If the operation's type has been promoted during type legalization, we
need to account for the fact that the high bits of the comparison
operand are likely unspecified.
The LHS is usually zero-extended, but MIPS sign extends it, so we have
to be slightly careful.
Patch by Simon Dardis.
llvm-svn: 264296
Summary:
Some target lowerings of FP_TO_FP16, for instance ARM's vcvtb.f16.f32
instruction, do not guarantee that the top 16 bits are zeroed out.
Remove the unsafe AssertZext and add tests to exercise this.
Reviewers: jmolloy, sbaranga, kristof.beyls, aadg
Subscribers: llvm-commits, srhines, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18426
llvm-svn: 264285
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17711
It disables direct moves on these operations in 32-bit mode since the patterns
assume 64-bit registers. The final patch is slightly different from the
Phabricator review as the bitcast operations needed to be disabled in 32-bit
mode as well. This fixes PR26617.
llvm-svn: 264282
This patch begins adding support for lowering to the XOP VPPERM instruction - adding the X86ISD::VPPERM opcode.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18189
llvm-svn: 264260
We need the "return address" of a noreturn call to be within the
bounds of the calling function; TrapUnreachable turns 'unreachable'
into a 'ud2' instruction, which has that desired effect.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18414
llvm-svn: 264224
Strengthen tests of storing frame indices.
Right now this just creates irrelevant scheduling changes.
We don't want to have multiple frame index operands
on an instruction. There seem to be various assumptions
that at least the same frame index will not appear twice
in the LocalStackSlotAllocation pass.
There's no reason to have this happen, and it just
makes it easy to introduce bugs where the immediate
offset is appplied to the storing instruction when it should
really be applied to the value being stored as a separate
add.
This might not be sufficient. It might still be problematic
to have an add fi, fi situation, but that's even less unlikely
to happen in real code.
llvm-svn: 264200
Currently, AnalyzeBranch() fails non-equality comparison between floating points
on X86 (see https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23875). This is because this
function can modify the branch by reversing the conditional jump and removing
unconditional jump if there is a proper fall-through. However, in the case of
non-equality comparison between floating points, this can turn the branch
"unanalyzable". Consider the following case:
jne.BB1
jp.BB1
jmp.BB2
.BB1:
...
.BB2:
...
AnalyzeBranch() will reverse "jp .BB1" to "jnp .BB2" and then "jmp .BB2" will be
removed:
jne.BB1
jnp.BB2
.BB1:
...
.BB2:
...
However, AnalyzeBranch() cannot analyze this branch anymore as there are two
conditional jumps with different targets. This may disable some optimizations
like block-placement: in this case the fall-through behavior is enforced even if
the fall-through block is very cold, which is suboptimal.
Actually this optimization is also done in block-placement pass, which means we
can remove this optimization from AnalyzeBranch(). However, currently
X86::COND_NE_OR_P and X86::COND_NP_OR_E are not reversible: there is no defined
negation conditions for them.
In order to reverse them, this patch defines two new CondCode X86::COND_E_AND_NP
and X86::COND_P_AND_NE. It also defines how to synthesize instructions for them.
Here only the second conditional jump is reversed. This is valid as we only need
them to do this "unconditional jump removal" optimization.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11393
llvm-svn: 264199
We were just completely ignoring the types when determining whether we could
safely emit a libcall as a tail call. This is clearly wrong.
Theoretically, we could dig deeper looking for incidental matches (much like
the generic code in Analysis.cpp does), but it's probably not worth it for the
few libcalls that exist.
llvm-svn: 264084
Improve vector extension of vectors on hardware without dedicated VSEXT/VZEXT instructions.
We already convert these to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG but can further improve this by using the legalizer instead of prematurely splitting into legal vectors in the combine as this only properly helps for lowering to VSEXT/VZEXT.
Removes a lot of unnecessary any_extend + mask pattern - (Fix for PR25718).
Reapplied with a fix for PR26953 (missing vector widening legalization).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17932
llvm-svn: 264062
Summary:
After this change, deopt operand bundles can be lowered directly by
SelectionDAG into STATEPOINT instructions (which are then lowered to a
call or sequence of nop, with an associated __llvm_stackmaps entry0.
This obviates the need to round-trip deoptimization state through
gc.statepoint via RewriteStatepointsForGC.
Reviewers: reames, atrick, majnemer, JosephTremoulet, pgavlin
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18257
llvm-svn: 264015
Summary:
Whole quad mode is already enabled for pixel shaders that compute
derivatives, but it must be suspended for instructions that cause a
shader to have side effects (i.e. stores and atomics).
This pass addresses the issue by storing the real (initial) live mask
in a register, masking EXEC before instructions that require exact
execution and (re-)enabling WQM where required.
This pass is run before register coalescing so that we can use
machine SSA for analysis.
The changes in this patch expose a problem with the second machine
scheduling pass: target independent instructions like COPY implicitly
use EXEC when they operate on VGPRs, but this fact is not encoded in
the MIR. This can lead to miscompilation because instructions are
moved past changes to EXEC.
This patch fixes the problem by adding use-implicit operands to
target independent instructions. Some general codegen passes are
relaxed to work with such implicit use operands.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: MatzeB, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18162
llvm-svn: 263982
Summary:
When control flow is implemented using the exec mask, the compiler will
insert branch instructions to skip over the masked section when exec is
zero if the section contains more than a certain number of instructions.
The previous code would only count instructions in successor blocks,
and this patch modifies the code to start counting instructions in all
blocks between the start and end of the branch.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18282
llvm-svn: 263969
This introduces a custom lowering for ISD::SETCCE (introduced in r253572)
that allows us to emit a short code sequence for 64-bit compares.
Before:
push {r7, lr}
cmp r0, r2
mov.w r0, #0
mov.w r12, #0
it hs
movhs r0, #1
cmp r1, r3
it ge
movge.w r12, #1
it eq
moveq r12, r0
cmp.w r12, #0
bne .LBB1_2
@ BB#1: @ %bb1
bl f
pop {r7, pc}
.LBB1_2: @ %bb2
bl g
pop {r7, pc}
After:
push {r7, lr}
subs r0, r0, r2
sbcs.w r0, r1, r3
bge .LBB1_2
@ BB#1: @ %bb1
bl f
pop {r7, pc}
.LBB1_2: @ %bb2
bl g
pop {r7, pc}
Saves around 80KB in Chromium's libchrome.so.
Some notes on this patch:
- I don't much like the ARMISD::BRCOND and ARMISD::CMOV combines I
introduced (nothing else needs them). However, they are necessary in
order to avoid poor codegen, and they seem similar to existing combines
in other backends (e.g. X86 combines (brcond (cmp (setcc Compare))) to
(brcond Compare)).
- No support for Thumb-1. This is in principle possible, but we'd need
to implement ARMISD::SUBE for Thumb-1.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15256
llvm-svn: 263962
Summary:
extract_vector_elt can cause an implicit any_ext if the types don't
match. When processing the following pattern:
(and (extract_vector_elt (load ([non_ext|any_ext|zero_ext] V))), c)
DAGCombine was ignoring the possible extend, and sometimes removing
the AND even though it was required to maintain some of the bits
in the result to 0, resulting in a miscompile.
This change fixes the issue by limiting the transformation only to
cases where the extract_vector_elt doesn't perform the implicit
extend.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, jmolloy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18247
llvm-svn: 263935
Summary:
The old address space inference pass (NVPTXFavorNonGenericAddrSpaces) is unable
to convert the address space of a pointer induction variable. This patch adds a
new pass called NVPTXInferAddressSpaces that overcomes that limitation using a
fixed-point data-flow analysis (see the file header comments for details).
The new pass is experimental and not enabled by default. Users can turn
it on by setting the -nvptx-use-infer-addrspace flag of llc.
Reviewers: jholewinski, tra, jlebar
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17965
llvm-svn: 263916
Improve computeZeroableShuffleElements to be able to peek through bitcasts to extract zero/undef values from BUILD_VECTOR nodes of different element sizes to the shuffle mask.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14261
llvm-svn: 263906
We need to be careful on which registers can be explicitly handled
via copies. Prologue, Epilogue use physical registers and if one belongs
to the set of CSRsViaCopy, it will no longer be CSRed, since PEI overwrites
it after the explicit copies.
llvm-svn: 263857
This patch adds unscaled loads and sign-extend loads to the TII
getMemOpBaseRegImmOfs API, which is used to control clustering in the MI
scheduler. This is done to create more opportunities for load pairing. I've
also added the scaled LDRSWui instruction, which was missing from the scaled
instructions. Finally, I've added support in shouldClusterLoads for clustering
adjacent sext and zext loads that too can be paired by the load/store optimizer.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18048
llvm-svn: 263819
Summary:
Allow the selection of BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_x and _XY. Do this now before
the frontend patches land in Mesa. Eventually, we may want to automatically
reduce the size of loads at the LLVM IR level, which requires such overloads,
and in some cases Mesa can generate them directly.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18255
llvm-svn: 263792
Summary:
These intrinsics expose the BUFFER_ATOMIC_* instructions and will be used
by Mesa to implement atomics with buffer semantics. The intrinsic interface
matches that of buffer.load.format and buffer.store.format, except that the
GLC bit is not exposed (it is automatically deduced based on whether the
return value is used).
The change of hasSideEffects is required for TableGen to accept the pattern
that matches the intrinsic.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, rivanvx, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18151
llvm-svn: 263791
Summary:
We cannot easily deduce that an offset is in an SGPR, but the Mesa frontend
cannot easily make use of an explicit soffset parameter either. Furthermore,
it is likely that in the future, LLVM will be in a better position than the
frontend to choose an SGPR offset if possible.
Since there aren't any frontend uses of these intrinsics in upstream
repositories yet, I would like to take this opportunity to change the
intrinsic signatures to a single offset parameter, which is then selected
to immediate offsets or voffsets using a ComplexPattern.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18218
llvm-svn: 263790
For fcmp, major concern about the following 6 cases is NaN result. The
comparison result consists of 4 bits, indicating lt, eq, gt and un (unordered),
only one of which will be set. The result is generated by fcmpu
instruction. However, bc instruction only inspects one of the first 3
bits, so when un is set, bc instruction may jump to to an undesired
place.
More specifically, if we expect an unordered comparison and un is set, we
expect to always go to true branch; in such case UEQ, UGT and ULT still
give false, which are undesired; but UNE, UGE, ULE happen to give true,
since they are tested by inspecting !eq, !lt, !gt, respectively.
Similarly, for ordered comparison, when un is set, we always expect the
result to be false. In such case OGT, OLT and OEQ is good, since they are
actually testing GT, LT, and EQ respectively, which are false. OGE, OLE
and ONE are tested through !lt, !gt and !eq, and these are true.
llvm-svn: 263753
