Currently a FileSpecList::FindFileIndex(...) will only match the specified FileSpec if:
- it has filename and directory and both match exactly
- if has a filename only and any filename in the list matches
Because of this, we modify our breakpoint resolving so it can handle relative paths by doing some extra code that removes the directory from the FileSpec when searching if the path is relative.
This patch is intended to fix breakpoints so they work as users expect them to by adding the following features:
- allow matches to relative paths in the file list to match as long as the relative path is at the end of the specified path at valid directory delimiters
- allow matches to paths to match if the specified path is relative and shorter than the file paths in the list
This allows us to remove the extra logic from BreakpointResolverFileLine.cpp that added support for setting breakpoints with relative paths.
This means we can still set breakpoints with relative paths when the debug info contains full paths. We add the ability to set breakpoints with full paths when the debug info contains relative paths.
Debug info contains "./a/b/c/main.cpp", the following will set breakpoints successfully:
- /build/a/b/c/main.cpp
- a/b/c/main.cpp
- b/c/main.cpp
- c/main.cpp
- main.cpp
- ./c/main.cpp
- ./a/b/c/main.cpp
- ./b/c/main.cpp
- ./main.cpp
This also ensures that we won't match partial directory names, if a relative path is in the list or is used for the match, things must match at the directory level.
The breakpoint resolving code will now use the new FileSpecList::FindCompatibleIndex(...) function to allow this fuzzy matching to work for breakpoints.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130401
Add a function to make it easier to debug a test failure caused by an
unexpected stop reason. This is similar to the assertState helper that
was added in ce825e4674.
Before:
self.assertEqual(stop_reason, lldb.eStopReasonInstrumentation)
AssertionError: 5 != 10
After:
self.assertStopReason(stop_reason, lldb.eStopReasonInstrumentation)
AssertionError: signal (5) != instrumentation (10)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131083
- Fix a typo in the function that never returns a significant value
- Add unit tests for the getters/setters in SBBreakpointLocation
- Verified the newly added unit test succeeds after the fix:
llvm-lit -sv lldb/test/API/functionalities/breakpoint/breakpoint_locations/TestBreakpointLocations.py
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660
This is required in preparation for the follow-up patch which adds
support for evaluating expressions from within C++ lambdas. In such
cases we need to materialize variables which are not part of the
current frame but instead are ivars on a 'this' pointer of the current
frame.
This test has some race condition which is making it hang on LLDB
Arm/AArch64 Linux buildbot. I am marking it as skipped until we
investigate whats going wrong.
not to be hit. But another thread might be hit at the same time and
actually stop. So we have to be sure to switch the first thread's
stop info to eStopReasonNone or we'll report a hit when the condition
failed, which is confusing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128776
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
Add a function to make it easier to debug a test failure caused by an
unexpected state.
Currently, tests are using assertEqual which results in a cryptic error
message: "AssertionError: 5 != 10". Even when a test provides a message
to make it clear why a particular state is expected, you still have to
figure out which of the two was the expected state, and what the other
value corresponds to.
We have a function in lldbutil that helps you convert the state number
into a user readable string. This patch adds a wrapper around
assertEqual specifically for comparing states and reporting better error
messages.
The aforementioned error message now looks like this: "AssertionError:
stopped (5) != exited (10)". If the user provided a message, that
continues to get printed as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127355
The function that was supposed to iterate over all the breakpoints sharing
BKPT_NAME stopped after the first one because of a reversed "if success"
condition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126730
After changing the "fallback" behavior when a user sets a breakpoint
without specifying a module the bad-address-breakpoint test case failed
incorrectly. This patch updates that test case in order to more
thoroughly discover an illegal address and use that as the means for
testing whether a breakpoint set at an illegal address fails to resolve.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126109
symbol name matches. Instead, we extract the incoming path's base
name, look up all the symbols with that base name, and then compare
the rest of the context that the user provided to make sure it
matches. However, we do this comparison using just a strstr. So for
instance:
break set -n foo::bar
will match not only "a::foo::bar" but "notherfoo::bar". The former is
pretty clearly the user's intent, but I don't think the latter is, and
results in breakpoints picking up too many matches.
This change adds a Language::DemangledNameContainsPath API which can
do a language aware match against the path provided. If the language
doesn't provide this we fall back to the strstr (though that's changed
to StringRef::contains in the patch).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124579
Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).
* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616
We had two sets of build<flavour> methods, whose bodies were largely
identical. This makes any kind of modification in their vicinity
repetitive and error-prone.
Replace each set with a single method taking an optional debug_info
parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111989
Adding the to be loaded dylib to the extra images causes the breakpoint
to be found in the image added to the target on Linux (though not on
Darwin). So adjust the test for this difference.
I added some tests for the case where the breakpoints take immediately
to the extant test case, and made a new test case for when the source
regex breakpoint will be set in a dlopen-ed library.
I also noticed when doing this that "lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint
can't handle the case where the breakpoint will be in a dlopen-ed
library, since it requires the breakpoint to have at least 1 location
before run. I fixed that by adding a parameter to say whether a
before run location is expected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111920
Following LLDB tests fail randomly on LLDB Arm/AArch64 Linux buildbots.
We still not have a reliable solution for these tests to pass
consistently. I am marking them skipped for now.
TestBreakpointCallbackCommandSource.py
TestIOHandlerResize.py
TestEditline.py
TestGuiViewLarge.py
TestGuiExpandThreadsTree.py
TestGuiBreakpoints.py
https://reviews.llvm.org/D45592 added a nice feature to be able to specify a breakpoint by a relative path. E.g. passing foo.cpp or bar/foo.cpp or zaz/bar/foo.cpp is fine. However, https://reviews.llvm.org/D68671 by mistake disabled the test that ensured this functionality works. With time, someone made a small mistake and fully broke the functionality.
So, I'm making a very simple fix and the test passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107126
The code that figured out which breakpoints to delete was supposed
to set the result status if it found breakpoints, and then the code
that actually deleted them checked that the result's status was set.
The code for "break delete --disabled" failed to set the status if
no "protected" breakpoints were provided. This was a confusing way
to implement this, so I reworked it with early returns so it was less
error prone, and added a test case for the no arguments case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106623
Previously ignore counts were checked when we stopped to do the sync callback in Breakpoint::ShouldStop. That meant we would do all the ignore count work even when
there is also a condition says the breakpoint should not stop.
That's wrong, lldb treats breakpoint hits that fail the thread or condition checks as "not having hit the breakpoint". So the ignore count check should happen after
the condition and thread checks in StopInfoBreakpoint::PerformAction.
The one side-effect of doing this is that if you have a breakpoint with a synchronous callback, it will run the synchronous callback before checking the ignore count.
That is probably a good thing, since this was already true of the condition and thread checks, so this removes an odd asymmetry. And breakpoints with sync callbacks
are all internal lldb breakpoints and there's not a really good reason why you would want one of these to use an ignore count (but not a condition or thread check...)
Differential Revision https://reviews.llvm.org/D103217
At the moment nearly every test calls something similar to
`self.dbg.CreateTarget(self.getBuildArtifact("a.out"))` and them sometimes
checks if the created target is actually valid with something like
`self.assertTrue(target.IsValid(), "some useless text")`.
Beside being really verbose the error messages generated by this pattern are
always just indicating that the target failed to be created but now why.
This patch introduces a helper function `createTestTarget` to our Test class
that creates the target with the much more verbose `CreateTarget` overload that
gives us back an SBError (with a fancy error). If the target couldn't be created
the function prints out the SBError that LLDB returned and asserts for us. It
also defaults to the "a.out" build artifact path that nearly all tests are using
to avoid to hardcode "a.out" in every test.
I converted a bunch of tests to the new function but I'll do the rest of the
test suite as follow ups.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102771
This patch fixes the column symbol resolution when creating a breakpoint
with the `move_to_nearest_code` flag set.
In order to achieve this, the patch adds column information handling in
the `LineTable`'s `LineEntry` finder. After experimenting a little, it
turns out the most natural approach in case of an inaccurate column match,
is to move backward and match the previous `LineEntry` rather than going
forward like we do with simple line breakpoints.
The patch also reflows the function to reduce code duplication.
Finally, it updates the `BreakpointResolver` heuristic to align it with
the `LineTable` method.
rdar://73218201
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101221
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Convert `assertTrue(a == b)` to `assertEqual(a, b)` to produce better failure messages.
These were mostly done via regex search & replace, with some manual fixes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95813
Explicitly consider the libraries reported on the initial rendezvous
breakpoint hit added. This is necessary on FreeBSD since the dynamic
loader issues only a single 'consistent' state rendezvous breakpoint hit
for all the libraries present in DT_NEEDED. It is also helpful on Linux
where it ensures that ld-linux is considered loaded as well
as the shared system libraries reported afterwards.
Reenable memory maps on FreeBSD since this fixed the issue triggered
by them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92187
This patch exposes the Target::CreateBreakpoint overload with the
boolean argument to move to the neareast code to the SBAPI.
This is useful when creating column breakpoints to restrict lldb's
resolution to the pointed source location, preventing it to go to the next
line.
rdar://72196842
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93266
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This patch exposes the Target::CreateBreakpoint overload with the
boolean argument to move to the neareast code to the SBAPI.
This is useful when creating column breakpoints to restrict lldb's
resolution to the pointed source location, preventing it to go to the next
line.
rdar://72196842
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93266
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Explicitly consider the libraries reported on the initial eTakeSnapshot
action added, through adding them to the added soentry list
in DYLDRendezvous::SaveSOEntriesFromRemote(). This is necessary
on FreeBSD since the dynamic loader issues only a single 'consistent'
state rendezvous breakpoint hit for all the libraries present
in DT_NEEDED (while Linux issues an added-consistent event pair).
Reenable memory maps on FreeBSD since this fixed the issue triggered
by them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92187
Replace the plethora of ObjC-implied 'skipUnlessDarwin' decorators
with marking tests as 'objc' category (whenever missing), and skip all
ObjC tests on non-Darwin platforms. I have used '.categories' file
wherever it was present already or all (>1) tests were relying on ObjC,
and explicit add_test_categories() where there was only one test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91056
Add preconditions to `TestBase.expect()` that catch semantically invalid calls
that happen to succeed anyway. This also fixes the broken callsites caught by
these checks.
This prevents the following incorrect calls:
1. `self.expect("lldb command", "some substr")`
2. `self.expect("lldb command", "assert message", "some substr")`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88792
