I'm working on adding !dbg attachments to functions (PR23367), which
we'll use to determine the canonical subprogram for a function (instead
of the `subprograms:` array in the compile units). This updates a few
old tests in preparation.
Transforms/Mem2Reg/ConvertDebugInfo2.ll had an old-style grep+count
based test that would start to fail because I've added an extra line
with `!dbg`. Instead, explicitly `CHECK` for what I think the test
actually cares about.
All three testcases have subprograms with a valid `function:` reference
-- which means my upgrade script will add a `!dbg` attachment -- but
that aren't referenced from any compile unit. I suspect these testcases
were handreduced over-zealously (or have bitrotted?). Add a reference
from the compile unit so that upcoming Verifier checks won't fail here.
llvm-svn: 246351
This reverts isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute's use of ReadNone until we
split ReadNone into two pieces: one attribute which reasons about how
the function reasons about memory and another attribute which determines
how it may be speculated, CSE'd, trap, etc.
llvm-svn: 246331
As a follow-up to r246098, require `DISubprogram` definitions
(`isDefinition: true`) to be 'distinct'. Specifically, add an assembler
check, a verifier check, and bitcode upgrading logic to combat testcase
bitrot after the `DIBuilder` change.
While working on the testcases, I realized that
test/Linker/subprogram-linkonce-weak-odr.ll isn't relevant anymore. Its
purpose was to check for a corner case in PR22792 where two subprogram
definitions match exactly and share the same metadata node. The new
verifier check, requiring that subprogram definitions are 'distinct',
precludes that possibility.
I updated almost all the IR with the following script:
git grep -l -E -e '= !DISubprogram\(.* isDefinition: true' |
grep -v test/Bitcode |
xargs sed -i '' -e 's/= \(!DISubprogram(.*, isDefinition: true\)/= distinct \1/'
Likely some variant of would work for out-of-tree testcases.
llvm-svn: 246327
PR24605 is caused due to an incorrect insert point in instcombine's IR
builder. When simplifying
%t = add X Y
...
%m = icmp ... %t
the replacement for %t should be placed before %t, not before %m, as
there could be a use of %t between %t and %m.
llvm-svn: 246315
Summary:
This patch removes two remaining places where pointer value comparisons
are used to order functions: comparing range annotation metadata, and comparing
block address constants. (These are both rare cases, and so no actual
non-determinism was observed from either case).
The fix for range metadata is simple: the annotation always consists of a pair
of integers, so we just order by those integers.
The fix for block addresses is more subtle. Two constants are the same if they
are the same basic block in the same function, or if they refer to corresponding
basic blocks in each respective function. Note that in the first case, merging
is trivially correct. In the second, the correctness of merging relies on the
fact that the the values of block addresses cannot be compared. This change is
actually an enhancement, as these functions could not previously be merged (see
merge-block-address.ll).
There is still a problem with cross function block addresses, in that constants
pointing to a basic block in a merged function is not updated.
This also more robustly compares floating point constants by all fields of their
semantics, and fixes a dyn_cast/cast mixup.
Author: jrkoenig
Reviewers: dschuff, nlewycky, jfb
Subscribers llvm-commits
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12376
llvm-svn: 246305
handle more allocas with loads past the end of the alloca.
I suspect there are some related crashers with slightly different
patterns, but I'll fix those and add test cases as I find them.
Thanks to David Majnemer for the excellent test case reduction here.
Made this super simple to debug and fix.
llvm-svn: 246289
After hitting @llvm.assume(X) we can:
- propagate equality that X == true
- if X is icmp/fcmp (with eq operation), and one of operand
is constant we can change all variables with constants in the same BasicBlock
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11918
llvm-svn: 246243
Any call which is side effect free is trivially OK to speculate. We
already had similar logic in EarlyCSE and GVN but we were missing it
from isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute.
This fixes PR24601.
llvm-svn: 246232
Constant propagation for single precision math functions (such as
tanf) is already working, but was not enabled. This patch enables
these for many single-precision functions, and adds respective test
cases.
Newly handled functions: acosf asinf atanf atan2f ceilf coshf expf
exp2f fabsf floorf fmodf logf log10f powf sinhf tanf tanhf
llvm-svn: 246194
This patch changes the analysis diagnostics produced when loops with
floating-point recurrences or memory operations are identified. The new messages
say "cannot prove it is safe to reorder * operations; allow reordering by
specifying #pragma clang loop vectorize(enable)". Depending on the type of
diagnostic the message will include additional options such as ffast-math or
__restrict__.
This patch also allows the vectorize(enable) pragma to override the low pointer
memory check threshold. When the hint is given a higher threshold is used.
See the clang patch for the options produced for each diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 246187
Constant propagation for single precision math functions (such as
tanf) is already working, but was not enabled. This patch enables
these for many single-precision functions, and adds respective test
cases.
Newly handled functions: acosf asinf atanf atan2f ceilf coshf expf
exp2f fabsf floorf fmodf logf log10f powf sinhf tanf tanhf
llvm-svn: 246186
Constant propagation for single precision math functions (such as
tanf) is already working, but was not enabled. This patch enables
these for many single-precision functions, and adds respective test
cases.
Newly handled functions: acosf asinf atanf atan2f ceilf coshf expf
exp2f fabsf floorf fmodf logf log10f powf sinhf tanf tanhf
llvm-svn: 246158
Unlike scalar operations, we can perform vector operations on element types that
are smaller than the native integer types. We type-promote scalar operations if
they are smaller than a native type (e.g., i8 arithmetic is promoted to i32
arithmetic on Arm targets). This patch detects and removes type-promotions
within the reduction detection framework, enabling the vectorization of small
size reductions.
In the legality phase, we look through the ANDs and extensions that InstCombine
creates during promotion, keeping track of the smaller type. In the
profitability phase, we use the smaller type and ignore the ANDs and extensions
in the cost model. Finally, in the code generation phase, we truncate the result
of the reduction to allow InstCombine to rewrite the entire expression in the
smaller type.
This fixes PR21369.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12202
Patch by Matt Simpson <mssimpso@codeaurora.org>!
llvm-svn: 246149
Globals in address spaces other than one may have 0 as a valid address,
so we should not assume that they can be null.
Reviewed by Philip Reames.
llvm-svn: 246137
A release fence acts as a publication barrier for stores within the current thread to become visible to other threads which might observe the release fence. It does not require the current thread to observe stores performed on other threads. As a result, we can allow store-load and load-store forwarding across a release fence.
We do need to make sure that stores before the fence can't be eliminated even if there's another store to the same location after the fence. In theory, we could reorder the second store above the fence and *then* eliminate the former, but we can't do this if the stores are on opposite sides of the fence.
Note: While more aggressive then what's there, this patch is still implementing a really conservative ordering. In particular, I'm not trying to exploit undefined behavior via races, or the fact that the LangRef says only 'atomic' accesses are ordered w.r.t. fences.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11434
llvm-svn: 246134
When computing base pointers, we introduce new instructions to propagate the base of existing instructions which might not be bases. However, the algorithm doesn't make any effort to recognize when the new instruction to be inserted is the same as an existing one already in the IR. Since this is happening immediately before rewriting, we don't really have a chance to fix it after the pass runs without teaching loop passes about statepoints.
I'm really not thrilled with this patch. I've rewritten it 4 different ways now, but this is the best I've come up with. The case where the new instruction is just the original base defining value could be merged into the existing algorithm with some complexity. The problem is that we might have something like an extractelement from a phi of two vectors. It may be trivially obvious that the base of the 0th element is an existing instruction, but I can't see how to make the algorithm itself figure that out. Thus, I resort to the call to SimplifyInstruction instead.
Note that we can only adjust the instructions we've inserted ourselves. The live sets are still being tracked in side structures at this point in the code. We can't easily muck with instructions which might be in them. Long term, I'm really thinking we need to materialize the live pointer sets explicitly in the IR somehow rather than using side structures to track them.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12004
llvm-svn: 246133
This patch ensures that every analysis diagnostic produced by the vectorizer
will be printed if the loop has a vectorization hint on it. The condition has
also been improved to prevent printing when a disabling hint is specified.
llvm-svn: 246132
As Sanjoy pointed out over in http://reviews.llvm.org/D11819, a switch on an icmp should always be able to become a branch instruction. This patch generalizes that notion slightly to prove that the default case of a switch is unreachable if the cases completely cover all possible bit patterns in the condition. Once that's done, the switch to branch conversion kicks in just fine.
Note: Duplicate case values are disallowed by the LangRef and verifier.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11995
llvm-svn: 246125
This was only added to preserve the old ScalarRepl's use of SSAUpdater
which was originally to avoid use of dominance frontiers. Now, we only
need a domtree, and we'll need a domtree right after this pass as well
and so it makes perfect sense to always and only use the dom-tree
powered mem2reg. This was flag-flipper earlier and has stuck reasonably
so I wanted to gut the now-dead code out of SROA before we waste more
time with it. Among other things, this will make passmanager porting
easier.
llvm-svn: 246028
Summary: When comparing basic blocks, there is an additional check that two Value*'s should have the same ID, which interferes with merging equivalent constants of different kinds (such as a ConstantInt and a ConstantPointerNull in the included testcase). The cmpValues function already ensures that the two values in each function are the same, so removing this check should not cause incorrect merging.
Also, the type comparison is redundant, based on reviewing the code and testing on the test suite and several large LTO bitcodes.
Author: jrkoenig
Reviewers: nlewycky, jfb, dschuff
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12302
llvm-svn: 246001
The loop minimum iterations check below ensures the loop has enough trip count so the generated
vector loop will likely be executed, and it covers the overflow check.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12107.
llvm-svn: 245952
It doesn't solve the problem, when for example we load something, and
then assume that it is the same as some constant value, because
globalopt will fail on unknown load instruction. The proposed solution
would be to skip some instructions that we can't evaluate and they are
safe to skip (f.e. load, assume and many others) and see if they are
required to perform optimization (f.e. we don't care about ephemeral
instructions that may appear using @llvm.assume())
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12266
llvm-svn: 245919
Some debug info was drastically out of date, from the days where we used
to emit a list of length one (with a single null entry) rather than an
empty list (or, more recently, no list at all) for list fields that have
no elements.
llvm-svn: 245796
Summary:
Merge functions previously relied on unsigned comparisons of pointer values to
order functions. This caused observable non-determinism in the compiler for
large bitcode programs. Basically, opt -mergefuncs program.bc | md5sum produces
different hashes when run repeatedly on the same machine. Differing output was
observed on three large bitcodes, but it was less frequent on the smallest file.
It is possible that this only manifests on the large inputs, hence remaining
undetected until now.
This patch fixes this by removing (almost, see below) all places where
comparisons between pointers are used to order functions. Most of these changes
are local, but the comparison of global values requires assigning an identifier
to each local in the order it is visited. This is very similar to the way the
comparison function identifies Value*'s defined within a function. Because the
order of visiting the functions and their subparts is deterministic, the
identifiers assigned to the globals will be as well, and the order of functions
will be deterministic.
With these changes, there is no more observed non-determinism. There is also
only minor slowdowns (negligible to 4%) compared to the baseline, which is
likely a result of the fact that global comparisons involve hash lookups and not
just pointer comparisons.
The one caveat so far is that programs containing BlockAddress constants can
still be non-deterministic. It is not clear what the right solution is here. In
particular, even if the global numbers are used to order by function, we still
need a way to order the BasicBlock*'s. Unfortunately, we cannot just bail out
and fail to order the functions or consider them equal, because we require a
total order over functions. Note that programs with BlockAddress constants are
relatively rare, so the impact of leaving this in is minor as long as this pass
is opt-in.
Author: jrkoenig
Reviewers: nlewycky, jfb, dschuff
Subscribers: jevinskie, llvm-commits, chapuni
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12168
llvm-svn: 245762
SCEV expansion can invalidate previously expanded values. For example
in SCEVExpander::ReuseOrCreateCast, if we already have the requested
cast value but it's not at the desired location, a new cast is inserted
and the old cast will be invalidated.
Therefore, when expanding the bounds for the pointers, a later entry can
invalidate the IR value for an earlier one. The fix is to store a value
handle rather than the value itself.
The newly added test has a more detailed description of how the bug
triggers.
This bug can have a negative but potentially highly variable performance
impact in Loop Distribution. Because one of the bound values was
invalidated and is an undef expression now, InstCombine is free to
transform the array overlap check:
Start0 <= End1 && Start1 <= End0
into:
Start0 <= End1
So depending on the runtime location of the arrays, we would detect a
conflict and fall back on the original loop of the versioned loop.
Also tested compile time with SPEC2006 LTO bc files.
llvm-svn: 245760
The original checkin was buggy, this change has a fix.
Original commit message:
[InstCombine] Transform A & (L - 1) u< L --> L != 0
Summary:
This transform is never a pessimization at the IR level (since it
replaces an `icmp` with another), and has potentiall payoffs:
1. It may make the `icmp` fold away or become loop invariant.
2. It may make the `A & (L - 1)` computation dead.
This shows up in Java, in range checks generated by array accesses of
the form `a[i & (a.length - 1)]`.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12210
llvm-svn: 245753
Summary:
This transform is never a pessimization at the IR level (since it
replaces an `icmp` with another), and has potentiall payoffs:
1. It may make the `icmp` fold away or become loop invariant.
2. It may make the `A & (L - 1)` computation dead.
This shows up in Java, in range checks generated by array accesses of
the form `a[i & (a.length - 1)]`.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12210
llvm-svn: 245635
Summary:
Add an LSR test that exercises isTruncateFree. Without this change, LSR creates
another indvar representing the truncated value.
Reviewers: jholewinski, eliben
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12058
llvm-svn: 245611
Instruction::dropUnknownMetadata(KnownSet) is supposed to preserve all
metadata in KnownSet, but the condition for DebugLocs was inverted.
Most users of dropUnknownMetadata() actually worked around this by not
adding LLVMContext::MD_dbg to their list of KnowIDs.
This is now made explicit.
llvm-svn: 245589
Summary: We know that -x & 1 is equivalent to x & 1, avoid using negation for testing if a negative integer is even or odd.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: junbuml, mssimpso, gberry, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12156
llvm-svn: 245569
Usually DSE is not supposed to remove lifetime intrinsics, but it's
actually ok to remove them for dead objects in terminating blocks,
because they convey no extra information there. Until we hit a lifetime
start that cannot be removed, that is. Because from that point on the
lifetime intrinsics become interesting again, e.g. for stack coloring.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11710
llvm-svn: 245542
Here we make ScalarEvolution::isKnownPredicate, indirectly, a little smarter.
Given some relational comparison operator OP, and two AddRec SCEVs, {I,+,S} OP
{J,+,T}, we can reduce this to the comparison I OP J when S == T, both AddRecs
are for the same loop, and both are known not to wrap.
As it turns out, because of the way that backedge-guard expressions can be
leveraged when computing known predicates, this allows indvars to simplify the
if-statement comparison in this loop:
void foo (int *a, int *b, int n) {
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
if (i > n)
a[i] = b[i] + 1;
}
}
which, somewhat surprisingly, we were not previously optimizing away.
llvm-svn: 245400
