`operator[]` returns `OpOperand &` instead of `Value`.
* This allows users to get OpOperands by name instead of "magic" number.
E.g., `extractSliceOp->getOpOperand(0)` can be written as
`extractSliceOp.getSourceMutable()[0]`.
* `OperandRange` provides a read-only API to operands: `operator[]`
returns `Value`. `MutableOperandRange` now provides a mutable API:
`operator[]` returns `OpOperand &`, which can be used to set operands.
Note: The TableGen code generator could be changed to return `OpOperand
&` (instead of `MutableOperandRange`) for non-variadic and non-optional
arguments in a subsequent change. Then the `[0]` part in the above
example would no longer be necessary.
Add capabilities for comparing opaque properties. This is useful when
dealing with arbitrary operations which can be compare based on their
OperationName. Now you can furthermore compare their properties without
the need to determine their actual type.
This feature was introduced in `D123492`.
Doing equivalence on pointers to sort operands of commutative operations is incorrect when checking equivalence of ops in separate regions (where the lhs and rhs operands are marked as equivalent but are not the same value).
It was also discussed in `D123492` and `D129480` that the correct solution would be to stable sort the operands in canonicalization (based on some numbering in the region maybe), but until that lands, reverting this change will unblock us and other users.
An example of a pass that might not work properly because of this is `DuplicateFunctionEliminationPass`.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154699
This fixes a bug that `OperationEquivalence::computeHash` doesn't
combine hash of operation locations even when `IgnoreLocations` is false.
Added a unit test which fails at the current trunk.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154015
The MLIR classes Type/Attribute/Operation/Op/Value support
cast/dyn_cast/isa/dyn_cast_or_null functionality through llvm's doCast
functionality in addition to defining methods with the same name.
This change begins the migration of uses of the method to the
corresponding function call as has been decided as more consistent.
Note that there still exist classes that only define methods directly,
such as AffineExpr, and this does not include work currently to support
a functional cast/isa call.
Context:
- https://mlir.llvm.org/deprecation/ at "Use the free function variants
for dyn_cast/cast/isa/…"
- Original discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/preferred-casting-style-going-forward/68443
Implementation:
This patch updates all remaining uses of the deprecated functionality in
mlir/. This was done with clang-tidy as described below and further
modifications to GPUBase.td and OpenMPOpsInterfaces.td.
Steps are described per line, as comments are removed by git:
0. Retrieve the change from the following to build clang-tidy with an
additional check:
main...tpopp:llvm-project:tidy-cast-check
1. Build clang-tidy
2. Run clang-tidy over your entire codebase while disabling all checks
and enabling the one relevant one. Run on all header files also.
3. Delete .inc files that were also modified, so the next build rebuilds
them to a pure state.
```
ninja -C $BUILD_DIR clang-tidy
run-clang-tidy -clang-tidy-binary=$BUILD_DIR/bin/clang-tidy -checks='-*,misc-cast-functions'\
-header-filter=mlir/ mlir/* -fix
rm -rf $BUILD_DIR/tools/mlir/**/*.inc
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151542
The following ops currently have the same finger print, even though they are different:
```
func.func @test() {
"test.foo"() ({
"test.bar"() : () -> ()
}) : () -> ()
}
```
And:
```
func.func @test() {
"test.bar"() : () -> ()
"test.foo"() ({ }) : () -> ()
}
```
The SHA1 hash used in OperationFingerPrint is order-sensitive, but the ops are hashed in the same order (post-order traversal), so the hash is the same. Switching to pre-order traversal does not solve the issue; a similar example, where IR differs just in its nesting structure, can be constructed.
The problem is solved by hashing the parent op pointer. (Alternatively, a traversal over the IR that hashes scope markers (`{}`) could be used.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151306
The MLIR classes Type/Attribute/Operation/Op/Value support
cast/dyn_cast/isa/dyn_cast_or_null functionality through llvm's doCast
functionality in addition to defining methods with the same name.
This change begins the migration of uses of the method to the
corresponding function call as has been decided as more consistent.
Note that there still exist classes that only define methods directly,
such as AffineExpr, and this does not include work currently to support
a functional cast/isa call.
Context:
* https://mlir.llvm.org/deprecation/ at "Use the free function variants for dyn_cast/cast/isa/…"
* Original discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/preferred-casting-style-going-forward/68443
Implementation:
This follows a previous patch that updated calls
`op.cast<T>()-> cast<T>(op)`. However some cases could not handle an
unprefixed `cast` call due to occurrences of variables named cast, or
occurring inside of class definitions which would resolve to the method.
All C++ files that did not work automatically with `cast<T>()` are
updated here to `llvm::cast` and similar with the intention that they
can be easily updated after the methods are removed through a
find-replace.
See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare/main...tpopp:llvm-project:tidy-cast-check
for the clang-tidy check that is used and then update printed
occurrences of the function to include `llvm::` before.
One can then run the following:
```
ninja -C $BUILD_DIR clang-tidy
run-clang-tidy -clang-tidy-binary=$BUILD_DIR/bin/clang-tidy -checks='-*,misc-cast-functions'\
-export-fixes /tmp/cast/casts.yaml mlir/*\
-header-filter=mlir/ -fix
rm -rf $BUILD_DIR/tools/mlir/**/*.inc
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150348
This new features enabled to dedicate custom storage inline within operations.
This storage can be used as an alternative to attributes to store data that is
specific to an operation. Attribute can also be stored inside the properties
storage if desired, but any kind of data can be present as well. This offers
a way to store and mutate data without uniquing in the Context like Attribute.
See the OpPropertiesTest.cpp for an example where a struct with a
std::vector<> is attached to an operation and mutated in-place:
struct TestProperties {
int a = -1;
float b = -1.;
std::vector<int64_t> array = {-33};
};
More complex scheme (including reference-counting) are also possible.
The only constraint to enable storing a C++ object as "properties" on an
operation is to implement three functions:
- convert from the candidate object to an Attribute
- convert from the Attribute to the candidate object
- hash the object
Optional the parsing and printing can also be customized with 2 extra
functions.
A new options is introduced to ODS to allow dialects to specify:
let usePropertiesForAttributes = 1;
When set to true, the inherent attributes for all the ops in this dialect
will be using properties instead of being stored alongside discardable
attributes.
The TestDialect showcases this feature.
Another change is that we introduce new APIs on the Operation class
to access separately the inherent attributes from the discardable ones.
We envision deprecating and removing the `getAttr()`, `getAttrsDictionary()`,
and other similar method which don't make the distinction explicit, leading
to an entirely separate namespace for discardable attributes.
Recommit d572cd1b06 after fixing python bindings build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141742
This new features enabled to dedicate custom storage inline within operations.
This storage can be used as an alternative to attributes to store data that is
specific to an operation. Attribute can also be stored inside the properties
storage if desired, but any kind of data can be present as well. This offers
a way to store and mutate data without uniquing in the Context like Attribute.
See the OpPropertiesTest.cpp for an example where a struct with a
std::vector<> is attached to an operation and mutated in-place:
struct TestProperties {
int a = -1;
float b = -1.;
std::vector<int64_t> array = {-33};
};
More complex scheme (including reference-counting) are also possible.
The only constraint to enable storing a C++ object as "properties" on an
operation is to implement three functions:
- convert from the candidate object to an Attribute
- convert from the Attribute to the candidate object
- hash the object
Optional the parsing and printing can also be customized with 2 extra
functions.
A new options is introduced to ODS to allow dialects to specify:
let usePropertiesForAttributes = 1;
When set to true, the inherent attributes for all the ops in this dialect
will be using properties instead of being stored alongside discardable
attributes.
The TestDialect showcases this feature.
Another change is that we introduce new APIs on the Operation class
to access separately the inherent attributes from the discardable ones.
We envision deprecating and removing the `getAttr()`, `getAttrsDictionary()`,
and other similar method which don't make the distinction explicit, leading
to an entirely separate namespace for discardable attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141742
Result types were not considered in OperationFingerPrint. This can lead to missing IR dumps when running with `shouldPrintAfterOnlyOnChange` and false positives in D144552.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145152
Add replaceUsesWithIf on Operation along the lines of
Value::replaceUsesWithIf. This had been missing on Operation and is
convenient to replace multi-result operations' results conditionally.
Reviewed By: lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144348
Replace `mapOperands` and `mapResults` with two new callbacks. It was not clear what "mapping" meant and why the equivalence relationship was a property of the Operand/OpResult as opposed to just SSA values.
This revision changes the contract of the two callbacks: `checkEquivalent` compares two values for equivalence. `markEquivalent` informs the caller that the analysis determined that two values are equivalent. This simplifies the API because callers do not have to reason about operands/results, but just SSA values.
`OperationEquivalence::isEquivalentTo` can be used directly in CSE and there is no need for a custom op equivalence analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142558
Currently CSE does not support CSE of ops with regions. This patch
extends the CSE support to ops with a single region.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134306
Depends on D137857
It can be useful to external users as well for detecting if there were any changes in IR between passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137078
This reland includes changes to the Python bindings.
Switch variadic operand and result segment size attributes to use the
dense i32 array. Dense integer arrays were introduced primarily to
represent index lists. They are a better fit for segment sizes than
dense elements attrs.
Depends on D131801
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131803
Switch variadic operand and result segment size attributes to use the
dense i32 array. Dense integer arrays were introduced primarily to
represent index lists. They are a better fit for segment sizes than
dense elements attrs.
Depends on D131738
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131702
This patch takes advantage of the Commutative trait on operation
to remove identical commutative operations where the operands are swapped.
The second operation below can be removed since `arith.addi` is commutative.
```
%1 = arith.addi %a, %b : i32
%2 = arith.addi %b, %a : i32
```
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123492
When constructing an OperationName, the overwhelming majority of
cases are from registered operations. This revision adds a non-locked
lookup into the currently registered operations, which prevents locking
in the common case. This revision also optimizes several uses of
RegisteredOperationName that expect the operation to be registered,
e.g. such as in OpBuilder.
These changes provides a reasonable speedup (5-10%) in some
compilations, especially on platforms where locking is expensive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117187
NamedAttribute is currently represented as an std::pair, but this
creates an extremely clunky .first/.second API. This commit
converts it to a class, with better accessors (getName/getValue)
and also opens the door for more convenient API in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113956
Identifier and StringAttr essentially serve the same purpose, i.e. to hold a string value. Keeping these seemingly identical pieces of functionality separate has caused problems in certain situations:
* Identifier has nice accessors that StringAttr doesn't
* Identifier can't be used as an Attribute, meaning strings are often duplicated between Identifier/StringAttr (e.g. in PDL)
The only thing that Identifier has that StringAttr doesn't is support for caching a dialect that is referenced by the string (e.g. dialect.foo). This functionality is added to StringAttr, as this is useful for StringAttr in generally the same ways it was useful for Identifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113536
- String binary search does 1 less string comparison
- Identifier linear scan on large attribute list is switched to string binary search
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112970
The main benefits of this change are faster access to operands
(no need to compute the offset, as it is now right after the
operation), simpler code(no need to manage a lot of the "is the
operand storage trailing" logic we had to before). The major
downside to this though, is that operand holding operations now
grow in size by 1 word (as no matter how we do this change, there
will need to be some additional book keeping).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111695
The current implementation invokes materializations
whenever an input operand does not have a mapping for the
desired type, i.e. it requires materialization at the earliest possible
point. This conflicts with goal of dialect conversion (and also the
current documentation) which states that a materialization is only
required if the materialization is supposed to persist after the
conversion process has finished.
This revision refactors this such that whenever a target
materialization "might" be necessary, we insert an
unrealized_conversion_cast to act as a temporary materialization.
This allows for deferring the invocation of the user
materialization hooks until the end of the conversion process,
where we actually have a better sense if it's actually
necessary. This has several benefits:
* In some cases a target materialization hook is no longer
necessary
When performing a full conversion, there are some situations
where a temporary materialization is necessary. Moving forward,
these users won't need to provide any target materializations,
as the temporary materializations do not require the user to
provide materialization hooks.
* getRemappedValue can now handle values that haven't been
converted yet
Before this commit, it wasn't well supported to get the remapped
value of a value that hadn't been converted yet (making it
difficult/impossible to convert multiple operations in many
situations). This commit updates getRemappedValue to properly
handle this case by inserting temporary materializations when
necessary.
Another code-health related benefit is that with this change we
can move a majority of the complexity related to materializations
to the end of the conversion process, instead of handling adhoc
while conversion is happening.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111620
This allows for iterating and interacting with the uses of a specific subset of
results as opposed to just the full range.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108586
This revision adds native ODS support for VariadicOfVariadic operand
groups. An example of this is the SwitchOp, which has a variadic number
of nested operand ranges for each of the case statements, where the
number of case statements is variadic. Builtin ODS support allows for
generating proper accessors for the nested operand ranges, builder
support, and declarative format support. VariadicOfVariadic operands
are supported by providing a segment attribute to use to store the
operand groups, mapping similarly to the AttrSizedOperand trait
(but with a user defined attribute name).
`build` methods for VariadicOfVariadic operand expect inputs of the
form `ArrayRef<ValueRange>`. Accessors for the variadic ranges
return a new `OperandRangeRange` type, which represents a
contiguous range of `OperandRange`. In the declarative assembly
format, VariadicOfVariadic operands and types are by default
formatted as a comma delimited list of value lists:
`(<value>, <value>), (), (<value>)`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107774
This allows to use OperationEquivalence to track structural comparison for equality
between two operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106422
Restore 499571ea83
reverted by 0082764605.
A compiler slightly older than
"[clang][Sema] removes -Wfree-nonheap-object reference param false positive"
may report the false positive.
We need to retain the workaround a bit longer so that such compilers
can be used to compile MLIR in a warning-free way.
It is currently stored in the high bits, which is disallowed on certain
platforms (e.g. android). This revision switches the representation to use
the low bits instead, fixing crashes/breakages on those platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101969
This method allows for removing multiple disjoint operands at once, reducing the need to erase operands individually (which results in shifting the operand list).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98290
Now that attributes can be generated using ODS, we can move the builtin attributes as well. This revision removes a majority of the builtin attributes with a few left for followup revisions. The attributes moved to ODS in this revision are: AffineMapAttr, ArrayAttr, DictionaryAttr, IntegerSetAttr, StringAttr, SymbolRefAttr, TypeAttr, and UnitAttr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97591
The current implementation of Value involves a pointer int pair with several different kinds of owners, i.e. BlockArgumentImpl*, Operation *, TrailingOpResult*. This design arose from the desire to save memory overhead for operations that have a very small number of results (generally 0-2). There are, unfortunately, many problematic aspects of the current implementation that make Values difficult to work with or just inefficient.
Operation result types are stored as a separate array on the Operation. This is very inefficient for many reasons: we use TupleType for multiple results, which can lead to huge amounts of memory usage if multi-result operations change types frequently(they do). It also means that simple methods like Value::getType/Value::setType now require complex logic to get to the desired type.
Value only has one pointer bit free, severely limiting the ability to use it in things like PointerUnion/PointerIntPair. Given that we store the kind of a Value along with the "owner" pointer, we only leave one bit free for users of Value. This creates situations where we end up nesting PointerUnions to be able to use Value in one.
As noted above, most of the methods in Value need to branch on at least 3 different cases which is both inefficient, possibly error prone, and verbose. The current storage of results also creates problems for utilities like ValueRange/TypeRange, which want to efficiently store base pointers to ranges (of which Operation* isn't really useful as one).
This revision greatly simplifies the implementation of Value by the introduction of a new ValueImpl class. This class contains all of the state shared between all of the various derived value classes; i.e. the use list, the type, and the kind. This shared implementation class provides several large benefits:
* Most of the methods on value are now branchless, and often one-liners.
* The "kind" of the value is now stored in ValueImpl instead of Value
This frees up all of Value's pointer bits, allowing for users to take full advantage of PointerUnion/PointerIntPair/etc. It also allows for storing more operation results as "inline", 6 now instead of 2, freeing up 1 word per new inline result.
* Operation result types are now stored in the result, instead of a side array
This drops the size of zero-result operations by 1 word. It also removes the memory crushing use of TupleType for operations results (which could lead up to hundreds of megabytes of "dead" TupleTypes in the context). This also allowed restructured ValueRange, making it simpler and one word smaller.
This revision does come with two conceptual downsides:
* Operation::getResultTypes no longer returns an ArrayRef<Type>
This conceptually makes some usages slower, as the iterator increment is slightly more complex.
* OpResult::getOwner is slightly more expensive, as it now requires a little bit of arithmetic
From profiling, neither of the conceptual downsides have resulted in any perceivable hit to performance. Given the advantages of the new design, most compiles are slightly faster.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97804
This class used to serve a few useful purposes:
* Allowed containing a null DictionaryAttr
* Provided some simple mutable API around a DictionaryAttr
The first of which is no longer an issue now that there is much better caching support for attributes in general, and a cache in the context for empty dictionaries. The second results in more trouble than it's worth because it mutates the internal dictionary on every action, leading to a potentially large number of dictionary copies. NamedAttrList is a much better alternative for the second use case, and should be modified as needed to better fit it's usage as a DictionaryAttrBuilder.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93442
Trailing objects are really nice for storing additional data inline with the main class, and is something that we heavily take advantage of for Operation(and many other classes). To get the address of the inline data you need to compute the address by doing some pointer arithmetic taking into account any objects stored before the object you want to access. Most classes keep the count of the number of objects, so this is relatively cheap to compute. This is not the case for results though, which have two different types(inline and trailing) that are not necessarily as cheap to compute as the count for other objects. This revision moves the storage for results to before the operation and stores them in reverse order. This allows for getting results to still be very fast given that they are never iterated directly in order, and also greatly improves the speed when accessing the other trailing objects of an operation(operands/regions/blocks/etc).
This reduced compile time when compiling a decently sized mlir module by about ~400ms, or 2.17s -> 1.76s.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92687
