test_unsigned_char test in TestExprsChar.py fails on AArch64/Windows
platform. There is known bug already present for the failure for various
arch/os combinations. This patch marks the test as xfail for
windows/AArch64.
...type variable by dereferencing the variable before
evaluating the expression.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128126
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
This patch remove XFAIL decorator from tests which as passing on AArch64
Windows. This is tested on surface pro x using tot llvm and clang 14.0.3
as compiler with visual studio 2019 x86_arm64 environment.
The old command wrote to CWD, which doesn't always work, and if it
didn't, there was no workaround (and it crashed on failure). This
patch changed the setting to provide a directory to save the objects
to.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121036
Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).
* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616
D112976 changed the layout and 0d62e31c45 andjusted the test
expectations to match.
This patch changes the tests to expect both versions, so that one can
run the test suite against older libc++ versions as well.
D112976 moved most of the guts of __vector_base into vector, this broke
some LLDB tests by changing the result types that LLDB sees. This updates
the test to reflect the new structure.
This reverts commit 3bf96b0329.
It causes crashes as reported in PR52257 and a few other places. A reproducer is bundled with this commit to verify any fix forward. The original test is left in place, but marked XFAIL as it now produces the wrong result.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113449
The point is to allow users with a related set of script based commands
to organize their commands in a hierarchy in the command set, rather than
having to have only top-level commands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110298
The `fallback` setting for import-std-module is supposed to allow running
expression that require an imported C++ module without causing any regressions
for users (neither in terms of functionality nor performance). This is done by
first trying to normally parse/evaluate an expression and when an error occurred
during this first attempt, we retry with the loaded 'std' module.
When we run into a system with a 'std' module that for some reason doesn't build
or otherwise causes parse errors, then this currently means that the second
parse attempt will overwrite the error diagnostics of the first parse attempt.
Given that the module build errors are outside of the scope of what the user can
influence, it makes more sense to show the errors from the first parse attempt
that are only concerned with the actual user input.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110696
Some downstream forks of LLDB change parts of the test setup in a way that
causes lldb to somehow resolve `std::abs` (probably to `::abs`). This patch
changes the tested function here to be `std::minmax` which (hopefully) doesn't
have any identically named functions that LLDB could find and call. Just to be
extra safe this also explicitly specified the template arguments so that in
case there is a `minmax` non-template function we still don't end up calling it
from this test.
If we applied a fix-it before evaluating an expression and that
expression didn't evaluate correctly, we should still tell users about
the fix-it we applied since that may be the reason why it didn't work
correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109908
Right now running `expr` to start the multiline expression editor and then
pressing enter causes an empty history empty to be created for the multiline
editor. That doesn't seem very useful for users as pressing the 'up' key will
now also bring up these empty expressions.
I don't think there is ever a use case for recalling a completely empty
expression from the history, so instead don't save those entries to the history
file and make sure we never recall them when navigating over the expression
history.
Note: This is actually a Swift downstream patch that got shipped with Apple's
LLDB for many years. However, this recently started conflicting with upstream
LLDB as D100048 added a test that made sure that empty expression entries don't
crash LLDB. Apple's LLDB was never affected by this crash as it never saved
empty expressions in the first place.
Reviewed By: augusto2112
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108983
Following tests fail on Arm/AArch64 randomly with timeouts:
TestMultilineNavigation.py
TestBatchMode.py
TestUnicode.py
TestGdbRemote_vContThreads.py
I am marking them as skipped until we find a away make to pass reliably.
Following tests have been failing randomly on LLDB Arm and AArch64 Linux
builtbots:
TestMultilineNavigation.py
TestMultilineCompletion.py
TestIOHandlerCompletion.py
TestGuiBasic.py
I have increased allocated CPU resources to these bots but it has not
improved situation to an acceptable level. This patch marks them as
skipped on Arm/AArch64 for now.
I didn't get around to fix this change and the original commit itself seems
fine, so this looks like an existing LLDB/Clang bug that was just uncovered
by this change. Skipping while I'm investigating.
At the moment nearly every test calls something similar to
`self.dbg.CreateTarget(self.getBuildArtifact("a.out"))` and them sometimes
checks if the created target is actually valid with something like
`self.assertTrue(target.IsValid(), "some useless text")`.
Beside being really verbose the error messages generated by this pattern are
always just indicating that the target failed to be created but now why.
This patch introduces a helper function `createTestTarget` to our Test class
that creates the target with the much more verbose `CreateTarget` overload that
gives us back an SBError (with a fancy error). If the target couldn't be created
the function prints out the SBError that LLDB returned and asserts for us. It
also defaults to the "a.out" build artifact path that nearly all tests are using
to avoid to hardcode "a.out" in every test.
I converted a bunch of tests to the new function but I'll do the rest of the
test suite as follow ups.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102771
When the user running LLDB with default settings sees the fixit
notification it means that the auto-applied fixit didn't work. This
patch shows the underlying error message instead of just the fixit to
make it easier to understand what the error in the expression was.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101333
The `--allow-jit` flag allows the user to force the IR interpreter to run the
provided expression.
The `--top-level` flag parses and injects the code as if its in the top level
scope of a source file.
Both flags just change the ExecutionPolicy of the expression:
* `--allow-jit true` -> doesn't change anything (its the default)
* `--allow-jit false` -> ExecutionPolicyNever
* `--top-level` -> ExecutionPolicyTopLevel
Passing `--allow-jit false` and `--top-level` currently causes the `--top-level`
to silently overwrite the ExecutionPolicy value that was set by `--allow-jit
false`. There isn't any ExecutionPolicy value that says "top-level but only
interpret", so I would say we reject this combination of flags until someone
finds time to refactor top-level feature out of the ExecutionPolicy enum.
The SBExpressionOptions suffer from a similar symptom as `SetTopLevel` and
`SetAllowJIT` just silently disable each other. But those functions don't have
any error handling, so not a lot we can do about this in the meantime.
Reviewed By: labath, kastiglione
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91780
An empty history entry can happen by entering the expression evaluator an immediately hitting enter:
```
$ lldb
(lldb) e
Enter expressions, then terminate with an empty line to evaluate:
1: <hit enter>
```
The next time the user enters the expression evaluator, if they hit the up arrow to load the previous expression, lldb crashes. This patch treats empty history sessions as a single expression of zero length, instead of an empty list of expressions.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR49845.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100048
When referencing `NSObject`, it's enough to import `objc/NSObject.h`. Importing `Foundation` is unnecessary in these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99867
Right now when running `expr --top-level -- void foo() {}`, LLDB just prints a cryptic
`error: Couldn't find $__lldb_expr() in the module` error. The reason for that is
that if we don't have a running process, we try to set our execution policy to always use the
IR interpreter (ExecutionPolicyNever) which works even without a process. However
that code didn't consider the special ExecutionPolicyTopLevel which we use for
top-level expressions. By changing the execution policy to ExecutionPolicyNever,
LLDB thinks we're actually trying to interpret a normal expression inside our
`$__lldb_expr` function and then fails when looking for it.
This just adds an exception for top-level expressions to that code and a bunch of tests.
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91723
This test passes on arm64 (Apple Silicon). I assume that "aarch64" still
ensures this gets skipped on Linux. I don't have access to such and
environment so I'll have to rely on the bot complaining.
Identical to previous commits that just add a standard library template to the
supported template list and test it. Adding this rather obscure class to the
template list is mostly caused by the std::deque test unexpectedly referencing
this type when testing against newer libc++ versions on macOS.
Fixes TestQueueFromStdModule and TestQueueFromStdModule on macOS.
Fixes rdar://73213589
Currently when LLDB has enough data in the debug information to import the `std` module,
it will just try to import it. However when debugging libraries where the sources aren't
available anymore, importing the module will generate a confusing diagnostic that
the module couldn't be built.
For the fallback mode (where we retry failed expressions with the loaded module), this
will cause the second expression to fail with a module built error instead of the
actual parsing issue in the user expression.
This patch adds checks that ensures that we at least have any source files in the found
include paths before we try to import the module. This prevents the module from being
loaded in the situation described above which means we don't emit the bogus 'can't
import module' diagnostic and also don't waste any time retrying the expression in the
fallback mode.
For the unit tests I did some refactoring as they now require a VFS with the files in it
and not just the paths. The Python test just builds a binary with a fake C++ module,
then deletes the module before debugging.
Fixes rdar://73264458
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95096
