I've always found the "findValue" a little odd and
inconsistent with other things in SDB.
This simplfifies the code in SDB to just handle a splat constant
address or a 2 operand GEP in the same BB. This removes the
need for "findValue" since the operands to the GEP are
guaranteed to be available. The splat constant handling is
new, but was needed to avoid regressions due to constant
folding combining GEPs created in CGP.
CGP is now responsible for canonicalizing gather/scatters into
this form. The pattern I'm using for scalarizing, a scalar GEP
followed by a GEP with an all zeroes index, seems to be subject
to constant folding that the insertelement+shufflevector was not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76947
The attached test case is simplified from tcmalloc. Both function calls should be optimized as tailcall. But llvm can only optimize the first call. The second call can't be optimized because function dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts failed to duplicate ret into block case2.
There 2 problems blocked the duplication:
1 Intrinsic call llvm.assume is not handled by dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts.
2 The control flow is more complex than expected, dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts can only duplicate ret into its predecessor, but here we have an intermediate block between call and ret.
The solutions:
1 Since CodeGenPrepare is already at the end of LLVM IR phase, we can simply delete the intrinsic call to llvm.assume.
2 A general solution to the complex control flow is hard, but for this case, after exit2 is duplicated into case1, exit2 is the only successor of exit1 and exit1 is the only predecessor of exit2, so they can be combined through eliminateFallThrough. But this function is called too late, there is no more dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts after it. We can add an earlier call to eliminateFallThrough to solve it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76539
Summary:
This is a simple fix for CodeGenPrepare that freezes branch condition when transforming select to branch.
If it is not frozen, instsimplify or the later pipeline can potentially exploit undefined behavior.
The diff shows optimized form becase D75859 and D76048 already made a few changes to CodeGenPrepare for optimizing freeze(cmp).
Reviewers: jdoerfert, spatel, lebedev.ri, efriedma
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76179
Summary:
This is a simple fix for CodeGenPrepare that freezes branch condition when transforming select to branch.
If it is not freezed, instsimplify or the later pipeline can potentially exploit undefined behavior.
The diff shows optimized form becase D75859 and D76048 already made a few changes to CodeGenPrepare for optimizing freeze(cmp).
Reviewers: jdoerfert, spatel, lebedev.ri, efriedma
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76179
Summary:
This is a simple patch that expands https://reviews.llvm.org/D75859 to pointer comparison and fcmp
Checked with Alive2
Reviewers: reames, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76048
Summary:
This patch helps CodeGenPrepare move freeze into the icmp when it is used by branch.
It reenables generation of efficient conditional jumps.
This is only done when at least one of icmp's operands is constant to prevent the transformation from increasing # of freeze instructions.
Performance degradation of MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2.test is resolved with this patch.
Checked with Alive2
Reviewers: reames, fhahn, nlopes
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: jdoerfert, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75859
This version fixes a buildbot failure cause by picking the wrong insert
point for XORs. We cannot pick the XOR binary operator as insert point,
as it is not guaranteed that both input operands for the overflow
intrinsic are defined before it.
This reverts the revert commit
c7fc0e5da6.
Instcombine folds (a + b <u a) to (a ^ -1 <u b) and that does not match
the expected pattern in CodeGenPerpare via UAddWithOverflow.
This causes a regression over Clang 7 on both X86 and AArch64:
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/juhXYV
This patch extends UAddWithOverflow to also catch the XOR case, if the
XOR is only used in the ICMP. This covers just a single case, but I'd
like to make sure I am not missing anything before tackling the other
cases.
Reviewers: nikic, RKSimon, lebedev.ri, spatel
Reviewed By: nikic, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74228
On some targets, like SPARC, forming overflow ops is only profitable if
the math result is used: https://godbolt.org/z/DxSmdB
This patch adds a new MathUsed parameter to allow the targets
to make the decision and defaults to only allowing it
if the math result is used. That is the conservative choice.
This patch also updates AArch64ISelLowering, X86ISelLowering,
ARMISelLowering.h, SystemZISelLowering.h to allow forming overflow
ops if the math result is not used. On those targets using the
overflow intrinsic for the overflow check only generates better code.
Reviewers: nikic, RKSimon, lebedev.ri, spatel
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74722
Summary:
Right now the alignment of the lower half of a store is computed as
align/2, which fails for unaligned stores (align = 1), and is overly
pessimitic for, e.g. a 8 byte store aligned to 4 bytes.
Fixes PR44851
Fixes PR44877
Reviewers: gchatelet, spatel, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74311
The code paths in the absence of TargetMachine, TargetLowering or
TargetRegisterInfo are poorly tested. As rL285987 said, requiring
TargetPassConfig allows us to delete many (untested) checks littered
everywhere.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73754
Add a pass to lower is.constant and objectsize intrinsics
This pass lowers is.constant and objectsize intrinsics not simplified by
earlier constant folding, i.e. if the object given is not constant or if
not using the optimized pass chain. The result is recursively simplified
and constant conditionals are pruned, so that dead blocks are removed
even for -O0. This allows inline asm blocks with operand constraints to
work all the time.
The new pass replaces the existing lowering in the codegen-prepare pass
and fallbacks in SDAG/GlobalISEL and FastISel. The latter now assert
on the intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65280
llvm-svn: 374784
This pass lowers is.constant and objectsize intrinsics not simplified by
earlier constant folding, i.e. if the object given is not constant or if
not using the optimized pass chain. The result is recursively simplified
and constant conditionals are pruned, so that dead blocks are removed
even for -O0. This allows inline asm blocks with operand constraints to
work all the time.
The new pass replaces the existing lowering in the codegen-prepare pass
and fallbacks in SDAG/GlobalISEL and FastISel. The latter now assert
on the intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65280
llvm-svn: 374743
In MVE, as of rL371218, we are attempting to sink chains of instructions such as:
%l1 = insertelement <8 x i8> undef, i8 %l0, i32 0
%broadcast.splat26 = shufflevector <8 x i8> %l1, <8 x i8> undef, <8 x i32> zeroinitializer
In certain situations though, we can end up breaking the dominance relations of
instructions. This happens when we sink the instruction into a loop, but cannot
remove the originals. The Use is updated, which might in fact be a Use from the
second instruction to the first.
This attempts to fix that by reversing the order of instruction that are sunk,
and ensuring that we update the uses on new instructions if they have already
been sunk, not the old ones.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67366
llvm-svn: 371743
This patch sinks add/mul(shufflevector(insertelement())) into the basic block in which they are used so that they can then be selected together.
This is useful for various MVE instructions, such as vmla and others that take R registers.
Loop tests have been added to the vmla test file to make sure vmlas are generated in loops.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66295
llvm-svn: 371218
If OptimizeExtractBits() encountered a shift instruction with no operands at all,
it would erase the instruction, but still return false.
This previously didn’t matter because its caller would always return after
processing the instruction, but https://reviews.llvm.org/D63233 changed the
function’s caller to fall through if it returned false, which would then cause
a use-after-free detectable by ASAN.
This change makes OptimizeExtractBits return true if it removes a shift
instruction with no users, terminating processing of the instruction.
Patch by: @brentdax (Brent Royal-Gordon)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66330
llvm-svn: 369168
This is based on the example/discussion in PR37428:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37428
Proper vector shift instructions don't appear until AVX2, so we may generate several
extra instructions within a loop trying to compensate for that. It's difficult to
recover from that shift expansion later than this, so use the existing TLI hook and
splat analysis to enable better codegen.
This extends CGP functionality introduced with:
rL201655
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63233
llvm-svn: 363511
This is a subset of the original commit from rL359879
which was reverted because it could crash when using the 'RemovedInstructions'
structure that enables delayed deletion of dead instructions. The motivating
compile-time win does not require that change though. We should get most of
that win from this change alone.
Using/updating a dominator tree to match math overflow patterns may be very
expensive in compile-time (because of the way CGP uses a DT), so just handle
the single-block case.
See post-commit thread for rL354298 for more details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190422/646276.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61075
llvm-svn: 359969
Using/updating a dominator tree to match math overflow patterns may be very
expensive in compile-time (because of the way CGP uses a DT), so just handle
the single-block case.
Also, we were restarting the iterator loops when doing the overflow intrinsic
transforms by marking the dominator tree for update. That was done to prevent
iterating over a removed instruction. But we can postpone the deletion using
the existing "RemovedInsts" structure, and that means we don't need to update
the DT.
See post-commit thread for rL354298 for more details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190422/646276.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61075
llvm-svn: 359879
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
This is probably a bigger limitation than necessary, but since we don't have any evidence yet
that this transform led to real-world perf improvements rather than regressions, I'm making a
quick, blunt fix.
In the motivating x86 example from:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41129
...and shown in the regression test, we want to avoid an extra instruction in the dominating
block because that could be costly.
The x86 LSR test diff is reversing the changes from D57789. There's no evidence that 1 version
is any better than the other yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59602
llvm-svn: 356665
This is almost the same as:
rL355345
...and should prevent any potential crashing from examples like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41064
...although the bug was masked by:
rL355823
...and I'm not sure how to repro the problem after that change.
llvm-svn: 356218
Targets can potentially emit more efficient code if they know address
computations never overflow. For example ILP32 code on AArch64 (which only has
64-bit address computation) can ignore the possibility of overflow with this
extra information.
llvm-svn: 355926
Inserting an overflowing arithmetic intrinsic can increase register
pressure by producing two values at a point where only one is needed,
while the second use maybe several blocks away. This increase in
pressure is likely to be more detrimental on performance than
rematerialising one of the original instructions.
So, check that the arithmetic and compare instructions are no further
apart than their immediate successor/predecessor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59024
llvm-svn: 355823
r44412 fixed a huge compile time regression but it needed ModifiedDT flag to be
maintained correctly in optimizations in optimizeBlock() and optimizeInst().
Function optimizeSelectInst() does not update the flag.
This patch propagates the flag in optimizeSelectInst() back to
optimizeBlock().
This patch also removes ModifiedDT in CodeGenPrepare class (which is not used).
The property of ModifiedDT is now recorded in a ref parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59139
llvm-svn: 355751
This uses the infrastructure added in rL353152 to sink zext and sexts to
sub/add users, to enable vsubl/vaddl generation when NEON is available.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40025.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, samparker, efriedma
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58063
llvm-svn: 355460
The test is reduced from an example in the post-commit thread for:
rL354746
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190304/632396.html
While we must avoid dying here, the real question should be:
Why is non-canonical and/or degenerate code making it to CGP when
using the new pass manager?
llvm-svn: 355345
