unrolling threshold to the optimize-for-size threshold. Basically, for loops containing calls, unrolling
can still be profitable as long as the loop is REALLY small.
llvm-svn: 113439
turning (fptrunc (sqrt (fpext x))) -> (sqrtf x) is great, but we have
to delete the original sqrt as well. Not doing so causes us to do
two sqrt's when building with -fmath-errno (the default on linux).
llvm-svn: 113260
in the duplicated block instead of duplicating them.
Duplicating them into the end of the loop and the preheader
means that we got a phi node in the header of the loop,
which prevented LICM from hoisting them. GVN would
usually come around later and merge the duplicated
instructions so we'd get reasonable output... except that
anything dependent on the shoulda-been-hoisted value can't
be hoisted. In PR5319 (which this fixes), a memory value
didn't get promoted.
llvm-svn: 113134
location is being re-stored to the memory location. We would get
a dangling pointer from the SSAUpdate data structure and miss a
use. This fixes PR8068
llvm-svn: 113042
on llvmdev: SRoA is introducing MMX datatypes like <1 x i64>,
which then cause random problems because the X86 backend is
producing mmx stuff without inserting proper emms calls.
In the short term, force off MMX datatypes. In the long term,
the X86 backend should not select generic vector types to MMX
registers. This is being worked on, but won't be done in time
for 2.8. rdar://8380055
llvm-svn: 112696
I have not been able to find a way to test each in isolation, for a few reasons:
1) The ability to look-through non-i1 BinaryOperator's requires the ability to look through non-constant
ICmps in order for it to ever trigger.
2) The ability to do LVI-powered PHI value determination only matters in cases that ProcessBranchOnPHI
can't handle. Since it already handles all the cases without other instructions in the def-use chain
between the PHI and the branch, it requires the ability to look through ICmps and/or BinaryOperators
as well.
llvm-svn: 112611
This actually exposed an infinite recursion bug in ComputeValueKnownInPredecessors which theoretically already existed (in JumpThreading's
handling of and/or of i1's), but never manifested before. This patch adds a tracking set to prevent this case.
llvm-svn: 112589
A = shl x, 42
...
B = lshr ..., 38
which can be transformed into:
A = shl x, 4
...
iff we can prove that the would-be-shifted-in bits
are already zero. This eliminates two shifts in the testcase
and allows eliminate of the whole i128 chain in the real example.
llvm-svn: 112314
framework, which is good at ripping through bitfield
operations. This generalize a bunch of the existing
xforms that instcombine does, such as
(x << c) >> c -> and
to handle intermediate logical nodes. This is useful for
ripping up the "promote to large integer" code produced by
SRoA.
llvm-svn: 112304
by the SRoA "promote to large integer" code, eliminating
some type conversions like this:
%94 = zext i16 %93 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
%96 = lshr i32 %94, 8 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
%101 = trunc i32 %96 to i8 ; <i8> [#uses=1]
This also unblocks other xforms from happening, now clang is able to compile:
struct S { float A, B, C, D; };
float foo(struct S A) { return A.A + A.B+A.C+A.D; }
into:
_foo: ## @foo
## BB#0: ## %entry
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm2
addss %xmm0, %xmm2
movdqa %xmm1, %xmm3
addss %xmm2, %xmm3
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm0
addss %xmm3, %xmm0
ret
on x86-64, instead of:
_foo: ## @foo
## BB#0: ## %entry
movd %xmm0, %rax
shrq $32, %rax
movd %eax, %xmm2
addss %xmm0, %xmm2
movapd %xmm1, %xmm3
addss %xmm2, %xmm3
movd %xmm1, %rax
shrq $32, %rax
movd %eax, %xmm0
addss %xmm3, %xmm0
ret
This seems pretty close to optimal to me, at least without
using horizontal adds. This also triggers in lots of other
code, including SPEC.
llvm-svn: 112278
