LLDB doesn't yet have a TypeSystemRust implemented however it is used to debug Rust applications. Most of the types map well enough to Clang types and there are python formatters implemented to display those types reasonably well in a debugger.
However, Rust enums are completely ignored by LLDB as Clang never emits DW_TAG_variant_part inside DW_TAG_structure_type
This diff adds a parser for DW_TAG_variant_part (Rust-only) that creates a matching valid Clang declaration to the Rust enum. As long as there is enough information and all fields have correct offsets synthetic/summary providers can be implemented to display it correctly when debugging Rust code
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149213
This replaces two radar links with improved comments explaining the
underlying issues.
- The first issue is working around a compiler bug that was fixed in
f454dfb6b5.
- The second issue is an invariant that doesn't actually hold. The
latter was marked as FIXME but there was nothing in the radar about a
possible alternative solution.
Both radars were closed.
The goal of this patch is to make it easier to reason about the state of
ObjCLanguage::MethodName. I do that in several ways:
- Instead of using the constructor directly, you go through a factory
method. It returns a std::optional<MethodName> so either you got an
ObjCLanguage::MethodName or you didn't. No more checking if it's valid
to know if you can use it or not.
- ObjCLanguage::MethodName is now immutable. You cannot change its
internals once it is created.
- ObjCLanguage::MethodName::GetFullNameWithoutCategory previously had a
parameter that let you get back an empty string if the method had no
category. Every caller of this method was enabling this behavior so I
dropped the parameter and made it the default behavior.
- No longer store all the various components of the method name as
ConstStrings. The relevant `Get` methods now return llvm::StringRefs
backed by the MethodName's internal storage. The lifetime of these
StringRefs are tied to the MethodName itself, so if you need to
persist these you need to create copies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149914
**Summary**
When filling out the LayoutInfo for a structure with the offsets
from DWARF, LLDB fills gaps in the layout by creating unnamed
bitfields and adding them to the AST. If we don't do this correctly
and our layout has overlapping fields, we will hat an assertion
in `clang::CGRecordLowering::lower()`. Specifically, if we have
a derived class with a VTable and a bitfield immediately following
the vtable pointer, we create a layout with overlapping fields.
This is an oversight in some of the previous cleanups done around this
area.
In `D76808`, we prevented LLDB from creating unnamed bitfields if there
was a gap between the last field of a base class and the start of a bitfield
in the derived class.
In `D112697`, we started accounting for the vtable pointer. The intention
there was to make sure the offset bookkeeping accounted for the
existence of a vtable pointer (but we didn't actually want to create
any AST nodes for it). Now that `last_field_info.bit_size` was being
set even for artifical fields, the previous fix `D76808` broke
specifically for cases where the bitfield was the first member of a
derived class with a vtable (this scenario wasn't tested so we didn't
notice it). I.e., we started creating redundant unnamed bitfields for
where the vtable pointer usually sits. This confused the lowering logic
in clang.
This patch adds a condition to `ShouldCreateUnnamedBitfield` which
checks whether the first field in the derived class is a vtable ptr.
**Testing**
* Added API test case
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150591
This patch adds a new private helper
`DWARFASTParserClang::ShouldCreateUnnamedBitfield` which
`ParseSingleMember` whether we should fill the current gap
in a structure layout with unnamed bitfields.
Extracting this logic will allow us to add additional
conditions in upcoming patches without jeoperdizing readability
of `ParseSingleMember`.
We also store some of the boolean conditions in local variables
to make the intent more obvious.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150590
The purpose of this method is to get the list of attributes of a
DebugInfoEntry. Prior to this change we were passing in a mutable
reference to a DWARFAttributes object and having the method fill it in
for us while returning the size of the filled out list. But
instead of doing that, we can just return a `DWARFAttributes` object
ourselves since every caller creates a new list before calling
GetAttributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150402
Similar to dw_form_t, dw_attr_t is typedef'd to be a uint16_t. LLVM
defines their type `llvm::dwarf::Attribute` as an enum backed by a
uint16_t. Switching to the LLVM type buys us type checking and the
requirement of explicit casts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150299
We have a handful of places in LLDB where we try to outsmart the logic
in Mangled to determine whether a string is mangled or not. There's at
least one place (*) where we are getting this wrong and causes a subtle
bug. The `cstring_is_mangled` is cheap enough that we should always rely
on it to determine whether a string is mangled or not.
(*) `ObjectFileMachO` assumes that a symbol that starts with a double
underscore (such as `__pthread_kill`) is mangled. That's mostly
harmless, until you use `function.name-without-args` in the frame
format. The formatter calls `Symbol::GetNameNoArguments()` which is a
wrapper around `Mangled::GetName(ePreferDemangledWithoutArguments)`. The
latter will first try using the appropriate language plugin to get the
demangled name without arguments, and if that fails, falls back to
returning the demangled name. Because we forced Mangled to treat the
symbol as a mangled name (even though it's not) there's no demangled
name. The result is that frames don't show any symbol at all.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148846
The function DWARFASTParserClang::ParsePointerToMemberType attempts to make
two pointers and then immediately tries to dereference them, without
verifying that the pointesr were successfully created. Sometimes the pointer
creation fails, and the dereference then causes a segfault. This add a check
that the pointers are non-null before attempting to dereference them.
In an upcoming patch, D142556, Clang is proposed to be changed to emit
line locations that are inlined at line 0. This clashed with the behavior of
GetDIENamesAndRanges() which used 0 as a default value to determine if
file, line or column numbers had been set. Users of that function then
checked for any non-0 values when setting up the call site:
if (call_file != 0 || call_line != 0 || call_column != 0)
[...]
which did not work with the Clang change since all three values then
could be 0.
This changes the function to use std::optional to catch non-set values
instead.
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142552
This came out of from https://discourse.llvm.org/t/dwarf-dwp-4gb-limit/63902
With big binaries we can have .dwp files where .debug_info.dwo section can grow
beyond 4GB. We would like to support this in LLVM and in LLDB.
The plan is to enable manual parsing of cu/tu index in DWARF library
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D137882), and then
switch internal index data structure to 64 bit.
For the second part is to enable 64bit offset support in LLDB with
this patch.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138618
Note that those functions on the left hand side are soft-deprecated in
favor of those on the right hand side:
getMinSignedBits -> getSignificantBits
getNullValue -> getZero
isNullValue -> isZero
isOneValue -> isOne
This came out of from https://discourse.llvm.org/t/dwarf-dwp-4gb-limit/63902
With big binaries we can have .dwp files where .debug_info.dwo section can grow
beyond 4GB. We would like to support this in LLVM and in LLDB.
The plan is to enable manual parsing of cu/tu index in DWARF library
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D137882), and then
switch internal index data structure to 64 bit.
For the second part is to enable 64bit offset support in LLDB with
this patch.
Depends on D139955
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138618
This came out of from https://discourse.llvm.org/t/dwarf-dwp-4gb-limit/63902
With big binaries we can have .dwp files where .debug_info.dwo section can grow
beyond 4GB. We would like to support this in LLVM and in LLDB.
The plan is to enable manual parsing of cu/tu index in DWARF library
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D137882), and then
switch internal index data structure to 64 bit.
For the second part is to enable 64bit offset support in LLDB with
this patch.
Depends on D139955
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138618
This reverts commit 19128792e2.
As pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D143652 this implementation
doesn't quite work for subobject constructors/destructors because DWARF
can map multiple definitions of a ctor/dtor to the same specification DIE.
With the current implementation we would pick the first definition we
find and use that linkage name which means we can sometimes pick the
wrong dtor/ctor and fail to execute a valid expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143652
This relands a patch previously reverted
in `181d6e24ca3c09bfd6ec7c3b20affde3e5ea9b40`.
This wasn't quite working on Linux because we
weren't populating the manual DWARF index with
`DW_TAG_imported_declaration`. The relanded patch
does this.
**Summary**
This patch makes the expression evaluator understand
namespace aliases.
This will become important once `std::ranges` become
more widespread since `std::views` is defined as:
```
namespace std {
namespace ranges::views {}
namespace views = ranges::views;
}
```
**Testing**
* Added API test
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143398
This relands the commit previously reverted in
`d2cc2c5610ffa78736aa99512bc85a85417efb0a` due to failures on Linux
when debugging split-debug-info enabled executables.
The problem was we called `SymbolFileDWARF::FindFunctions` directly
instead of `Module::FindFunctions` which resulted in a nullptr
dereference because the backing `SymbolFileDWARFDwo` didn't have
an index attached to it. The relanded version calls `Module::FindFunctions`
instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143652
**Summary**
This patch addresses the case where we have a `DW_AT_external`
subprogram for a constructor (and/or destructor) that doesn't carry
a `DW_AT_linkage_name` attribute. The corresponding DIE(s) that
represent the definition will have a linkage name, but if the name
contains constructs that LLDBs fallback mechanism for guessing mangled
names to resolve external symbols doesn't support (e.g., abi-tags)
then we end up failing to resolve the function call.
We address this by trying to find the linkage name before we create
the constructor/destructor decl, which will get attached using
an `AsmLabelAttr` to make symbol resolution easier.
**Testing**
* Added API test
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143652
**Summary**
This patch makes the expression evaluator understand
namespace aliases.
This will become important once `std::ranges` become
more widespread since `std::views` is defined as:
```
namespace std {
namespace ranges::views {}
namespace views = ranges::views;
}
```
**Testing**
* Added API test
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143398
This patch makes the members of `TemplateParameterInfos` only accessible
via public APIs. The motivation for this is that
`TemplateParameterInfos` attempts to maintain two vectors in tandem
(`args` for the template arguments and `names` for the corresponding
name). Working with this structure as it's currently designed makes
it easy to run into out-of-bounds accesses later down the line.
This patch proposes to introduce a new
`TemplateParameterInfos::InsertArg` which is the only way to
set the `TemplateArgument` and name of an entry and since we
require both to be specified we maintain the vectors in sync
out-of-the-box.
To avoid adding non-const getters just for unit-tests a new
`TemplateParameterInfosManipulatorForTests` is introduced
that can be used to control internal state from tests.
Otherwise we may be inserting a decl into a DeclContext that's not fully defined yet.
This simplifies/removes some clang AST node creation code. Instead, use
clang::printTemplateArgumentList().
Reviewed By: Michael137
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142413
SymbolFiles should own Types by keeping them in their TypeList. This
patch privates the Type constructor to guarantee that every created Type
is kept in the SymbolFile's type list.
This regressed with `e262b8f48af9fdca8380f2f079e50291956aad71`.
Two issues here:
1. `:16x` is not a valid format specifier and
we would crash when we encountered this log
(which was the case in `TestCPPAccelerator.py`)
2. The third argument was missing curly braces so
the log message itself was malformed.
In preparation for eanbling 64bit support in LLDB switching to use llvm::formatv
instead of format MACROs.
Reviewed By: labath, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139955
Without checking template parameters, we would sometimes lookup the
wrong type definition for a type declaration because different
instantiations of the same template class had the same debug info name.
The added GetForwardDeclarationDIETemplateParams() shouldn't need a
cache because we'll cache the results of the declaration -> definition
lookup anyway. (DWARFASTParserClang::ParseStructureLikeDIE()
is_forward_declaration branch)
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138834
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
A previous patch added the ability for us to tell if types were forcefully completed. This patch adds the ability to see which modules have forcefully completed types and aggregates the number of modules with forcefully completed types at the root level.
We add a module specific setting named "debugInfoHadIncompleteTypes" that is a boolean value. We also aggregate the number of modules at the root level that had incomplete debug info with a key named "totalModuleCountWithIncompleteTypes" that is a count of number of modules that had incomplete types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138638
When a process gets restarted TypeSystem objects associated with it
may get deleted, and any CompilerType objects holding on to a
reference to that type system are a use-after-free in waiting. Because
of the SBAPI, we don't have tight control over where CompilerTypes go
and when they are used. This is particularly a problem in the Swift
plugin, where the scratch TypeSystem can be restarted while the
process is still running. The Swift plugin has a lock to prevent
abuse, but where there's a lock there can be bugs.
This patch changes CompilerType to store a std::weak_ptr<TypeSystem>.
Most of the std::weak_ptr<TypeSystem>* uglyness is hidden by
introducing a wrapper class CompilerType::WrappedTypeSystem that has a
dyn_cast_or_null() method. The only sites that need to know about the
weak pointer implementation detail are the ones that deal with
creating TypeSystems.
rdar://101505232
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136650
It's required in following situations:
1. As a base class.
2. As a data member.
3. As an array element type.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134066
Undoes a lot of the code added in D135169 to piggyback off of the enum logic in `TypeSystemClang::SetIntegerInitializerForVariable()`.
Fixes#58383.
Reviewed By: DavidSpickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137045
See https://discourse.llvm.org/t/dwarf-using-simplified-template-names/58417 for background on simplified template names.
lldb doesn't work with simplified template names because it uses DW_AT_name which doesn't contain template parameters under simplified template names.
Two major changes are required to make lldb work with simplified template names.
1) When building clang ASTs for struct-like dies, we use the name as a cache key. To distinguish between different instantiations of a template class, we need to add in the template parameters.
2) When looking up types, if the requested type name contains '<' and we didn't initially find any types from the index searching the name, strip the template parameters and search the index, then filter out results with non-matching template parameters. This takes advantage of the clang AST's ability to print full names rather than doing it by ourself.
An alternative is to fix up the names in the index to contain the fully qualified name, but that doesn't respect .debug_names.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134378
In D134378, we'll need the clang AST to be able to construct the qualified in some cases.
This makes logging in one place slightly less informative.
Reviewed By: dblaikie, Michael137
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135979
Fixes#58135
Somehow lldb was able to print the member on its own but when we try
to print the whole type found by "image lookup -t" lldb would crash.
This is because we'd encoded the initial value of the member as an integer.
Which isn't the end of the world because bool is integral for C++.
However, clang has a special AST node to handle literal bool and it
expected us to use that instead.
This adds a new codepath to handle static bool which uses cxxBoolLiteralExpr
and we get the member printed as you'd expect.
For testing I added a struct with just the bool because trying to print
all of "A" crashes as well. Presumably because one of the other member's
types isn't handled properly either.
So for now I just added the bool case, we can merge it with A later.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135169
