This is described in (N2) https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1126/
so caught by the PVS Studio analyzer.
Warning message -
V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was
expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator.
LoopEmitter.cpp 983
V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was
expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator.
LoopEmitter.cpp 1039
The assert should be
assert(bArgs.size() == reduc.size() + (needsUniv ? 1 : 0));
since + has higher precedence and ? has lower.
This further can be reduce to
assert(aArgs.size() == reduc.size() + needsUniv);
because needUniv is a bool value which is implicitly converted to 0 or
Some of the options only fed into the full sparse pipeline. However,
some backends prefer to use the sparse minipipeline. This change exposes
some important optimization flags to the pass as well. This prepares
some SIMDization of PyTorch sparsified code.
Codegen "vectors" for pos/crd/val use the capacity as memref size, not
the actual used size. Although the sparsifier itself always uses just
the defined pos/crd/val parts, printing these and passing them back to a
runtime environment could benefit from wrapping the basic pos/crd/val
getters into a proper memref view that sets the right size.
This patch generalizes tensor.expand_shape and memref.expand_shape to
consume the output shape as a list of SSA values. This enables us to
implement generic reshape operations with dynamic shapes using
collapse_shape/expand_shape pairs.
The output_shape input to expand_shape follows the static/dynamic
representation that's also used in `tensor.extract_slice`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140821
---------
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Shukla<gaurav.shukla@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Shukla <gaurav.shukla@amd.com>
Co-authored-by: Ramiro Leal-Cavazos <ramiroleal050@gmail.com>
This ensures the explicit value is generated (and not a load into the
values array). Note that actually not storing values array at all is
still TBD, this is just the very first step.
Addresses issue #88716.
Some function parameter names in the affected header files did not match
the parameter names in the definitions, or were listed in a different
order.
---------
Signed-off-by: Troy-Butler <squintik@outlook.com>
This patch generalizes tensor.expand_shape and memref.expand_shape to
consume the output shape as a list of SSA values. This enables us to
implement generic reshape operations with dynamic shapes using
collapse_shape/expand_shape pairs.
The output_shape input to expand_shape follows the static/dynamic
representation that's also used in `tensor.extract_slice`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140821
Co-authored-by: Ramiro Leal-Cavazos <ramiroleal050@gmail.com>
This commit fixes the following error when stopping the sparse compiler
pipeline after bufferization (e.g., with `test-analysis-only`):
```
LLVM ERROR: Building op `vector.print` but it isn't known in this MLIRContext: the dialect may not be loaded or this operation hasn't been added by the dialect. See also https://mlir.llvm.org/getting_started/Faq/#registered-loaded-dependent-whats-up-with-dialects-management
```
In order to support various external frameworks (JAX vs PyTorch) we need
a bit more flexibility in [dis]assembling external buffers to and from
sparse tensors in MLIR land. This PR adds a direct-out option that
avoids the rigid pre-allocated for copy-out semantics.
Note that over time, we expect the [dis]assemble operations to converge
into something that supports all sorts of external frameworks. Until
then, this option helps in experimenting with different options.
Operations must be created with the supplied builder. Otherwise, the
dialect conversion / greedy pattern rewrite driver can break.
This commit fixes a crash in the dialect conversion:
```
within split at llvm-project/mlir/test/Conversion/TosaToLinalg/tosa-to-linalg-invalid.mlir:1 offset :8:8: error: failed to legalize operation 'tosa.add'
%0 = tosa.add %1, %arg2 : (tensor<10x10xf32>, tensor<*xf32>) -> tensor<*xf32>
^
within split at llvm-project/mlir/test/Conversion/TosaToLinalg/tosa-to-linalg-invalid.mlir:1 offset :8:8: note: see current operation: %9 = "tosa.add"(%8, %arg2) : (tensor<10x10xf32>, tensor<*xf32>) -> tensor<*xf32>
mlir-opt: llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/IR/UseDefLists.h:198: mlir::IRObjectWithUseList<mlir::OpOperand>::~IRObjectWithUseList() [OperandType = mlir::OpOperand]: Assertion `use_empty() && "Cannot destroy a value that still has uses!"' failed.
```
This commit is the proper fix for #87297 (which was reverted).
Note that even though the sparse runtime support lib always uses SoA
storage for COO storage (and provides correct codegen by means of views
into this storage), in some rare cases we need the true physical SoA
storage as a coordinate buffer. This PR provides that functionality by
means of a (costly) coordinate buffer call.
Since this is currently only used for testing/debugging by means of the
sparse_tensor.print method, this solution is acceptable. If we ever want
a performing version of this, we should truly support AoS storage of COO
in addition to the SoA used right now.
Last resort resolution of cycles introduced a sparse conversion without
explicit sparse deallocation (which is not inserted by any automatic
means). This fixes 2 out of 5 remaining asan detected leaks in sparse
integration tests.
This change lifts the restriction that purely allocated empty sparse
tensors cannot escape the method. Instead it makes a best effort to add
a finalizing operation before the escape.
This assumes that
(1) we never build sparse tensors across method boundaries
(e.g. allocate in one, insert in other method)
(2) if we have other uses of the empty allocation in the
same method, we assume that either that op will fail
or will do the finalization for us.
This is best-effort, but fixes some very obvious missing cases.
This commit adds a new test-only op:
`sparse_tensor.has_runtime_library`. The op returns "1" if the sparse
compiler runs in runtime library mode.
This op is useful for writing test cases that require different IR
depending on whether the sparse compiler runs in runtime library or
codegen mode.
This commit fixes a memory leak in `sparse_pack_d.mlir`. This test case
uses `sparse_tensor.assemble` to create a sparse tensor SSA value from
existing buffers. This runtime library reallocates+copies the existing
buffers; the codegen path does not. Therefore, the test requires
additional deallocations when running in runtime library mode.
Alternatives considered:
- Make the codegen path allocate. "Codegen" is the "default" compilation
mode and it is handling `sparse_tensor.assemble` correctly. The issue is
with the runtime library path, which should not allocate. Therefore, it
is better to put a workaround in the runtime library path than to work
around the issue with a new flag in the codegen path.
- Add a `sparse_tensor.runtime_only` attribute to
`bufferization.dealloc_tensor`. Verifying that the attribute can only be
attached to `bufferization.dealloc_tensor` may introduce an unwanted
dependency of `MLIRSparseTensorDialect` on `MLIRBufferizationDialect`.
This commit fixes a memory leak in `sparse_codegen_foreach.mlir`. The
bufferization inserted a copy for the operand of `sparse_tensor.foreach`
because it conservatively assumed that the op writes to the operand.
