Summary:
Unlike the rest of the sanitizer code, lib/interception uses native macros like __linux__
to check for specific targets instead of the common ones like SANITIZER_LINUX.
When working on the Solaris port of the sanitizers, the current style was found to not
only be inconsistent, but clumsy to use because the canonical way to check for Solaris
is to check for __sun__ && __svr4__ which is a mouthful.
Therefore, this patch switches to use SANITIZER_* macros instead.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: #sanitizers, srhines, krytarowski, llvm-commits, fedor.sergeev
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39798
llvm-svn: 319906
If the lookup using RTLD_NEXT failed, the sanitizer runtime library
is later in the library search order than the DSO that we are trying
to intercept, which means that we cannot intercept this function. We
still want the address of the real definition, though, so look it up
using RTLD_DEFAULT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39779
llvm-svn: 317930
Summary:
Part of the code inspired by the original work on libsanitizer in GCC 5.4 by Christos Zoulas.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, kcc, vitalybuka, filcab
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36321
llvm-svn: 310351
The idea isthat asan/tsan can survive if user intercepts the same functions. At the same time user has an ability to call back into asan/tsan runtime. See the following tests for examples:
asan/output_tests/interception_failure_test-linux.cc
asan/output_tests/interception_test-linux.cc
asan/output_tests/interception_malloc_test-linux.cc
llvm-svn: 157388
