In OpenMP Version 5.1, the tile and unroll directives were added. When
using these directives, it is possible to nest them within other OpenMP
Loop Constructs. This patch enables the semantics to allow for this
behaviour on these specific directives. Any nested loops will be stored
within the initial Loop Construct until reaching the DoConstruct itself.
Relevant tests have been added, and previous behaviour has been retained
with no changes.
See also, #110008
Allow utility constructs (error and nothing) to appear in the
specification part as well as the execution part. The exception is
"ERROR AT(EXECUTION)" which should only be in the execution part.
In case of ambiguity (the boundary between the specification and the
execution part), utility constructs will be parsed as belonging to the
specification part. In such cases move them to the execution part in the
OpenMP canonicalization code.
This fixes a compilation error when code like this is presented to the
compiler:
!$OMP PARALLEL DO
!DIR$ VECTOR ALIGNED
DO 20 i=1,N
a = a + 0.5
20 CONTINUE
The directive itself is later ignored (with a warning that this is
happening), but because the compiler already errored out before that
point, it completely fails to compile this code. Other compilers accept
the code without complaints.
Addresses the same issue as the following abandoned revision: D104391.
Rewrite leading declarative allocations so they are nested within their respective executable allocate directive
Original:
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPExecutableAllocate
After rewriting:
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPExecutableAllocate
| ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
| ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148409
Co-authored-by: Isaac Perry <isaac.perry@arm.com>
Addresses the same issue as the following abandoned revision: D104391.
Rewrite leading declarative allocations so they are nested within their respective executable allocate directive
Original:
```
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPExecutableAllocate
```
After rewriting:
```
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPExecutableAllocate
| ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
| ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
```
Co-authored-by: Isaac Perry <isaac.perry@arm.com>
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148409
This reverts commit 5faf45a3d2.
Once again arcanist stripped the co-author metadata. I'm going to add it to the revision description and try one last time.
Addresses the same issue as the following abandoned revision: D104391.
Rewrite leading declarative allocations so they are nested within their respective executable allocate directive
Original:
```
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPExecutableAllocate
```
After rewriting:
```
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPExecutableAllocate
| ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
| ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
```
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148409
Addresses the same issue as the following abandoned revision: D104391.
Rewrite leading declarative allocations so they are nested within their respective executable allocate directive
Original:
```
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPExecutableAllocate
```
After rewriting:
```
ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPExecutableAllocate
| ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
| ExecutionPartConstruct -> OpenMPDeclarativeAllocate
```
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148409
