The stack validation heuristic is counter-productive in this case, as
the unaligned address is most likely the thing that caused the signal in
the first place.
As we have debuginfod as symbol locator available in lldb now, we want
to make full use of it.
In case of post mortem debugging, we don't always have the main
executable available.
However, the .note.gnu.build-id of the main executable(some other
modules too), should be available in the core file, as those binaries
are loaded in memory and dumped in the core file.
We try to iterate through the NT_FILE entries, read and store the gnu
build id if possible. This will be very useful as this id is the unique
key which is needed for querying the debuginfod server.
Test:
Build and run lldb. Breakpoint set to
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolLocator/Debuginfod/SymbolLocatorDebuginfod.cpp#L147
Verified after this commit, module_uuid is the correct gnu build id of
the main executable which caused the crash(first in the NT_FILE entry)
Target::Install() set 0700 permissions for the main executable file.
Platform::Install() just copies permissions from the source. But the
permission eFilePermissionsUserExecute is missing on the Windows host. A
lot of tests failed in case of Windows host and Linux target because of
this issue. There is no API to provide the exec flag. This patch set the
permission eFilePermissionsUserExecute for all files installed via
Platform::Install() from the Windows host. It fixes a lot of tests in
case of Windows host and Linux target.
This commit addresses issue #87244, where a redundant condition was
found in the Target.cpp file. Static analyzer cppcheck flagged the issue
in the Target.cpp file
fix#87244
A leaf function may not store the link register to stack, but we it can
still end up being a non-zero frame if it gets interrupted by a signal.
Currently, we were unable to unwind past this function because we could
not read the link register value.
To make this work, this patch:
- changes the function-entry unwind plan to include the `fp|lr = <same>`
rules. This in turn necessitated an adjustment in the generic
instruction emulation logic to ensure that `lr=[sp-X]` can override the
`<same>` rule.
- allows the `<same>` rule for pc and lr in all
`m_all_registers_available` frames (and not just frame zero).
The test verifies that we can unwind in a situation like this, and that
the backtrace matches the one we computed before getting a signal.
that separates out language and version. To avoid reinventing the wheel
and introducing subtle incompatibilities, this API uses the table of
languages and versiond defined by the upcoming DWARF 6 standard
(https://dwarfstd.org/languages-v6.html). While the DWARF 6 spec is not
finialized, the list of languages is broadly considered stable.
The primary motivation for this is to allow the Swift language plugin to
switch between language dialects between, e.g., Swift 5.9 and 6.0 with
out introducing a ton of new language codes. On the main branch this
change is considered NFC.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89980
These are hardcoded strings that are already present in the data section
of the binary, no need to immediately place them in the ConstString
StringPools. Lots of code still calls `GetBroadcasterClass` and places
the return value into a ConstString. Changing that would be a good
follow-up.
Additionally, calls to these functions are still wrapped in ConstStrings
at the SBAPI layer. This is because we must guarantee the lifetime of
all strings handed out publicly.
Summary:
AddMemoryList() was returning the last error status returned by
ReadMemory(). So if an invalid memory region was read last, the function
would return an error.
Test Plan:
./bin/llvm-lit -sv
~/src/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/process_save_core_minidump/TestProcessSaveCoreMinidump.py
Reviewers:
kevinfrei,clayborg
Subscribers:
Tasks:
Tags:
This PR adds a check within `PutFile` to exit early when both local and
destination files have matching MD5 hashes. If they differ, or there is
trouble getting the hashes, the regular code path to put the file is
run.
As I needed this to talk to an `lldb-server` which runs the gdb-remote
protocol, I enabled `CalculateMD5` within `Platform/gdb-server` and also
found and fixed a parsing bug within it as well. Before this PR, the
client is incorrectly parsing the response packet containing the
checksum; after this PR, hopefully this is fixed. There is a test for
the parsing behavior included in this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Anthony Ha <antha@microsoft.com>
This is another step towards supporting DWARF5 checksums and inline
source code in LLDB. This is a reland of #85468 but without the
functional change of storing the support file from the line table (yet).
AddressableBits is in the Utility module of LLDB. It currently directly
refers to Process, which is from the Target LLDB module. This is a
layering violation which concretely means that it is impossible to link
anything that uses Utility without it also using Target as well. This is
generally not an issue for LLDB (since everything is built together) but
it may make it difficult to write unit tests for AddressableBits later
on.
Some languages may create artificial functions that have no real user
code, even though there is line table information for them. One such
case is with coroutine code that receives the CoroSplitter
transformation in LLVM IR. That code transformation creates many
different Functions, cloning one Instruction into many Instructions in
many different Functions and copying the associated debug locations.
It would be difficult to make that pass delete debug locations of cloned
instructions in a language agnostic way (is it even possible?), but LLDB
can ignore certain locations by querying its Language APIs and having it
decide based on, for example, mangling information.
Change GetNumChildren()/CalculateNumChildren() methods return
llvm::Expected
This is an NFC change that does not yet add any error handling or change
any code to return any errors.
This is the second big change in the patch series started with
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83501
A follow-up PR will wire up error handling.
Change GetNumChildren()/CalculateNumChildren() methods return
llvm::Expected
This is an NFC change that does not yet add any error handling or change
any code to return any errors.
This is the second big change in the patch series started with
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83501
A follow-up PR will wire up error handling.
In Swift's downstream lldb, there are a number of experimental properties. This change
extracts a getter function containing the common logic for getting a boolean valued
experimental property.
This also deletes `SetInjectLocalVariables` which isn't used anywhere.
[lldb] Add SBProcess methods for get/set/use address masks (#83095)
I'm reviving a patch from phabracator, https://reviews.llvm.org/D155905
which was approved but I wasn't thrilled with all the API I was adding
to SBProcess for all of the address mask types / memory regions. In this
update, I added enums to control type address mask type (code, data,
any) and address space specifiers (low, high, all) with defaulted
arguments for the most common case. I originally landed this via
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83095 but it failed on CIs
outside of arm64 Darwin so I had to debug it on more environments
and update the patch.
This patch is also fixing a bug in the "addressable bits to address
mask" calculation I added in AddressableBits::SetProcessMasks. If lldb
were told that 64 bits are valid for addressing, this method would
overflow the calculation and set an invalid mask. Added tests to check
this specific bug while I was adding these APIs.
This patch changes the value of "no mask set" from 0 to
LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS_MASK, which is UINT64_MAX. A mask of all 1's
means "no bits are used for addressing" which is an impossible mask,
whereas a mask of 0 means "all bits are used for addressing" which
is possible.
I added a base class implementation of ABI::FixCodeAddress and
ABI::FixDataAddress that will apply the Process mask values if they
are set to a value other than LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS_MASK.
I updated all the callers/users of the Mask methods which were
handling a value of 0 to mean invalid mask to use
LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS_MASK.
I added code to the all AArch64 ABI Fix* methods to apply the
Highmem masks if they have been set. These will not be set on a
Linux environment, but in TestAddressMasks.py I test the highmem
masks feature for any AArch64 target, so all AArch64 ABI plugins
must handle it.
rdar://123530562
This reverts commit 9a12b0a600.
TestAddressMasks fails its first test on lldb-x86_64-debian,
lldb-arm-ubuntu, lldb-aarch64-ubuntu bots. Reverting while
investigating.
I'm reviving a patch from phabracator, https://reviews.llvm.org/D155905
which was approved but I wasn't thrilled with all the API I was adding
to SBProcess for all of the address mask types / memory regions. In this
update, I added enums to control type address mask type (code, data,
any) and address space specifiers (low, high, all) with defaulted
arguments for the most common case.
This patch is also fixing a bug in the "addressable bits to address
mask" calculation I added in AddressableBits::SetProcessMasks. If lldb
were told that 64 bits are valid for addressing, this method would
overflow the calculation and set an invalid mask. Added tests to check
this specific bug while I was adding these APIs.
rdar://123530562
Looking ast the definition of both functions this is *almost* an NFC
change, except that Triple also looks at the SubArch (important) and
ObjectFormat (less so).
This fixes a bug that only manifests with how Xcode uses the SBAPI to
attach to a process by name: it guesses the architecture based on the
system. If the system is arm64 and the Process is arm64e Target fails
to update the triple because it deemed the two to be equivalent.
rdar://123338218
Looking ast the definition of both functions this is *almost* an NFC
change, except that Triple also looks at the SubArch (important) and
ObjectFormat (less so).
This fixes a bug that only manifests with how Xcode uses the SBAPI to
attach to a process by name: it guesses the architecture based on the
system. If the system is arm64 and the Process is arm64e Target fails to
update the triple because it deemed the two to be equivalent.
rdar://123338218
Target::SetArchitecture() does not necessarily set the triple that is
being passed in, and will unconditionally log the real architecture to
the log channel. By flipping the order between the log outputs, the
resulting combined log makes a lot more sense to read.
Updates:
- The previous patch changed the default behavior to not load dwos in
`DWARFUnit`
~~`SymbolFileDWARFDwo *GetDwoSymbolFile(bool load_all_debug_info =
false);`~~
`SymbolFileDWARFDwo *GetDwoSymbolFile(bool load_all_debug_info = true);`
- This broke some lldb-shell tests (see
https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/as-lldb-cmake/16273/)
- TestDebugInfoSize.py
- with symbol on-demand, by default statistics dump only reports
skeleton debug info size
- `statistics dump -f` will load all dwos. debug info = skeleton debug
info + all dwo debug info
Currently running `statistics dump` will trigger lldb to load debug info
that's not yet loaded (eg. dwo files). Resulted in a delay in the
command return, which, can be interrupting.
This patch also added a new option `--load-all-debug-info` asking
statistics to dump all possible debug info, which will force loading all
debug info available if not yet loaded.
Currently running `statistics dump` will trigger lldb to load debug info
that's not yet loaded (eg. dwo files). Resulted in a delay in the
command return, which, can be interrupting.
This patch also added a new option `--load-all-debug-info` asking
statistics to dump all possible debug info, which will force loading all
debug info available if not yet loaded.
On arm64 machines, when there is a hardware breakpoint or watchpoint
set, and lldb has instruction-stepped a thread, and then done a
Process::Resume, we will sometimes receive an extra "instruction step
completed" mach exception and the pc has not advanced. From a user's
perspective, they hit Continue and lldb stops again at the same spot.
From the testsuite's perspective, this has been a constant source of
testsuite failures for any test using hardware watchpoints and
breakpoints, the arm64 CI bots seem especially good at hitting this
issue.
Jim and I have been slowly looking at this for a few months now, and
finally I decided to try to detect this situation in lldb and silently
resume the process again when it happens.
We were already detecting this "got an insn-step finished mach exception
but this thread was not instruction stepping" combination in
StopInfoMachException where we take the mach exception and create a
StopInfo object for it. We had a lot of logging we used to understand
the failure as it was hit on the bots in assert builds.
This patch adds a new case to `Thread::GetPrivateStopInfo()` to call the
StopInfo's (new) `IsContinueInterrupted()` method. In
StopInfoMachException, where we previously had logging for assert
builds, I now note it in an ivar, and when
`Thread::GetPrivateStopInfo()` asks if this has happened, we check all
of the combination of events that this comes up: We have a hardware
breakpoint or watchpoint, we were not instruction stepping this thread
but got an insn-step mach exception, the pc is the same as the previous
stop's pc. And in that case, `Thread::GetPrivateStopInfo()` returns no
StopInfo -- indicating that this thread would like to resume execution.
The `Thread` object has two StackFrameLists, `m_curr_frames_sp` and
`m_prev_frames_sp`. When a thread resumes execution, we move
`m_curr_frames_sp` in to `m_prev_frames_sp` and when it stops executing,
w euse `m_prev_frames_sp` to seed the new `m_curr_frames_sp` if most of
the stack is the same as before.
In this same location, I now save the Thread's RegisterContext::GetPC
into an ivar, `m_prev_framezero_pc`. StopInfoMachException needs this
information to check all of the conditions I outlined above for
`IsContinueInterrupted`.
This has passed exhaustive testing and we do not have any testsuite
failures for hardware watchpoints and breakpoints due to this kernel bug
with the patch in place. In focusing on these tests for thousands of
runs, I have found two other uncommon race conditions for the
TestConcurrent* tests on arm64. TestConcurrentManyBreakpoints.py (which
uses no hardware watchpoint/breakpoints) will sometimes only have 99
breakpoints when it expects 100, and any of the concurrent tests using
the shared harness (I've seen it in
TestConcurrentWatchBreakDelay.py,
TestConcurrentTwoBreakpointsOneSignal.py,
TestConcurrentSignalDelayWatch.py) can fail when the test harness checks
that there is only one thread still running at the end, and it finds two
-- one of them under pthread_exit / pthread_terminate. Both of these
failures happen on github main without my changes, and with my changes -
they are unrelated race conditions in these tests, and I'm sure I'll be
looking into them at some point if they hit the CI bots with frequency.
On my computer, these are in the 0.3-0.5% of the time class. But the CI
bots do have different timing.
A user found a crash when they would do code like:
```
(lldb) script
>>> target = lldb.SBTarget()
>>> lldb.debugger.SetSelectedTarget(target)
```
We were not checking if the target was valid in and it caused a crash..
We have a Python script that needs to locate coredump path during
debugging so that we can retrieve certain metadata files associated with
it. Currently, there is no API for this.
This patch adds a new `SBProcess::GetCoreFile()` to retrieve target dump
file spec used for dump debugging. Note: this is different from the main
executable module spec. To achieve this, the patch hoists m_core_file
into PostMortemProcess for sharing.
---------
Co-authored-by: jeffreytan81 <jeffreytan@fb.com>
Adding command interpreter statistics into "statistics dump" command so
that we can track the command usage frequency for telemetry purpose.
This is useful to answer questions like what is the most frequently used
lldb commands across all our users.
---------
Co-authored-by: jeffreytan81 <jeffreytan@fb.com>
This patch is the next piece of work in my Large Watchpoint proposal,
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116
This patch breaks a user's watchpoint into one or more
WatchpointResources which reflect what the hardware registers can cover.
This means we can watch objects larger than 8 bytes, and we can watched
unaligned address ranges. On a typical 64-bit target with 4 watchpoint
registers you can watch 32 bytes of memory if the start address is
doubleword aligned.
Additionally, if the remote stub implements AArch64 MASK style
watchpoints (e.g. debugserver on Darwin), we can watch any power-of-2
size region of memory up to 2GB, aligned to that same size.
I updated the Watchpoint constructor and CommandObjectWatchpoint to
create a CompilerType of Array<UInt8> when the size of the watched
region is greater than pointer-size and we don't have a variable type to
use. For pointer-size and smaller, we can display the watched granule as
an integer value; for larger-than-pointer-size we will display as an
array of bytes.
I have `watchpoint list` now print the WatchpointResources used to
implement the watchpoint.
I added a WatchpointAlgorithm class which has a top-level static method
that takes an enum flag mask WatchpointHardwareFeature and a user
address and size, and returns a vector of WatchpointResources covering
the request. It does not take into account the number of watchpoint
registers the target has, or the number still available for use. Right
now there is only one algorithm, which monitors power-of-2 regions of
memory. For up to pointer-size, this is what Intel hardware supports.
AArch64 Byte Address Select watchpoints can watch any number of
contiguous bytes in a pointer-size memory granule, that is not currently
supported so if you ask to watch bytes 3-5, the algorithm will watch the
entire doubleword (8 bytes). The newly default "modify" style means we
will silently ignore modifications to bytes outside the watched range.
I've temporarily skipped TestLargeWatchpoint.py for all targets. It was
only run on Darwin when using the in-tree debugserver, which was a proxy
for "debugserver supports MASK watchpoints". I'll be adding the
aforementioned feature flag from the stub and enabling full mask
watchpoints when a debugserver with that feature is enabled, and
re-enable this test.
I added a new TestUnalignedLargeWatchpoint.py which only has one test
but it's a great one, watching a 22-byte range that is unaligned and
requires four 8-byte watchpoints to cover.
I also added a unit test, WatchpointAlgorithmsTests, which has a number
of simple tests against WatchpointAlgorithms::PowerOf2Watchpoints. I
think there's interesting possible different approaches to how we cover
these; I note in the unit test that a user requesting a watch on address
0x12e0 of 120 bytes will be covered by two watchpoints today, a
128-bytes at 0x1280 and at 0x1300. But it could be done with a 16-byte
watchpoint at 0x12e0 and a 128-byte at 0x1300, which would have fewer
false positives/private stops. As we try refining this one, it's helpful
to have a collection of tests to make sure things don't regress.
I tested this on arm64 macOS, (genuine) x86_64 macOS, and AArch64
Ubuntu. I have not modifed the Windows process plugins yet, I might try
that as a standalone patch, I'd be making the change blind, but the
necessary changes (see ProcessGDBRemote::EnableWatchpoint) are pretty
small so it might be obvious enough that I can change it and see what
the Windows CI thinks.
There isn't yet a packet (or a qSupported feature query) for the gdb
remote serial protocol stub to communicate its watchpoint capabilities
to lldb. I'll be doing that in a patch right after this is landed,
having debugserver advertise its capability of AArch64 MASK watchpoints,
and have ProcessGDBRemote add eWatchpointHardwareArmMASK to
WatchpointAlgorithms so we can watch larger than 32-byte requests on
Darwin.
I haven't yet tackled WatchpointResource *sharing* by multiple
Watchpoints. This is all part of the goal, especially when we may be
watching a larger memory range than the user requested, if they then add
another watchpoint next to their first request, it may be covered by the
same WatchpointResource (hardware watchpoint register). Also one "read"
watchpoint and one "write" watchpoint on the same memory granule need to
be handled, making the WatchpointResource cover all requests.
As WatchpointResources aren't shared among multiple Watchpoints yet,
there's no handling of running the conditions/commands/etc on multiple
Watchpoints when their shared WatchpointResource is hit. The goal beyond
"large watchpoint" is to unify (much more) the Watchpoint and Breakpoint
behavior and commands. I have a feeling I may be slowly chipping away at
this for a while.
Re-landing this patch after fixing two undefined behaviors in
WatchpointAlgorithms found by UBSan and by failures on different
CI bots.
rdar://108234227
This patch is the next piece of work in my Large Watchpoint proposal,
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116
This patch breaks a user's watchpoint into one or more
WatchpointResources which reflect what the hardware registers can cover.
This means we can watch objects larger than 8 bytes, and we can watched
unaligned address ranges. On a typical 64-bit target with 4 watchpoint
registers you can watch 32 bytes of memory if the start address is
doubleword aligned.
Additionally, if the remote stub implements AArch64 MASK style
watchpoints (e.g. debugserver on Darwin), we can watch any power-of-2
size region of memory up to 2GB, aligned to that same size.
I updated the Watchpoint constructor and CommandObjectWatchpoint to
create a CompilerType of Array<UInt8> when the size of the watched
region is greater than pointer-size and we don't have a variable type to
use. For pointer-size and smaller, we can display the watched granule as
an integer value; for larger-than-pointer-size we will display as an
array of bytes.
I have `watchpoint list` now print the WatchpointResources used to
implement the watchpoint.
I added a WatchpointAlgorithm class which has a top-level static method
that takes an enum flag mask WatchpointHardwareFeature and a user
address and size, and returns a vector of WatchpointResources covering
the request. It does not take into account the number of watchpoint
registers the target has, or the number still available for use. Right
now there is only one algorithm, which monitors power-of-2 regions of
memory. For up to pointer-size, this is what Intel hardware supports.
AArch64 Byte Address Select watchpoints can watch any number of
contiguous bytes in a pointer-size memory granule, that is not currently
supported so if you ask to watch bytes 3-5, the algorithm will watch the
entire doubleword (8 bytes). The newly default "modify" style means we
will silently ignore modifications to bytes outside the watched range.
I've temporarily skipped TestLargeWatchpoint.py for all targets. It was
only run on Darwin when using the in-tree debugserver, which was a proxy
for "debugserver supports MASK watchpoints". I'll be adding the
aforementioned feature flag from the stub and enabling full mask
watchpoints when a debugserver with that feature is enabled, and
re-enable this test.
I added a new TestUnalignedLargeWatchpoint.py which only has one test
but it's a great one, watching a 22-byte range that is unaligned and
requires four 8-byte watchpoints to cover.
I also added a unit test, WatchpointAlgorithmsTests, which has a number
of simple tests against WatchpointAlgorithms::PowerOf2Watchpoints. I
think there's interesting possible different approaches to how we cover
these; I note in the unit test that a user requesting a watch on address
0x12e0 of 120 bytes will be covered by two watchpoints today, a
128-bytes at 0x1280 and at 0x1300. But it could be done with a 16-byte
watchpoint at 0x12e0 and a 128-byte at 0x1300, which would have fewer
false positives/private stops. As we try refining this one, it's helpful
to have a collection of tests to make sure things don't regress.
I tested this on arm64 macOS, (genuine) x86_64 macOS, and AArch64
Ubuntu. I have not modifed the Windows process plugins yet, I might try
that as a standalone patch, I'd be making the change blind, but the
necessary changes (see ProcessGDBRemote::EnableWatchpoint) are pretty
small so it might be obvious enough that I can change it and see what
the Windows CI thinks.
There isn't yet a packet (or a qSupported feature query) for the gdb
remote serial protocol stub to communicate its watchpoint capabilities
to lldb. I'll be doing that in a patch right after this is landed,
having debugserver advertise its capability of AArch64 MASK watchpoints,
and have ProcessGDBRemote add eWatchpointHardwareArmMASK to
WatchpointAlgorithms so we can watch larger than 32-byte requests on
Darwin.
I haven't yet tackled WatchpointResource *sharing* by multiple
Watchpoints. This is all part of the goal, especially when we may be
watching a larger memory range than the user requested, if they then add
another watchpoint next to their first request, it may be covered by the
same WatchpointResource (hardware watchpoint register). Also one "read"
watchpoint and one "write" watchpoint on the same memory granule need to
be handled, making the WatchpointResource cover all requests.
As WatchpointResources aren't shared among multiple Watchpoints yet,
there's no handling of running the conditions/commands/etc on multiple
Watchpoints when their shared WatchpointResource is hit. The goal beyond
"large watchpoint" is to unify (much more) the Watchpoint and Breakpoint
behavior and commands. I have a feeling I may be slowly chipping away at
this for a while.
rdar://108234227
Temporarily revert to unblock the CI bots, this is breaking the -DLLVM_ENABLE_MODULES=On
modules style build. I've notified Ismail.
This reverts commit 888501bc63.
This patch makes ScriptedThreadPlan conforming to the ScriptedInterface
& ScriptedPythonInterface facilities by introducing 2
ScriptedThreadPlanInterface & ScriptedThreadPlanPythonInterface classes.
This allows us to get rid of every ScriptedThreadPlan-specific SWIG
method and re-use the same affordances as other scripting offordances,
like Scripted{Process,Thread,Platform} & OperatingSystem.
To do so, this adds new transformer methods for `ThreadPlan`, `Stream` &
`Event`, to allow the bijection between C++ objects and their python
counterparts.
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>
BroadcastEvent currently takes its EventData* param and shoves it into
an Event object, which takes ownership of the pointer and places it into
a shared_ptr to manage the lifetime.
Instead of relying on `new` and passing raw pointers around, I think it
would make more sense to create the shared_ptr up front.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D151292 I added the ability to track address
masks separately for high and low memory addresses, a capability of
AArch64. I did my testing with manual address mask settings (via
target.process.highmem-virtual-addressable-bits) but didn't have a real
corefile that included this metadata and required it.
My intention is that when the high address mask isn't specified, by the
user (via the setting) or the Process plugin, we fall back to using the
low address mask. The low and high address mask is the same for almost
all environments.
But the patch I wrote never uses the Process plugin high address mask if
it was set, e.g. from corefile metadata. This patch corrects that.
I also have an old patch in Phabractor that was approved to add
FixAddress methods to SBProcess; I need to pick that patch up and finish
it (I wanted to add an enum to specify which mask is being requested
iirc), so I can do address masks tests in API tests.
rdar://120926000
