In D98289#inline-939112 @dblaikie said:
Perhaps this could be more informative about what makes the range list
index of 0 invalid? "index 0 out of range of range list table (with
range list base 0xXXX) with offset entry count of XX (valid indexes
0-(XX-1))" Maybe that's too verbose/not worth worrying about since
this'll only be relevant to DWARF producers trying to debug their
DWARFv5, maybe no one will ever see this message in practice. Just
a thought.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102851
DW_AT_ranges can use DW_FORM_sec_offset (instead of DW_FORM_rnglistx).
In such case DW_AT_rnglists_base does not need to be present.
DWARF-5 spec:
"If the offset_entry_count is zero, then DW_FORM_rnglistx cannot
be used to access a range list; DW_FORM_sec_offset must be used
instead. If the offset_entry_count is non-zero, then
DW_FORM_rnglistx may be used to access a range list;"
This fix is for TestTypeCompletion.py category `dwarf` using GCC with DWARF-5.
The fix just provides GetRnglist() lazy getter for `m_rnglist_table`.
The testcase is easier to review by:
diff -u lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/DWARF/DW_AT_low_pc-addrx.s \
lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/DWARF/DW_AT_range-DW_FORM_sec_offset.s
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98289
DWARF allows .dwo file paths to be relative rather than absolute. When
they are relative, DWARF uses DW_AT_comp_dir to find the .dwo
file. DW_AT_comp_dir can also be relative, making the entire search
patch for the .dwo file relative. In this case, LLDB currently
searches relative to its current working directory, i.e. the directory
from which the debugger was launched. This is not right, as the
compiler, which generated the relative paths, can have no idea where
the debugger will be launched. The correct thing is to search relative
to the location of the executable binary. That is what this patch
does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97786
DWARF allows .dwo file paths to be relative rather than absolute. When
they are relative, DWARF uses DW_AT_comp_dir to find the .dwo
file. DW_AT_comp_dir can also be relative, making the entire search
patch for the .dwo file relative. In this case, LLDB currently
searches relative to its current working directory, i.e. the directory
from which the debugger was launched. This is not right, as the
compiler, which generated the relative paths, can have no idea where
the debugger will be launched. The correct thing is to search relative
to the location of the executable binary. That is what this patch
does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97786
By moving them into a folder with a local lit config
requiring x86. All these tests use x86 target triples.
There are two tests that require target-x86_64 because
they run program files (instead of just needing the backend).
Those are moved to the x86 folder also but their REQUIRES are
unchanged.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100193
The file contained bogus input - the DIE list was not properly
terminated. This should not cause a crash, but it seems it was crashing
at least on linux arm and x86 windows.
SymbolFileDWARF::ResolveSymbolContext is currently unaware that in DWARF5 the primary file is specified at file index 0. As a result it misses to correctly resolve the symbol context for the primary file when DWARF5 debug data is used and the primary file is only specified at index 0.
This change makes use of CompileUnit::ResolveSymbolContext to resolve the symbol context. The ResolveSymbolContext in CompileUnit has been previously already updated to reflect changes in DWARF5
and contains a more readable version. It can resolve more, but will also do a bit more work than
SymbolFileDWARF::ResolveSymbolContext (getting the Module, and going through SymbolFileDWARF::ResolveSymbolContextForAddress), however, it's mostly directed by $resolve_scope
what will be resolved, and ensures that code is easier to maintain if there's only one path.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98619
Apply changes from https://reviews.llvm.org/D91014 to other places where DWARF entries are being processed.
Test case is provided by @jankratochvil.
The test is marked to run only on x64 and exclude Windows and Darwin, because the assembly is not OS-independent.
(First attempt https://reviews.llvm.org/D96778 broke the build bots)
Reviewed By: jankratochvil
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97765
In DWARF v4 compile units go in .debug_info and type units go in
.debug_types. However, in v5 both kinds of units are in .debug_info.
Therefore we can't decide whether to use the CU or TU index just by
looking at which section we're reading from. We have to wait until we
have read the unit type from the header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96194
Currently TypePrinter lumps anonymous classes and unnamed classes in one group "anonymous" this is not correct and can be confusing in some contexts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96807
Currently TypePrinter lumps anonymous classes and unnamed classes in one group "anonymous" this is not correct and can be confusing in some contexts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96807
Finishing out the support (to the best of my knowledge/based on current
testing running the whole check-lldb with a clang forcibly using
DW_AT_ranges on all DW_TAG_subprograms) for this feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94064
gcc already produces debug info with this form
-freorder-block-and-partition
clang produces this sort of thing with -fbasic-block-sections and with a
coming-soon tweak to use ranges in DWARFv5 where they can allow greater
reuse of debug_addr than the low/high_pc forms.
This fixes the case of breaking on a function name, but leaves broken
printing a variable - a follow-up commit will add that and improve the
test case to match.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94063
In split DWARF v5 files, the DWO id is no longer in the DW_AT_GNU_dwo_id
attribute. It's in the CU header instead. This change makes lldb look in
both places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93444
I found a few cases where entries in the debug_line for a specific line of code have invalid entries (the address is outside of a code section or no section at all) and also valid entries. When this happens lldb might not set the breakpoint because the first line entry it will find in the line table might be the invalid one and since it's range is "invalid" no location is resolved. To get around this I changed the way we parse the line sequences to ignore those starting at an address under the first code segment.
Greg suggested to implement it this way so we don't need to check all sections for every line sequence.
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87172
This would be reproducible in future DWZ category of the testsuite as:
Failed Tests (1):
lldb-api :: python_api/symbol-context/two-files/TestSymbolContextTwoFiles.py
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91014
Current user_id_t format is:
63{isDebugTypes} 62..32{dwo || 7fffffff}
31..0 {die_offset}
while current DIERef format is (I have made up the bit positions but the
field widths do match):
63{m_section==isDebugTypes} 62{m_dwo_num_valid} 61..32{m_dwo_num}
31..0 {m_die_offset}
Proposing to change user_id_t to:
63{isDebugTypes} 62{dwo_is_valid} 61..32{dwo; 0 if !valid}
31..0 {die_offset}
There is no benefit of having 31-bits wide dwo_num in user_id_t when it
gets converted to 30-bits width in DIERef.
This patch is for future DWZ patchset which extends the dwo_is_valid bit
into a 2-bit field (normal, DWO, DWZ, DWZcommon) so that both user_id_t
and DIERef can be changed then the same way.
It would be best to somehow unify user_id_t and DIERef but I do not plan
to do that. user_id_t should probably remain a number for the Python API
compatibility while there still needs to be some class with all the
methods to access it.
SymbolFileDWARF::GetDwpSymbolFile() and SymbolFileDWARF::GetDIE use
0x3fffffff for DWP but that does not clash:
formerly:
31bits32..62:0x7fffffff = normal unit / not any DWO
31bits32..62:0x3fffffff = DWP
31bits32..62:others = DWO unit number
after this patch:
bit62=0 30bits32..61:any = normal unit / not any DWO
bit62=1 30bits32..61:0x3fffffff = DWP
bit62=1 30bits32..61:others = DWO unit number
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90413
There were invalid DIE references which nobody used. If LLDB starts to
report invalid DIE references it would lock up (mutex lock).
These invalid DIE references are there since initial check-in by:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83302
The function was returning an incorrect (empty) value on the first
invocation. Given that this only affected the first invocation, this
bug/typo went mostly unaffected. DW_AT_const_value were particularly
badly affected by this as the GetByteSize call is
SymbolFileDWARF::ParseVariableDIE is likely to be the first call of this
function, and its effects cannot be undone by retrying.
Depends on D86348.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86436
Class-level static constexpr variables can have both DW_AT_const_value
(in the "declaration") and a DW_AT_location (in the "definition")
attributes. Our code was trying to handle this, but it was brittle and
hard to follow (and broken) because it was processing the attributes in
the order in which they were found.
Refactor the code to make the intent clearer -- DW_AT_location trumps
DW_AT_const_value, and fix the bug which meant that we were not
displaying these variables properly (the culprit was the delayed parsing
of the const_value attribute due to a need to fetch the variable type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86615
This fixes several issues in handling of DW_AT_const_value attributes:
- the first is that the size of the data given by data forms does not
need to match the size of the underlying variable. We already had the
case to handle this for DW_FORM_(us)data -- this extends the handling
to other data forms. The main reason this was not picked up is because
clang uses leb forms in these cases while gcc prefers the fixed-size
ones.
- The handling of DW_AT_strp form was completely broken -- we would end
up using the pointer value as the result. I've reorganized this code
so that it handles all string forms uniformly.
- In case of a completely bogus form we would crash due to
strlen(nullptr).
Depends on D86311.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86348
In some cases when we have a DW_AT_const_value and the data can be found in the
DWARFExpression then ValueObjectVariable does not handle it properly and we end
up with an extracting data from value failed error.
The test is a very stripped down assembly file since reproducing this relies on the results of compiling with -O1 which may not be stable over time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86311
This is very similar to D85968, only more elusive to since we were not
adding the typedef type to the relevant DeclContext until D86140, which
meant that the DeclContext was populated (and the relevant assertion
hit) only after importing the type into the expression ast in a
particular way.
I haven't checked whether this situation can be hit in the gmodules
case, but my money is on "yes".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86216
Parsing DWARFv5 debug_loclist offsets when a CU is parsed is weighing
down memory usage of symbolizers that don't need to parse this data at
all. There's not much benefit to caching these anyway - since they are
O(1) lookup and reading once you know where the offset list starts (and
can do bounds checking with the offset list size too).
In general, I think it might be time to start paying down some of the
technical debt of loc/loclist/range/rnglist parsing to try to unify it a
bit more.
eg:
* Currently DWARFUnit has: RangeSection, RangeSectionBase, LocSection,
LocSectionBase, LocTable, RngListTable, LoclistTableHeader (be nice if
these were all wrapped up in two variables - one for loclists, one for
rnglists)
* rnglists and loclists are handled differently (see:
LoclistTableHeader, but no RnglistTableHeader)
* maybe all these types could be less stateful - lazily parse what they
need to, even reparsing rather than caching because it doesn't seem
too expensive, for instance. (though admittedly so long as it's
constantcost/overead per compilatiton that's probably adequate)
* Maybe implementing and using a DWARFDataExtractor that can be
sub-ranged (so we could slice it up to just the single contribution) -
though maybe that's not so useful because loc/ranges need to refer to
it by absolute, not contribution-relative mechanisms
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86110
With -flimit-debug-info, we can run into cases when we only have a class
as a declaration, but we do have a definition of a nested class. In this
case, clang will hit an assertion when adding a member to an incomplete
type (but only if it's adding a c++ class, and not C struct).
It turns out we already had code to handle a similar situation arising
in the -gmodules scenario. This extends the code to handle
-flimit-debug-info as well, and reorganizes bits of other code handling
completion of types to move functions doing similar things closer
together.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85968
When bit-field data was stored in a Scalar in ValueObjectChild during UpdateValue()
it was extracting the bit-field value. Later on in lldb_private::DumpDataExtractor(…)
we were again attempting to extract the bit-field. Which would then not obtain the
correct value. This will remove the extra extraction in UpdateValue().
We hit this specific case when values are passed in registers, which we could only
reproduce in an optimized build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85376
