formatting the source, avoiding manual process setup,
assert improvements (` assertTrue(a == b) -> assertEqual(a, b)`).
This doesn't add any new test cases but removes some dependence on unrelated
features where possible (e.g., structs declared in functions, using the standard
library to printf stuff or initialize objects).
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5
Reverted in f9ad1d1c77 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
`Target::GetScratchTypeSystems` returns the list of scratch TypeSystems. The
current implementation is iterating over all LanguageType values and retrieves
the respective TypeSystem for each LanguageType.
All C/C++/Obj-C LanguageTypes are however mapped to the same
ScratchTypeSystemClang instance, so the current implementation adds this single
TypeSystem instance several times to the list of TypeSystems (once for every
LanguageType that we support).
The only observable effect of this is that `SBTarget.FindTypes` for builtin
types currently queries the ScratchTypeSystemClang several times (and also adds
the same result several times).
Reviewed By: bulbazord, labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111931
This adds support for parsing DW_AT_calling_convention in the DWARF parser.
The generic DWARF parsing code already support extracting this attribute from A
DIE and TypeSystemClang already offers a parameter to add a calling convention
to a function type (as the PDB parser supports calling convention parsing), so
this patch just converts the DWARF enum value to the Clang enum value and adds a
few tests.
There are two tests in this patch.:
* A unit test for the added DWARF parsing code that should run on all platforms.
* An API tests that covers the whole expression evaluation machinery by trying
to call functions with non-standard calling conventions. The specific subtests
are target specific as some calling conventions only work on e.g. win32 (or, if
they work on other platforms they only really have observable differences on a
specific target). The tests are also highly compiler-specific, so if GCC or
Clang tell us that they don't support a specific calling convention then we just
skip the test.
Note that some calling conventions are supported by Clang but aren't implemented
in LLVM (e.g. `pascal`), so there we just test that if this ever gets
implemented in LLVM that LLDB works too. There are also some more tricky/obscure
conventions that are left out such as the different swift* conventions, some
planned Obj-C conventions (`Preserve*`), AAPCS* conventions (as the DWARF->Clang
conversion is ambiguous for AAPCS and APPCS-VFP) and conventions only used for
OpenCL etc.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108629
D105471 fixes the way we assign sizes to empty structs in C mode. Instead of
just giving them a size 0, we instead use the size we get from DWARF if possible.
After landing D105471 the TestStructTypes test started failing on Windows. The
tests checked that the size of an empty C struct is 0 while the size LLDB now
reports is 4 bytes. It turns out that 4 bytes are the actual size Clang is using
for C structs with the MicrosoftRecordLayoutBuilder. The commit that introduced
that behaviour is 00a061dccc.
This patch removes that specific check from TestStructTypes. Note that D105471
added a series of tests that already cover this case (and the added checks
automatically adjust to whatever size the target compiler chooses for empty
structs).
C doesn't allow empty structs but Clang/GCC support them and give them a size of 0.
LLDB implements this by checking the tag kind and if it's `DW_TAG_structure_type` then
we give it a size of 0 via an empty external RecordLayout. This is done because our
internal TypeSystem is always in C++ mode (which means we would give them a size
of 1).
The current check for when we have this special case is currently too lax as types with
`DW_TAG_structure_type` can also occur in C++ with types defined using the `struct`
keyword. This means that in a C++ program with `struct Empty{};`, LLDB would return
`0` for `sizeof(Empty)` even though the correct size is 1.
This patch removes this special case and replaces it with a generic approach that just
assigns empty structs the byte_size as specified in DWARF. The GCC/Clang special
case is handles as they both emit an explicit `DW_AT_byte_size` of 0. And if another
compiler decides to use a different byte size for this case then this should also be
handled by the same code as long as that information is provided via `DW_AT_byte_size`.
Reviewed By: werat, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105471
This test is using -gpubnames which is only available since Clang 8. The
original Clang 7 requirement was based on the availability of
-accel-tables=Dwarf (which the test initially used before being changed to
-gpubnames in commit 15a6df52ef ).
BlockPointerSyntheticFrontEnd does a CopyType which results in it copying the type
back into its own context. This will result in a call to ASTImporterDelegate::setOrigin
with &decl->getASTContext() == origin.ctx this can result in an infinite recursion
later on in ASTImporter since it will attempt to find the decl in its origin which will be itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96366
Convert `assertTrue(a == b)` to `assertEqual(a, b)` to produce better failure messages.
These were mostly done via regex search & replace, with some manual fixes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95813
