This is a follow up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D141629
and applies the change it made to all paths through ToAddress
(now DoToAddress).
I have included the test from my previous attempt
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136938.
The initial change only applied fixing to addresses that
would parse as integers, so my test case failed. Since
ToAddress has multiple exit points, I've wrapped it into
a new method DoToAddress.
Now you can call ToAddress, it will call DoToAddress and
no matter what path you take, the address will be fixed.
For the memory tagging commands we actually want the full
address (to work out mismatches). So I added ToRawAddress
for that.
I have tested this on a QEMU AArch64 Linux system with
Memory Tagging, Pointer Authentication and Top Byte Ignore
enabled. By running the new test and all other tests in
API/linux/aarch64.
Some commands have had calls to the ABI plugin removed
as ToAddress now does this for them.
The "memory region" command still needs to use the ABI plugin
to detect the end of memory when there are non-address bits.
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142715
In API tests, replace use of the `p` alias with the `expression` command.
To avoid conflating tests of the alias with tests of the expression command,
this patch canonicalizes to the use `expression`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141539
This teaches ProcessElfCore to recognise the MTE tag segments.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.html#core-dump-support
These segments contain all the tags for a matching memory segment
which will have the same size in virtual address terms. In real terms
it's 2 tags per byte so the data in the segment is much smaller.
Since MTE is the only tag type supported I have hardcoded some
things to those values. We could and should support more formats
as they appear but doing so now would leave code untested until that
happens.
A few things to note:
* /proc/pid/smaps is not in the core file, only the details you have
in "maps". Meaning we mark a region tagged only if it has a tag segment.
* A core file supports memory tagging if it has at least 1 memory
tag segment, there is no other flag we can check to tell if memory
tagging was enabled. (unlike a live process that can support memory
tagging even if there are currently no tagged memory regions)
Tests have been added at the commands level for a core file with
mte and without.
There is a lot of overlap between the "memory tag read" tests here and the unit tests for
MemoryTagManagerAArch64MTE::UnpackTagsFromCoreFileSegment, but I think it's
worth keeping to check ProcessElfCore doesn't cause an assert.
Depends on D129487
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129489
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
Add a function to make it easier to debug a test failure caused by an
unexpected state.
Currently, tests are using assertEqual which results in a cryptic error
message: "AssertionError: 5 != 10". Even when a test provides a message
to make it clear why a particular state is expected, you still have to
figure out which of the two was the expected state, and what the other
value corresponds to.
We have a function in lldbutil that helps you convert the state number
into a user readable string. This patch adds a wrapper around
assertEqual specifically for comparing states and reporting better error
messages.
The aforementioned error message now looks like this: "AssertionError:
stopped (5) != exited (10)". If the user provided a message, that
continues to get printed as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127355
This is off by default. If you get a result and that
memory has memory tags, when --show-tags is given you'll
see the tags inline with the memory content.
```
(lldb) memory read mte_buf mte_buf+64 --show-tags
<...>
0xfffff7ff8020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0d f0 fe ca 00 00 00 00 ................ (tag: 0x2)
<...>
(lldb) memory find -e 0xcafef00d mte_buf mte_buf+64 --show-tags
data found at location: 0xfffff7ff8028
0xfffff7ff8028: 0d f0 fe ca 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ (tags: 0x2 0x3)
0xfffff7ff8038: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ (tags: 0x3 0x4)
```
The logic for handling alignments is the same as for memory read
so in the above example because the line starts misaligned to the
granule it covers 2 granules.
Depends on D125089
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125090
This reverts commit 3e928c4b9d.
This fixes an issue seen on Windows where we did not properly
get the section names of regions if they overlapped. Windows
has regions like:
[0x00007fff928db000-0x00007fff949a0000) ---
[0x00007fff949a0000-0x00007fff949a1000) r-- PECOFF header
[0x00007fff949a0000-0x00007fff94a3d000) r-x .hexpthk
[0x00007fff949a0000-0x00007fff94a85000) r-- .rdata
[0x00007fff949a0000-0x00007fff94a88000) rw- .data
[0x00007fff949a0000-0x00007fff94a94000) r-- .pdata
[0x00007fff94a94000-0x00007fff95250000) ---
I assumed that you could just resolve the address and get the section
name using the start of the region but here you'd always get
"PECOFF header" because they all have the same start point.
The usual command repeating loop used the end address of the previous
region when requesting the next, or getting the section name.
So I've matched this in the --all scenario.
In the example above, somehow asking for the region at
0x00007fff949a1000 would get you a region that starts at
0x00007fff949a0000 but has a different end point. Using the load
address you get (what I assume is) the correct section name.
This does 2 things:
* Moves it after the short options. Which makes sense given it's
a niche, default off option.
(if 2 files for one option seems a bit much, I am going to reuse
them for "memory find" later)
* Fixes the use of repeated commands. For example:
memory read buf --show-tags
<shows tags>
memory read
<shows tags>
Added tests for the repetition and updated existing help tests.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125089
Previously if you read a code/data mask before there was a valid thread
you would get the top byte mask. This meant the value was "valid" as in,
don't read it again.
When using a corefile we ask for the data mask very early on and this
meant that later once you did have a thread it wouldn't read the
register to get the rest of the mask.
This fixes that and adds a corefile test generated from the same program
as in my previous change on this theme.
Depends on D118794
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122411
Non-address bits are not part of the virtual address in a pointer.
So they must be removed before passing to interfaces like ptrace.
Some of them we get way with not removing, like AArch64's top byte.
However this is only because of a hardware feature that ignores them.
This change updates all the Process/Target Read/Write memory methods
to remove non-address bits before using addresses.
Doing it in this way keeps lldb-server simple and also fixes the
memory caching when differently tagged pointers for the same location
are read.
Removing the bits is done at the ReadMemory level not DoReadMemory
because particualrly for process, many subclasses override DoReadMemory.
Tests have been added for read/write at the command and API level,
for process and target. This includes variants like
Read<sometype>FromMemory. Commands are tested to make sure we remove
at the command and API level.
"memory find" is not included because:
* There is no API for it.
* It already has its own address handling tests.
Software breakpoints do use these methods but they are not tested
here because there are bigger issues to fix with those. This will
happen in another change.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118794
This adds an option to the memory region command
to print all regions at once. Like you can do by
starting at address 0 and repeating the command
manually.
memory region [-a] [<address-expression>]
(lldb) memory region --all
[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000400000) ---
[0x0000000000400000-0x0000000000401000) r-x <...>/a.out PT_LOAD[0]
<...>
[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]
[0x0001000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff) ---
The output matches exactly what you'd get from
repeating the command. Including that it shows
unmapped areas between the mapped regions.
(this is why Process GetMemoryRegions is not
used, that skips unmapped areas)
Help text has been updated to show that you can have
an address or --all but not both.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111791
Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).
* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616
This reverts commit 0df522969a.
Additional checks are added to fix the detection of the last memory region
in GetMemoryRegions or repeating the "memory region" command when the
target has non-address bits.
Normally you keep reading from address 0, looking up each region's end
address until you get LLDB_INVALID_ADDR as the region end address.
(0xffffffffffffffff)
This is what the remote will return once you go beyond the last mapped region:
[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]
[0x0001000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff) ---
Problem is that when we "fix" the lookup address, we remove some bits
from it. On an AArch64 system we have 48 bit virtual addresses, so when
we fix the end address of the [stack] region the result is 0.
So we loop back to the start.
[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]
[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000400000) ---
To fix this I added an additional check for the last range.
If the end address of the region is different once you apply
FixDataAddress, we are at the last region.
Since the end of the last region will be the last valid mappable
address, plus 1. That 1 will be removed by the ABI plugin.
The only side effect is that on systems with non-address bits, you
won't get that last catch all unmapped region from the max virtual
address up to 0xf...f.
[0x0000fffff8000000-0x0000fffffffdf000) ---
[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]
<ends here>
Though in some way this is more correct because that region is not
just unmapped, it's not mappable at all.
No extra testing is needed because this is already covered by
TestMemoryRegion.py, I simply forgot to run it on system that had
both top byte ignore and pointer authentication.
This change has been tested on a qemu VM with top byte ignore,
memory tagging and pointer authentication enabled.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115508
This adds an option --show-tags to "memory read".
(lldb) memory read mte_buf mte_buf+32 -f "x" -s8 --show-tags
0x900fffff7ff8000: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 (tag: 0x0)
0x900fffff7ff8010: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 (tag: 0x1)
Tags are printed on the end of each line, if that
line has any tags associated with it. Meaning that
untagged memory output is unchanged.
Tags are printed based on the granule(s) of memory that
a line covers. So you may have lines with 1 tag, with many
tags, no tags or partially tagged lines.
In the case of partially tagged lines, untagged granules
will show "<no tag>" so that the ordering is obvious.
For example, a line that covers 2 granules where the first
is not tagged:
(lldb) memory read mte_buf-16 mte_buf+16 -l32 -f"x" --show-tags
0x900fffff7ff7ff0: 0x00000000 <...> (tags: <no tag> 0x0)
Untagged lines will just not have the "(tags: ..." at all.
Though they may be part of a larger output that does have
some tagged lines.
To do this I've extended DumpDataExtractor to also print
memory tags where it has a valid execution context and
is asked to print them.
There are no special alignment requirements, simply
use "memory read" as usual. All alignment is handled
in DumpDataExtractor.
We use MakeTaggedRanges to find all the tagged memory
in the current dump, then read all that into a MemoryTagMap.
The tag map is populated once in DumpDataExtractor and re-used
for each subsequently printed line (or recursive call of
DumpDataExtractor, which some formats do).
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107140
This removes the non-address bits before we try to use
the addresses.
Meaning that when results are shown, those results won't
show non-address bits either. This follows what "memory read"
has done. On the grounds that non-address bits are a property
of a pointer, not the memory pointed to.
I've added testing and merged the find and read tests into one
file.
Note that there are no API side changes because "memory find"
does not have an equivalent API call.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117299
Although the memory tag commands use a memory tag manager to handle
addresses, that only removes the top byte.
That top byte is 4 bits of memory tag and 4 free bits, which is more
than it should strictly remove but that's how it is for now.
There are other non-address bit uses like pointer authentication.
To ensure the memory tag manager only has to deal with memory tags,
use the ABI plugin to remove the rest.
The tag access test has been updated to sign all the relevant pointers
and require that we're running on a system with pointer authentication
in addition to memory tagging.
The pointers will look like:
<4 bit user tag><4 bit memory tag><signature><bit virtual address>
Note that there is currently no API for reading memory tags. It will
also have to consider this when it arrives.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117672
This was left over from when I had used some pointer authentication
instructions to sign the pointer. Then I realised that simply setting
the top byte is enough to prove the ABI plugin is being called.
Top byte ignore is a feature of the armv8-a architecure and doesn't
need any extra compiler flags.
Due to a missing cast the << 60 always resulted in zero leaving
the top nibble empty. So we weren't actually testing that lldb
ignores those bits in addition to the tag bits.
Correct that and also set the top nibbles to ascending values
so that we can catch if lldb only removes one of the tag bits
and top nibble, but not both.
In future the tag manager will likely only remove the tag bits
and leave non-address bits to the ABI plugin but for now make
sure we're testing what we claim to implement.
Addresses on AArch64 can have top byte tags, memory tags and pointer
authentication signatures in the upper bits.
While testing memory tagging I found that memory read couldn't
read a range if the two addresses had different tags. The same
could apply to signed pointers given the right circumstance.
(lldb) memory read mte_buf_alt_tag mte_buf+16
error: end address (0x900fffff7ff8010) must be greater than the start
address (0xa00fffff7ff8000).
Or it would try to read a lot more memory than expected.
(lldb) memory read mte_buf mte_buf_alt_tag+16
error: Normally, 'memory read' will not read over 1024 bytes of data.
error: Please use --force to override this restriction just once.
error: or set target.max-memory-read-size if you will often need a
larger limit.
Fix this by removing non address bits before we calculate the read
range. A test is added for AArch64 Linux that confirms this by using
the top byte ignore feature.
This means that if you do read with a tagged pointer the output
does not include those tags. This is potentially confusing but I think
overall it's better that we don't pretend that we're reading memory
from a range that the process is unable to map.
(lldb) p ptr1
(char *) $4 = 0x3400fffffffff140 "\x80\xf1\xff\xff\xff\xff"
(lldb) p ptr2
(char *) $5 = 0x5600fffffffff140 "\x80\xf1\xff\xff\xff\xff"
(lldb) memory read ptr1 ptr2+16
0xfffffffff140: 80 f1 ff ff ff ff 00 00 38 70 bc f7 ff ff 00 00 ........8p......
Reviewed By: omjavaid, danielkiss
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103626
This reverts commit 640beb38e7.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
It was being used only in some very old tests (which pass even without
it) and its implementation is highly questionable.
These days we have different mechanisms for requesting a build with a
particular kind of c++ library (USE_LIB(STD)CPP in the makefile).
This reverts commit fac3f20de5.
I found this has broken how we detect the last memory region in
GetMemoryRegions/"memory region" command.
When you're debugging an AArch64 system with pointer authentication,
the ABI plugin will remove the top bit from the end address of the last
user mapped area.
(lldb)
[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]
ABI plugin removes anything above the 48th bit (48 bit virtual addresses
by default on AArch64, leaving an address of 0.
(lldb)
[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000400000) ---
You get back a mapping for 0 and get into an infinite loop.
This adds a specific unwind plan for AArch64 Linux sigreturn frames.
Previously we assumed that the fp would be valid here but it is not.
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/sigreturn.S
On Ubuntu Bionic it happened to point to an old frame info which meant
you got what looked like a correct backtrace. On Focal, the info is
completely invalid. (probably due to some code shuffling in libc)
This adds an UnwindPlan that knows that the sp in a sigreturn frame
points to an rt_sigframe from which we can offset to get saved
sp and pc values to backtrace correctly.
Based on LibUnwind's change: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90898
A new test is added that sets all compares the frames from the initial
signal catch to the handler break. Ensuring that the stack/frame pointer,
function name and register values match.
(this test is AArch64 Linux specific because it's the only one
with a specific unwind plan for this situation)
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
Reviewed By: omjavaid, labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112069
This reverts commit 5fbcf67734.
ProcessDebugger is used in ProcessWindows and NativeProcessWindows.
I thought I was simplifying things by renaming to DoGetMemoryRegionInfo
in ProcessDebugger but the Native process side expects "GetMemoryRegionInfo".
Follow the pattern that WriteMemory uses. So:
* ProcessWindows::DoGetMemoryRegioninfo calls ProcessDebugger::GetMemoryRegionInfo
* NativeProcessWindows::GetMemoryRegionInfo does the same
On AArch64 we have various things using the non address bits
of pointers. This means when you lookup their containing region
you won't find it if you don't remove them.
This changes Process GetMemoryRegionInfo to a non virtual method
that uses the current ABI plugin to remove those bits. Then it
calls DoGetMemoryRegionInfo.
That function does the actual work and is virtual to be overriden
by Process implementations.
A test case is added that runs on AArch64 Linux using the top
byte ignore feature.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102757
The "memory tag read" command will now tell you
when the allocation tag read does not match the logical
tag.
(lldb) memory tag read mte_buf+(8*16) mte_buf+(8*16)+48
Logical tag: 0x9
Allocation tags:
[0xfffff7ff7080, 0xfffff7ff7090): 0x8 (mismatch)
[0xfffff7ff7090, 0xfffff7ff70a0): 0x9
[0xfffff7ff70a0, 0xfffff7ff70b0): 0xa (mismatch)
The logical tag will be taken from the start address
so the end could have a different tag. You could for example
read from ptr_to_array_1 to ptr_to_array_2. Where the latter
is tagged differently to prevent buffer overflow.
The existing command will read 1 granule if you leave
off the end address. So you can also use it as a quick way
to check a single location.
(lldb) memory tag read mte_buf
Logical tag: 0x9
Allocation tags:
[0xfffff7ff7000, 0xfffff7ff7010): 0x0 (mismatch)
This avoids the need for a seperate "memory tag check" command.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106880
In the latest Linux kernels synchronous tag faults
include the tag bits in their address.
This change adds logical and allocation tags to the
description of synchronous tag faults.
(asynchronous faults have no address)
Process 1626 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'a.out', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: sync tag check fault (fault address: 0x900fffff7ff9010 logical tag: 0x9 allocation tag: 0x0)
This extends the existing description and will
show as much as it can on the rare occasion something
fails.
This change supports AArch64 MTE only but other
architectures could be added by extending the
switch at the start of AnnotateSyncTagCheckFault.
The rest of the function is generic code.
Tests have been added for synchronous and asynchronous
MTE faults.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105178
The default mode of "memory tag write" is to calculate the
range from the start address and the number of tags given.
(just like "memory write" does)
(lldb) memory tag write mte_buf 1 2
(lldb) memory tag read mte_buf mte_buf+48
Logical tag: 0x0
Allocation tags:
[0xfffff7ff9000, 0xfffff7ff9010): 0x1
[0xfffff7ff9010, 0xfffff7ff9020): 0x2
[0xfffff7ff9020, 0xfffff7ff9030): 0x0
This new option allows you to set an end address and have
the tags repeat until that point.
(lldb) memory tag write mte_buf 1 2 --end-addr mte_buf+64
(lldb) memory tag read mte_buf mte_buf+80
Logical tag: 0x0
Allocation tags:
[0xfffff7ff9000, 0xfffff7ff9010): 0x1
[0xfffff7ff9010, 0xfffff7ff9020): 0x2
[0xfffff7ff9020, 0xfffff7ff9030): 0x1
[0xfffff7ff9030, 0xfffff7ff9040): 0x2
[0xfffff7ff9040, 0xfffff7ff9050): 0x0
This is implemented using the QMemTags packet previously
added. We skip validating the number of tags in lldb and send
them on to lldb-server, which repeats them as needed.
Apart from the number of tags, all the other client side checks
remain. Tag values, memory range must be tagged, etc.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105183
This adds a new command for writing memory tags.
It is based on the existing "memory write" command.
Syntax: memory tag write <address-expression> <value> [<value> [...]]
(where "value" is a tag value)
(lldb) memory tag write mte_buf 1 2
(lldb) memory tag read mte_buf mte_buf+32
Logical tag: 0x0
Allocation tags:
[0xfffff7ff9000, 0xfffff7ff9010): 0x1
[0xfffff7ff9010, 0xfffff7ff9020): 0x2
The range you are writing to will be calculated by
aligning the address down to a granule boundary then
adding as many granules as there are tags.
(a repeating mode with an end address will be in a follow
up patch)
This is why "memory tag write" uses MakeTaggedRange but has
some extra steps to get this specific behaviour.
The command does all the usual argument validation:
* Address must evaluate
* You must supply at least one tag value
(though lldb-server would just treat that as a nop anyway)
* Those tag values must be valid for your tagging scheme
(e.g. for MTE the value must be > 0 and < 0xf)
* The calculated range must be memory tagged
That last error will show you the final range, not just
the start address you gave the command.
(lldb) memory tag write mte_buf_2+page_size-16 6
(lldb) memory tag write mte_buf_2+page_size-16 6 7
error: Address range 0xfffff7ffaff0:0xfffff7ffb010 is not in a memory tagged region
(note that we do not check if the region is writeable
since lldb can write to it anyway)
The read and write tag tests have been merged into
a single set of "tag access" tests as their test programs would
have been almost identical.
(also I have renamed some of the buffers to better
show what each one is used for)
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105182
This new command looks much like "memory read"
and mirrors its basic behaviour.
(lldb) memory tag read new_buf_ptr new_buf_ptr+32
Logical tag: 0x9
Allocation tags:
[0x900fffff7ffa000, 0x900fffff7ffa010): 0x9
[0x900fffff7ffa010, 0x900fffff7ffa020): 0x0
Important proprties:
* The end address is optional and defaults to reading
1 tag if ommitted
* It is an error to try to read tags if the architecture
or process doesn't support it, or if the range asked
for is not tagged.
* It is an error to read an inverted range (end < begin)
(logical tags are removed for this check so you can
pass tagged addresses here)
* The range will be expanded to fit the tagging granule,
so you can get more tags than simply (end-begin)/granule size.
Whatever you get back will always cover the original range.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97285
AArch64 kernel builds default to having /smaps and
the "VmFlags" line was added in 3.8. Long before MTE
was supported.
So we can assume that if you're AArch64 with MTE,
you can run this test.
The previous method of checking had a race condition
where the process we read smaps for, could finish before
we get to read the file.
I explored some alternatives but in the end I think
it's fine to just assume we have what we need.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100493
By checking for cpu and toolchain features ahead
of time we don't need the custom return codes.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97684
This test is flakey because it tries to read the proc/smaps
file of the first lldb-server process it finds. This process
can finish before we finish doing that.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/96/builds/6634/steps/6/logs/stdio
For now limit this to MTE targets which basically means
QEMU via lldb-dotest, which doesn't have this issue.
I'll fix the race condition shortly.
This extends the "memory region" command to
show tagged regions on AArch64 Linux when the MTE
extension is enabled.
(lldb) memory region the_page
[0x0000fffff7ff8000-0x0000fffff7ff9000) rw-
memory tagging: enabled
This is done by adding an optional "flags" field to
the qMemoryRegion packet. The only supported flag is
"mt" but this can be extended.
This "mt" flag is read from /proc/{pid}/smaps on Linux,
other platforms will leave out the "flags" field.
Where this "mt" flag is received "memory region" will
show that it is enabled. If it is not or the target
doesn't support memory tagging, the line is not shown.
(since majority of the time tagging will not be enabled)
Testing is added for the existing /proc/{pid}/maps
parsing and the new smaps parsing.
Minidump parsing has been updated where needed,
though it only uses maps not smaps.
Target specific tests can be run with QEMU and I have
added MTE flags to the existing helper scripts.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87442
This patch marks TestCreateDuringInstructionStep.py as flakey for Linux.
This is failing randomly on arm/aarch64. I will monitor buildbot and
skip it if it fails again.
Summary:
TestBuiltinTrap fail on darwin embedded because the `__builin_trap`
builtin doesn't get any line info attached to it by clang when
building for arm64.
The test was already XFailed for linux arm(64), I presume for the same
reasons. This patch just XFails it independently of the platform.
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, danielkiss, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76408
Summary:
Around a third of our test sources have LLVM license headers. This patch removes those headers from all test
sources and also fixes any tests that depended on the length of the license header.
The reasons for this are:
* A few tests verify line numbers and will start failing if the number of lines in the LLVM license header changes. Once I landed my patch for valid SourceLocations in debug info we will probably have even more tests that verify line numbers.
* No other LLVM project is putting license headers in its test files to my knowledge.
* They make the test sources much more verbose than they have to be. Several tests have longer license headers than the actual test source.
For the record, the following tests had their line numbers changed to pass with the removal of the license header:
lldb-api :: functionalities/breakpoint/breakpoint_by_line_and_column/TestBreakpointByLineAndColumn.py
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestGDBRemoteRepro.test
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestMultipleTargets.test
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestReuseDirectory.test
lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook-threads.test
lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook.test
lldb-api :: lang/objc/exceptions/TestObjCExceptions.py
Reviewers: #lldb, espindola, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: emaste, aprantl, arphaman, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74839
Summary:
The error message from the construct `assertTrue(a == b, "msg") ` are nearly always completely useless for actually debugging the issue.
This patch is just replacing this construct (and similar ones like `assertTrue(a != b, ...)` with the proper call to assertEqual or assertNotEquals.
This patch was mostly written by a shell script with some manual verification afterwards:
```
lang=python
import sys
def sanitize_line(line):
if line.strip().startswith("self.assertTrue(") and " == " in line:
line = line.replace("self.assertTrue(", "self.assertEquals(")
line = line.replace(" == ", ", ", 1)
if line.strip().startswith("self.assertTrue(") and " != " in line:
line = line.replace("self.assertTrue(", "self.assertNotEqual(")
line = line.replace(" != ", ", ", 1)
return line
for a in sys.argv[1:]:
with open(a, "r") as f:
lines = f.readlines()
with open(a, "w") as f:
for line in lines:
f.write(sanitize_line(line))
```
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74475
