Now that we have an AllocTensorOp (previously InitTensorOp) in the bufferization dialect, the InitOp in the sparse dialect is no longer needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126180
This was carry over from LLVM IR where the alias definition can
be ambiguous, but MLIR type aliases have no such problems.
Having the `type` keyword is superfluous and doesn't add anything.
This commit drops it, which also nicely aligns with the syntax for
attribute aliases (which doesn't have a keyword).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125501
This is the first implementation of complex (f64 and f32) support
in the sparse compiler, with complex add/mul as first operations.
Note that various features are still TBD, such as other ops, and
reading in complex values from file. Also, note that the
std::complex<float> had a bit of an ABI issue when passed as
single argument. It is still TBD if better solutions are possible.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125596
Implements a floating-point sign operator (using the new semi-ring ops)
that accomodates +/-Inf and +/-NaN in consistent way.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125494
This was leftover from when the standard dialect was destroyed, and
when FuncOp moved to the func dialect. Now that these transitions
have settled a bit we can drop these.
Most updates were handled using a simple regex: replace `^( *)func` with `$1func.func`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124146
Adding lowering for Unary and Binary required several changes due to
their unique nature of containing custom code for different "regions"
of the sparse structure being operated on. Along with a Kind, a pointer
to the Operation is passed along to be merged once the lattice
structure is figured out.
The original operation is maintained, as it is required for subsequent
lattice decisions. However, sparse_tensor.binary has some branches
are considered as fully handled and therefore are marked with as
kBinaryBranch to distinguish them.
A unique aspect of the custom code is that sometimes the desired result
is no result at all -- i.e. a user wants overlapping sparse entries to
become empty in the output. The solution to this is to return an
uninitialized Value(), which is checked and handled elsewhere in the
code and results in nothing being written to the output tensor for that
case.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123057
The SparseTensor passes currently use opaque numbers for the CLI, despite using an enum internally. This patch exposes the enums instead of numbered items that are matched back to the enum.
Fixes GitHub issue #53389
Reviewed by: aartbik, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123876
This revision adds support for the linalg.index to the sparse compiler
pipeline. In essence, this adds the ability to refer to indices in
the tensor index expression, as illustrated below:
Y[i, j, k, l, m] = T[i, j, k, l, m] * i * j
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121251
Now that sparse tensor types are first-class citizens and the sparse compiler
is taking shape, it is time to make sure other compiler optimizations compose
well with sparse tensors. Mostly, this should be completely transparent (i.e.,
dense and sparse take the same path). However, in some cases, optimizations
only make sense in the context of sparse tensors. This is a first example of
such an optimization, where fusing a sampled elt-wise multiplication only makes
sense when the resulting kernel has a potential lower asymptotic complexity due
to the sparsity.
As an extreme example, running SDDMM with 1024x1024 matrices and a sparse
sampling matrix with only two elements runs in 463.55ms in the unfused
case but just 0.032ms in the fused case, with a speedup of 14485x that
is only possible in the exciting world of sparse computations!
Reviewed By: mravishankar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120429
It is time to compose Linalg related optimizations with SparseTensor
related optimizations. This is a careful first start by adding some
general Linalg optimizations "upstream" of the sparse compiler in the
full sparse compiler pipeline. Some minor changes were needed to make
those optimizations aware of sparsity.
Note that after this, we will add a sparse specific fusion rule,
just to demonstrate the power of the new composition.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119971
This test shows that when access patterns do not match (e.g. transposing
a row-wise sparse matrix into another row-wise sparse matrix), a conversion
operation in between can enable codegen (i.e. avoid cycle in iteration graph).
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119864
Rather than hardcoding all constants, we now use the input tensor to drive the
code setup. Of course, we still need to hardcode dim-2 of A and the final
verification in CHECK is input dependent, but overall this sets a slightly
better example of tensor setup in general.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117349
(1) copy-and-past error in encoding alias name:
this is an annotation for a tensor (3-d) not a matrix (2-d).
(2) typo in "initialization"
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117255
This revision implements sparse outputs (from scratch) in all cases where
the loops can be reordered with all but one parallel loops outer. If the
inner parallel loop appears inside one or more reductions loops, then an
access pattern expansion is required (aka. workspaces in TACO speak).
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115091
Moves sparse tensor output support forward by generalizing from injective
insertions only to include reductions. This revision accepts the case with all
parallel outer and all reduction inner loops, since that can be handled with
an injective insertion still. Next revision will allow the inner parallel loop
to move inward (but that will require "access pattern expansion" aka "workspace").
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114399
First version was vectors only. With some clever "path" insertion,
we now support any d-dimensional tensor. Up next: reductions too
Reviewed By: bixia, wrengr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114024
This revision contains all "sparsification" ops and rewriting necessary to support sparse output tensors when the kernel has no reduction (viz. insertions occur in lexicographic order and are "injective"). This will be later generalized to allow reductions too. Also, this first revision only supports sparse 1-d tensors (viz. vectors) as output in the runtime support library. This will be generalized to n-d tensors shortly. But this way, the revision is kept to a manageable size.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113705
Added a type with different pointer/index bit width. Also
added some sanity CHECKs on the stored indices.
Reviewed By: wrengr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112778
Rationale:
The silent exit(1) gives little clues on where the error occurs on failure
and may even be confusing at first. The CHECK testing of all computed values
and indices may be a little bit more elaborate, but it directly pinpoints
where errors happen if they occur. This style is also consistent with
the other tests, which I actually prefer.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112688
This revison lifts the artificial restriction on having exact matches between
source and destination type shapes. A static size may become dynamic. We still
reject changing a dynamic size into a static size to avoid the need for a
runtime "assert" on the conversion. This revision also refactors some of the
conversion code to share same-content buffers.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111915
Precursor: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110200
Removed redundant ops from the standard dialect that were moved to the
`arith` or `math` dialects.
Renamed all instances of operations in the codebase and in tests.
Reviewed By: rriddle, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110797
We have several ways to materialize sparse tensors (new and convert) but no explicit operation to release the underlying sparse storage scheme at runtime (other than making an explicit delSparseTensor() library call). To simplify memory management, a sparse_tensor.release operation has been introduced that lowers to the runtime library call while keeping tensors, opague pointers, and memrefs transparent in the initial IR.
*Note* There is obviously some tension between the concept of immutable tensors and memory management methods. This tension is addressed by simply stating that after the "release" call, no further memref related operations are allowed on the tensor value. We expect the design to evolve over time, however, and arrive at a more satisfactory view of tensors and buffers eventually.
Bug:
http://llvm.org/pr52046
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111099
This integration tests runs a fused and non-fused version of
sampled matrix multiplication. Both should eventually have the
same performance!
NOTE: relies on pending tensor.init fix!
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110444
The sparse constant provides a constant tensor in coordinate format. We first split the sparse constant into a constant tensor for indices and a constant tensor for values. We then generate a loop to fill a sparse tensor in coordinate format using the tensors for the indices and the values. Finally, we convert the sparse tensor in coordinate format to the destination sparse tensor format.
Add tests.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110373
This test makes sure kernels map to efficient sparse code, i.e. all
compressed for-loops, no co-iterating while loops. In addition, this
revision removes the special constant folding inside the sparse
compiler in favor of Mahesh' new generic linalg folding. Thanks!
NOTE: relies on Mahesh fix, which needs to be rebased first
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110001
Now not just SUM, but also PRODUCT, AND, OR, XOR. The reductions
MIN and MAX are still to be done (also depends on recognizing
these operations in cmp-select constructs).
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110203
