A class member named by an expression in a member function that may instantiate to a static _or_ non-static member is represented by a `UnresolvedLookupExpr` in order to defer the implicit transformation to a class member access expression until instantiation. Since `ASTContext::getDecltypeType` only creates a `DecltypeType` that has a `DependentDecltypeType` as its canonical type when the operand is instantiation dependent, and since we do not transform types unless they are instantiation dependent, we need to mark the `UnresolvedLookupExpr` as instantiation dependent in order to correctly build a `DecltypeType` using the expression as its operand with a `DependentDecltypeType` canonical type. Fixes#99873.
CXXFoldExpr relies on exactly one of the two operands to have unexpanded
parameter packs. If this invariant does not holds, results of
`getPattern()`, `isLeftFold()` and other related members are incorrect.
Asserting this on construction makes debugging the problems easier as
the failure is happening closer to the code that contains the error.
Also move the constructor to the `.cpp` file to avoid potential ODR
violations from having an `assert` in the header in combination with
precompiled libraries.
Reapplies #92957, fixing an instance where the `template` keyword was
missing prior to a dependent name in `llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h`. An
_alias-declaration_ is used to work around a bug affecting GCC releases
before 11.1 (see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94799) which
rejects the use of the `template` keyword prior to the
_nested-name-specifier_ in the class member access.
CWG1835 was one of the many core issues resolved by P1787R6: "Declarations and where to
find them" (http://wg21.link/p1787r6). Its resolution changes how
member-qualified names (as defined by [basic.lookup.qual.general] p2) are looked
up. This patch implementation that resolution.
Previously, an _identifier_ following `.` or `->` would be first looked
up in the type of the object expression (i.e. qualified lookup), and
then in the context of the _postfix-expression_ (i.e. unqualified
lookup) if nothing was found; the result of the second lookup was
required to name a class template. Notably, this second lookup would
occur even when the object expression was dependent, and its result
would be used to determine whether a `<` token is the start of a
_template-argument_list_.
The new wording in [basic.lookup.qual.general] p2 states:
> A member-qualified name is the (unique) component name, if any, of
> - an _unqualified-id_ or
> - a _nested-name-specifier_ of the form _`type-name ::`_ or
_`namespace-name ::`_
>
> in the id-expression of a class member access expression. A
***qualified name*** is
> - a member-qualified name or
> - the terminal name of
> - a _qualified-id_,
> - a _using-declarator_,
> - a _typename-specifier_,
> - a _qualified-namespace-specifier_, or
> - a _nested-name-specifier_, _elaborated-type-specifier_, or
_class-or-decltype_ that has a _nested-name-specifier_.
>
> The _lookup context_ of a member-qualified name is the type of its
associated object expression (considered dependent if the object
expression is type-dependent). The lookup context of any other qualified
name is the type, template, or namespace nominated by the preceding
_nested-name-specifier_.
And [basic.lookup.qual.general] p3 now states:
> _Qualified name lookup_ in a class, namespace, or enumeration performs
a search of the scope associated with it except as specified below.
Unless otherwise specified, a qualified name undergoes qualified name
lookup in its lookup context from the point where it appears unless the
lookup context either is dependent and is not the current instantiation
or is not a class or class template. If nothing is found by qualified
lookup for a member-qualified name that is the terminal name of a
_nested-name-specifier_ and is not dependent, it undergoes unqualified
lookup.
In non-standardese terms, these two paragraphs essentially state the
following:
- A name that immediately follows `.` or `->` in a class member access
expression is a member-qualified name
- A member-qualified name will be first looked up in the type of the
object expression `T` unless `T` is a dependent type that is _not_ the
current instantiation, e.g.
```
template<typename T>
struct A
{
void f(T* t)
{
this->x; // type of the object expression is 'A<T>'. although 'A<T>' is dependent, it is the
// current instantiation so we look up 'x' in the template definition context.
t->y; // type of the object expression is 'T' ('->' is transformed to '.' per [expr.ref]).
// 'T' is dependent and is *not* the current instantiation, so we lookup 'y' in the
// template instantiation context.
}
};
```
- If the first lookup finds nothing and:
- the member-qualified name is the first component of a
_nested-name-specifier_ (which could be an _identifier_ or a
_simple-template-id_), and either:
- the type of the object expression is the current instantiation and it
has no dependent base classes, or
- the type of the object expression is not dependent
then we lookup the name again, this time via unqualified lookup.
Although the second (unqualified) lookup is stated not to occur when the
member-qualified name is dependent, a dependent name will _not_ be
dependent once the template is instantiated, so the second lookup must
"occur" during instantiation if qualified lookup does not find anything.
This means that we must perform the second (unqualified) lookup during
parsing even when the type of the object expression is dependent, but
those results are _not_ used to determine whether a `<` token is the
start of a _template-argument_list_; they are stored so we can replicate
the second lookup during instantiation.
In even simpler terms (paraphrasing the meeting minutes from the review of P1787; see https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21summer2020/P1787%28Lookup%29Review2020-06-15Through2020-06-18):
- Unqualified lookup always happens for the first name in a
_nested-name-specifier_ that follows `.` or `->`
- The result of that lookup is only used to determine whether `<` is the
start of a _template-argument-list_ if the first (qualified) lookup
found nothing and the lookup context:
- is not dependent, or
- is the current instantiation and has no dependent base classes.
An example:
```
struct A
{
void f();
};
template<typename T>
using B = A;
template<typename T>
struct C : A
{
template<typename U>
void g();
void h(T* t)
{
this->g<int>(); // ok, '<' is the start of a template-argument-list ('g' was found via qualified lookup in the current instantiation)
this->B<void>::f(); // ok, '<' is the start of a template-argument-list (current instantiation has no dependent bases, 'B' was found via unqualified lookup)
t->g<int>(); // error: '<' means less than (unqualified lookup does not occur for a member-qualified name that isn't the first component of a nested-name-specifier)
t->B<void>::f(); // error: '<' means less than (unqualified lookup does not occur if the name is dependent)
t->template B<void>::f(); // ok: '<' is the start of a template-argument-list ('template' keyword used)
}
};
```
Some additional notes:
- Per [basic.lookup.qual.general] p1, lookup for a
member-qualified name only considers namespaces, types, and templates
whose specializations are types if it's an _identifier_ followed by
`::`; lookup for the component name of a _simple-template-id_ followed
by `::` is _not_ subject to this rule.
- The wording which specifies when the second unqualified lookup occurs
appears to be paradoxical. We are supposed to do it only for the first
component name of a _nested-name-specifier_ that follows `.` or `->`
when qualified lookup finds nothing. However, when that name is followed
by `<` (potentially starting a _simple-template-id_) we don't _know_
whether it will be the start of a _nested-name-specifier_ until we do
the lookup -- but we aren't supposed to do the lookup until we know it's
part of a _nested-name-specifier_! ***However***, since we only do the
second lookup when the first lookup finds nothing (and the name isn't
dependent), ***and*** since neither lookup is type-only, the only valid
option is for the name to be the _template-name_ in a
_simple-template-id_ that is followed by `::` (it can't be an
_unqualified-id_ naming a member because we already determined that the
lookup context doesn't have a member with that name). Thus, we can lock
into the _nested-name-specifier_ interpretation and do the second lookup
without having to know whether the _simple-template-id_ will be followed
by `::` yet.
Used to implement CWG2191 where `typeid` for a polymorphic glvalue only
becomes potentially-throwing if the `typeid` operand was already
potentially throwing or a `nullptr` check was inserted:
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2191.html
Also change `Expr::hasSideEffects` for `CXXTypeidExpr` to check the
operand for side-effects instead of always reporting that there are
side-effects
Remove `IsDeref` parameter of `CGCXXABI::shouldTypeidBeNullChecked`
because it should never return `true` if `!IsDeref` (we shouldn't add a
null check that wasn't there in the first place)
We previously doubled the id-expression expansion, even when the pack
was expanded to empty. The previous condition for determining whether we
should expand couldn't distinguish between cases where 'the expansion
was previously postponed' and 'the expansion occurred but resulted in
emptiness.'
In the latter scenario, we crash because we have not been examining the
current lambda's parent local instantiation scope since
[D98068](https://reviews.llvm.org/D98068): Any Decls instantiated in the
parent scope are not visible to the generic lambda, and thus any attempt
of looking for instantiated Decls in the lambda is capped to the current
Lambda's LIS.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/92230
Reapplies #87541 and #88311 (again) addressing the bug which caused
expressions naming overload sets to be incorrectly rebuilt, as well as
the bug which caused base class members to always be treated as overload
sets.
The primary change since #88311 is `UnresolvedLookupExpr::Create` is called directly in `BuildPossibleImplicitMemberExpr` with `KnownDependent` as `true` (which causes the expression type to be set to `ASTContext::DependentTy`). This ensures that any further semantic analysis involving the type of the potentially implicit class member access expression is deferred until instantiation.
Implements https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2662R3.pdf
The feature is exposed as an extension in older language modes.
Mangling is not yet supported and that is something we will have to do before release.
This is a follow up to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71417 ,
which aims to resolve concerns brought up there. Namely, this patch
replaces `CXXNewInitializationStyle::Implicit` with a dedicated
`HasInitializer` flag. This makes `CXXNewInitializationStyle` to model
syntax again. This patch also renames `Call` and `List` to less
confusing `Parens` and `Braces`.
This patch converts CXXNewExpr::InitializationStyle into a scoped enumat namespace scope. It also affirms the status quo by adding a new enumerator to represent implicit initializer.
This is a re-land of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71322ace4489397
This patch converts `CXXNewExpr::InitializationStyle` into a scoped enum at namespace scope. It also affirms the status quo by adding a new enumerator to represent implicit initializer.
This patch converts `CXXConstructExpr::ConstructionKind` into a scoped enum in namespace scope, making it eligible for forward declaring. This is useful in cases like annotating bit-fields with `preferred_type`.
The dependence of a template argument is not only determined by the
argument itself, but also by the type of the template parameter:
> Furthermore, a non-type
[template-argument](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.names#nt:template-argument)
is dependent if the corresponding non-type
[template-parameter](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.param#nt:template-parameter)
is of reference or pointer type and the
[template-argument](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.names#nt:template-argument)
designates or points to a member of the current instantiation or a
member of a dependent
type[.](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.dep#temp-3.sentence-1)
For example:
```cpp
struct A{};
template <const A& T>
const A JoinStringViews = T;
template <int V>
class Builder {
public:
static constexpr A Equal{};
static constexpr auto Val = JoinStringViews<Equal>;
};
```
The constant expression `Equal` is not dependent, but because the type
of the template parameter is a reference type and `Equal` is a member of
the current instantiation, the template argument of
`JoinStringViews<Equal>` is actually dependent, which makes
`JoinStringViews<Equal>` dependent.
When a template-id of a variable template is dependent,
`CheckVarTemplateId` will return an `UnresolvedLookupExpr`, but
`UnresolvedLookupExpr` calculates dependence by template arguments only
(the `ConstantExpr` `Equal` here), which is not dependent. This causes
type deduction to think that `JoinStringViews<Equal>` is `OverloadTy`
and treat it as a function template, which is clearly wrong.
This PR adds a `KnownDependent` parameter to the constructor of
`UnresolvedLookupExpr`. After canonicalization, if `CanonicalConverted`
contains any dependent argument, `KnownDependent` is set to `true`. This
fixes the dependence calculation of `UnresolvedLookupExpr` for dependent
variable templates.
Fixes#65153 .
Currently CXXRewrittenBinaryOperator::getDecomposedForm(...) may crash
if the spaceship operator returns a comparison category by reference. This
because IgnoreImplicitAsWritten() does not look through CXXConstructExpr. The
fix is to use IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource() which will look though
CXXConstructExpr.
This fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64162
The goal of this change is to clean up some of the code surrounding
HLSL using CXXThisExpr as a non-pointer l-value. This change cleans up
a bunch of assumptions and inconsistencies around how the type of
`this` is handled through the AST and code generation.
This change is be mostly NFC for HLSL, and completely NFC for other
language modes.
This change introduces a new member to query for the this object's type
and seeks to clarify the normal usages of the this type.
With the introudction of HLSL to clang, CXXThisExpr may now be an
l-value and behave like a reference type rather than C++'s normal
method of it being an r-value of pointer type.
With this change there are now three ways in which a caller might need
to query the type of `this`:
* The type of the `CXXThisExpr`
* The type of the object `this` referrs to
* The type of the implicit (or explicit) `this` argument
This change codifies those three ways you may need to query
respectively as:
* CXXMethodDecl::getThisType()
* CXXMethodDecl::getThisObjectType()
* CXXMethodDecl::getThisArgType()
This change then revisits all uses of `getThisType()`, and in cases
where the only use was to resolve the pointee type, it replaces the
call with `getThisObjectType()`. In other cases it evaluates whether
the desired returned type is the type of the `this` expr, or the type
of the `this` function argument. The `this` expr type is used for
creating additional expr AST nodes and for member lookup, while the
argument type is used mostly for code generation.
Additionally some cases that used `getThisType` in simple queries could
be substituted for `getThisObjectType`. Since `getThisType` is
implemented in terms of `getThisObjectType` calling the later should be
more efficient if the former isn't needed.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, bogner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159247
- When the destination is a final class type that does not derive from
the source type, the cast always fails and is now emitted as a null
pointer or call to __cxa_bad_cast.
- When the destination is a final class type that does derive from the
source type, emit a direct comparison against the corresponding base
class vptr value(s). There may be more than one such value in the case
of multiple inheritance; check them all.
For now, this is supported only for the Itanium ABI. I expect the same thing is
possible for the MS ABI too, but I don't know what guarantees are made about
vfptr uniqueness.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154658
Add -fcheck-new and -fno-check-new, from GCC, which make the compiler
not assume pointers returned from operator new are non-null.
Fixes#16931.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125272
Instead of using the validity of a brace's source location as a flag
for list initialization, this now uses a PointerIntPair to model it so
we do not increase the size of the AST node to track this information.
This allows us to retain the valid source location information, which
fixes the coverage assertion.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62105
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148245
This commit relands the patches for implementing P0960R3 and P1975R0,
which describe initializing aggregates via a parenthesized list.
The relanded commits are:
* 40c52159d3 - P0960R3 and P1975R0: Allow initializing aggregates from
a parenthesized list of values
* c77a91bb7b - Remove overly restrictive aggregate paren init logic
* 32d7aae04f - Fix a clang crash on invalid code in C++20 mode
This patch also fixes a crash in the original implementation.
Previously, if the input tried to call an implicitly deleted copy or
move constructor of a union, we would then try to initialize the union
by initializing it's first element with a reference to a union. This
behavior is incorrect (we should fail to initialize) and if the type of
the first element has a constructor with a single template typename
parameter, then Clang will explode. This patch fixes that issue by
checking that constructor overload resolution did not result in a
deleted function before attempting parenthesized aggregate
initialization.
Additionally, this patch also includes D140159, which contains some
minor fixes made in response to code review comments in the original
implementation that were made after that patch was submitted.
Co-authored-by: Sheng <ox59616e@gmail.com>
Fixes#54040, Fixes#59675
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141546
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.
Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.
Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.
The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.
Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.
As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, rupprecht
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
This feature causes clang to crash when compiling Chrome - see
https://crbug.com/1405031 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59675
Revert "[clang] Fix a clang crash on invalid code in C++20 mode."
This reverts commit 32d7aae04f.
Revert "[clang] Remove overly restrictive aggregate paren init logic"
This reverts commit c77a91bb7b.
Revert "[clang][C++20] P0960R3 and P1975R0: Allow initializing aggregates from a parenthesized list of values"
This reverts commit 40c52159d3.
This patch implements P0960R3, which allows initialization of aggregates
via parentheses.
As an example:
```
struct S { int i, j; };
S s1(1, 1);
int arr1[2](1, 2);
```
This patch also implements P1975R0, which fixes the wording of P0960R3
for single-argument parenthesized lists so that statements like the
following are allowed:
```
S s2(1);
S s3 = static_cast<S>(1);
S s4 = (S)1;
int (&&arr2)[] = static_cast<int[]>(1);
int (&&arr3)[2] = static_cast<int[2]>(1);
```
This patch was originally authored by @0x59616e and completed by
@ayzhao.
Fixes#54040, Fixes#54041
Co-authored-by: Sheng <ox59616e@gmail.com>
Full write up : https://discourse.llvm.org/t/c-20-rfc-suggestion-desired-regarding-the-implementation-of-p0960r3/63744
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129531
This reverts commit f1f1b60c7b.
Temporary revert, possibly triggers a new assertion failure on
QualType::getCommonPtr.
We're working on a reproducer, to follow-up on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554.
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.
Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.
Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.
The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.
Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.
As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.
Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.
Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.
The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.
Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.
As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
Different versions of a lambda will in general refer to different
enclosing variable declarations, because we do not merge most
block-scope declarations, such as local variables. Keep track of all the
declarations that correspond to a lambda's capture fields so that we can
rewrite the name of any of those variables to the lambda capture,
regardless of which copy of the body of `operator()` we look at.
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.
Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.
Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.
The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.
Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.
As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.
Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.
Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.
The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.
Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.
As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.
Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.
Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.
The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.
Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.
As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.
Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.
Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.
The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.
Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.
As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
This is a change to how we represent type subsitution in the AST.
Instead of only storing the replaced type, we track the templated
entity we are substituting, plus an index.
We modify MLTAL to track the templated entity at each level.
Otherwise, it's much more expensive to go from the template parameter back
to the templated entity, and not possible to do in some cases, as when
we instantiate outer templates, parameters might still reference the
original entity.
This also allows us to very cheaply lookup the templated entity we saw in
the naming context and find the corresponding argument it was replaced
from, such as for implementing template specialization resugaring.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131858
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.
This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.
In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.
We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.
In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.
Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.
at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.
This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.
In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.
We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.
In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.
Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.
at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
