There seems to have been some erroneous code attempting to describe the
ABI of parameters (non-trivial record parameters are passed by
reference). This would break the type of the function (especially when
it caused a mismatch between the type of a declaration & a definition)
causing PR14763 and PR14645.
llvm-svn: 183329
In an effort to make -flimit-debug-info more consistent I over-shot the
mark & made types used via typedefs never produce definitions in the
debug info (even if the type was used in a way that would require a
definition).
The fix for this is to do exactly what I was hoping to do at some point
- plumb the declaration/definition choice through the various layers of
"CreateType" in CGDebugInfo. In this way we can produce declarations
whenever they are sufficient & definitions otherwise - including when
qualifiers are used, for example (discovered in PR14467). This may not
be complete (there may be other types/situations where we need to
propagate the "declaration/definition" choice) but it lays the basic
foundation which we can enhance in future iterations.
llvm-svn: 183296
To make this more consistent with 'getOrCreateType' & clarify the
distinction between the two. The only thing I couldn't quite communicate
in the name is that getOrCreateTypeDeclaration may actually produce a
full definition (in -fno-limit-debug-info) but the point is to call it
whenever only a declaration is needed & the implementation can choose
whether to provide a declaration or definition.
(also, unfortunately, getOrCreateType can produce declarations too - we
should sure this up by making it not do that - any caller that can
tolerate a declaration should be calling getOrCreateTypeDeclaration
instead)
llvm-svn: 182674
Perhaps we should just suppress this, rather than erroring, but since we
have the infrastructure for it I figured I'd use it - if this is
determined to be not the right thing we should probably remove that
infrastructure entirely. I guess it's lying around from the early days
of implementing debug info support.
llvm-svn: 182673
This resolves the last of the PR14606 failures in the GDB 7.5 test
suite. (but there are still unresolved issues in the imported_decl case
- we need to implement optional/lazy decls for functions & variables
like we already do for types)
llvm-svn: 182329
This reverts commit r181947 (git d2990ce56a16050cac0d7937ec9919ff54c6df62 )
This addresses one of the two issues identified in r181947, ensuring
that types imported via using declarations only result in a declaration
being emitted for the type, not a definition. The second issue (emitting
using declarations that are unused) is hopefully an acceptable increase
as the real fix for this would be a bit difficult (probably at best we
could record which using directives were involved in lookups - but may
not have been the result of the lookup).
This also ensures that DW_TAG_imported_declarations (& directives) are
not emitted in line-tables-only mode as well as ensuring that typedefs
only require/emit declarations (rather than definitions) for referenced
types.
llvm-svn: 182231
This reverts commit r181393 (git 3923d6a87fe7b2c91cc4a7dbd90c4ec7e2316bcd).
This seems to be emitting too much extra debug info for two (known)
reasons:
* full class definitions are emitted when only declarations are expected
* unused using declarations still produce DW_TAG_imported_declarations
llvm-svn: 181947
We might benefit from API refactoring here (why pass in a value that's
derived from another parameter?) but this is the immediate issue.
llvm-svn: 181747
We could support the GCC extension DW_TAG_GNU_template_parameter_pack if
we're feeling adventurous, at some point - but I don't think GDB's doing
anything useful with it yet anyway.
llvm-svn: 181644
* Provide DW_TAG_template_value_parameter for pointers, function
pointers, member pointers, and member function pointers (still missing
support for template template parameters which GCC encodes as a
DW_TAG_GNU_template_template_param)
* Provide values for all but the (member & non-member) function pointer case.
Simple constant integer values for member pointers (offset within the
object) and address for the value pointer case. GCC doesn't provide a
value for the member function pointer case so I'm not sure how, if at
all, GDB supports encoding that. & non-member function pointers should
follow shortly in a subsequent patch.
* Null pointer value encodings of all of these types, including
correctly encoding null data member pointers as -1.
llvm-svn: 181634
This was added, untested (though the relevant crash was tested), in
r128725/PR9600. Removing it doesn't cause failures & nothing I can
imagine could cause this check to ever return 'true' (we should never be
dealing with dependent types here). The subsequent change to check
"isIncompleteType" (r128855/PR9608) makes a lot more sense.
llvm-svn: 181542
Basic support is implemented here - it still doesn't account for
declared-but-not-defined variables or functions. It cannot handle out of
order (declared, 'using', then defined) cases for variables, but can
handle that for functions (& can handle declared, 'using'd, and not
defined at all cases for types).
llvm-svn: 181393
This reverts commit r178497 since the backend has been fixed.
Also add a test to ensure that we're emitting template information for unions.
llvm-svn: 178587
* Store the .block_descriptor (instead of self) in the alloca so we
can guarantee that all captured variables are available at -O0.
* Add the missing OpDeref for the alloca.
rdar://problem/12767564
llvm-svn: 178361
