The new field in the MemoryAccess allows us to track a value related
to that access:
- For real memory accesses the value is the loaded result or the
stored value.
- For straigt line scalar accesses it is the access instruction
itself.
- For PHI operand accesses it is the operand value.
We use this value to simplify code which deduced information about the value
later in the Polly pipeline and was known to be error prone.
Reviewers: grosser, Meinsersbur
Subscribers: #polly
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12062
llvm-svn: 245213
This modifies the order in which Polly passes are executed.
Assuming a function has two scops (A and B), the order before was:
FunctionPassManager
ScopDetection
IndependentBlocks
TempScopInfo for A and B
RegionPassManager
ScopInfo for A
DependenceInfo for A
IslScheduleOptimizer for A
IslAstInfo for A
CodeGeneration for A
ScopInfo for B
DependenceInfo for B
IslScheduleOptimizer for B
IslAstInfo for B
CodeGeneration for B
After this patch:
FunctionPassManager
ScopDetection
IndependentBlocks
RegionPassManager
TempScopInfo for A
ScopInfo for A
DependenceInfo for A
IslScheduleOptimizer for A
IslAstInfo for A
CodeGeneration for A
TempScopInfo for B
ScopInfo for B
DependenceInfo for B
IslScheduleOptimizer for B
IslAstInfo for B
CodeGeneration for B
TempScopInfo for B might store information and references to the IR
that CodeGeneration for A might modify. Changing the order ensures that
the IR is not modified from the analysis of a region until code
generation.
Reviewers: grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12014
llvm-svn: 245091
Before we only modeled PHI nodes if at least one incoming basic block was itself
part of the region, now we always model them except if all of their operands are
part of a single non-affine subregion which we model as a black-box.
This change only affects PHI nodes in the entry block, that have exactly one
incoming edge. Before this change, we did not model them and as a result code
generation would not know how to code generate them. With this change, code
generation can code generate them like any other PHI node.
This issue was exposed by r244606. Before this change simplifyRegion would have
moved these PHI nodes out of the SCoP, so we would never have tried to code
generate them. We could implement this behavior again, but changing the IR
after the scop has been modeled and transformed always adds a risk of us
invalidating earlier analysis results. It seems more save and overall also more
consistent to just model and handle this one-entry-edge PHI nodes like any
other PHI node in the scop.
Solution proposed by: Michael Kruse <llvm@meinersbur.de>
llvm-svn: 244721
Even though read-only accesses to scalars outside of a scop do not need to be
modeled to derive valid transformations or to generate valid sequential code,
but information about them is useful when we considering memory footprint
analysis and/or kernel offloading.
llvm-svn: 243981
We use the branch instruction as the location at which a PHI-node write takes
place, instead of the PHI-node itself. This allows us to identify the
basic-block in a region statement which is on the incoming edge of the PHI-node
and for which the write access was originally introduced. As a result we can,
during code generation, avoid generating PHI-node write accesses for basic
blocks that do not preceed the PHI node without having to look at the IR
again.
This change fixes a bug which was introduced in r243420, when we started to
explicitly model PHI-node reads and writes, but dropped some additional checks
that where still necessary during code generation to not emit PHI-node writes
for basic-blocks that are not on incoming edges of the original PHI node.
Compared to the code before r243420 the new code does not need to inspect the IR
any more and we also do not generate multiple redundant writes.
llvm-svn: 243852
Summary:
When translating PHI nodes into memory dependences during code generation we
require two kinds of memory. 'Normal memory' as for all scalar dependences and
'PHI node memory' to store the incoming values of the PHI node. With this
patch we now mark and track these two kinds of memories, which we previously
incorrectly marked as a single memory object.
Being aware of PHI node storage makes code generation easier, as we do not need
to guess what kind of storage a scalar reference requires. This simplifies the
code nicely.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: pollydev, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11554
llvm-svn: 243420
Upcoming revisions of isl require us to include header files explicitly, which
have previously been already transitively included. Before we add them, we sort
the existing includes.
Thanks to Chandler for sort_includes.py. A simple, but very convenient script.
llvm-svn: 236930
This will allow the ScopInfo to build the polyhedral representation for
non-affine regions that contain loops. Such loops are basically not visible
in the SCoP representation. Accesses that are variant in such loops are
therefor represented as non-affine accesses.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8153
llvm-svn: 234713
If a scalar was defined and used only in a non-affine subregion we do
not need to model the accesses. However, if the scalar was defined
inside the region and escapes the region we have to model the access.
The same is true if the scalar was defined outside and used inside the
region.
llvm-svn: 230960
This allows us to model non-affine regions in the SCoP representation.
SCoP statements can now describe either basic blocks or non-affine
regions. In the latter case all accesses in the region are accumulated
for the statement and write accesses, except in the entry, have to be
marked as may-write.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7846
llvm-svn: 230329
These write are important as they will force the scheduling and code
generation of an otherwise trivial statement and also impose an order of
execution needed to guarantee the correct final value for a scalar in a loop.
Added test case modeled after ClamAV/clamscan.
llvm-svn: 228847
This allows us to model PHI nodes in the polyhedral description
without demoting them. The modeling however will result in the
same accesses as the demotion would have introduced.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7415
llvm-svn: 228433
In TempScopInfo::buildCondition we extract the conditions to guard the
BB *in addition of* loop bounds. This means we should only consider the
conditions in the paths (in CFG) that do not contain cycles (loops).
At the same time, we set the invert flag if the FalseBB of the current
branch dominates our target BB to indicate that we reach the target BB
with an inverted condition from the current branch.
In this case, the path from the FalseBB contains a cycle if the FalseBB
is the target of a backedge. The conditions implied by such a path should
not be consider. We can identify such a case by checking if the TrueBB
also dominates our target BB, which means we can also reach our target
BB from the TrueBB, without going through the backedge.
llvm-svn: 222907
We will use ScalarEvolution in the ScopInfo.cpp to get the loop trip
count, not cache it in the TempScop object.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6070
llvm-svn: 221035
Now MaxLoopDepth only lives in Scops not in TempScops anymore.
This is the first part of a series of changes to make TempScops
obsolete.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6069
llvm-svn: 221026
Without this patch, the testcase would fail on the delinearization of the second
array:
; void foo(long n, long m, long o, double A[n][m][o]) {
; for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
; for (long j = 0; j < m; j++)
; for (long k = 0; k < o; k++) {
; A[i+3][j-4][k+7] = 1.0;
; A[i][0][k] = 2.0;
; }
; }
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[3 + i0, -4 + i1, 7 + i2] };
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
Here is the output of FileCheck on the testcase without this patch:
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
^
<stdin>:26:2: note: possible intended match here
[n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[o0] };
^
It is possible to find a good delinearization for A[i][0][k] only in the context
of the delinearization of both array accesses.
There are two ways to delinearize together all array subscripts touching the
same base address: either duplicate the code from scop detection to first gather
all array references and then run the delinearization; or as implemented in this
patch, use the same delinearization info that we computed during scop detection.
llvm-svn: 210117
Instead of relying on the delinearization to infer the size of an element,
compute the element size from the base address type. This is a much more precise
way of computing the element size than before, as we would have mixed together
the size of an element with the strides of the innermost dimension.
llvm-svn: 209695
definition below all of the header #include lines, Polly edition.
If you want to know more details about this, you can see the recent
commits to Debug.h in LLVM. This is just the Polly segment of a cleanup
I'm doing globally for this macro.
llvm-svn: 206852
Value::user_iterator changes in LLVM r203364. Converts several of these
loops to nice range based loops in the process.
Built and tested cleanly for me, yay for being able to fully build and
test Polly changes!
llvm-svn: 203381
In rare cases the modification of one scop can effect the validity of other
scops, as code generation of an earlier scop may make the scalar evolution
functions derived for later scops less precise. The example that triggered this
patch was a scop that contained an 'or' expression as follows:
%add13710 = or i32 %j.19, 1
--> {(1 + (4 * %l)),+,2}<nsw><%for.body81>
Scev could only analyze the 'or' as it knew %j.19 is a multiple of 2. This
information was not available after the first scop was code generated (or
independent-blocks was run on it) and SCEV could not derive a precise SCEV
expression any more. This means we could not any more code generate this SCoP.
My current understanding is that there is always the risk that an earlier code
generation change invalidates later scops. As the example we have seen here is
difficult to avoid, we use this occasion to guard us against all such
invalidations.
This patch "solves" this issue by verifying right before we start working on
a detected scop, if this scop is in fact still valid. This adds a certain
overhead. However the verification we run is anyways very fast and secondly
it is only run on detected scops. So the overhead should not be very large. As
a later optimization we could detect scops only on demand, such that we need
to run scop-detections always only a single time.
This should fix the single last failure in the LLVM test-suite for the new
scev-based code generation.
llvm-svn: 201593
The MayAliasSet class is currently not used and just confuses people. We can
reintroduce it in case need a more precise tracking of alias sets.
llvm-svn: 201191
Use 0 >= 1 instead of 0 != 0 to represent 'false'. This might be slightly more
efficient as isl may create a union of sets for 0 != 0, whereas this is never
needed for the expression 0 >= 1.
Contributed-by: Alexandre Isoard <alexandre.isoard@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 190384
Ensure that the scalar write access corresponds to the result of a load
instruction appears after the generic read access corresponds to the load
instruction.
llvm-svn: 186419
