This patch adds an attribute `inclusive` which if present causes
the upperbound to be included in the loop iteration interval.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94235
Introduce a conversion pass from SCF parallel loops to OpenMP dialect
constructs - parallel region and workshare loop. Loops with reductions are not
supported because the OpenMP dialect cannot model them yet.
The conversion currently targets only one level of parallelism, i.e. only
one top-level `omp.parallel` operation is produced even if there are nested
`scf.parallel` operations that could be mapped to `omp.wsloop`. Nested
parallelism support is left for future work.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91982
Now backends spell out which namespace they want to be in, instead of relying on
clients #including them inside already-opened namespaces. This also means that
cppNamespaces should be fully qualified, and there's no implicit "::mlir::"
prepended to them anymore.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86811
This simple patch translates the num_threads and if clauses of the parallel
operation. Also includes test cases.
A minor change was made to parsing of the if clause to parse AnyType and
return the parsed type. Updates to test cases also.
Reviewed by: SouraVX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84798
This patch moves the registration to a method in the MLIRContext: getOrCreateDialect<ConcreteDialect>()
This method requires dialect to provide a static getDialectNamespace()
and store a TypeID on the Dialect itself, which allows to lazyily
create a dialect when not yet loaded in the context.
As a side effect, it means that duplicated registration of the same
dialect is not an issue anymore.
To limit the boilerplate, TableGen dialect generation is modified to
emit the constructor entirely and invoke separately a "init()" method
that the user implements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85495
Summary:
This includes a basic implementation for the OpenMP parallel
operation without a custom pretty-printer and parser.
The if, num_threads, private, shared, first_private, last_private,
proc_bind and default clauses are included in this implementation.
Currently the reduction clause is omitted as it is more complex and
requires analysis to see if we can share implementation with the loop
dialect. The allocate clause is also omitted.
A discussion about the design of this operation can be found here:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/openmp-parallel-operation-design-issues/686
The current OpenMP Specification can be found here:
https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf
Co-authored-by: Kiran Chandramohan <kiran.chandramohan@arm.com>
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgorny, yaxunl, kristof.beyls, guansong, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, Joonsoo, grosul1, frgossen, Kayjukh, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79410
- Exports MLIR targets to be used out-of-tree.
- mimicks `add_clang_library` and `add_flang_library`.
- Fixes libMLIR.so
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D77515 libMLIR.so was no longer containing
any object files. We originally had a cludge there that made it work with
the static initalizers and when switchting away from that to the way the
clang shlib does it, I noticed that MLIR doesn't create a `obj.{name}` target,
and doesn't export it's targets to `lib/cmake/mlir`.
This is due to MLIR using `add_llvm_library` under the hood, which adds
the target to `llvmexports`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78773
[MLIR] Fix libMLIR.so and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB
Primarily, this patch moves all mlir references to LLVM libraries into
either LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or LINK_COMPONENTS. This enables magic in
the llvm cmake files to automatically replace reference to LLVM components
with references to libLLVM.so when necessary. Among other things, this
completes fixing libMLIR.so, which has been broken for some configurations
since D77515.
Unlike previously, the pattern is now that mlir libraries should almost
always use add_mlir_library. Previously, some libraries still used
add_llvm_library. However, this confuses the export of targets for use
out of tree because libraries specified with add_llvm_library are exported
by LLVM. Instead users which don't need/can't be linked into libMLIR.so
can specify EXCLUDE_FROM_LIBMLIR
A common error mode is linking with LLVM libraries outside of LINK_COMPONENTS.
This almost always results in symbol confusion or multiply defined options
in LLVM when the same object file is included as a static library and
as part of libLLVM.so. To catch these errors more directly, there's now
mlir_check_all_link_libraries.
To simplify usage of add_mlir_library, we assume that all mlir
libraries depend on LLVMSupport, so it's not necessary to separately specify
it.
tested with:
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB + LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79067
[MLIR] Move from using target_link_libraries to LINK_LIBS
This allows us to correctly generate dependencies for derived targets,
such as targets which are created for object libraries.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79243
Three commits have been squashed to avoid intermediate build breakage.
add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
CMake allows calling target_link_libraries() without a keyword,
but this usage is not preferred when also called with a keyword,
and has surprising behavior. This patch explicitly specifies a
keyword when using target_link_libraries().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75725
add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Instead of creating extra libraries we don't really need, collect a
list of all dialects and use that instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75221
In the previous state, we were relying on forcing the linker to include
all libraries in the final binary and the global initializer to self-register
every piece of the system. This change help moving away from this model, and
allow users to compose pieces more freely. The current change is only "fixing"
the dialect registration and avoiding relying on "whole link" for the passes.
The translation is still relying on the global registry, and some refactoring
is needed to make this all more convenient.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74461
Summary:
This patch is a step towards enabling BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on, which
builds most libraries as DLLs instead of statically linked libraries.
The main effect of this is that incremental build times are greatly
reduced, since usually only one library need be relinked in response
to isolated code changes.
The bulk of this patch is fixing incorrect usage of cmake, where library
dependencies are listed under add_dependencies rather than under
target_link_libraries or under the LINK_LIBS tag. Correct usage should be
like this:
add_dependencies(MLIRfoo MLIRfooIncGen)
target_link_libraries(MLIRfoo MLIRlib1 MLIRlib2)
A separate issue is that in cmake, dependencies between static libraries
are automatically included in dependencies. In the above example, if MLIBlib1
depends on MLIRlib2, then it is sufficient to have only MLIRlib1 in the
target_link_libraries. When compiling with shared libraries, it is necessary
to have both MLIRlib1 and MLIRlib2 specified if MLIRfoo uses symbols from both.
Reviewers: mravishankar, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, vchuravy, inouehrs, mehdi_amini, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: Joonsoo, merge_guards_bot, jholewinski, mgorny, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, csigg, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, herhut, aartbik, liufengdb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73653
Summary:
Barrier is a simple operation that takes no arguments and returns
nothing, but implies a side effect (synchronization of all threads)
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgorny, guansong, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72400
