Arcanist (arc) will now always run linters before uploading any new
commit to Phabricator. All errors/warnings (or their absence) will be
shown in the web interface together with a explanation by the commiter
(arcanist will ask the commiter if the build was not clean).
The linters include:
- clang-format
- spelling check
- permissions check (aka. chmod)
- filename check
- merge conflict marker check
Note, that their scope is sometimes limited (see .arclint for
details).
This commit also fixes all errors and warnings these linters reported,
namely:
- spelling mistakes and typos
- executable permissions for various text files
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4916
llvm-svn: 215871
This reverts commit 215684. The intention of the commit is great, but
unfortunately it seems to be the cause of 14 LNT test suite failures:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly/builds/116
To make our buildbots and performance testers green until this issue is solved,
we temporarily revert this commit.
llvm-svn: 215816
The support is limited to signed modulo access and condition
expressions with a constant right hand side, e.g., A[i % 2] or
A[i % 9]. Test cases are modified according to this new feature and
new test cases are added.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4843
llvm-svn: 215684
There is no needed for neither 1-dimensional nor higher dimensional arrays to
require positive offsets in the outermost array dimension.
We originally introduced this assumption with the support for delinearizing
multi-dimensional arrays.
llvm-svn: 214665
As our delinearization works optimistically, we need in some cases run-time
checks that verify our optimistic assumptions. A simple example is the
following code:
void foo(long n, long m, long o, double A[n][m][o]) {
for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < 150; j++)
for (long k = 0; k < 200; k++)
A[i][j][k] = 1.0;
}
After clang linearized the access to A and we delinearized it again to
A[i][j][k] we need to ensure that we do not access the delinearized array
out of bounds (this information is not available in LLVM-IR). Hence, we
need to verify the following constraints at run-time:
CHECK: Assumed Context:
CHECK: [o, m] -> { : m >= 150 and o >= 200 }
llvm-svn: 212198
This change is particularly useful in the code generation as we need
to know which binary operator/identity element we need to combine/initialize
the privatization locations.
+ Print the reduction type for each memory access
+ Adjusted the test cases to comply with the new output format and
to test for the right reduction type
llvm-svn: 212126
Iterate over all store memory accesses and check for valid binary reduction
candidate loads by following the operands of the stored value. For each
candidate pair we check if they have the same base address and there are no
other accesses which may overlap with them. This ensures that no intermediate
value can escape into other memory locations or is overwritten at some point.
+ 17 test cases for reduction detection and reduction dependency modeling
llvm-svn: 211957
+ Flag to indicate reduction like statements
+ Command line option to (dis)allow multiplicative reduction opcodes
+ Two simple positive test cases, one fp test case w and w/o fast math
+ One "negative" test case (only reduction like but no reduction)
llvm-svn: 211114
+ Added const iterator version
+ Changed name to begin/end to allow range loops
+ Changed call sites to range loops
+ Changed typename to (const_)iterator
llvm-svn: 210927
Without this patch, the testcase would fail on the delinearization of the second
array:
; void foo(long n, long m, long o, double A[n][m][o]) {
; for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
; for (long j = 0; j < m; j++)
; for (long k = 0; k < o; k++) {
; A[i+3][j-4][k+7] = 1.0;
; A[i][0][k] = 2.0;
; }
; }
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[3 + i0, -4 + i1, 7 + i2] };
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
Here is the output of FileCheck on the testcase without this patch:
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
^
<stdin>:26:2: note: possible intended match here
[n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[o0] };
^
It is possible to find a good delinearization for A[i][0][k] only in the context
of the delinearization of both array accesses.
There are two ways to delinearize together all array subscripts touching the
same base address: either duplicate the code from scop detection to first gather
all array references and then run the delinearization; or as implemented in this
patch, use the same delinearization info that we computed during scop detection.
llvm-svn: 210117
definition below all of the header #include lines, Polly edition.
If you want to know more details about this, you can see the recent
commits to Debug.h in LLVM. This is just the Polly segment of a cleanup
I'm doing globally for this macro.
llvm-svn: 206852
In case the domain of a statement is empty, the schedule optimizer set by
accident the schedule to a NULL pointer. This is incorrect. Instead, we set
it to an empty isl_map with zero schedule dimensions. We already checked for
this in our test cases, but unfortunately the test cases did not fail as
expected. The assert we add in this commit now ensures that the test cases
fail properly in case we regress on this again.
llvm-svn: 201886
This pass eliminates loop iterations that compute results that are not used
later on. This can help e.g. in D, where the default zero-initialization is
often unnecessary if right after new values are assigned to an array.
Contributed-by: Peter Conn <conn.peter@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 201817
We do not have a use for this information at the moment. If we need this at some
point, the "instruction -> access" mapping needs to be enhanced as a single
instruction could then possibly perform multiple accesses.
This patch allows us to build the polyhedral information for scops with scalar
dependences.
llvm-svn: 201815
When constructing a scop sometimes the exact representation of a statement or
condition would be very complex, but there is a common case which is a lot
simpler, but which is only valid under certain assumptions. The assumed context
records the assumptions taken during the construction of this scop and that need
to be code generated as a run-time test.
At the moment, we do not yet model any assumptions, but only added the
AssumedContext as well as the isl-ast generation support. As a next step,
this needs to be hooked up with the isl code generation.
if (1) /* run-time condition */
{ /* optimized code */ }
else
{ /* original code */ }
llvm-svn: 193652
Instead of defining the relevant functions inline, we now just keep the
declarations in the class itself. This makes the class declaration a lot
easier to read as all functions can be seen at once. We also use this
opportunity to privatize all functions not used in the public interface of the
class.
llvm-svn: 190841
SCoP invariant parameters with the different start value would deter parameter
sharing. For example, when compiling the following C code:
void foo(float *input) {
for (long j = 0; j < 8; j++) {
// SCoP begin
for (long i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
float x = input[j * 64 + i + 1];
input[j * 64 + i] = x * x;
}
}
}
Polly would creat two parameters for these memory accesses:
p_0: {0,+,256}
p_2: {4,+,256}
[j * 64 + i + 1] => MemRef_input[o0] : 4o0 = p_1 + 4i0
[j * 64 + i] => MemRef_input[o0] : 4o0 = p_0 + 4i0
These parameters only differ from start value. To enable parameter sharing,
we split the start value from SCEVAddRecExpr, so they would share a single
parameter that always has zero start value:
p0: {0,+,256}<%for.cond1.preheader>
[j * 64 + i + 1] => MemRef_input[o0] : 4o0 = 4 + p_1 + 4i0
[j * 64 + i] => MemRef_input[o0] : 4o0 = p_0 + 4i0
Such translation can make the polly-dependence much faster.
Contributed-by: Star Tan <tanmx_star@yeah.net>
llvm-svn: 187728
