This adds a G_INSERT instruction, which technically makes G_SEQUENCE redundant
(it's equivalent to a G_INSERT into an IMPLICIT_DEF). We'll leave G_SEQUENCE
for now though: it's likely to be far more common as it's a fundamental part of
legalization, so avoiding the mess and bloat of the extra IMPLICIT_DEFs is
probably worthwhile.
llvm-svn: 279306
Summary: This way they can be re-used by target-specific schedulers.
Reviewers: atrick, MatzeB, kparzysz
Subscribers: kparzysz, llvm-commits, MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23678
llvm-svn: 279305
First, make sure all types involved are represented, rather than being implicit
from the register width.
Second, canonicalize all types to scalar. These operations just act in bits and
don't care about vectors.
Also standardize spelling of Indices in the MachineIRBuilder (NFC here).
llvm-svn: 279294
Unsigned addition and subtraction can reuse the instructions created to
legalize large width operations (i.e. both produce and consume a carry flag).
Signed operations and multiplies get a dedicated op-with-overflow instruction.
Once this is produced the two values are combined into a struct register (which
will almost always be merged with a corresponding G_EXTRACT as part of
legalization).
llvm-svn: 279278
The heuristic above this code is incredibly suspect, but disregarding that it mutates the cast opcode so we need to check the *mutated* opcode later to see if we need to emit an AssertSext or AssertZext node.
Fixes PR29041.
llvm-svn: 279223
The ppc64 multistage bot fails on this.
This reverts commit r279124.
Also Revert "CodeGen: Add/Factor out LiveRegUnits class; NFCI" because it depends on the previous change
This reverts commit r279171.
llvm-svn: 279199
This is a set of register units intended to track register liveness, it
is similar in spirit to LivePhysRegs.
You can also think of this as the liveness tracking parts of the
RegisterScavenger factored out into an own class.
This was proposed in http://llvm.org/PR27609
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21916
llvm-svn: 279171
The following function currently relies on tail-merging for if
conversion to succeed. The common tail of cond_true and cond_false is
extracted, and this then forms a diamond pattern that can be
successfully if converted.
If this block does not get extracted, either because tail-merging is
disabled or the threshold is higher, we should still recognize this
pattern and if-convert it.
Fixed a regression in the original commit. Need to un-reverse branches after
reversing them, or other conversions go awry.
Regression on self-hosting bots with no obvious explanation. Tidied up range
handling to be more obviously correct, but there was no smoking gun.
define i32 @t2(i32 %a, i32 %b) nounwind {
entry:
%tmp1434 = icmp eq i32 %a, %b ; <i1> [#uses=1]
br i1 %tmp1434, label %bb17, label %bb.outer
bb.outer: ; preds = %cond_false, %entry
%b_addr.021.0.ph = phi i32 [ %b, %entry ], [ %tmp10, %cond_false ]
%a_addr.026.0.ph = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %a_addr.026.0, %cond_false ]
br label %bb
bb: ; preds = %cond_true, %bb.outer
%indvar = phi i32 [ 0, %bb.outer ], [ %indvar.next, %cond_true ]
%tmp. = sub i32 0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
%tmp.40 = mul i32 %indvar, %tmp.
%a_addr.026.0 = add i32 %tmp.40, %a_addr.026.0.ph
%tmp3 = icmp sgt i32 %a_addr.026.0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
br i1 %tmp3, label %cond_true, label %cond_false
cond_true: ; preds = %bb
%tmp7 = sub i32 %a_addr.026.0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
%tmp1437 = icmp eq i32 %tmp7, %b_addr.021.0.ph
%indvar.next = add i32 %indvar, 1
br i1 %tmp1437, label %bb17, label %bb
cond_false: ; preds = %bb
%tmp10 = sub i32 %b_addr.021.0.ph, %a_addr.026.0
%tmp14 = icmp eq i32 %a_addr.026.0, %tmp10
br i1 %tmp14, label %bb17, label %bb.outer
bb17: ; preds = %cond_false, %cond_true, %entry
%a_addr.026.1 = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %tmp7, %cond_true ], [ %a_addr.026.0, %cond_false ]
ret i32 %a_addr.026.1
}
Without tail-merging or diamond-tail if conversion:
LBB1_1: @ %bb
@ =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
cmp r0, r1
ble LBB1_3
@ BB#2: @ %cond_true
@ in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
subs r0, r0, r1
cmp r1, r0
it ne
cmpne r0, r1
bgt LBB1_4
LBB1_3: @ %cond_false
@ in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
subs r1, r1, r0
cmp r1, r0
bne LBB1_1
LBB1_4: @ %bb17
bx lr
With diamond-tail if conversion, but without tail-merging:
@ BB#0: @ %entry
cmp r0, r1
it eq
bxeq lr
LBB1_1: @ %bb
@ =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
cmp r0, r1
ite le
suble r1, r1, r0
subgt r0, r0, r1
cmp r1, r0
bne LBB1_1
@ BB#2: @ %bb17
bx lr
llvm-svn: 279168
The cost of predicating a diamond is only the instructions that are not shared
between the two branches. Additionally If a predicate clobbering instruction
occurs in the shared portion of the branches (e.g. a cond move), it may still
be possible to if convert the sub-cfg. This change handles these two facts by
rescanning the non-shared portion of a diamond sub-cfg to recalculate both the
predication cost and whether both blocks are pred-clobbering.
llvm-svn: 279167
This may affect calculations for thresholds, but is not a significant change
in behavior.
The problem was that an inclusive range must have an additonal flag to showr
that it is empty, because otherwise begin == end implies that the range has one
element, and it may not be possible to move past on either side.
llvm-svn: 279166
Re-apply r276044 with off-by-1 instruction fix for the reload placement.
This is a variant of scavengeRegister() that works for
enterBasicBlockEnd()/backward(). The benefit of the backward mode is
that it is not affected by incomplete kill flags.
This patch also changes
PrologEpilogInserter::doScavengeFrameVirtualRegs() to use the register
scavenger in backwards mode.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21885
llvm-svn: 279124
This is prep work for allowing the threshold to be different during layout,
and to enforce a single threshold between merging and duplicating during
layout. No observable change intended.
llvm-svn: 279117
Summary:
This is a pretty trivial, but I thought it was worth just checking that nobody feels it's completely the wrong thing to be doing.
The motivation is that when starting a new backend, you often start with a minimal stub, pretty much just FooTargetMachine and FooTargetInfo. Once that's built, you might naturally try `llc -march=foo myinput.ll` and it seems more developer-friendly if this ends up asserting due to the lack of MCAsmInfo with an informative message rather than just segfaulting.
Reviewers: MatzeB, chandlerc
Subscribers: bogner, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23443
llvm-svn: 279061
This will allow tail duplication and tail merging during layout to have a
shared threshold to make sure that they don't overlap. No observable change
intended.
llvm-svn: 278981
Summary:
This is part of the "NodeType* -> NodeRef" migration. Notice that since
GraphWriter prints object address as identity, I added a static_assert on
NodeRef to be a pointer type.
Reviewers: dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits, MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23580
llvm-svn: 278966
This is a fix for https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=29010
Root cause of the bug is that the register class of the machine instruction operand does not fully reflect if this registers that can be allocated.
Both for i386 and x86_64 the operand's register class is VR128RegClass and thus contains xmm0-xmm15, though in i386 we can only use xmm0-xmm8.
In order to get the actual allocable registers of the class we need to use RegisterClassInfo.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23613
llvm-svn: 278954
This is used to mark functions with the C++11 [[ noreturn ]] or C11 _Noreturn
attributes.
Patch by Victor Leschuk!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23167
llvm-svn: 278940
In theory the indices of RC (and thus the index used for LiveRegs) may differ from the indices of OpRC.
Fixed the code to extract the correct RC index.
OpRC contains the first X consecutive elements of RC, and thus their indices are currently de facto the same, therefore a test cannot be added at this point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23491
llvm-svn: 278923
This is a mechanical change of comments in switches like fallthrough,
fall-through, or fall-thru to use the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro instead.
llvm-svn: 278902
Also avoid some pointless use of auto! Because that's friendlier to
readers and avoids several types accidentally resolving to unnecessary
references here (MachineInstr *&, unsigned &).
llvm-svn: 278894
Rather than doing a funny dance that relies on dereferencing end() not
crashing, add some API to MachineInstrBundleIterator to get a non-const
version of the iterator.
llvm-svn: 278870
If AnalyzeBranch can't analyze a block and it is possible to
fallthrough, then duplicating the block doesn't make sense, as only one
block can be the layout predecessor for the un-analyzable fallthrough.
Submitted wit a test case, but NOTE: the test case doesn't currently
fail. However, the test case fails with D20505 and would have saved me
some time debugging.
llvm-svn: 278866
The current MachineBasicBlock might be the last block, so FallThru may
be past the end(). Use getNextNode(), which will convert to nullptr,
rather than &*++, which is invalid if we reach the end().
llvm-svn: 278858
Do not reorder and move up a loop latch block before a loop header
when optimising for size because this will generate an extra
unconditional branch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22521
llvm-svn: 278840
The pipeliner was generating an invalid Phi name for an operand
in the epilog block, which caused an assert in the live variable
analysis pass. The fix is to the code that generates new Phis
in the epilog block. In this case, there is an existing Phi that
needs to be reused rather than creating a new Phi instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23513
llvm-svn: 278805
Following the discussion on D22038, this refactors a PowerPC specific setcc -> srl(ctlz) transformation so it can be used by other targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23445
llvm-svn: 278799
