Depends on D129371.
It survived all GCC ASan tests.
Changes are trivial and mostly "borrowed" RISC-V logics, except that a different SHADOW_OFFSET is used.
Reviewed By: SixWeining, MaskRay, XiaodongLoong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129418
Initial libsanitizer support for LoongArch. It survived all GCC UBSan tests.
Major changes:
1. LoongArch port of Linux kernel only supports `statx` for `stat` and its families. So we need to add `statx_to_stat` and use it for `stat`-like libcalls. The logic is "borrowed" from Glibc.
2. `sanitizer_syscall_linux_loongarch64.inc` is mostly duplicated from RISC-V port, as the syscall interface is almost same.
Reviewed By: SixWeining, MaskRay, XiaodongLoong, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129371
This caused build failures when building Clang and libc++ together on Mac:
fatal error: 'experimental/memory_resource' file not found
See the code review for details. Reverting until the problem and how to
solve it is better understood.
(Updates to some test files were not reverted, since they seemed
unrelated and were later updated by 340b48b267b96.)
> This is the first part of a plan to ship experimental features
> by default while guarding them behind a compiler flag to avoid
> users accidentally depending on them. Subsequent patches will
> also encompass incomplete features (such as <format> and <ranges>)
> in that categorization. Basically, the idea is that we always
> build and ship the c++experimental library, however users can't
> use what's in it unless they pass the `-funstable` flag to Clang.
>
> Note that this patch intentionally does not start guarding
> existing <experimental/FOO> content behind the flag, because
> that would merely break users that might be relying on such
> content being in the headers unconditionally. Instead, we
> should start guarding new TSes behind the flag, and get rid
> of the existing TSes we have by shipping their Standard
> counterpart.
>
> Also, this patch must jump through a few hoops like defining
> _LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL because we still support compilers
> that do not implement -funstable yet.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128927
This reverts commit bb939931a1.
`add_dependencies(${LIB_PARENT_TARGET} aix-${libname})` should only happen when `aix-${libname}` is added.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129433
This is a follow up to D118200 which applies a similar cleanup to
headers when using in-tree libc++ to avoid accidentally picking up
the system headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128035
This is the first part of a plan to ship experimental features
by default while guarding them behind a compiler flag to avoid
users accidentally depending on them. Subsequent patches will
also encompass incomplete features (such as <format> and <ranges>)
in that categorization. Basically, the idea is that we always
build and ship the c++experimental library, however users can't
use what's in it unless they pass the `-funstable` flag to Clang.
Note that this patch intentionally does not start guarding
existing <experimental/FOO> content behind the flag, because
that would merely break users that might be relying on such
content being in the headers unconditionally. Instead, we
should start guarding new TSes behind the flag, and get rid
of the existing TSes we have by shipping their Standard
counterpart.
Also, this patch must jump through a few hoops like defining
_LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL because we still support compilers
that do not implement -funstable yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128927
We no longer support the use of LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS for libcxx and
libcxxabi. We don't use paths to libcxx and libcxxabi in compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126905
We no longer support the use of LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS for libcxx and
libcxxabi. We don't use paths to libcxx and libcxxabi in compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126905
This avoids the need for string-ification and lets CMake deduplicate
potentially duplicate flags.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122750
When `compiler-rt` is configured as a runtime, the configure-time target
detection for builtins is done in compile-only mode, which is basically a
test of whether the newly-built `clang` can compile a simple program with
an additional flag (`-m32` and `-m64` in my case). The problem is that on
my Debian system `clang` can compile `int foo(int x, int y) { return x + y; }`
with `-m32` but fails to include `limits.h` (or any other target-specific
header) for the `i386` target:
```
$ /path/to/build/./bin/clang --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -DVISIBILITY_HIDDEN -O3 -DNDEBUG -m32 -std=c11 -fPIC -fno-builtin -fvisibility=hidden -fomit-frame-pointer -MD -MT CMakeFiles/clang_rt.builtins-i386.dir/absvdi2.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/clang_rt.builtins-i386.dir/absvdi2.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/clang_rt.builtins-i386.dir/absvdi2.c.o -c /path/to/src/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/absvdi2.c
In file included from /path/to/src/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/absvdi2.c:13:
In file included from /path/to/src/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/int_lib.h:93:
In file included from /path/to/build/lib/clang/15.0.0/include/limits.h:21:
In file included from /usr/include/limits.h:25:
/usr/include/features.h:364:12: fatal error: 'sys/cdefs.h' file not found
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
```
This is an attempt to make the target detection more robust: extend the test
program with `#include <limits.h>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127975
Similar to D120946, pass LIBCXX_HAS_GCC_S_LIB and LIBCXX_USE_COMPILER_RT
through to the custom lib++ builds so that libfuzzer doesn't end up with
a .deplibs section that links against those libraries when the
variables are set to false.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127912
Profile library are written by standard libraries or POSIX calls depend on target support, so there is no porting effort for the target, we could enable that for both RV32 and RV64, verified on the RV64 platform.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124599
This avoids the need for string-ification and lets CMake deduplicate
potentially duplicate flags.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122750
Apply this in add_compiler_rt_runtime instead of manually adding it
to the individual projects. This applies the option on more
parts of compiler-rt than before, but should ideally not make any
difference assuming the other runtimes that lacked the option
also were C11 compatible.
Not marking this as required, to match the existing behaviour (where
`-std=c11` was added only if supported by the compiler).
This was suggested during the review of D110005.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124343
Like D118875, but for ubsan, asan, etc.
With this, I can successfully run:
bin/clang++ -target x86_64-apple-ios14.0-macabi foo.cc \
-isysroot $(xcrun -show-sdk-path) -fsanitize=undefined
with a locally built libclang_rt.ubsan_osx_dynamic.dylib.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124059
ld64 implicitly ad-hoc code-signs as of Xcode 12, and `strip` and friends know
how keep this special ad-hoc signature valid.
So this should have no effective behavior change, except that you can now strip
libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib and it'll still have a valid ad-hoc
signature, instead of strip printing "warning: changes being made to the file
will invalidate the code signature in:" and making the ad-hoc code signature
invalid.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123475
This is useful when building a complete toolchain to ensure that CRT
is built after builtins but before the rest of the compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120682
This is useful when building a complete toolchain to ensure that CRT
is built after builtins but before the rest of the compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120682
This clarifies that this is an LLVM specific variable and avoids
potential conflicts with other projects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119918
This is useful when building a complete toolchain to ensure that CRT
is built after builtins but before the rest of the compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120682
Pass LIBCXX_HAS_PTHREAD_LIB, LIBCXX_HAS_RT_LIB and LIBCXXABI_HAS_PTHREAD_LIB
through to the custom lib++ builds so that libfuzzer doesn't end up with a .deplibs section that
links against those libraries when the variables are set to false.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120946
Let `archive-aix-libatomic` accept additional argument to customize name of output atomic library.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120534
clang-cl doesn't support -target <target>, instead it only supports
--target=<target> so building a RUNTIME configuration for clang-cl
ended up in never building builtins. Which in turn lead to clang-cl
not being able to find the runtime libraries because we depend
on the compiler_rt.builtins.lib being in the runtime dir for the
Driver to add it as a candidate.
I don't think this should have any downsides since most the code
these days are using --target=<target> instead of the old syntax.
Reviewed By: mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120308
This patch extends compiler-rt's cmake config to build macOS builtins with both macOS and Mac Catalyst support.
This is done by telling the compiler to emit macho files with two build version load commands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118875
This reverts commit 910a642c0a.
There are serious correctness issues with the current approach: __sync_*
routines which are not actually atomic should not be enabled by default.
I'll continue discussion on the review.
ARMv5 and older architectures don’t support SMP and do not have atomic instructions. Still they’re in use in IoT world, where one has to stick to libgcc.
Reviewed By: mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116088
Note: the term "libgcc" refers to the all of `libgcc.a`, `libgcc_eh.a`,
and `libgcc_s.so`.
Enabling libunwind as a replacement for libgcc on Linux has proven to be
challenging since libgcc_s.so is a required dependency in the [Linux
standard base][5]. Some software is transitively dependent on libgcc
because glibc makes hardcoded calls to functions in libgcc_s. For example,
the function `__GI___backtrace` eventually makes its way to a [hardcoded
dlopen to libgcc_s' _Unwind_Backtrace][1]. Since libgcc_{eh.a,s.so} and
libunwind have the same ABI, but different implementations, the two
libraries end up [cross-talking, which ultimately results in a
segfault][2].
To solve this problem, libunwind needs to build a “libgcc”. That is, link
the necessary functions from compiler-rt and libunwind into an archive
and shared object that advertise themselves as `libgcc.a`, `libgcc_eh.a`,
and `libgcc_s.so`, so that glibc’s baked calls are diverted to the
correct objects in memory. Fortunately for us, compiler-rt and libunwind
use the same ABI as the libgcc family, so the problem is solvable at the
llvm-project configuration level: no program source needs to be edited.
Thus, the end result is for a user to configure their LLVM build with a
flag that indicates they want to archive compiler-rt/unwind as libgcc.
We achieve this by compiling libunwind with all the symbols necessary
for compiler-rt to emulate the libgcc family, and then generate symlinks
named for our "libgcc" that point to their corresponding libunwind
counterparts.
We alternatively considered patching glibc so that the source doesn't
directly refer to libgcc, but rather _defaults_ to libgcc, so that a
system preferring compiler-rt/libunwind can point to these libraries
at the config stage instead. Even if we modified the Linux standard
base, this alternative won't work because binaries that are built using
libgcc will still end up having crosstalk between the differing
implementations.
This problem has been solved in this manner for [FreeBSD][3], and this
CL has been tested against [Chrome OS][4].
[1]: https://github.com/bminor/glibc/blob/master/sysdeps/arm/backtrace.c#L68
[2]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1162190#c16
[3]: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/tree/main/lib/libgcc_s
[4]: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/overlays/chromiumos-overlay/+/2945947
[5]: https://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_5.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/libgcc-s.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108416
Follow-up to 458ead66dc, which replaced the bespoke CMakeLists.txt
file for building a custom instrumented libc++ with an invocation of the
runtimes build.
In the the bespoke CMakeLists.txt, the LIBCXX_CXX_ABI setting was forced
to libcxxabi, but this was not done for the CMake invocation for the
runtimes build. This would cause CMake configuration issues on platforms
where the default LIBCXX_CXX_ABI setting is not libcxxabi, such as
FreeBSD.
Add `-DLIBCXX_CXX_ABI=libcxxabi` to that invocation, to make sure the
custom instrumented libc++ always uses the expected ABI.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119554
This reverts commit 640beb38e7.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
Adds x-ray support for hexagon to llvm codegen, clang driver,
compiler-rt libs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113638
Reapplying this after 543a9ad7c4,
which fixes the leak introduced there.
Some of the compiler-rt runtimes use custom instrumented libc++ build.
Use the runtimes build for building this custom libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114922
We don't run tests or benchmarks from this build anyway.
Benchmarks in custom libc++ break my local build.
Reviewed By: ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115375
