Commit Graph

70 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jonas Devlieghere
6879391908 [lldb] Replace Host::SystemLog with Debugger::Report{Error,Warning}
As it exists today, Host::SystemLog is used exclusively for error
reporting. With the introduction of diagnostic events, we have a better
way of reporting those. Instead of printing directly to stderr, these
messages now get printed to the debugger's error stream (when using the
default event handler). Alternatively, if someone is listening for these
events, they can decide how to display them, for example in the context
of an IDE such as Xcode.

This change also means we no longer write these messages to the system
log on Darwin. As far as I know, nobody is relying on this, but I think
this is something we could add to the diagnostic event mechanism.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128480
2022-06-24 09:46:26 -07:00
Dave Lee
4cc8f2a017 [lldb][tests] Automatically call compute_mydir (NFC)
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
2022-06-17 14:34:49 -07:00
Dave Lee
47c4c6a746 [lldb] Use assertState in more tests (NFC)
Follow to D127355, converting more `assertEquals` to `assertState`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127378
2022-06-09 16:18:07 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
ce825e4674 [lldb] Add assertState function to the API test suite
Add a function to make it easier to debug a test failure caused by an
unexpected state.

Currently, tests are using assertEqual which results in a cryptic error
message: "AssertionError: 5 != 10". Even when a test provides a message
to make it clear why a particular state is expected, you still have to
figure out which of the two was the expected state, and what the other
value corresponds to.

We have a function in lldbutil that helps you convert the state number
into a user readable string. This patch adds a wrapper around
assertEqual specifically for comparing states and reporting better error
messages.

The aforementioned error message now looks like this: "AssertionError:
stopped (5) != exited (10)". If the user provided a message, that
continues to get printed as well.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127355
2022-06-08 16:16:38 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
fc43703481 [lldb] Use objc_getRealizedClassList_trylock on macOS Ventura and later
In order to avoid stranding the Objective-C runtime lock, we switched
from objc_copyRealizedClassList to its non locking variant
objc_copyRealizedClassList_nolock. Not taking the lock was relatively
safe because we run this expression on one thread only, but it was still
possible that someone was in the middle of modifying this list while we
were trying to read it. Worst case that would result in a crash in the
inferior without side-effects and we'd unwind and try again later.

With the introduction of macOS Ventura, we can use
objc_getRealizedClassList_trylock instead. It has semantics similar to
objc_copyRealizedClassList_nolock, but instead of not locking at all,
the function returns if the lock is already taken, which avoids the
aforementioned crash without stranding the Objective-C runtime lock.
Because LLDB gets to allocate the underlying memory we also avoid
stranding the malloc lock.

rdar://89373233

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127252
2022-06-08 11:34:27 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
a66ff2316e [lldb] Re-enable fixed on-device tests
These tests were fixed by 833882b327.
2022-04-12 11:39:25 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
de2ddc8f31 [lldb] XFAIL tests that aren't passing remotely
XFAIL a series of tests that are failing remotely.
2022-04-08 15:02:26 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
af2ea183f5 [lldb] Import Foundation in TestConflictingDefinition.py
We need to import foundation to get a 'NSLog' declaration when building
against the iOS SDK. This doesn't appear necessary when building against
the macOS SDK, presumable because it gets transitively imported by
objc/NSObject.h
2022-04-08 10:46:34 -07:00
Dave Lee
779bbbf27f [lldb] Replace asserts on .Success() with assertSuccess()
Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).

* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616
2022-02-14 08:31:17 -08:00
Adrian Prantl
587a397917 Skip tests when compiler with older versions of clang 2021-11-19 09:05:48 -08:00
Adrian Prantl
721bb73676 make testcase more robust 2021-11-18 14:00:53 -08:00
Adrian Prantl
5cf23ecc23 fix syntax error 2021-11-18 10:49:51 -08:00
Adrian Prantl
08c0a45ab8 Unbreak test after D111899 2021-11-18 08:51:50 -08:00
SYNOPSYS\georgiev
9f0b5f9a39 [lldb/test] Added lldbutil function to test a breakpoint
Testing the breakpoint itself rather than the lldb string.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111899
2021-11-17 08:37:30 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere
d09a21a0b3 [lldb] Remove failures case from TestTaggedPointerCmd
Somehow every pointer looks like it's tagged on GreenDragon. Removing
the check to unblock the bot until we can get to the bottom of this.
2021-11-07 10:40:43 -08:00
Jonas Devlieghere
10eb32f45d [lldb] Improve 'lang objc tagged-pointer info' command
Don't try to get a class descriptor for a pointer that doesn't look like
a tagged pointer. Also print addresses as fixed-width hex and update the
test.
2021-11-05 13:19:00 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
f9e6be5cc1 [lldb] Update tagged pointer command output and test.
- Use formatv to print the addresses.
 - Add check for 0x0 which is treated as an invalid address.
 - Use a an address that's less likely to be interpreted as a real
   tagged pointer.
2021-11-03 15:04:36 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
50b40b0518 [lldb] Improve error reporting in lang objc tagged-pointer info
Improve error handling for the lang objc tagged-pointer info. Rather
than failing silently, report an error if we couldn't convert an
argument to an address or resolve the class descriptor.

  (lldb) lang objc tagged-pointer info 0xbb6404c47a587764
  error: could not get class descriptor for 0xbb6404c47a587764

  (lldb) lang objc tagged-pointer info n1
  error: could not convert 'n1' to a valid address

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112945
2021-11-02 14:25:42 -07:00
Raphael Isemann
85bcc1eb2f [lldb] Make SBType::IsTypeComplete more consistent by forcing the loading of definitions
Currently calling SBType::IsTypeComplete returns true for record types if and
only if the underlying record in our internal Clang AST has a definition.

The function however doesn't actually force the loading of any external
definition from debug info, so it currently can return false even if the type is
actually defined in a program's debug info but LLDB hasn't lazily created the
definition yet.

This patch changes the behaviour to always load the definition first so that
IsTypeComplete now consistently returns true if there is a definition in the
module/target.

The motivation for this patch is twofold:

* The API is now arguably more useful for the user which don't know or care
about the internal lazy loading mechanism of LLDB.

* With D101950 there is no longer a good way to ask a Decl for a definition
without automatically pulling in a definition from the ExternalASTSource. The
current behaviour doesn't seem useful enough to justify the necessary
workarounds to preserve it for a time after D101950.

Note that there was a test that used this API to test lazy loading of debug info
but that has been replaced with TestLazyLoading by now (which just dumps the
internal Clang AST state instead).

Reviewed By: aprantl

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112615
2021-10-30 13:28:27 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere
b505ed9d31 [lldb] Remove support for replaying the test suite from a reproducer
This patch removes the infrastructure to replay the test suite from a
reproducer, as well as the modifications made to the individual tests.
2021-09-30 10:47:19 -07:00
Raphael Isemann
57bf5c8659 [lldb] Add a test for user-defined objc_copyRealizedClassList_nolock
LLDB evaluates some utility expression to update the Objective-C class list that
ends up calling function such as `free` or `objc_copyRealizedClassList_nolock`.
This adds a test that just tries to define our own bogus version of
`objc_copyRealizedClassList_nolock`. It just tests that LLDB doesn't crash as we
currently don't have a way to tell LLDB to look for the function in a specific
library.

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107778
2021-08-10 14:54:42 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere
9d5e95d094 Re-land "[lldb] Upstream support for Foundation constant classes"
Upstream support for NSConstantArray, NSConstantIntegerNumber,
NSConstant{Float,Double}Number and NSConstantDictionary.

We would've upstreamed this earlier but testing it requires
-fno-constant-nsnumber-literals, -fno-constant-nsarray-literals and
-fno-constant-nsdictionary-literals which haven't been upstreamed yet.
As a temporary workaround use the system compiler (xcrun clang) for the
constant variant of the tests.

I'm just upstreaming this. The patch and the tests were all authored by
Fred Riss.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107660
2021-08-06 17:24:47 -07:00
Sterling Augustine
4e5af6ef48 Revert "[lldb] Upstream support for Foundation constant classes"
This reverts commit 34d78b6a67.

This breaks build bots witha  missing file:
/home/worker/2.0.1/lldb-x86_64-debian/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Language/ObjC/Cocoa.cpp:10:10: fatal error: 'objc/runtime.h' file not found
2021-08-06 16:56:59 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
34d78b6a67 [lldb] Upstream support for Foundation constant classes
Upstream support for NSConstantArray, NSConstantIntegerNumber,
NSConstant{Float,Double}Number and NSConstantDictionary.

We would've upstreamed this earlier but testing it requires
-fno-constant-nsnumber-literals, -fno-constant-nsarray-literals and
-fno-constant-nsdictionary-literals which haven't been upstreamed yet.
As a temporary workaround use the system compiler (xcrun clang) for the
constant variant of the tests.

I'm just upstreaming this. The patch and the tests were all authored by
Fred Riss.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107660
2021-08-06 16:08:48 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
c7dee6aefd [lldb] Enable TestRuntimeTypes on Apple Silicon 2021-06-11 10:24:41 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
accb095512 [lldb] Disable TestClangModulesUpdate.py because it's flaky
The test is failing intermittently on GreenDragon.

rdar://76540904
2021-04-13 20:37:17 -07:00
Dave Lee
d1a1798e51 [lldb] Replace unneeded use of Foundation with ObjectiveC in tests (NFC)
When referencing `NSObject`, it's enough to import `objc/NSObject.h`. Importing `Foundation` is unnecessary in these cases.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99867
2021-04-04 20:04:41 -07:00
Dave Lee
10ed479d73 [lldb] Import ObjectiveC module instead of Foundation in test
Use `@import ObjectiveC` instead of `@import Foundation`, as the former is all
that's needed, and results in fewer clang modules being built.

This results in the following clang modules *not* being built for this test.

ApplicationServices
CFNetwork
ColorSync
CoreFoundation
CoreGraphics
CoreServices
CoreText
DiskArbitration
Dispatch
Foundation
IOKit
ImageIO
Security
XPC
_Builtin_intrinsics
launch
libkern
os_object
os_workgroup

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99859
2021-04-04 20:04:26 -07:00
Raphael Isemann
6919c58262 [lldb] Add a test for Obj-C properties with conflicting names
This is apparently allowed in Objective-C so we should test this in LLDB.

Reviewed By: teemperor

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99513
2021-03-30 11:08:16 +02:00
Raphael Isemann
69e7b74578 [lldb][NFC] Add a test case for Objective-C properties with conflicting names
This is an LLDB test for the ASTImporter crash that got fixed in D99077.
The test is using Clang modules for the properties as it seems the conflicting
names are not actually correctly handled when generating debug information
(only the first property is emitted and the second one is ignored in the current
clang ToT).
2021-03-29 12:33:07 +02:00
Raphael Isemann
19b4d3ce27 [lldb] Don't emit a warning when using Objective-C getters in expressions
Clang emits a warning when accessing an Objective-C getter but not using the result.
This gets triggered when just trying to print a getter value in the expression parser (where
Clang just sees a normal expression like `obj.getter` while parsing).

This patch just disables the warning in the expression parser (similar to what we do with
the C++ equivalent of just accessing a member variable but not doing anything with it).

Reviewed By: kastiglione

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94307
2021-02-11 16:48:41 +01:00
Dave Lee
3cc3762292 [lldb] Use assertIn/NotIn over assertTrue/False (NFC)
For improved failure messages, use `assertIn` over `assertTrue`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96095
2021-02-06 11:52:01 -08:00
Dave Lee
0ed758b260 [lldb] Convert more assertTrue to assertEqual (NFC)
Follow up to D95813, this converts multiline assertTrue to assertEqual.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95899
2021-02-03 21:15:08 -08:00
Dave Lee
619e2e095f [lldb] Convert assertTrue(a == b) to assertEqual(a, b)
Convert `assertTrue(a == b)` to `assertEqual(a, b)` to produce better failure messages.

These were mostly done via regex search & replace, with some manual fixes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95813
2021-02-02 12:39:03 -08:00
Shafik Yaghmour
dc057e87f6 [LLDB] Fix how ObjCBOOLSummaryProvider deals with BOOL
ObjCBOOLSummaryProvider was incorrectly treating BOOL as unsigned and this is now fixed.
Also adding tests for one bit bit-fields of BOOL and unsigned char.
2021-01-22 10:05:24 -08:00
Raphael Isemann
a8350ce79d [lldb] Add support for using variables with C++ keywords names in non-C++ expressions
LLDB is currently always activating C++ when parsing expressions as LLDB itself
is using C++ features when creating the final AST that will be codegen'd
(specifically, references to variables, namespaces and using declarations are
used).

This is causing problems for users that have variables in non-C++ programs (e.g.
plain C or Objective-C) that have names which are keywords in C++. Expressions
referencing those variables fail to parse as LLDB's Clang parser thinks those
identifiers are C++ keywords and not identifiers that may belong to a
declaration.

We can't just disable C++ in the expression parser for those situations as
replacing the functionality of the injected C++ code isn't trivial. So this
patch is just disabling most keywords that are exclusive to C++ in LLDB's Clang
parser when we are in a non-C++ expression. There are a few keywords we can't
disable for now:

* `using` as that's currently used in some situations to inject variables into the expression function.
* `__null` as that's used by LLDB to define `NULL`/`Nil`/`nil`.

Getting rid of these last two keywords is possible but is a large enough change
that this will be handled in follow up patches.

Note that this only changes the keyword status of those tokens but this patch
does not remove any C++ functionality from the expression parser. The type
system still follows C++ rules and so does the rest of the expression parser.

There is another small change that gives the hardcoded macro definitions in LLDB
a higher precedence than the macros imported from the Objective-C modules. The
reason for this is that the Objective-C modules in LLDB are actually parsed in
Objective-C++ mode and they end up providing the C++ definitions of certain
system macros (like `NULL` being defined as `nullptr`). So we have to move the
LLDB definition forward and surround the definition from the module with an
`#ifdef` to make sure that we use the correct LLDB definition that doesn't
reference C++ keywords. Or to give an example, this is how the expression source
code changes:

Before:
```
 #define NULL (nullptr) // injected module definition
 #ifndef NULL
 #define NULL (__null) // hardcoded LLDB definition
 #endif
```

After:
```
 #ifndef NULL
 #define NULL (__null) // hardcoded LLDB definition
 #endif
 #ifndef NULL
 #define NULL (nullptr) // injected module definition
 #endif
```

Fixes rdar://10356912

Reviewed By: shafik

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82770
2020-11-16 16:04:44 +01:00
Jonas Devlieghere
406ad18748 [lldb/DataFormatters] Display null C++ pointers as nullptr
Display null pointer as `nullptr`, `nil` and `NULL` for C++,
Objective-C/Objective-C++ and C respectively. The original motivation
for this patch was to display a null std::string pointer as nullptr
instead of "", but the fix seemed generic enough to be done for all
summary providers.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77153
2020-11-12 15:24:06 -08:00
Michał Górny
311cca8bbf [lldb] [test] Rename '.categories' to 'categories'
Make category-specifying files visible.  There is really no good reason
to keep them hidden, and having them visible increases the chances
that someone will actually spot them.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91065
2020-11-10 12:02:38 +01:00
Michał Górny
a852cf66ea [lldb] [test] Skip ObjC-based tests via 'objc' category
Replace the plethora of ObjC-implied 'skipUnlessDarwin' decorators
with marking tests as 'objc' category (whenever missing), and skip all
ObjC tests on non-Darwin platforms.  I have used '.categories' file
wherever it was present already or all (>1) tests were relying on ObjC,
and explicit add_test_categories() where there was only one test.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91056
2020-11-10 12:02:38 +01:00
Michał Górny
93c9110c98 [lldb] [test] Use skipUnlessDarwin for tests specific to Darwin
Use skipUnlessDarwin decorator for tests that are specific to Darwin,
instead of skipIf... for all other platforms.  This should make it clear
that these tests are not supposed to work elsewhere.  It will also make
these tests stop repeatedly popping up while I look for tests that could
be fixed on the platform in question.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91003
2020-11-07 19:26:42 +01:00
Jonas Devlieghere
e9b0994012 [lldb] Replace unittest2.expectedFailure with expectedFailure (NFC)
Rename the existing expectedFailure to expectedFailureIfFn to better
describe its purpose and provide an overload for
unittest2.expectedFailure in decorators.py.
2020-08-17 10:05:49 -07:00
Raphael Isemann
42b9a68352 [lldb][NFC] Use expect_expr in more tests 2020-08-17 13:14:57 +02:00
Raphael Isemann
7208cb1ac4 [lldb] Remove XFAIL from now passing TestPtrRefs/TestPtreRefsObjC
8fcfe2862f and
0cceb54366 fixed those tests.
2020-08-15 08:14:44 +02:00
Davide Italiano
0cceb54366 [TestPtrRefsObjC] Prefer command script import. 2020-08-14 15:31:02 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
254e0abf5b [lldb] Fix the last remaining tests not inheriting TCC permissions
After this patch all test should have the inferior inheriting the TCC
permissions from its parent.
2020-08-11 12:50:36 -07:00
shafik
0db2934b0f [ASTImporter] Modify ImportDefiniton for ObjCInterfaceDecl so that we always the ImportDeclContext one we start the definition
Once we start the definition of an ObjCInterfaceDecl we won't attempt to ImportDeclContext
later on. Unlike RecordDecl case which uses DefinitionCompleter to force completeDefinition
we don't seem to have a similar mechanism for ObjCInterfaceDecl.

This fix was needed due to a bug we see in LLDB expression parsing where an initial expression
cause an ObjCInterfaceDecl to be defined and subsequent expressions during import do not call
ImportDeclContext and we can end up in a situation where ivars are imported out of order and not all ivars are imported.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83972
2020-07-24 13:15:08 -07:00
Vedant Kumar
46334dfc3b [lldb/test] Skip test in TestBitfieldIvars.py instead of xfailing it
The test triggers an ASan exception, causing job failures on the
sanitizer bot.

As suggested by Shafik.
2020-07-21 11:29:09 -07:00
shafik
a54c42df9a Fix how we handle bit-fields for Objective-C when creating an AST
Currently expressions dealing with bit-fields in Objective-C objects is pretty broken. When generating debug-info for Objective-C bit-fields DW_AT_data_bit_offset has a different meaning than it does to C and C++.
When we parse the DWARF we validate bit offsets for C and C++ correctly but not for ObjC. For ObjC in some cases we end up incorrectly flagging an error and we don't generate further bit-fields in the AST.
Later on when we do a name lookup we don't find the ObjCIvarDecl in the ObjCInterfaceDecl in some cases since we never added it and then we don't go to the runtime to obtain the offset.

This will fix how we handle bit-fields for the Objective-C case and add tests to verify this fix but also to documents areas that still don't work and will be addressed in follow-up PRs.

Note: we can never correctly calculate offsets statically because of how Objective-C deals with the fragile base class issue. Which means the runtime may need to shift fields over.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83433
2020-07-20 16:12:29 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
64c87a94ca [lldb/Test] Fix tests that rely on logfiles with reproducers.
Now that the log file is included in the reproducers, the path needs to
be remapped for the test to find the new file in the reproducer.
2020-06-17 10:09:06 -07:00
Raphael Isemann
91728b9172 [lldb] Don't print IRForTarget errors directly to the console
Summary:

When we get an error back from IRForTarget we directly print that error to the
debugger output stream instead of putting it in the result object. The result
object only gets a vague "The expression could not be prepared to run in the
target" error message that doesn't actually tell the user what went wrong.

This patch just puts the IRForTarget errors into the status object that is
returned to the caller instead of directly printing it to the debugger. Also
updates one test that now can actually check for the error message it is
supposed to check for (instead of the default error which is all we had before).

Reviewers: JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81654
2020-06-12 10:27:25 +02:00