Summary:
Currently FPOWI defaults to Legal and LegalizeDAG.cpp turns Legal into Expand for this opcode because Legal is a "lie".
This patch changes the default for this opcode to Expand and removes the hack from LegalizeDAG.cpp. It also removes all the code in the targets that set this opcode to Expand themselves since they can just rely on the default.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, efriedma
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, nemanjai, javed.absar, andrew.w.kaylor, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33530
llvm-svn: 304215
Currently getOptimalMemOpType returns i32 for large enough sizes without
checking for alignment, leading to poor code generation when misaligned accesses
aren't permitted as we generate a word store then later split it up into byte
stores. This means we inadvertantly go over the MaxStoresPerMemcpy limit and for
memset we splat the memset value into a word then immediately split it up
again.
Fix this by leaving it up to FindOptimalMemOpLowering to figure out which type
to use, but also fix a bug there where it wasn't correctly checking if
misaligned memory accesses are allowed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33442
llvm-svn: 303990
Summary:
A temporary workaround for PR32780 - rematerialized instructions accessing the same promoted global through different constant pool entries.
The patch turns off the globals promotion optimization leaving all its code in place, so that it can be easily turned on once PR32780 is fixed.
Since this is a miscompilation issue causing generation of misbehaving code, and the problem is very subtle, the patch might be valuable enough to get into 4.0.1.
Reviewers: efriedma, jmolloy
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, llvm-commits, rengolin, asl, tstellar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33446
llvm-svn: 303679
Use variadic templates instead of relying on <cstdarg> + sentinel.
This enforces better type checking and makes code more readable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32541
llvm-svn: 302571
Now both emitLeadingFence and emitTrailingFence take the instruction
itself, instead of taking IsLoad/IsStore pairs.
Instruction::mayReadFromMemory and Instrucion::mayWriteToMemory are used
for determining those two booleans.
The instruction argument is also useful for later D32763, in
emitTrailingFence. For emitLeadingFence, it seems to have cleaner
interface with the proposed change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32762
llvm-svn: 302539
Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification
of machine representation. This attribute instructs the backend that the
argument is prepared in stack prior to CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END
sequence (see http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.htm for details). Frame size
stored in CALLSEQ_START in this case does not count the size of this
argument. However CALLSEQ_END still keeps total frame size, as caller can
be responsible for cleanup of entire frame. So CALLSEQ_START and
CALLSEQ_END keep different frame size and the difference is treated by
MachineVerifier as stack error. Currently there is no way to distinguish
this case from actual errors.
This patch adds additional argument to CALLSEQ_START and its
target-specific counterparts to keep size of stack that is set up prior to
the call frame sequence. This argument allows MachineVerifier to calculate
actual frame size associated with frame setup instruction and correctly
process the case of inalloca arguments.
The changes made by the patch are:
- Frame setup instructions get the second mandatory argument. It
affects all targets that use frame pseudo instructions and touched many
files although the changes are uniform.
- Access to frame properties are implemented using special instructions
rather than calls getOperand(N).getImm(). For X86 and ARM such
replacement was made previously.
- Changes that reflect appearance of additional argument of frame setup
instruction. These involve proper instruction initialization and
methods that access instruction arguments.
- MachineVerifier retrieves frame size using method, which reports sum of
frame parts initialized inside frame instruction pair and outside it.
The patch implements approach proposed by Quentin Colombet in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27481#c1.
It fixes 9 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed
in PR27481.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32394
llvm-svn: 302527
This exposes a method in MachineFrameInfo that calculates
MaxCallFrameSize and calls it after instruction selection in the ARM
target.
This avoids
ARMBaseRegisterInfo::canRealignStack()/ARMFrameLowering::hasReservedCallFrame()
giving different answers in early/late phases of codegen.
The testcase shows a particular nasty example result of that where we
would fail to properly align an alloca.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32622
llvm-svn: 302303
This adds routines for reseting KnownBits to unknown, making the value all zeros or all ones. It also adds methods for querying if the value is zero, all ones or unknown.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32637
llvm-svn: 302262
Added the integer data processing intrinsics from ACLE v2.1 Chapter 9
but I have missed out the saturation_occurred intrinsics for now. For
the instructions that read and write the GE bits, a chain is included
and the only instruction that reads these flags (sel) is only
selectable via the implemented intrinsic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32281
llvm-svn: 302126
This patch replaces the separate APInts for KnownZero/KnownOne with a single KnownBits struct. This is similar to what was done to ValueTracking's version recently.
This is largely a mechanical transformation from KnownZero to Known.Zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32569
llvm-svn: 301620
Otherwise there's some mismatch, and we'll either form an illegal type or an
illegal node.
Thanks to Eli Friedman for pointing out the problem with my original solution.
llvm-svn: 301036
DAG combine was mistakenly assuming that the step-up it was looking at was
always a doubling, but it can sometimes be a larger extension in which case
we'd crash.
llvm-svn: 301002
Single-threaded fences aren't required to provide any synchronization with
other processing elements so there's no need for a DMB. They should still be a
barrier for compiler optimizations though.
llvm-svn: 300904
Before, we assumed that any ConstantInt offset was precisely the access width,
so we could use the "[rN]!" form. ISelLowering only ever created that kind, but
further simplification during combining could lead to unexpected constants and
incorrect codegen.
Should fix PR32658.
llvm-svn: 300878
The hardware div feature refers only to Thumb, but because of its name
it is tempting to use it to check for hardware division in general,
which may cause problems in ARM mode. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D32005.
This patch adds "Thumb" to its name, to make its scope clear. One
notable place where I haven't made the change is in the feature flag
(used with -mattr), which is still hwdiv. Changing it would also require
changes in a lot of tests, including clang tests, and it doesn't seem
like it's worth the effort.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32160
llvm-svn: 300827
Move the BFI logic to computeKnownBitsForTargetNode, and delete
the redundant CMOV logic.
This is intended as a cleanup, but it's probably possible to construct
a case where moving the BFI logic allows more combines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31795
llvm-svn: 300752
For subtargets that use the custom lowering for divmod, e.g. gnueabi,
we used to check if the subtarget has hardware divide and then lower to
a div-mul-sub sequence if true, or to a libcall if false.
However, judging by the usage of hasDivide vs hasDivideInARMMode, it
seems that hasDivide only refers to Thumb. For instance, in the
ARMTargetLowering constructor, the code that specifies whether to use
libcalls for (S|U)DIV looks like this:
bool hasDivide = Subtarget->isThumb() ? Subtarget->hasDivide()
: Subtarget->hasDivideInARMMode();
In the case of divmod for arm-gnueabi, using only hasDivide() to
determine what to do means that instead of lowering to __aeabi_idivmod
to get the remainder, we lower to div-mul-sub and then further lower the
div to __aeabi_idiv. Even worse, if we have hardware divide in ARM but
not in Thumb, we generate a libcall instead of using it (this is not an
issue in practice since AFAICT none of the cores that we support have
hardware divide in ARM but not Thumb).
This patch fixes the code dealing with custom lowering to take into
account the mode (Thumb or ARM) when deciding whether or not hardware
division is available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32005
llvm-svn: 300536
This patch refactors and strengthens the type checks performed for interleaved
accesses. The primary functional change is to ensure that the interleaved
accesses have valid element types. The added test cases previously failed
because the element type is f128.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31817
llvm-svn: 299864
In LowerMUL, the chain information is not preserved for the new
created Load SDNode.
For example, if a Store alias with one of the operand of Mul.
The Load for that operand need to be scheduled before the Store.
The dependence is recorded in the chain of Store, in TokenFactor.
However, when lowering MUL, the SDNodes for the new Loads for
VMULL are not updated in the TokenFactor for the Store. Thus the
chain is not preserved for the lowered VMULL.
llvm-svn: 299701
Follow up to D25691, this sets up the plumbing necessary to support vector demanded elements support in known bits calculations in target nodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31249
llvm-svn: 299201
Summary:
The true and false operands for the CMOV are operands 0 and 1.
ARMISelLowering.cpp::computeKnownBits was looking at operands 1 and 2
instead. This can cause CMOV instructions to be incorrectly folded into
BFI if value set by the CMOV is another CMOV, whose known bits are
computed incorrectly.
This patch fixes the issue and adds a test case.
Reviewers: kristof.beyls, jmolloy
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson, srhines, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31265
llvm-svn: 298624
including the amended (no UB anymore) fix for adding/subtracting -2147483648.
This reverts r298328 "[ARM] Revert r297443 and r297820."
and partially reverts r297842 "Revert "[Thumb1] Fix the bug when adding/subtracting -2147483648""
llvm-svn: 298417
The glueless lowering of addc/adde in Thumb1 has known serious
miscompiles (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D31081), and r297820
causes an infinite loop for certain constructs. It's not
clear when they will be fixed, so let's just take them out
of the tree for now.
(I resolved a small conflict with r297453.)
llvm-svn: 298328
The special case of zero sized values was previously not handled correctly.
This patch handles this by not promoting if the size is zero.
Patch by Tim Neumann.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31116
llvm-svn: 298320
Enable the selection of the 64-bit signed multiply accumulate
instructions which operate on 16-bit operands. These are enabled for
ARMv5TE onwards for ARM and for V6T2 and other DSP enabled Thumb
architectures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30044
llvm-svn: 297809
Create nodes for smulwb and smulwt and move their selection from
DAGToDAG to DAG combine. smlawb and smlawt can then be selected
using tablegen. Added some helper functions to detect shift patterns
as well as a wrapper around SimplifyDemandBits. Added a couple of
extra tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30708
llvm-svn: 297716
ARMISD::ADD[CE] nodes, instead of the generic ISD::ADD[CE].
Summary:
This allows for some simplification because the combines
are no longer limited to just one go at the node before
it gets legalized into an ARM target-specific one.
Reviewers: jmolloy, rogfer01
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30401
llvm-svn: 297453
same as already done for ARM and Thumb2.
Reviewers: jmolloy, rogfer01, efriedma
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30400
llvm-svn: 297443
The original patch r296865 was reverted as it broke the chromium builds for
Android https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32134, this patch reapplies
r296865 with a fix to make sure it doesn't cause the build regression.
The problem was that intrinsic selection on int_arm_get_fpscr was failing in
ISel this was because the code to manually select this intrinsic still thought
it was the version with no side-effects (INTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN) which is wrong as
it doesn't semantically match the definition in the tablegen code which says it
does have side-effects, I've fixed this by updating the intrinsic type to
INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN (has side-effects). I've also added a test for this based on
Hans original reproducer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30645
llvm-svn: 297137
This patch teaches (ARM|AArch64)ISelLowering.cpp to match illegal vector types
to interleaved access intrinsics as long as the types are multiples of the
vector register width. A "wide" access will now be mapped to multiple
interleave intrinsics similar to the way in which non-interleaved accesses with
illegal types are legalized into multiple accesses. I'll update the associated
TTI costs (in getInterleavedMemoryOpCost) as a follow-on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29466
llvm-svn: 296750
The transform in question claims to be doing:
// fold (add (select cc, 0, c), x) -> (select cc, x, (add, x, c))
...starting in PerformADDCombineWithOperands(), but it wasn't actually checking for a setcc node
for the sext/zext patterns.
This is exactly the opposite of a transform I'd like to add to DAGCombiner's foldSelectOfConstants(),
so I was seeing infinite loops with my draft of a patch applied.
The changes in select_const.ll look positive (less instructions). The change in arm-and-tst-peephole.ll
is unrelated. We're changing the input IR in that test to preserve the intent of the test, but that's
not affected by this code change.
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30355
llvm-svn: 296389
Removed the HasT2ExtractPack feature and replaced its references
with HasDSP. This then allows the Thumb2 extend instructions to be
selected for ARMv8M +dsp. These instruction descriptions have also
been refactored and more target tests have been added for their isel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29623
llvm-svn: 295452
When generating a floating point comparison we currently unconditionally
generate VCMPE. This has the sideeffect of setting the cumulative Invalid
bit in FPSCR if any of the operands are QNaN.
It is expected that use of a relational predicate on a QNaN value should
raise Invalid. Quoting from the C standard:
The relational and equality operators support the usual mathematical
relationships between numeric values. For any ordered pair of numeric
values exactly one of relationships the less, greater, equal and is true.
Relational operators may raise the floating-point exception when argument
values are NaNs.
The standard doesn't explicitly state the expectation for equality operators,
but the implication and obvious expectation is that equality operators
should not raise Invalid on a QNaN input, as those predicates are wholly
defined on unordered inputs (to return not equal).
Therefore, add a new operand to ARMISD::FPCMP and FPCMPZ indicating if
QNaN should raise Invalid, and pipe that through to TableGen.
llvm-svn: 294945
There are no vldN/vstN f16 variants, even with +fullfp16.
We could use the i16 variants, but, in practice, even with +fullfp16,
the f16 sequence leading to the i16 shuffle usually gets scalarized.
We'd need to improve our support for f16 codegen before getting there.
Reject f16 interleaved accesses. If we try to emit the f16 intrinsics,
we'll just end up with a selection failure.
llvm-svn: 294818
We mark X0 as preserved by a call that passes the returned parameter.
x0 = ...
fun(x0) // no implicit def of x0
This no longer is valid if we pass the parameter in a different register then
the returned value as is the case with a swiftself parameter (passed in x20).
x20 = ...
fun(x20) // there should be an implict def of x8
rdar://30425845
llvm-svn: 294527
When constructing global address literals while targeting the RWPI
relocation model. LLVM currently only uses literal pools. If MOVW/MOVT
instructions are available we can use these instead. Beside being more
efficient it allows -arm-execute-only to work with
-relocation-model=RWPI as well.
When we generate MOVW/MOVT for global addresses when targeting the RWPI
relocation model, we need to use base relative relocations. This patch
does the needed plumbing in MC to generate these for MOVW/MOVT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29487
Change-Id: I446786e43a6f5aa9b6a5bb2cd216d60d41c7755d
llvm-svn: 294298
