If we have a dependence between an abstract attribute A to an abstract
attribute B such hat changes in A should trigger an update of B, we do
not need to keep the dependence around once the update was triggered. If
the dependence is still required the update will reinsert it into the
dependence map, if it is not we avoid triggering B in the future. This
replaces the "recompute interval" mechanism we used before to prune
stale dependences.
Number of required iterations is generally down, compile time for the
module pass (not really the CGSCC pass) is down quite a bit.
There is one test change which looks like an artifact in the undefined
behavior AA that needs to be looked at.
We now also use the BumpPtrAllocator from the Attributor in the
InformationCache. The lifetime of objects in either is pretty much the
same and it should result in consistently good performance regardless of
the allocator.
Doing so requires to call more constructors manually but so far that
does not seem to be problematic or messy.
---
Single run of the Attributor module and then CGSCC pass (oldPM)
for SPASS/clause.c (~10k LLVM-IR loc):
Before:
```
calls to allocation functions: 615359 (368257/s)
temporary memory allocations: 83315 (49859/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 75.64MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 163.43MB
total memory leaked: 269.04KB
```
After:
```
calls to allocation functions: 613042 (359555/s)
temporary memory allocations: 83322 (48869/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 75.64MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 162.92MB
total memory leaked: 269.04KB
```
Difference:
```
calls to allocation functions: -2317 (-68147/s)
temporary memory allocations: 7 (205/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 2.23KB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B
---
There are also some adjustments to use MaybeAlign in here due
to CallBase::getParamAlignment() being deprecated. It would
be cleaner if getOrEnforceKnownAlignment was migrated
to Align/MaybeAlign.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78345
CallSite will likely be removed soon, but AbstractCallSite serves a different purpose and won't be going away.
This patch switches it to internally store a CallBase* instead of a
CallSite. The only interface changes are the removal of the getCallSite
method and getCallBackUses now takes a CallBase&. These methods had only
a few callers that were easy enough to update without needing a
compatibility shim.
In the future once the other CallSites are gone, the CallSite.h
header should be renamed to AbstractCallSite.h
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78322
Since we use the fact that some uses are droppable in the Attributor we
need to handle them explicitly when we replace uses. As an example, an
assumed dead value can have live droppable users. In those we cannot
replace the value simply by an undef. Instead, we either drop the uses
(via `dropDroppableUses`) or keep them as they are. In this patch we do
both, depending on the situation. For values that are dead but not
necessarily removed we keep droppable uses around because they contain
information we might be able to use later. For values that are removed
we drop droppable uses explicitly to avoid replacement with undef.
Running the verifier is expensive so we want to avoid it even in runs
that enable assertions. As we move closer to enabling the Attributor
this code will be executed by some buildbots but not cause overhead for
most people.
Before, we eagerly analyzed all the functions to collect information
about them, e.g. what instructions may read/write memory. This had
multiple drawbacks:
- In CGSCC-mode we can end up looking at a callee which is not in the
SCC but for which we need an initialized cache.
- We end up looking at functions that we deem dead and never need to
analyze in the first place.
- We have a implicit dependence which is easy to break.
This patch moves the function analysis into the information cache and
makes it lazy. There is no real functional change expected except due to
the first reason above.
The CallGraphUpdater allows to directly alter call site information and
we should do so. This might appease the windows buildbot that crashes
during the SCC traversal.
Attributor.cpp became quite big and we need to start provide structure.
The Attributor code is now in Attributor.cpp and the classes derived
from AbstractAttribute are in AttributorAttributes.cpp. Minor changes
were required but no intended functional changes.
We also minimized includes as part of this.
Reviewed By: baziotis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76873
The new and old pass managers (PassManagerBuilder.cpp and
PassBuilder.cpp) are exposed to an `extern` declaration of
`attributor-disable` option which will guard the addition of the
attributor passes to the pass pipelines.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76871
Query AAValueSimplify on pointers in memory accessing instructions to take
advantage of the constant propagation (or any other value simplification) of such values.
There was a TODO in genericValueTraversal to provide the context
instruction and due to the lack of it users that wanted one just used
something available. Unfortunately, using a fixed instruction is wrong
in the presence of PHIs so we need to update the context instruction
properly.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76870
This cannot be triggered right now, as far as I know, but it doesn't
make sense to deduce a constant range on arguments of declarations.
Exposed during testing of AAValueSimplify extensions.
Use DL & ABI information for better alignment deduction, e.g., if a type
is accessed and the ABI specifies an alignment requirement for such an
access we can use it. This is based on a patch by @lebedev.ri and
inspired by getBaseAlign in Loads.cpp.
Depends on D76673.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76674
If we have a must-tail call the callee and caller need to have matching
ABIs. Part of that is alignment which we might modify when we deduce
alignment of arguments of either. Since we would need to keep them in
sync, which is not as simple, we simply avoid deducing alignment for
arguments of the must-tail caller or callee.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76673
We create a lot of AbstractAttributes and they live as long as
the Attributor does. It seems reasonable to allocate them via a
BumpPtrAllocator owned by the Attributor.
Reviewed By: baziotis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76589
Make the attributor pass aware of aligned_alloc for converting heap
allocations to stack ones.
Depends on D76971.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76974
This patch integrates operand bundle llvm.assumes [0] with the
Attributor. Most IRAttributes will now look at uses of the associated
value and if there are llvm.assume operand bundle uses with the right
tag we will check if they are in the must-be-executed-context (around
the context instruction). Droppable users, which is currently only
llvm::assume, are handled special in some places now as well.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74888
We special cased must-tail calls all over the place because they cannot
be modified as other calls can be. However, we already centralized the
modification API so we can centralize the handling as well. This
simplifies the code and allows to remove must-tail calls completely.
This patch add mayContainUnboundedCycle helper function which checks whether a function has any cycle which we don't know if it is bounded or not.
Loops with maximum trip count are considered bounded, any other cycle not.
It also contains some fixed tests and some added tests contain bounded and
unbounded loops and non-loop cycles.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, uenoku, baziotis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74691
Resolution for below fixme:
(ii) Check whether the value is captured in the scope using AANoCapture.
FIXME: This is conservative though, it is better to look at CFG and
check only uses possibly executed before this callsite.
Propagates caller argument's noalias attribute to callee.
Reviewed by: jdoerfert, uenoku
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1, uenoku
Subscribers: uenoku, sstefan1, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71617
This patch introduces the propagation of known information based on path exploration.
For example,
```
int u(int c, int *p){
if(c) {
return *p;
} else {
return *p + 1;
}
}
```
An argument `p` is dereferenced whatever c's value is.
For an instruction `CtxI`, we accumulate branch instructions in the must-be-executed-context of `CtxI` and then, we take the conjunction of the successors' known state.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65593
It is possible that an instruction to be changed to unreachable is
in the same block with a terminator that can be constant-folded.
In this case, as of now, the instruction will be changed to
unreachable before the terminator is folded. But, then the
whole BB becomes invalidated and so when we go ahead to fold
the terminator, we trap.
Change the order of these two.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75780
