Commit Graph

820 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Christopher Tetreault
792f8e1114 [SVE] Take constant fold fast path for splatted vscale vectors
This should be a perfectly reasonable operation for scalable vectors.
Currently, it only works for zeroinitializer values of
ScalableVectorType, but the fundamental operation is sound and it should
be possible to make it work for other splats

Reviewed By: david-arm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77442
2020-11-17 12:45:31 -08:00
Simon Pilgrim
6fa7030a76 [ConstProp] Remove unused check-prefixes
Just use default CHECK and remove duplicate RUN
2020-11-09 13:12:40 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
00808e321c [InstSimplify] allow vector folds for (Pow2C << X) == NonPow2C
Existing pre-conditions seem to be correct:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/lCLB

  Name: non-zero C1
  Pre: !isPowerOf2(C1) && isPowerOf2(C2) && C1 != 0
  %sub = shl i8 C2, %X
  %cmp = icmp eq i8 %sub, C1
  =>
  %cmp = false

  Name: one == C2
  Pre: !isPowerOf2(C1) && isPowerOf2(C2) && C2 == 1
  %sub = shl i8 C2, %X
  %cmp = icmp eq i8 %sub, C1
  =>
  %cmp = false

  Name: nuw
  Pre: !isPowerOf2(C1) && isPowerOf2(C2)
  %sub = shl nuw i8 C2, %X
  %cmp = icmp eq i8 %sub, C1
  =>
  %cmp = false

  Name: nsw
  Pre: !isPowerOf2(C1) && isPowerOf2(C2)
  %sub = shl nsw i8 C2, %X
  %cmp = icmp eq i8 %sub, C1
  =>
  %cmp = false
2020-11-08 09:52:05 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
73a5f0b614 [InstSimplify] add tests for icmp with power-of-2 operand; NFC 2020-11-08 09:52:05 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
c74db55ff5 [InstSimplify] allow vector folds for icmp Pred (1 << X), 0x80 2020-11-04 08:12:48 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
5765edbf9e [InstSimplify] add vector cmp tests; NFC 2020-11-04 08:12:47 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
e77ba263fe [InstSimplify] peek through 'not' operand in logic-of-icmps fold
This extends D78430 to solve cases like:
https://llvm.org/PR47858

There are still missed opportunities shown in the tests,
and as noted in the earlier patches, we have related
functionality in InstCombine, so we may want to extend
other folds in a similar way.

A semi-random sampling of test diff proofs in this patch:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/sS4C
2020-10-25 11:13:30 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
7de2add829 [InstSimplify] add tests for logic-of-cmps with not op; NFC
One variant of this is shown in:
https://llvm.org/PR47858
2020-10-25 11:13:30 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
c72198079d [ValueTracking] add range limits for cttz
As discussed in D89952,
instcombine can sometimes find a way to reduce similar patterns,
but it is incomplete.
InstSimplify uses the computeConstantRange() ValueTracking analysis
via simplifyICmpWithConstant(), so we just need to fill in the max
value of cttz to process any "icmp pred cttz(X), C" pattern (the
min value is initialized to zero automatically).

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Z_SLWZ

Follow-up to D89976.
2020-10-23 08:43:45 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
3fb0d6b0d5 [ValueTracking] add range limits for ctlz
As discussed in D89952,
instcombine can sometimes find a way to reduce similar patterns,
but it is incomplete.
InstSimplify uses the computeConstantRange() ValueTracking analysis
via simplifyICmpWithConstant(), so we just need to fill in the max
value of ctlz to process any "icmp pred ctlz(X), C" pattern (the
min value is initialized to zero automatically).

Follow-up to D89976.
2020-10-23 08:43:45 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
0351bd959f [InstSimplify] add tests for cttz constant range; NFC
This is a search-and-replace of f6cb7f3
2020-10-23 08:43:45 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
9bcb437f46 [InstSimplify] add tests for ctlz constant range; NFC
This is a search-and-replace of f6cb7f3.
2020-10-23 08:43:45 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
748ecc6b32 [ValueTracking] add range limits for ctpop
As discussed in D89952,
instcombine can sometimes find a way to reduce similar patterns,
but it is incomplete.
InstSimplify uses the computeConstantRange() ValueTracking analysis
via simplifyICmpWithConstant(), so we just need to fill in the max
value of ctpop to process any "icmp pred ctpop(X), C" pattern (the
min value is initialized to zero automatically).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89976
2020-10-23 08:17:54 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
f6cb7f37ff [InstSimplify] add tests for ctpop constant range; NFC 2020-10-22 14:16:48 -04:00
Sjoerd Meijer
51d7df3fa1 [InstructionSimplify] icmp (X+Y), (X+Z) simplification
This improves simplifications for pattern `icmp (X+Y), (X+Z)` -> `icmp Y,Z`
if only one of the operands has NSW set, e.g.:

    icmp slt (x + 0), (x +nsw 1)

We can still safely rewrite this to:

    icmp slt 0, 1

because we know that the LHS can't overflow if the RHS has NSW set and
C1 < C2 && C1 >= 0, or C2 < C1 && C1 <= 0

This simplification is useful because ScalarEvolutionExpander which is used to
generate code for SCEVs in different loop optimisers is not always able to put
back NSW flags across control-flow, thus inhibiting CFG simplifications.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89317
2020-10-22 08:55:52 +01:00
Sjoerd Meijer
e86a70ce3d [InstructionSimplify] And precommit more tests for D89317. NFC. 2020-10-21 11:02:25 +01:00
Sjoerd Meijer
782b8f0d38 [InstructionSimplify] Precommit more tests for D89317. NFC. 2020-10-21 10:14:39 +01:00
Sanjay Patel
7c516504a1 [InstSimplify] allow vector splats for icmp-of-neg folds 2020-10-20 09:24:36 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
b11588b18e [InstSimplify] add vector icmp tests; NFC 2020-10-20 09:24:35 -04:00
Juneyoung Lee
62a0ec1612 Add support for !noundef metatdata on loads
This patch adds metadata !noundef and makes load instructions can optionally have it.
A load with !noundef always return a well-defined value (has no undef bit or isn't poison).
If the loaded value isn't well defined, the behavior is undefined.

This metadata can be used to encode the assumption from C/C++ that certain reads of variables should have well-defined values.
It is helpful for optimizing freeze instructions away, because freeze can be removed when its operand has well-defined value, and showing that a load from arbitrary location is well-defined is usually hard otherwise.

The same information can be encoded with llvm.assume with operand bundle; using metadata is chosen because I wasn't sure whether code motion can be freely done when llvm.assume is inserted from clang instead.
The existing codebase already is stripping unknown metadata when doing code motion, so using metadata is UB-safe as well.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89050
2020-10-17 13:50:10 +09:00
Jay Foad
1417abe54c [AMDGPU] Add new llvm.amdgcn.fma.legacy intrinsic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89558
2020-10-16 17:10:21 +01:00
Sjoerd Meijer
66f22411e1 [InstructionSimplify] Precommit tests for D89317. NFC. 2020-10-13 15:40:33 +01:00
Amara Emerson
322d0afd87 [llvm][mlir] Promote the experimental reduction intrinsics to be first class intrinsics.
This change renames the intrinsics to not have "experimental" in the name.

The autoupgrader will handle legacy intrinsics.

Relevant ML thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140729.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88787
2020-10-07 10:36:44 -07:00
Sanjay Patel
149f5b573c [APFloat] convert SNaN to QNaN in convert() and raise Invalid signal
This is an alternate fix (see D87835) for a bug where a NaN constant
gets wrongly transformed into Infinity via truncation.
In this patch, we uniformly convert any SNaN to QNaN while raising
'invalid op'.
But we don't have a way to directly specify a 32-bit SNaN value in LLVM IR,
so those are always encoded/decoded by calling convert from/to 64-bit hex.

See D88664 for a clang fix needed to allow this change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88238
2020-10-01 14:37:38 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
645c53a9d9 [ValueTracking] enhance isKnownNeverInfinity to understand sitofp
As discussed in D87877, instcombine already has this fold,
but it was missing from the more general ValueTracking logic.

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/PumYZP
2020-09-27 08:40:31 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
71f25ac8ca [InstSimplify] add tests for fcmp with casted op; NFC
This shows missing analysis in ValueTracking's isKnownNeverInfinity().
2020-09-27 08:36:57 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
e34bd1e0b0 [APFloat] prevent NaN morphing into Inf on conversion (PR43907)
We shift the significand right on a truncation, but that needs to be made NaN-safe:
always set at least 1 bit in the significand.
https://llvm.org/PR43907

See D88238 for the likely follow-up (but needs some plumbing fixes before it can proceed).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87835
2020-09-24 14:02:19 -04:00
Arthur Eubanks
61ac58e10a [NewPM] Pin tests with -debug-pass to legacy PM
-debug-pass is a legacy PM only option.

Some tests checks that the pass returned that it made a change,
which is not relevant to the NPM, since passes return PreservedAnalyses.

Some tests check that passes are freed at the proper time, which is also
not relevant to the NPM.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87945
2020-09-22 17:54:25 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
f4f7df037e [DIE] Remove DeadInstEliminationPass
This pass is like DeadCodeEliminationPass, but only does one pass
through a function instead of iterating on users of eliminated
instructions.

DeadCodeEliminationPass should be used in all cases.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87933
2020-09-21 12:12:25 -07:00
Sanjay Patel
f74a334fe3 [ConstantFolding] add undef handling for fmin/fmax intrinsics
The output here may not be optimal (yet), but it should be
consistent for commuted operands (it was not before) and
correct. We can do better by checking FMF and NaN if needed.

Code in InstSimplify generally assumes that we have already
folded code like this, so it was not handling 2 constant
inputs by commuting consistently.
2020-09-19 10:31:01 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
d3b0644e22 [InstSimplify] add tests for constant folding fmin/fmax with undef op; NFC 2020-09-18 16:09:44 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
3f100e64b4 [InstSimplify] fix fmin/fmax miscompile for partial undef vectors (PR47567)
It would also be correct to return the variable operand in these cases,
but eliminating a variable use is probably better for optimization.
2020-09-18 10:05:44 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
6690de098e [InstSimplify] add another test for NaN propagation; NFC 2020-09-18 09:20:26 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
c6ebe3fd00 [InstSimplify] add tests for FP constant miscompile; NFC (PR43907) 2020-09-17 12:04:39 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
8985755762 [InstSimplify] add limit folds for fmin/fmax
If the constant operand is the opposite of the min/max value,
then the result must be the other value.

This is based on the similar codegen transform proposed in:
D87571
2020-09-15 10:58:44 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
55d371abd7 [InstSimplify] add folds for fmin/fmax with 'nnan'
maximum(nnan X, +INF) --> +INF
minimum(nnan X, -INF) --> -INF

This is based on the similar codegen transform proposed in:
D87571
2020-09-14 11:46:11 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
7526376164 [InstSimplify] allow folds for fmin/fmax with 'ninf'
maxnum(ninf X, +FLT_MAX) --> +FLT_MAX
minnum(ninf X, -FLT_MAX) --> -FLT_MAX

This is based on the similar codegen transform proposed in:
D87571
2020-09-14 11:18:08 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
dae68fdf9e [InstSimplify] add/move tests for fmin/fmax; NFC
The new tests are duplicated from the sibling patch for codegen:
D87571
2020-09-14 10:24:19 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
5df9cb5bc7 [InstSimplify] fix test comments; NFC 2020-09-14 10:07:54 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
7bb9a2f996 [InstSimplify] fix miscompiles with maximum/minimum intrinsics
As discussed in the sibling codegen functionality patch D87571,
this transform was created with D52766, but it is not correct.

The incorrect test diffs were missed during review, but the
'TODO' comment about this functionality was still in the code -
we need 'nnan' to enable this fold.
2020-09-14 09:06:41 -04:00
Eli Friedman
37f2776d1a [ConstantFold] Fold binary arithmetic on scalable vector splats.
It's a nice simplification, and it confuses instcombine if we don't do
it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87422
2020-09-11 16:41:58 -07:00
Juneyoung Lee
a6183d0f02 [ValueTracking] isKnownNonZero, computeKnownBits for freeze
This implements support for isKnownNonZero, computeKnownBits when freeze is involved.

```
  br (x != 0), BB1, BB2
BB1:
  y = freeze x
```

In the above program, we can say that y is non-zero. The reason is as follows:

(1) If x was poison, `br (x != 0)` raised UB
(2) If x was fully undef, the branch again raised UB
(3) If x was non-zero partially undef, say `undef | 1`, `freeze x` will return a nondeterministic value which is also non-zero.
(4) If x was just a concrete value, it is trivial

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75808
2020-09-10 08:07:38 +09:00
Nikita Popov
e97f3b1b43 [InstCombine] Fold abs of known negative operand
If we know that the abs operand is known negative, we can replace
it with a neg.

To avoid computing known bits twice, I've removed the fold for the
non-negative case from InstSimplify. Both the non-negative and the
negative case are handled by InstCombine now, with one known bits call.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87196
2020-09-08 20:14:35 +02:00
Nikita Popov
ff218cbc84 [InstSimplify] Fold degenerate abs of abs form
This addresses the remaining issue from D87188. Due to a series of
folds, we may end up with abs-of-abs represented as
x == 0 ? -abs(x) : abs(x). Rather than recognizing this as a special
abs pattern and doing an abs-of-abs fold on it afterwards,
I'm directly folding this to one of the select operands in InstSimplify.

The general pattern falls into the "select with operand replaced"
category, but that fold is not powerful enough to recognize that
both hands of the select are the same for value zero.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87197
2020-09-06 09:43:08 +02:00
Nikita Popov
621b10ca18 [InstSimplify] Add tests for a peculiar abs of abs form (NFC)
This pattern shows up when canonicalizing to spf abs form to
intrinsic abs form.
2020-09-05 21:42:22 +02:00
Nikita Popov
73104b0751 [InstSimplify] Fold min/max based on dominating condition
If we have a dominating condition that x >= y, then umax(x, y) is x,
etc. I'm doing this in InstSimplify as the corresponding transform
for the select form is also done there.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87168
2020-09-05 16:16:40 +02:00
Nikita Popov
781a438408 [InstSimplify] Add tests for min/max with dominating condition (NFC) 2020-09-04 23:45:54 +02:00
Bryan Chan
3404add468 [EarlyCSE] Verify hash code in regression tests
As discussed in D86843, -earlycse-debug-hash should be used in more regression
tests to catch inconsistency between the hashing and the equivalence check.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86863
2020-09-04 10:40:35 -04:00
Bryan Chan
a09eef113f Replace CRLF with LF; NFC 2020-09-03 15:30:08 -04:00
Nikita Popov
a5be86fde5 [InstSimplify] Protect against more poison in SimplifyWithOpReplaced (PR47322)
Replace the check for poison-producing instructions in
SimplifyWithOpReplaced() with the generic helper canCreatePoison()
that properly handles poisonous shifts and thus avoids the problem
from PR47322.

This additionally fixes a bug in IIQ.UseInstrInfo=false mode, which
previously could have caused this code to ignore poison flags.
Setting UseInstrInfo=false should reduce the possible optimizations,
not increase them.

This is not a full solution to the problem, as poison could be
introduced more indirectly. This is just a minimal, easy to backport
fix.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86834
2020-08-29 21:59:39 +02:00