In the USE statements that f18 emits to module files, ensure that symbols
from intrinsic modules are marked as such on their USE statements. And
ensure that the current working directory (".") cannot override the intrinsic
module search path when trying to locate an intrinsic module.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127019
The entity with BIND(C) attribute cannot be a named constant, so the
BIND(C) and parameter attributes are conflicted. Add check for it.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126654
This patch supports the following checks:
```
[5.1] 2.21.2 THREADPRIVATE Directive
The threadprivate directive must appear in the declaration section of
a scoping unit in which the common block or variable is declared.
[5.1] 2.14.7 Declare Target Directive
The directive must appear in the declaration section of a scoping unit
in which the common block or variable is declared.
```
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, shraiysh, NimishMishra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125767
Similar to procedure argument, the function result cannot be one
named constant.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126693
As Fortran 2018 C819, a variable with the BIND attribute shall be declared
in the specification part of a module. Add the support for this check.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126653
This patch implements the following semantic check:
A list-item cannot appear in more than one nontemporal clause.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, shraiysh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110270
As an extension for REAL literals, we allow an exponent letter which
matches an explicit kind-param. The standard requires the exponent
to be 'E' if a kind-param is present. This patch
- documents this extension in Extensions.md
- enables a portability warning if it is used with -pedantic
The test case for this, kinds05.f90, needs D125804, which makes
test_errors.py test warnings as well, to actually test the warnings.
I include it already now to keep things together, it will do no harm
(I hope ...).
We also add WARNING-directives to the test kinds04.f90 in preparation
for D125804. As the exponent-letter 'Q' does not imply the same kind
on all platforms, the emitted warnings are platform-dependent.
Therefore, the test is duplicated into two variants which are run
conditionally.
Finally, we promote the portability warning for when the exponent letter
is neither 'E' nor matching the kind-param to a standard warning.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126459
When two or more generic interfaces are available by declaration or
by USE association at different scoping levels, we need to search
the outer generic interfaces as well as the inner ones, but only after
the inner ones have failed to produce a specific procedure that matches
a given set of actual arguments. This means that it is possible for
a specific procedure of a generic interface of an inner scope to override
a conflicting specific procedure of a generic interface of an outer
scope.
Also cope with forward references to derived types when a generic
interface is also in scope.
Fixes LLVM bug https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55240 and
LLVM bug https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55300.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126587
When processing the literal constants of the various kinds of
INTEGER that are too large by 1 (e.g., 2147483648_4) in expression
analysis, emit a portability warning rather than a fatal error if
the literal constant appears as the operand to a unary minus, since
the folded result will be in range. And don't emit any warning if
the negated literal is coming from a module file -- f18 wrote the
module file and the warning would simply be confusing, especially to
the programmer that wrote (-2147483647_4-1) in the first place.
Further, emit portability warnings for the canonical expressions for
infinities and NaN (-1./0., 0./0., & 1./0.), but not when they appear
in a module file, for the same reason. The Fortran language has no
syntax for these special values so we have to emit expressions that
fold to them.
Fixes LLVM bugs https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55086 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55081.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126584
The CreateEntry() function in name resolution needs to allow for the name
of an alternate entry point already having been declared in the outer scope
as the homonymous specific procedure of a generic interface; e.g.,
interface foo
module procedure foo
end interface
subroutine bar
entry foo
end subroutine
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126436
A recent change fixed the processing of BIND(C,NAME=expr) character
expressions so that they are evaluated as constants in the scope of
the subprogram. However, when the character name expression results
in an empty value after trimming, the compiler emits a warning message,
and this message is now causing a crash due to a lack of statement
context. To fix, extend the deferred processing of the BIND(C,NAME="")
so that a basic statement context exists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126416
A recent fix beefed up semantics checking to catch the case of a call
to an external assumed-length character function; this check has false
positives in the case of an assumed-length character function that is
a dummy procedure. These do have a length that is passed in extra
compiler-created arguments. This patch refines the check and undoes some
changes to tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126390
This is a support for " #pragma omp atomic compare fail ". It has Parser & AST support for now.
Reviewed By: tianshilei1992
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123235
The derived type information table construction code had a
crash whose root cause was replacing an expression with one
of its operands -- the deletion of the LHS of that assignment
led to the RHS being invalidated before it could be read.
Fix by cloning the RHS. Also update a TODO message to the
new "_todo_en_US" message class and add a comment about how
it should be resolved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126154
The scalar-default-character-expression that defines the interoperable
name of a function or subroutine (or interface) must have its names
resolved within the context of the subprogram, despite its appearance
on a function-stmt or a subroutine-stmt. Failure to do so can lead
to bogus errors or to incorrect results.
The solution is to defer name resolution for function-stmt suffixes
(but not entry-stmt suffixes) and for subroutine-stmt language binding
specifications to EndSubprogram(). (Their resolution only need to be
deferred to the end of the specification part, but it's cleanest to
deal with it in EndSubprogram().)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126153
User-defined derived type I/O subroutines need to be unique for
a given type and operation in any scope, but it is acceptable
to have more than one defined I/O subroutine so long as only one
of them is visible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126152
A utility predicate in semantics was incorrectly determining that
an INTERFACE ASSIGNMENT(=) (or other form of generic) could not have
a specific procedure with an unlimited polymorphic second argument.
This led to a crash later in expression analysis. Fix, and
extend tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126151
The purity or impurity of a call to a generic interface
depends on the attributes of the specific procedure or specific
binding. Change expression analysis of calls to generic interfaces
to replace the symbol in the parse tree with the specific procedure
or binding; this ensures that later checking for purity in
DO CONCURRENT and other contexts will be accurate.
Remove an "XFAIL" from a test that now passes again with this fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126150
Name resolution for subprograms checks whether the name is already
present in the enclosing scope as a generic interface, so that the
case of a generic with the same name as one of its specifics can be
handled. The particular means by which the enclosing scope is searched
for the name would resolve the name (bind a symbol to it) as a side
effect. This turns out to be the wrong thing to do when the subprogram
is going to have its symbol created in another scope to cope with its
BIND(C,NAME="name") name, and its Fortran name is already present in the
enclosing scope for a subprogram of the same name but without
BIND(C,NAME="name").
A very long explanation for a one-line fix, sorry. In short, change
the code to look up the name but not resolve it at that point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126149
Semantics was allowing calls to CHARACTER(*) functions, which are odd
things -- they can be declared, and passed around, but can never actually
be called as such. They must be redeclared with an explicit length that
ends up being passed as a hidden argument. So check for these calls
and diagnose them, add tests, and clean up some existing tests that
were in error and now get caught.
Possible TODO for lowering: there were some test cases that used
bad calls to assumed-length CHARACTER*(*) functions and validated
their implementations. I've removed some, and adjusted another,
but the code that somehow implemented these calls may need to be
removed and replaced with an assert about bad semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126148
The code in semantics that reinitializes symbol table pointers in
the parse tree of a parameterized derived type prior to a new
instantiation of the type was processing the symbols of the
derived type instantiation scope in arbitrary address order,
which could fail if a reference to a type parameter inherited from
an ancestor type was processed prior to the parent component sequence.
Fix by instantiating components of PDT instantiations in declaration
order.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126147
When a Hollerith (or short character) literal is presented as an actual
argument that corresponds to a dummy argument for which a BOZ literal
would be acceptable, treat the Hollerith as if it had been a BOZ
literal in the same way -- and with the same code -- as f18 already
does for the similar extension in DATA statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126144
Forward references to ENTRY names to pass them as actual procedure arguments
don't work in all cases, exposing some basic ordering problems in
name resolution for these symbols. Refactor; create all the
necessary procedure symbols, and either function result or host association
symbols (for subroutines), at the time that the subprogrma scope is
created, so that the names exist in the scope as text "before"
the ENTRY is processed in name resolution. Some processing
remains in PostEntryStmt() so that we can check that an ENTRY with
an explicit distinct RESULT doesn't also have declarations for the
ENTRY name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126142
The binding names of inner procedures with BIND(C) are not exposed
to the loader and should be ignored for potential conflict errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126141
Intrinsic module names are not in the user's namespace, so they
are free to declare global names that conflict with intrinsic
modules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126140
As Fortran 2018 15.8.1(3), in a reference to an elemental procedure, if
any argument is an array, each actual argument that corresponds to an
INTENT (OUT) or INTENT (INOUT) dummy argument shall be an array. Add
this semantic check.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125685
Complex component references (z%RE, z%IM) of complex named constants
should be evaluated at compilation time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125341
Fortran 2018 requires that a compiler allow objects whose rank + corank
is 15, and that's our maximum; detect and diagnose violations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125153
In a function, ENTRY E without an explicit RESULT() creates a
function result entity also named E that is storage associated with
the enclosing function's result. f18 was emitting an incorrect error
message if that function result E was referenced without any
declaration prior to its ENTRY statement when it should have been
implicitly declared instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125144
As is already supported for dummy procedures, we need to also accept
declarations of procedure pointers that consist of a POINTER attribute
statement followed by an INTERFACE block. (The case of an INTERFACE
block followed by a POINTER statement already works.)
While cleaning this case up, adjust the utility predicate IsProcedurePointer()
to recognize it (namely a SubprogramDetails symbol with Attr::POINTER)
and delete IsProcName(). Extend tests, and add better comments to
symbol.h to document the two ways in which procedure pointers are
represented.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125139
The semantic test for an intrinsic assignment to a polymorphic
derived type entity from a type that is an extension of its base
type was reversed, so it would allow assignments that it shouldn't
and disallowed some that it should; and the test case for it
incorectly assumed that the invalid semantics were correct.
Fix the code and the test, and add a new test for the invalid
case (LHS type is an extension of the RHS type).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125135
DATA statements in inner procedures were not treating undeclared objects
as implicitly declared variables if the DATA statement appeared in a
specification part; they were treated as host-associated symbols instead.
This was incorrect. Fix DATA statement name resolution to always treat
DATA as if it had appeared in the executable part.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125129
A disassociated procedure pointer is allowed to be passed as an absent
actual argument that corresponds to an optional dummy procedure,
but not NULL(); accept that case as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125127
Actual arguments whose lengths are less than the expected length
of their corresponding dummy argument are errors; but this needs
to be refined. Short actual arguments that are variables remain
errors, but those that are expressions can be (again) extended on
the right with blanks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125115
When processing an entry-stmt in name resolution, attrs_ was
reset before SetBindNameOn was called, causing the symbol to lose
the binding label information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125097
As Fortran 2018 5.2.2 states, a program shall consist of exactly one
main program. Add this semantic check.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125186
The code below causes flang to crash with an exception.
After fixing the crash flang with an internal error "no symbol found for 'bar'"
This change fixes all the issues.
program name
implicit none
integer, parameter :: bar = 1
integer foo(bar) /bar*2/
end program name
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124914
As Fortran 2018 states, in each where-assignment-stmt, the mask-expr and
the variable being defined shall be arrays of the same shape. The
previous check does not consider checking if it is an array.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125022
When we pass an alternate return specifier to a regular (not an asterisk)
dummy argument, flang would throw an internal compiler error of
derefencing a null pointer.
To avoid the ICE, a check was added.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123947
The RETURN statement is allowed in functions and subroutines, but not
in main programs. It is however a common extension, which we also
implement, to allow RETURN from main programs -- we only issue a
portability warning when -pedantic or -std=f2018 are set.
This patch fixes false positives for this portability warning, where it
was triggered also when RETURN was present in functions or subroutines.
Fixexs #55080
Reviewed By: PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124732
As Fortran 2018 C1533, a nonintrinsic elemental procedure shall not be
used as an actual argument. The semantic check for implicit iterface is
missed.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124379
Semantics is not preventing a named common block to appear with
different size in a same file (named common block should always have
the same storage size (see Fortran 2018 8.10.2.5), but it is a common
extension to accept different sizes).
Lowering was not coping with this well, since it just use the first
common block appearance, starting with BLOCK DATAs to define common
blocks (this also was an issue with the blank common block, which can
legally appear with different size in different scoping units).
Semantics is also not preventing named common from being initialized
outside of a BLOCK DATA, and lowering was dealing badly with this,
since it only gave an initial value to common blocks Globals if the
first common block appearance, starting with BLOCK DATAs had an initial
value.
Semantics is also allowing blank common to be initialized, while
lowering was assuming this would never happen, and was never creating
an initial value for it.
Lastly, semantics was not complaining if a COMMON block was initialized
in several scoping unit in a same file, while lowering can only generate
one of these initial value.
To fix this, add a structure to keep track of COMMON block properties
(biggest size, and initial value if any) at the Program level. Once the
size of a common block appearance is know, the common block appearance
is checked against this information. It allows semantics to emit an error
in case of multiple initialization in different scopes of a same common
block, and to warn in case named common blocks appears with different
sizes. Lastly, this allows lowering to use the Program level info about
common blocks to emit the right GlobalOp for a Common Block, regardless
of the COMMON Block appearances order: It emits a GlobalOp with the
biggest size, whose lowest bytes are initialized with the initial value
if any is given in a scope where the common block appears.
Lowering is updated to go emit the common blocks before anything else so
that the related GlobalOps are available when lowering the scopes where
common block appear. It is also updated to not assume that blank common
are never initialized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124622
A non-CHARACTER expression in a CASE statement is allowed to have
a distinct kind (not type) from the expression in its SELECT CASE.
If a value in a CASE statement is out of range for the SELECT CASE
type, emit a warning, but it should not be a fatal error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124544
Name resolution fails with a bogus "is not a variable" error message
when a host-associated object appears in a NAMELIST group. The root
cause is that ConvertToObjectEntity() returns false for host-associated
objects. Fix that, and also apply a similar fix to ConvertToProcEntity()
nearby.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124541
