A lot of `TestConcurrent*.py` expect one of the threads to crash, but we
weren't checking for it properly.
Possibly because signal reporting got better on FreeBSD at some point,
and it now shows the same info as Linux does.
```
lldb-api :: functionalities/inferior-changed/TestInferiorChanged.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/inferior-crashing/TestInferiorCrashing.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/inferior-crashing/TestInferiorCrashingStep.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/inferior-crashing/recursive-inferior/TestRecursiveInferior.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/inferior-crashing/recursive-inferior/TestRecursiveInferiorStep.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/thread/concurrent_events/TestConcurrentCrashWithBreak.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/thread/concurrent_events/TestConcurrentCrashWithSignal.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/thread/concurrent_events/TestConcurrentCrashWithWatchpoint.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/thread/concurrent_events/TestConcurrentCrashWithWatchpointBreakpointSignal.py
```
Fixes#48777
`TestConcurrentTwoBreakpointsOneSignal.py` no longer fails, at least on
an AWS instance, so I've removed the xfail there.
self.wait_for_running_event(process) is always called after
self.runCmd("continue"). It is strange to expect eStateConnected here.
This test failed in case of a remote target. The correct state is
eStateRunning. Removed incorrect checking.
This actually passes on Windows but I don't know how to convey
that with an xfail without clashing with the xfail for all
platforms.
At least this avoids a UPASS.
Any time we see the pattern `assertEqual(value, bool)`, we can replace
that with `assert<bool>(value)`. Likewise for `assertNotEqual`.
Technically this relaxes the test a bit, as we may want to make sure
`value` is either `True` or `False`, and not something that implicitly
converts to a bool. For example, `assertEqual("foo", True)` will fail,
but `assertTrue("foo")` will not. In most cases, this distinction is not
important.
There are two such places that this patch does **not** transform, since
it seems intentional that we want the result to be a bool:
*
5daf2001a1/lldb/test/API/python_api/sbstructureddata/TestStructuredDataAPI.py (L90)
*
5daf2001a1/lldb/test/API/commands/settings/TestSettings.py (L940)
Followup to 9c2468821e. I patched `teyit`
with a `visit_assertEqual` node handler to generate this.
This uses [teyit](https://pypi.org/project/teyit/) to modernize asserts,
as recommended by the [unittest release
notes](https://docs.python.org/3.12/whatsnew/3.12.html#id3).
For example, `assertTrue(a == b)` is replaced with `assertEqual(a, b)`.
This produces better error messages, e.g. `error: unexpectedly found 1
and 2 to be different` instead of `error: False`.
assertEquals is a deprecated alias for assertEqual and has been removed
in Python 3.12. This wasn't an issue previously because we used a
vendored version of the unittest module. Now that we use the built-in
version this gets updated together with the Python version used to run
the test suite.
This removes the dependency LLDB API tests have on
lldb/third_party/Python/module/unittest2, and instead uses the standard
one provided by Python.
This does not actually remove the vendored dep yet, nor update the docs.
I'll do both those once this sticks.
Non-trivial changes to call out:
- expected failures (i.e. "bugnumber") don't have a reason anymore, so
those params were removed
- `assertItemsEqual` is now called `assertCountEqual`
- When a test is marked xfail, our copy of unittest2 considers failures
during teardown to be OK, but modern unittest does not. See
TestThreadLocal.py. (Very likely could be a real bug/leak).
- Our copy of unittest2 was patched to print all test results, even ones
that don't happen, e.g. `(5 passes, 0 failures, 1 errors, 0 skipped,
...)`, but standard unittest prints a terser message that omits test
result types that didn't happen, e.g. `OK (skipped=1)`. Our lit
integration parses this stderr and needs to be updated w/ that
expectation.
I tested this w/ `ninja check-lldb-api` on Linux. There's a good chance
non-Linux tests have similar quirks, but I'm not able to uncover those.
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
After D133376, jumping to the return line in the otherfn function became
ambiguous because it has two line entries associated with it. Work
around that problem by changing the function. Filed PR59458 to track
possible improvements in jump target disambiguation.
This commit combines the initial commit (7c240de609af), a fix for x86_64 Linux
(3a0581501e76) and a fix for thinko in a last minute rewrite that I really
should have run the testsuite on.
Also, make sure that all the "I need to step over watchpoint" plans execute
before we call a public stop. Otherwise, e.g. if you have N watchpoints and
a Signal, the signal stop info will get us to stop with the watchpoints in a
half-done state.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130674
Add a function to make it easier to debug a test failure caused by an
unexpected stop reason. This is similar to the assertState helper that
was added in ce825e4674.
Before:
self.assertEqual(stop_reason, lldb.eStopReasonInstrumentation)
AssertionError: 5 != 10
After:
self.assertStopReason(stop_reason, lldb.eStopReasonInstrumentation)
AssertionError: signal (5) != instrumentation (10)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131083
This reverts commit 5778ada8e5.
The watchpoint tests all stall on aarch64-ubuntu bots. Reverting till I can
get my hands on an system to test this out.
Since we want to present the "new & old" values for watchpoint hits, on architectures,
including the ARM family, that stop before the triggering instruction is run, we need
to single step over the instruction before stopping for realz. This was incorrectly
done directly in the StopInfoWatchpoint::ShouldStop. That causes problems if more than
one thread stops "for a reason" at the same time as the watchpoint, since the other actions
didn't expect the process to make progress in this part of the execution control machinery.
The correct way to do this is to schedule the step over using ThreadPlans, and then to restore
the stop info after that plan stops, so that the rest of the stop info actions can happen when
all the other threads have handled their immediate actions as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129814
The requirements for "thread until <line number>" are:
a) If any code contributed by <line number> or the nearest subsequent of <line number> is executed before leaving the function, stop
b) If you end up leaving the function w/o triggering (a), then stop
In case of (a), since the <line number> may have multiple entries in the line table and the compiler might have scheduled/moved the relevant code across, and the lldb does not know the control flow, set breakpoints on all the line table entries of best match of <line number> i.e. exact or the nearest subsequent line.
Along with the above, currently, CommandObjectThreadUntil is also setting the breakpoints on all the subsequent line numbers after the best match and this latter part is wrong.
This issue is discussed at http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2018-August/013979.html.
In fact, currently `TestStepUntil.py` is not actually testing step until scenarios and `test_missing_one` test fails without this patch if tests are made to run. Fixed the test as well.
Reviewed By: jingham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50304
The requirements for "thread until <line number>" are:
a) If any code contributed by <line number> or the nearest subsequent of <line number> is executed before leaving the function, stop
b) If you end up leaving the function w/o triggering (a), then stop
In case of (a), since the <line number> may have multiple entries in the line table and the compiler might have scheduled/moved the relevant code across, and the lldb does not know the control flow, set breakpoints on all the line table entries of best match of <line number> i.e. exact or the nearest subsequent line.
Along with the above, currently, CommandObjectThreadUntil is also setting the breakpoints on all the subsequent line numbers after the best match and this latter part is wrong.
This issue is discussed at http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2018-August/013979.html.
In fact, currently `TestStepUntil.py` is not actually testing step until scenarios and `test_missing_one` test fails without this patch if tests are made to run. Fixed the test as well.
Reviewed By: jingham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50304
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
This test depends on multiple threads with one of them
hitting a watchpoint at the same time as a breakpoint, and
can fail because of the way arm64 watchpoints are handled.
I added skips to most of these via
```
commit bef4da4a6a
Author: Jason Molenda <jason@molenda.com>
Date: Wed May 25 16:05:16 2022 -0700
Skip testing of watchpoint hit-count/ignore-count on multithreaded
```
but missed that this test is susceptable to the same issue.
Skip all watchpoint hit-count/ignore-count tests for multithreaded
API tests for now on arm64 Darwin.
On AArch64, insns that trigger a WP are rolled back and we are
notified. lldb needs to disable the WP, insn step, re-enable it,
then report it to the user. lldb only does this full step action
for the "selected thread", and so when a program stops with
multiple threads hitting a stop reason, some of them watchpoints,
any non-selected-thread will not be completed in this way. But
all threads with the initial watchpoint exception will have their
hit-count/ignore-counts updated. When we resume execution, the
other threads sitting at the instruction will again execute &
trigger the WP exceptoin again, repeating until we've gone through
all of the threads.
This bug is being tracked in llvm.org/pr49433 and inside apple
in rdar://93863107
This patch handles the situation where the main thread exits (through
the SYS_exit syscall). In this case, the process as a whole continues
running until all of the other threads exit, or one of them issues an
exit_group syscall.
The patch consists of two changes:
- a moderate redesign of the handling of thread exit (WIFEXITED) events.
Previously, we were removing (forgetting) a thread once we received
the WIFEXITED (or WIFSIGNALED) event. This was problematic for the
main thread, since the main thread WIFEXITED event (which is better thought
of as a process-wide event) gets reported only after the entire process
exits. This resulted in deadlocks, where we were waiting for the
process to stop (because we still considered the main thread "live").
This patch changes the logic such that the main thread is removed as
soon as its PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT (the pre-exit) event is received. At
this point we can consider the thread gone (for most purposes). As a
corrolary, I needed to add special logic to catch process-wide exit
events in the cases where we don't have the main thread around.
- The second part of the patch is the removal of the assumptions that
the main thread is always available. This generally meant replacing
the uses of GetThreadByID(process_id) with GetCurrentThread() in
various process-wide operations (such as memory reads).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122716
After applying the same for as in TestThreadBacktraceRepeat, the test
appears to pass reliably. The skip decorator was added many years ago,
so it's not clear whether this is what caused it to hang.
Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).
* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616
This test is completely nondeterministic, environment-dependent and does
not test what it was supposed to test (reverting the associated patch
does not make it fail).
I tried to figure out what the patch was meant to fix to see if I can
create a better test with the current tools, but I was not able to
understand the problem (it sounds like it has something to do with local
classes, but I don't understand the details).
D116372, while fixing one kind of a race, ended up creating a new one.
The new issue could occur when one inferior thread exits while another
thread initiates termination of the entire process (exit_group(2)).
With some bad luck, we could start processing the exit notification
(PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT) only to have the become unresponsive (ESRCH) in the
middle of the MonitorCallback function. This function would then delete
the thread from our list even though it wasn't completely dead (it stays
zombified until we read the WIFEXITED event). The linux kernel will not
deliver the exited event for the entire process until we process
individual thread exits.
In a pre-D116372 world, this wouldn't be a problem because we would read
this event (even though we would not know what to do with it) with
waitpid(-1). Now, when we issue invididual waitpids, this event will
never be picked up, and we end up hanging.
The fix for this is actually quite simple -- don't delete the thread in
this situation. The thread will be deleted when the WIFEXITED event
comes.
This situation was kind of already tested by
TestCreateDuringInstructionStep (which is how I found this problem), but
it was mostly accidental, so I am also creating a dedicated test which
reproduces this situation.
It was being used only in some very old tests (which pass even without
it) and its implementation is highly questionable.
These days we have different mechanisms for requesting a build with a
particular kind of c++ library (USE_LIB(STD)CPP in the makefile).
These tests work fine with VS2017, but become more flaky with VS2019 and the buildbot is about to get upgraded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114907
This provides a convenient way to limit a breakpoint
to the current thread when setting it from the command line w/o
having to figure out what the current thread is.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107015
TestExitDuringExpression test_exit_before_one_thread_no_unwind fails
sporadically on both Arm and AArch64 linux buildbots. This seems like
manifesting itself on a fully loaded machine. I have not found a reliable
timeout value so marking it skip for now.
The test had a race that could cause two threads to end up with the same
"thread local" value. I believe this would not cause the test to fail,
but it could cause it to succeed even when the functionality is broken.
The new implementation removes this uncertainty, and removes a lot of
cruft left over from the time this test was written using pthreads.
TestExitDuringExpression test_exit_before_one_thread_unwind fails
sporadically on both Arm and AArch64 linux buildbots.
This seems like a thread timing issue. I am marking it skip for now.
For instance, some recent clang emits this code on x86_64:
0x100002b99 <+57>: callq 0x100002b40 ; step_out_of_here at main.cpp:11
-> 0x100002b9e <+62>: xorl %eax, %eax
0x100002ba0 <+64>: popq %rbp
0x100002ba1 <+65>: retq
and the "xorl %eax, %eax" is attributed to the same line as the callq. Since
step out is supposed to stop just on returning from the function, you can't guarantee
it will end up on the next line. I changed the test to check that we were either
on the call line or on the next line, since either would be right depending on the
debug information.
TestExitDuringExpression test_exit_before_one_thread_unwind fails
sporadically on arm/linux. This seems like a thread timing issue.
I am marking it skip for now.
Use realpath() when spawning the executable create_after_attach
to workaround a FreeBSD plugin (and possibly others) problem.
If the executable is started via a path containing a symlink, it is
added to the module list twice -- via the real and apparent path.
This in turn cases the requested breakpoint to resolve twice.
Use realpath() for main program path in lldb-vscode breakpoint tests
to workaround a similar problem. If the passed path does not match
the realpath, lldb-vscode does not report the breakpoints as verified
and causes tests to fail.
Since the underlying problems are non-trivial to fix and the purpose
of these tests is not to reproduce symlink problems, let's apply
trivial workarounds to make them pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97230
The original patch got reverted as a dependency of cf1c774d6a .
That patch got relanded so it's also necessary to reland this patch.
Original summary:
After cf1c774d6a, Clang seems to generate code
that is more similar to icc/Clang, so we can use the same line numbers for
all compilers in this test.
